[Biofuel] Merceds-Benz

2009-10-17 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Hi all. Did anybody experience or heard of anybody experiencing severe problems 
with MB CDI engines in connection with biodiesel ?

Jan W
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20091017/d8f33aed/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz

2009-10-17 Thread Zeke Yewdall
Haven't really heard either way.  I have heard lots of rumors about quite a
few of the common rail diesel's having problems with biodiesel, due to
polymerization of the biodiesel at extremely high pressures that those
engines have, but I cannot remember any details or specific examples of any
of them right now.  And I don't recall what sort of biodiesel and what
iodine numbers they were running.

Z

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Jan Warnqvist 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all. Did anybody experience or heard of anybody experiencing severe
 problems with MB CDI engines in connection with biodiesel ?

 Jan W
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20091017/d8f33aed/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20091017/89a2786f/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Electric vehicles, touted as next big thing, still in their infancy [Japan]

2009-10-17 Thread Zeke Yewdall
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Ivan Menchero [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:



 BTW how come the electric vehicle do not have solar panels on their roof?
 prize? AC/DC problems?


 Ivan
 -


It's mostly because of power density.  An average car, with current solar
panel efficiencies, and average electric car efficiencies for a 3000lb car,
would get an extra two or three miles a day of extra range from the solar
panels on the roof.  A large van, maybe two miles a day extra range.   It's
alot more effective to put the solar panels on the roof of the garage, where
you can have alot more area (and not worry about them adding weight to the
car, though that's not really that much anyway) and then you can actually
have a large enough solar array to provide 30 to 100 miles of range per day
of sun -- grid tie the solar array, then charge the car at night from the
grid (if the utility will allow that).

Average car -- between 250 and 350 watt hours per mile (up to 500 to 800
watt hours per mile for larger vans/trucks).  Average power density of a top
of the line commercially available solar panel (Sunpower) is about 15 watts
per square foot (in full sun -- flat mounted panels on a car roof will be
less due to poor sun angle depending on latitude and time of year).  If we
have 15 square feet of roof area on the car covered, that's only about 200
watts, and assuming a conservative 4 equivalent full sun hours per day,
that's 800 watt hours before losses.  80% efficiency of all the electronics
round trip is decent, which leaves us with about 650 watts hours per day
collected -- about two to three miles of range.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20091017/19a87abe/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz

2009-10-17 Thread Jan Warnqvist
I had a colleague whose MB 320 CDI suddenly broke down due to suspected 
injection pump scar. When you ask MB owners about this they all say:
Neverthis cannot happen with a Mercedes- Benz! As a MB owner myself I am 
very curious about otherĀ“s experiences concerning this..
- Original Message - 
From: Zeke Yewdall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Cc: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz


 Haven't really heard either way.  I have heard lots of rumors about quite 
 a
 few of the common rail diesel's having problems with biodiesel, due to
 polymerization of the biodiesel at extremely high pressures that those
 engines have, but I cannot remember any details or specific examples of 
 any
 of them right now.  And I don't recall what sort of biodiesel and what
 iodine numbers they were running.

 Z

 On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Jan Warnqvist 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all. Did anybody experience or heard of anybody experiencing severe
 problems with MB CDI engines in connection with biodiesel ?

 Jan W
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20091017/d8f33aed/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20091017/89a2786f/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz

2009-10-17 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Zeke, Jan and all

Haven't really heard either way.  I have heard lots of rumors about quite a
few of the common rail diesel's having problems with biodiesel, due to
polymerization of the biodiesel at extremely high pressures that those
engines have, but I cannot remember any details or specific examples of any
of them right now.

Maybe they're just rumours, but I think DI diesels might indeed have 
problems with polymerised biodiesel in the US. But is it because of 
the high pressures? Can high pressure cause oxidation? I don't know, 
but it's only from US sources that I ever hear that.

Most biodiesel in the US is soy biodiesel, which doesn't need high 
pressure to oxidise and polymerise, it's a semi-drying oil, it'll 
polymerise anyway. The IV is well above the EU biodiesel standard 
upper limit. (See Iodine Values 
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html#iodine, National 
standards for biodiesel
http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield2.html#biodstds.) The 
biodiesel industry in the US seems to be more are less in denial 
about this, but then the US National Biodiesel Board is a creature of 
US Big Soy.

Hm, I must check how the US-EU row over the US dumping cheap soy 
biodiesel on the EU market is progressing. IIRC last time I looked 
the US was accusing the EU of protectionism, on the basis of what 
sounded like GMO-style substantial equivalence of America's soy and 
Europe's rapeseed oil, though they're not equivalent when it comes to 
iodine values and polymerisation. Rapeseed oil has a much lower IV 
and is much less likely to polymerise. Nonetheless, a lot of 
Europeans use anti-oxidant with their biodiesel, while very little 
anti-oxidant is used in the US, by contrast. Also, in the US most 
biodiesel is the NBB's commercial B20, a low blend with a lower risk 
of polymerisation, so they have to care about it that much less.

They're never going to accept that soy could be anything less than 
ideal. I get the impression that, even if there is such a thing, 
high-pressure polymerisation could be just a convenient scapegoat for 
soy's shortcomings.

Best

Keith


And I don't recall what sort of biodiesel and what
iodine numbers they were running.

Z

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Jan Warnqvist 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi all. Did anybody experience or heard of anybody experiencing severe
  problems with MB CDI engines in connection with biodiesel ?

   Jan W


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz

2009-10-17 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Hello Keith, Zeke and all. If polymerisation is the issue should it be 
related to the oxidation stability of the BD. It should therefore be 
important to use anti-oxidants in order to improve the stability. The 
connection is higher pressure - higher temperatures - quicker 
polymerisation. And the higher the iodine number the lower stability. Sorry 
about that, ASTM.
- Original Message - 
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz


 Hi Zeke, Jan and all

Haven't really heard either way.  I have heard lots of rumors about quite 
a
few of the common rail diesel's having problems with biodiesel, due to
polymerization of the biodiesel at extremely high pressures that those
engines have, but I cannot remember any details or specific examples of 
any
of them right now.

 Maybe they're just rumours, but I think DI diesels might indeed have
 problems with polymerised biodiesel in the US. But is it because of
 the high pressures? Can high pressure cause oxidation? I don't know,
 but it's only from US sources that I ever hear that.

 Most biodiesel in the US is soy biodiesel, which doesn't need high
 pressure to oxidise and polymerise, it's a semi-drying oil, it'll
 polymerise anyway. The IV is well above the EU biodiesel standard
 upper limit. (See Iodine Values
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html#iodine, National
 standards for biodiesel
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield2.html#biodstds.) The
 biodiesel industry in the US seems to be more are less in denial
 about this, but then the US National Biodiesel Board is a creature of
 US Big Soy.

 Hm, I must check how the US-EU row over the US dumping cheap soy
 biodiesel on the EU market is progressing. IIRC last time I looked
 the US was accusing the EU of protectionism, on the basis of what
 sounded like GMO-style substantial equivalence of America's soy and
 Europe's rapeseed oil, though they're not equivalent when it comes to
 iodine values and polymerisation. Rapeseed oil has a much lower IV
 and is much less likely to polymerise. Nonetheless, a lot of
 Europeans use anti-oxidant with their biodiesel, while very little
 anti-oxidant is used in the US, by contrast. Also, in the US most
 biodiesel is the NBB's commercial B20, a low blend with a lower risk
 of polymerisation, so they have to care about it that much less.

 They're never going to accept that soy could be anything less than
 ideal. I get the impression that, even if there is such a thing,
 high-pressure polymerisation could be just a convenient scapegoat for
 soy's shortcomings.

 Best

 Keith


And I don't recall what sort of biodiesel and what
iodine numbers they were running.

Z

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Jan Warnqvist 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi all. Did anybody experience or heard of anybody experiencing severe
  problems with MB CDI engines in connection with biodiesel ?

   Jan W


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz

2009-10-17 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Keith, Zeke and all. If polymerisation is the issue should it be
related to the oxidation stability of the BD. It should therefore be
important to use anti-oxidants in order to improve the stability. The
connection is higher pressure - higher temperatures - quicker
polymerisation.

Thankyou Jan.

And the higher the iodine number the lower stability. Sorry
about that, ASTM.

:-)

Best

Keith


- Original Message -
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz


  Hi Zeke, Jan and all

Haven't really heard either way.  I have heard lots of rumors about quite
a
few of the common rail diesel's having problems with biodiesel, due to
polymerization of the biodiesel at extremely high pressures that those
engines have, but I cannot remember any details or specific examples of
any
of them right now.

  Maybe they're just rumours, but I think DI diesels might indeed have
  problems with polymerised biodiesel in the US. But is it because of
  the high pressures? Can high pressure cause oxidation? I don't know,
  but it's only from US sources that I ever hear that.

  Most biodiesel in the US is soy biodiesel, which doesn't need high
  pressure to oxidise and polymerise, it's a semi-drying oil, it'll
  polymerise anyway. The IV is well above the EU biodiesel standard
  upper limit. (See Iodine Values
  http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html#iodine, National
  standards for biodiesel
  http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield2.html#biodstds.) The
  biodiesel industry in the US seems to be more are less in denial
  about this, but then the US National Biodiesel Board is a creature of
  US Big Soy.

  Hm, I must check how the US-EU row over the US dumping cheap soy
  biodiesel on the EU market is progressing. IIRC last time I looked
  the US was accusing the EU of protectionism, on the basis of what
  sounded like GMO-style substantial equivalence of America's soy and
  Europe's rapeseed oil, though they're not equivalent when it comes to
  iodine values and polymerisation. Rapeseed oil has a much lower IV
  and is much less likely to polymerise. Nonetheless, a lot of
  Europeans use anti-oxidant with their biodiesel, while very little
  anti-oxidant is used in the US, by contrast. Also, in the US most
  biodiesel is the NBB's commercial B20, a low blend with a lower risk
  of polymerisation, so they have to care about it that much less.

  They're never going to accept that soy could be anything less than
  ideal. I get the impression that, even if there is such a thing,
  high-pressure polymerisation could be just a convenient scapegoat for
  soy's shortcomings.

  Best

  Keith


And I don't recall what sort of biodiesel and what
iodine numbers they were running.

Z

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Jan Warnqvist 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Hi all. Did anybody experience or heard of anybody experiencing severe
   problems with MB CDI engines in connection with biodiesel ?

 Jan W


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz

2009-10-17 Thread denise farley
Keith,
Just out of sheer curiosity, where does the information that Most biodiesel
in the US is soy biodiesel come from?

I was wondering too, since I cannot find the information even on the NBB
(unless I am blind which is never outside the realm of possibility), where
might be a good source to look for a list of currently operating biodiesel
plant?  Ours closed and is in bankruptcy and of the other two in the local
area, only one is operating.  We couldn't compete even switching to animal
fats - and all those inherent processing problems.  Of course, the one
operating is big-bucks AGP and, yes, uses soy.

Hmmm.  D'ya think I might have sort of answered my own question here?
 Although I will say there is a soybean processing coop south of here that
ceased production of biodiesel in their facility for at least 6 months last
I heard.  They sold their soybean oil to AGP during that period.  Sigh.

Thanks so much!
Denise


On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Keith Addison
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:


 Most biodiesel in the US is soy biodiesel, which doesn't need high
 pressure to oxidise and polymerise, it's a semi-drying oil, it'll
 polymerise anyway. The IV is well above the EU biodiesel standard
 upper limit. (See Iodine Values
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html#iodine, National
 standards for biodiesel
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield2.html#biodstds.) The
 biodiesel industry in the US seems to be more are less in denial
 about this, but then the US National Biodiesel Board is a creature of
 US Big Soy.

 Hm, I must check how the US-EU row over the US dumping cheap soy
 biodiesel on the EU market is progressing. IIRC last time I looked
 the US was accusing the EU of protectionism, on the basis of what
 sounded like GMO-style substantial equivalence of America's soy and
 Europe's rapeseed oil, though they're not equivalent when it comes to
 iodine values and polymerisation. Rapeseed oil has a much lower IV
 and is much less likely to polymerise. Nonetheless, a lot of
 Europeans use anti-oxidant with their biodiesel, while very little
 anti-oxidant is used in the US, by contrast. Also, in the US most
 biodiesel is the NBB's commercial B20, a low blend with a lower risk
 of polymerisation, so they have to care about it that much less.

 They're never going to accept that soy could be anything less than
 ideal. I get the impression that, even if there is such a thing,
 high-pressure polymerisation could be just a convenient scapegoat for
 soy's shortcomings.

 Best

 Keith


 ___

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20091017/f1fa8762/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz

2009-10-17 Thread Jan Warnqvist
hello Denise, I think that US BD is more or synonomous with soy biodiesel 
although it may be a myth. US is the biggest soy producer in the world and 
that is not a myth.
- Original Message - 
From: denise farley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2009 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Merceds-Benz


 Keith,
 Just out of sheer curiosity, where does the information that Most 
 biodiesel
 in the US is soy biodiesel come from?

 I was wondering too, since I cannot find the information even on the NBB
 (unless I am blind which is never outside the realm of possibility), where
 might be a good source to look for a list of currently operating biodiesel
 plant?  Ours closed and is in bankruptcy and of the other two in the local
 area, only one is operating.  We couldn't compete even switching to animal
 fats - and all those inherent processing problems.  Of course, the one
 operating is big-bucks AGP and, yes, uses soy.

 Hmmm.  D'ya think I might have sort of answered my own question here?
 Although I will say there is a soybean processing coop south of here that
 ceased production of biodiesel in their facility for at least 6 months 
 last
 I heard.  They sold their soybean oil to AGP during that period.  Sigh.

 Thanks so much!
 Denise


 On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Keith Addison
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:


 Most biodiesel in the US is soy biodiesel, which doesn't need high
 pressure to oxidise and polymerise, it's a semi-drying oil, it'll
 polymerise anyway. The IV is well above the EU biodiesel standard
 upper limit. (See Iodine Values
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html#iodine, National
 standards for biodiesel
 http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield2.html#biodstds.) The
 biodiesel industry in the US seems to be more are less in denial
 about this, but then the US National Biodiesel Board is a creature of
 US Big Soy.

 Hm, I must check how the US-EU row over the US dumping cheap soy
 biodiesel on the EU market is progressing. IIRC last time I looked
 the US was accusing the EU of protectionism, on the basis of what
 sounded like GMO-style substantial equivalence of America's soy and
 Europe's rapeseed oil, though they're not equivalent when it comes to
 iodine values and polymerisation. Rapeseed oil has a much lower IV
 and is much less likely to polymerise. Nonetheless, a lot of
 Europeans use anti-oxidant with their biodiesel, while very little
 anti-oxidant is used in the US, by contrast. Also, in the US most
 biodiesel is the NBB's commercial B20, a low blend with a lower risk
 of polymerisation, so they have to care about it that much less.

 They're never going to accept that soy could be anything less than
 ideal. I get the impression that, even if there is such a thing,
 high-pressure polymerisation could be just a convenient scapegoat for
 soy's shortcomings.

 Best

 Keith


 ___

 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20091017/f1fa8762/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/