http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article351153.ece

Chernobyl: A poisonous legacy

Twenty years after a blast in the nuclear plant at Chernobyl spread 
radioactive debris across Europe, it has been revealed that 375 farms 
in Britain, with 200,000 sheep, are still contaminated by fallout

By Andy McSmith

Published: 14 March 2006

After two decades, the legacy of the Chernobyl disaster is still 
casting its poisonous shadow over Britain's countryside. The 
Department of Health has admitted that more than 200,000 sheep are 
grazing on land contaminated by fallout from the explosion at the 
Ukrainian nuclear plant 1,500 miles away. Emergency orders still 
apply to 355 Welsh farms, 11 in Scotland and nine in England as a 
result of the catastrophe in April 1986.

The revelation - in a Commons written answer to the Labour MP Gordon 
Prentice - comes as Mr Blair prepares to make the case for nuclear 
power in a forthcoming government Energy Review. The Prime Minister 
argues that nuclear energy would allow the UK to achieve twin 
objectives of cutting C02 emissions and reducing dependency on 
imported natural gas supplies.

But, just last week a damning report from the Government's own 
advisory board on sustainable development identified five major 
disadvantages to any planned renewal of Britain's nuclear power 
programme, including the threat of terrorist attack and the danger of 
radiation exposure. The longevity of the "Chernobyl effect" in a 
region generation of nuclear power stations, and going through a 
consultation exercise to try to convince the public that this is a 
safe form of electricity generation, we shouldn't overlook the 
terrible consequences if something does go wrong,

"No one would now build a reactor as unsafe as those at Chernobyl, 
which were jerry built. Even so, I think a lot of people will be 
shocked to know that, as we approach the 20th anniversary of 
Chernobyl, hundreds of farming families are still living with the 
fallout."

Jean McSorley, Greenpeace's senior adviser on nuclear energy said: 
"Chernobyl was the worst nuclear accident the world has ever seen but 
it is by no means the worst that could happen. In Cumbria, where I 
come from, people who are old enough to remember still talk about it. 
It's quite moving to hear the stress that farming families were put 
through. I think the British public that all this distance from 
Chernobyl, 20 years later, so many families are still living with its 
impact day to day."

The Chernobyl disaster turned public opinion in Britain against civil 
nuclear power overnight. The land still poisoned by Chernobyl's 
radioactivity lies all along the Welsh hills between Bangor and Bala, 
much of it in the Snowdonia National park. There is also a large 
triangle of contaminated land in Cumbria, south of Buttermere - 
though the number of farms affected is smaller than in Wales.

Some of the Scottish hills are also still affected. No sheep can be 
moved out of any of these areas without a special licence, under 
Emergency Orders imposed in 1986. Sheep that have higher than the 
permitted level of radiation have to be marked with a special dye 
that does not wash off in the rain, and have to spend months grazing 
on uncontaminated grass before they are passed as fit to go into the 
food chain.

A National Farmers' Union spokesman said: "The paramount concern has 
to be the safety of the consumer, and consumer confidence in the meat 
supply, so exceptional care has to be taken to make sure no 
contaminated meat goes into the food chain."

Most of Britain's nuclear power stations have either ceased to 
produce electricity, or are nearing the end of their active life. The 
last is due for closure in 2035. The Government is now conducting an 
energy review, to be published in June, which is expected to announce 
a new nuclear programme.

Tony Blair signalled his support for the industry in a speech to 
Labour's conference last autumn, when he warned Britain is too 
reliant on "unstable" regimes for its energy supplies, and singled 
out nuclear power as an alternative.

But resistance to the idea has been growing, particularly with the 
publication last week of the report by the government's Sustainable 
Development Commission. The Commons Environmental Audit Committee 
will also report later this month. According to a committee member, 
their findings are expected to be "measured" but "certainly won't put 
a strong case for nuclear power".

On 23 March, leading specialists will hold a conference in London on 
the long term impact of Chernobyl. At the end of the month, the 
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority will issue a revised figure for the 
cost of cleaning up the sites of disused publicly owned nuclear 
plants.

Their figure is expected to be substantially higher than their 
original estimate which was published last year, of £56bn.

David Ellwood, 49, farmer: 'Nobody can tell us when the radiation will pass'

By Geneviéve Roberts

David Ellwood has 700 sheep on his farm in Ulpha, near 
Broughton-in-Furness. His wife, Heather, 50, helps out on Baskell 
Farm, and they have four children.

"I remember the Chernobyl disaster 20 years ago. We were lambing in 
April and it was raining like hell. We got a letter from the ministry 
suggesting it would last about three weeks, but they were only 
guessing - it could go on for another 20 years.

"Every time we take sheep to auction, we must phone Defra, who check 
they are clear from contamination [from radioactive caesium]. They 
give us £1.30 for every sheep they monitor. We take them off the fell 
and put them in the fields for a couple of weeks before selling them, 
so readings are usually low. But the odd one gets a high reading if 
it comes straight in off the fell, and has to be slaughtered.

"Defra are here four or five times a year which is a hassle. At 
shearing time in July they monitor everything. If we are taking 
Cheviots to auction, we have to get them into a pen to take readings, 
which makes them mucky and bad for selling. Now we try to get them 
monitored three or four days before," said Mr Ellwood, 49. "We have 
been on this farm for 16 years, and owned the ground surrounding it 
before that, so have always been affected by Chernobyl. There is a 
lot of contaminated peat on our fell, so when the grass comes up in 
the summer that gets contaminated too. If our fell were rocky, I 
don't think it would be such a problem.

"I could get angry, but it is pointless, there is not a damn thing we 
can do and nobody seems to know when it will pass. I would be worried 
if more power stations were built. We were 1,500 miles from Chernobyl 
and still feel the effects."

Edwin Noble, 45, sheep farmer: 'I had no idea it could affect us so far away'

Edwin Noble and his family, who run a 2,500- acre farm close to Mount 
Snowden, live under emergency restrictions that they were told would 
apply for 30 days, but which are likely to continue for years.

Mr Noble, 45, was in his early twenties when he took charge of the 
family farm. On the night of 2 May 1986, he was disturbed by 
torrential rain and feared the river would burst its banks. What he 
did not know was that the radiation cloud from Chernobyl was passing 
invisibly overhead. The rain left huge deposits of radioceasium in 
the peaty soil, which is no direct threat to humans but works itself 
into the grass, contaminating his sheep.

"I had heard about Chernobyl on the news, but had no idea at all that 
[it] could affect us so far away," he said. "It's something we have 
had to live with ever since.

"Every time we move a sheep or lamb off our land it has got to be 
scanned. If it fails the monitoring, it ... cannot be sold. If you 
can get the sheep or lamb off the contaminated land, then the 
radiation comes out of them fairly quickly, but the whole of our farm 
is affected, so we rent grazing land 20 miles away. It means you 
constantly have to think ahead. If the lamb is fattened and ready to 
go to market, you can't have it sitting in a pen waiting to be 
monitored because it loses weight, so you've got to get the 
monitoring done ahead of time. When the market is volatile, it has 
cost us a sale.

"The experience has made me very opposed to nuclear power. It's not 
so much the inconvenience for farmers like us - but what if the 
explosion had been at the plant near here, at Trawfynydd? It doesn't 
seem worth the risk," he said.

 


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to