[Biofuel] Smoke -- the killer in the kitchen

2005-01-18 Thread Keith Addison


http://www.itdg.org/?id=smoke_index
Download full report (4.7Mb Acrobat file):
http://www.itdg.org/?id=smoke_report_home#Download
Summary of the report
http://www.itdg.org/?id=smoke_report_home
Read the report online
http://www.itdg.org/?id=smoke_report_1
WHO statement on indoor air pollution
http://www.itdg.org/?id=iap_who


http://www.itdg.org/?id=smoke_index
ITDG - Intermediate Technology Development Group

Indoor Air Pollution in Developing Countries
Smoke - the killer in the kitchen

Smoke in the home from cooking on wood, dung and crop waste kills 
nearly one million children a year.


The total annual death toll is 1.6 million - a life lost every 20 
seconds. It is a larger killer than malaria and is the fourth 
greatest risk to death and disease in the world's poorest countries. 
Despite this, little has been done to tackle this chronic crisis.


In its report, Smoke: the Killer in the Kitchen, ITDG is calling for 
global action to save the lives of 1.6 million men, women and 
children lost each year to lethal levels of household smoke.



* Summary of the report
* Read the report online
* Download the report
* Buy a copy from ITDG Publishing
* Find out more: key questions and answers
* Further information
* Links

The problem

More than a third of humanity, 2.4 billion people, burn biomass 
(wood, crop residues, charcoal and dung) for cooking and heating. 
When coal is included a total of 3 billion people - half the world's 
population - cook with solid fuel.


The smoke from burning these fuels turns kitchens in the world's 
poorest countries into death traps. Particles from fuels like wood 
and charcoal make lungs vulnerable to acute lower respiratory 
infections, such as pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 
or cancer. In addition there is evidence to link indoor air pollution 
to asthma, tuberculosis, low birth weight and infant mortality and 
cataracts.


While the world spends millions of dollars combating levels of 
pollution in Western cities, it has neglected to tackle the death 
toll caused by lethal levels of smoke in the homes of the poor world.


What can be done

The scale of the problem is immense. What is needed is a global 
campaign that matches the level of this chronic problem, in line with 
the international community's response to hunger, HIV/AIDS, dirty 
water, poor sanitation and malaria. Read ITDG's call for a Global 
Action Plan


However, there are solutions - and they need not cost the earth. ITDG 
has worked with communities in Kenya, Sudan and Nepal to develop 
improved stoves, smoke hoods, chimneys and improved ventilation.


You can read about our work in these countries, and see how simple 
technology - affordable, accessible and appropriate - can make a real 
difference to people's lives.


Smoke and health in Kenya
In the Kajiado region of Kenya, ITDG has been working with Maasai 
women to develop a simple smoke hood, which has reduced smoke levels 
by up to 80%.

Smoke and health in Sudan
In Kassala, eastern Sudan, an ITDG project is working with households 
to develop solutions to indoor air pollution, including a switch to 
LPG.

Smoke and health in Nepal
In Nepal ITDG has been working with the community to develop 
improvements in home insulation and stove design to reduce fuel use.


In the past, one of the excuses for inaction on household smoke has 
been that there was insufficient medical evidence of its impact. 
There is now ample evidence. And as we have shown, there are also 
simple and effective ways of reducing levels of smoke. What is 
missing is the political will to act.


ITDG is calling on the United Nations to instigate a Global Action 
Plan to address the neglected killer of indoor air pollution, and to 
back the newly formed Partnership for Clean Indoor Air with the 
necessary resources and political will.


This partnership, which is backed by the World Health Organisation, 
the World Bank, the US Environmental Protection Agency and others, is 
beginning to turn around the inaction on smoke in the home, but needs 
high-level political and financial support if it is to have a 
significant impact.


Read the report online
You can buy a copy of the report from ITDG Publishing, download it as 
a PDF file, or read it online as web pages:


Executive summary

Smoke - the killer in the kitchen


* A crisis affecting mainly poor women and children
* Smoke and the Millennium Development Goals

Smoke's increasing cloud across the globe


* Why has so little been done?
* How smoke kills and injures
* Exposure in poor homes far exceeds accepted safety levels
* Researching how smoke affects health
* Health effects of indoor air pollution

Reducing exposure to indoor air pollution


* Cooking on a cleaner fuel
* Getting smoke out of the house
* Cutting smoke volumes
* Reducing the need for fire
* Changing patterns of behaviour
* Heating the home
* Identifying appropriate solutions

Weighing up the cost of smoke 

Re: [Biofuel] Smoke -- the killer in the kitchen

2005-01-18 Thread bob allen




Smoke -- the killer in the kitchen
http://www.itdg.org/?id=smoke_index


and is not just the kitchens of the developing  countries...

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/story.jsp?story=601500

Pollution during pregnancy is linked to childhood cancer
By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor

17 January 2005

Women who breathe air polluted with smoke and exhaust fumes are up to 
four times more likely to have children who develop cancer, a study 
shows. Research at the University of Birmingham suggests atmospheric 
pollution from oil-fired furnaces and vehicle exhausts may be the 
principal cause of childhood cancer.


By linking pollution hot spots round the country with the incidence of 
cancer, the findings show that pregnant women and those about to 
conceive who live near factories, power stations or major road junctions 
are at greatest risk.


The study, in the /Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health/, will 
fuel speculation about the causes of childhood cancer which have baffled 
scientists for decades.


Cancer is a defect of cell division associated with ageing, but studies 
in children with leukaemia have shown that cancer cells are present from 
birth, suggesting the origins of the disease may lie in the womb. 
Heredity, radiation and viruses are among the suggested causes.


Some experts say childhood leukaemia, the commonest childhood cancer, is 
increasing, though the claim is disputed. If a rise in childhood cancer 
is confirmed, the increase in vehicle pollution could be a cause.


George Knox, emeritus professor of epidemiology, who made the study, 
said: Most childhood cancers are probably initiated by close perinatal 
encounters with one or more of these high emission sources. The low 
atmospheric levels of these substances suggest the mother may breathe 
them in, with carcinogens passing across the placenta.


He added that direct exposures in early infancy, or through breast 
milk, or even pre-conceptually, cannot be excluded.


Professor Knox compared a map showing chemical emissions for the UK 
prepared by the National Atmospheric Emissions Laboratory with details 
of all children who died of leukaemia and other cancers before their 
16th birthday between 1966 and 1980.


The scientist said: The evidence from this set of data is that these 
exposures account for half or more of cancers in childhood. This needs 
to be pursued with further research and we need to separate people from 
the sources of pollution and to reduce toxic emissions.




18 January 2005 12:39

Search this site:

printable versionPrintable Story 
http://news.independent.co.uk/low_res/story.jsp?story=601500host=3dir=59






--
--
Bob Allen,http://ozarker.org/bob 
--

-
The modern conservative is engaged in one of Man's oldest exercises
in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral
justification for selfishness  JKG 



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

___
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/



Re: [biofuel] Smoke - the killer in the kitchen

2003-12-05 Thread Aaron F. Wieler


This was the last paragraph on the article about smoke as an indoor air
pollutant.

 MDG 7 - Some of the interventions to reduce indoor air pollution can
 result in the more efficient use of wood fuel and therefore contribute
 to a lessening in greenhouse gas emissions and the conservation of
 forest areas - thereby contributing to environmental sustainability.
 Surprisingly, even switching from inefficient use of biomass to fossil
 fuel (kerosene or LPG) can reduce climate impact, as it can conserve
 forestry and emit less greenhouse gas than inefficiently burned
 biofuels.


It's curious to me that we're still talking about fewer greenhouse gas
emissions from fossil fuels than more recent biofuels. My initial reaction
(please correct me if I'm wrong) is that we're working on such a large
time scale with fossil fuels and such a small time scale with
biofuels like wood and dung that carbon emissions from fossil fuels cost
us as greenhouse gases, but similar carbon emissions from fuels which
recently absorbed their carbon from the atmosphere may be considered
carbon neutral.

This is an over-simplification of course, because we care about more
atmospheric contaminants that CO2 and CO, and wood burning at low
temperatures is a really great way to produce harmful emissions. But I
think we SHOULD stop talking about greenhouse gases and particulate
emissions and NOx emissions and sulfuric compounds and all those other more
complicated byproducts of combustion as the
really-bad-problem-related-to-industrialization-that-rich-and-smart-people-in-the-first-world-should-find-alternatives-to-for-poor-people-in-the-third-world.

The question is, how much can we just talk about carbon dioxide absorption
and release into the atmosphere from growing and burning biomass? It's
certainly a nice way to simplify the matter, and biofuels come out miles
ahead. I look at my wood stove (yes, even with expensive catalytic
converter) still spewing lots of smoke into the clear Vermont air. The
appropriate solution for us 10 years ago was a wood stove that was as clean
as possible but not ultra-expensive. I love burning wood from a 10 mile
radius of the house, and I love that it's carbon-neutral, but there's so
much more coming out of the stove pipe that we rarely talk about. I
remember seeing Juneau, Alaska, USA when I was a kid in winter, with a
wood smoke affect similar to that of Los Angeles.

Cleaner, more attractive, inexpensive, safe, etc. solutions? Well,
biodiesel or SVO in furnaces sounds like a good start if you have a
furnace. wood-fired boiler for DHW and heating (and cooking?). pellet
stoves...I think there will end up being a lot of different solutions
appropriate for different places. Thats how it should be, of course, but
when there's a showroom full of hundreds of models of a few designs for
heaters and stoves (cooking), the population has to be a little more
educated to buy something to get off the fossil fuel grid.

(My first public ramble here. I hope at least one of you found it
interesting.)

-Aaron




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/index.php?list=biofuel

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[biofuel] Smoke - the killer in the kitchen

2003-12-04 Thread Keith Addison

http://www.itdg.org/html/smoke/smoke_report_1.htm

Download report:
http://www.itdg.org/html/smoke/smoke_report.htm#Download

Indoor Air Pollution in Developing Countries
Smoke - the killer in the kitchen

Poverty condemns half of humanity to cook with solid fuels on 
inefficient stoves. Smoke in homes from these cook stoves is the 
fourth greatest risk factor for death and disease in the world's 
poorest countries, and is linked to 1.6 million deaths per year. Yet 
the international community has largely neglected it.

Women and children are most at risk from the killer in the kitchen, 
as they spend considerable time around the cooking fire. Reducing 
indoor air pollution across the developing world would contribute 
significantly to achieving the internationally agreed Millennium 
Development Goals, in particular the aim to reduce child mortality by 
two-thirds by 2015.

More than a third of humanity, 2.4 billion people, use biomass (wood, 
crop residues, charcoal and dung) for cooking and heating. Of these, 
approximately 800 million depend solely on crop residues and dung. It 
is a technology that has changed little since the Stone Age. When 
coal is included a total of 3 billion people - approximately half the 
world's population - cook with solid fuel.

The smoke from burning these fuels in the home is one of the four 
leading causes of death and disease in the world's poorest countries. 
The indoor air pollution from the burning of solid fuels is linked to 
the deaths of over 1.6 million people, predominately women and 
children, each year. This is more than three people per minute. It is 
a death toll almost as great as that caused by dirty water and poor 
sanitation, and greater than malaria.

Smoke in the home is one of the world's leading child killers, 
claiming nearly one million children's lives each year. Illness 
caused by smoke kills more children annually than malaria or HIV/AIDS.

The most recent figures from the World Health Organization (WHO) show 
that in developing countries where mortality is high, the four 
greatest risks leading to death, disease and injury are being 
underweight, unsafe sex, unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene and 
smoke from solid fuel.

Three of these risks are the subject of wide-ranging campaigns and 
programmes, albeit massively under funded. Being underweight, unsafe 
sex, and unsafe water and sanitation are well known as the principal 
causes of death and disease. It is an international scandal that 
relatively little is known and done about the impacts of indoor air 
pollution.

The World Health Report 2002 carries a breakdown of the causes of 
death and disease around the world. Figure 1 indicates the total 
number of deaths in the world attributable to these leading health 
risks, and also shows the impact of ill health and disability 
(measured in DALYs) in the world's poorest countries where mortality 
is highest.

Figure 1: World Health Report's estimates of death and ill-health 
(DALYs) from leading risk factors in the year 2000

Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) The WHO and World Bank measure 
health risks according to a disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) 
formula. DALYs estimate life years lost from disease and injuries and 
the subsequent disability over the remaining years. It is a measure 
that allows comparison of health interventions across various life 
threatening diseases.

The main victims of death from exposure to indoor air pollution are 
women and children. Children aged under five account for 56 per cent 
of total deaths from indoor air pollution. The main cause of 
children's death from indoor air pollution is acute lower respiratory 
infections (ALRI). At 2.1 million deaths a year, ALRI is the world's 
leading killer of children under five. More than 50 per cent of these 
deaths are caused by indoor air pollution, lack of adequate heating 
and other precarious living conditions.

Figure 2: Deaths in the under-fives by various causes

Recently the UN General Assembly restated their aim to control 
malaria. It is interesting to parallel the scale of the problems 
presented by malaria and indoor air pollution. Twenty per cent of the 
world's population are at risk from malaria; almost 50% are at risk 
from indoor air pollution. Malaria kills about one million people per 
year; indoor air pollution kills over 1.6 million. Quite rightly 
there is a major international campaign to fight malaria. This report 
argues for a similar worldwide campaign for healthy indoor air.

A crisis affecting mainly poor women and children

Indoor air pollution is nothing new. As the smoke-stained walls and 
ceilings of caves occupied by prehistoric man attest, smoke has been 
a fact of life for millennia. Living without smoke is inconceivable 
for many people in developing countries. The vast majority of staple 
foods, 95%, need cooking before they can be eaten. Cooking needs 
energy.

This is not an indiscriminate killer. Indoor air pollution