[Biofuel] was...GeoExchange, on the cheap

2006-08-04 Thread AltEnergyNetwork

Whoa, you still sleep on a waterbed? ;-)
I had one years ago, the good ones with the coils for added support.
Had to get rid of it after about 8 months because of back pain and 
restless. nights. They are really bad for your back as they offer very little 
support. Anyone that I know who ever
had one got rid of theirs, long time ago as well. Not just my opinion, believe 
me, your back will pay from it years from now if you keep using one for long 
enough.

Thermoelectric cooling and heating could be much more more efficient than AC 
for localised use such as thermoelectric liquid cooled/heated water for bed 
blankets, cooling vests. Eliminates EMF flowing close to the body,
possible hazardous fire risks, dual heating/cooling and uses approx 70% less 
power than traditional AC. eliminates those hot, sticky sheets and lowers the 
need for running your larger cooling unit.
Sounds like an ad, huh? Lot's of cool applications, me thinks,

 Portable units get more difficult because you have to be able to provide about 
4.8 amps peak / per duty cycle
and about 1/2 amp continuous.

regards
tallex


  ---Original Message---
  From: Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] GeoExchange, on the cheap
  Sent: 04 Aug '06 14:23
  
  Hey Kirk;
  
  Ever slept on a waterbed that got unplugged and woken up at 4 am
  shivering?  Cooling my beduh ...no thanks.
  
  Joe
  
  Kirk McLoren wrote:
  
  
  Yes but using water like that certainly is only possible for a few. Most
  water systems are stressed already. The best method would be to use the
  latent heat of evaporation. It is important to know the relative humidity
  where you are.
  
  The koolsuit is a legitimate suggestion. 10 pounds of ice in a backpack
  with circulatory system for arms and legs is a viable low energy low
  impact system.
  
  1 pound of water water will absorb 1 BTU when raised 1 degree F. If you
  need many BTU the volume becomes considerable.
  
  Just as using fluorescent instead of tungsten makes sense so does limiting
  cooling to a suit and mattress also make sense.
  
  We need to soften our impact on the world around us.
  
  
  Kirk
  
  _MIKE REDLER [LINK: MAILTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]_
  wrote:  Understood. But, why would I care if the sewer is a good heat sink?
  I suggested that the sewer be used as a way of discharging water after it
  had absorbed heat from inside the house (or apartment).
  
  I'm interested in finding a medium which is better than hot summer air
  for cooling the condenser and proposed that water, already cooled from
  being underground has the same benefit as geoexchange without the cost of
  digging a hole.
  
  - Redler
  
  Kirk McLoren wrote:
  
  Sewer lines are engineered for the load. Trust me they didnt install
  larger pipes so you can use them as a heat sink.
  
  The smaller the load the cheaper to refrigerate. A koolsuit would take
  maybe 300 watts.
  
  The rule of thumb in ac sizing is a ton per dozen occupants.
  
  
  Kirk
  
  _MIKE REDLER [LINK: MAILTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]_
  wrote:  Bob, Joe, et al
  
  Sure, that much I knew. But, what I meant by on the cheap was to use
  the existing infrastructure (i.e. existing, underground water lines) as
  the ground source instead of requiring a new hole to be dug. Sewer lines
  could be used as a conduit for sending heat out of the house (or
  apartment). Perhaps the heated water could be contained and used as
  domestic hot water for the laundry (for example). I know that there is at
  least one company in Florida that pumps heat from one's attic into the
  domestic hot water supply so, it's quite possible.
  
  Using city water and sewer lines as conduit for ground sourcing wouldn't
  be a closed loop and I'm not sure of the volume (cost) of water required
  for it to be effective. The part I like about it is the apparent low cost
  in implementing it. In areas of the city where digging a hole gets
  complicated, this might be an effective alternative.
  
  -Redler
  
  bob allen wrote:
  
  It's being done all over the country.  It's called ground source heat
  pumps.  the condenser uses the ground (more specifically water in it)   as
  the heat sink.  It is fairly simple set up if you have a well. If   not a
  contractor Takes a back hoe and lays plastic pipe horizontally   for
  hundreds of feet a couple of feet down.[LINK:
  http://www.geoexchange.org/] http://www.geoexchange.org/now if you
  mean is anybody rolling their own water cooled air   condenser, I don't
  know.Mike Redler wrote:
  
  Hi everyone,As with many in this forum, I've been trying to stay cool
  today without   switching on the AC. It's tempting but, so far I've
  resisted.I was standing under the shower head, thinking about what my
  air   conditioner might be doing had it been  turned on. Specifically, how
  the   condenser responds to a difference in temperature and how that
  difference kinda

Re: [Biofuel] was...GeoExchange, on the cheap

2006-08-04 Thread Joe Street




I never said I had a waterbed. But I slept on one when I was staying
with freinds one time and it got unplugged. Nasty. I preffer a futon.
Air does flow through blankets and sheets (and the futon actually) and
any time you run chilled water through pipes you can get condensation
so talk about sticky sheets how about damp ones? So then are you going
to use a vapor barrier? That makes for clammy sleeping believe me, I
know, from using a vapor barrier inside my sleeping bag while camping
in Canadian winter conditions. It keeps your insulation dry, true,
but warm and clammy is not what most people refer to as comfort! No
I'll stick with controlling air temperature thank you, but consider
that a straw bale home with a poured earthen plaster or concrete floor
combined with the thick plaster on the walls and the awesome insulation
properties of the bales, has enough thermal mass to prevent interior
air from getting so damn hot (or cold in the winter). Visit one of
these homes and see for yourself.

Joe

AltEnergyNetwork wrote:

  Whoa, you still sleep on a waterbed? ;-)
I had one years ago, the good ones with the coils for added support.
Had to get rid of it after about 8 months because of back pain and 
restless. nights. They are really bad for your back as they offer very little support. Anyone that I know who ever
had one got rid of theirs, long time ago as well. Not just my opinion, believe me, your back will pay from it years from now if you keep using one for long enough.

Thermoelectric cooling and heating could be much more more efficient than AC for localised use such as thermoelectric liquid cooled/heated water for bed blankets, cooling vests. Eliminates EMF flowing close to the body,
possible hazardous fire risks, dual heating/cooling and uses approx 70% less power than traditional AC. eliminates those hot, sticky sheets and lowers the need for running your larger cooling unit.
Sounds like an ad, huh? Lot's of cool applications, me thinks,

 Portable units get more difficult because you have to be able to provide about 4.8 amps peak / per duty cycle
and about 1/2 amp continuous.

regards
tallex


  
  
 ---Original Message---
 From: Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] GeoExchange, on the cheap
 Sent: 04 Aug '06 14:23
 
 Hey Kirk;
 
 Ever slept on a waterbed that got unplugged and woken up at 4 am
 shivering?  Cooling my beduh ...no thanks.
 
 Joe
 
 Kirk McLoren wrote:
 
 
 Yes but using water like that certainly is only possible for a few. Most
 water systems are stressed already. The best method would be to use the
 latent heat of evaporation. It is important to know the relative humidity
 where you are.
 
 The "koolsuit" is a legitimate suggestion. 10 pounds of ice in a backpack
 with circulatory system for arms and legs is a viable low energy low
 impact system.
 
 1 pound of water water will absorb 1 BTU when raised 1 degree F. If you
 need many BTU the volume becomes considerable.
 
 Just as using fluorescent instead of tungsten makes sense so does limiting
 cooling to a suit and mattress also make sense.
 
 We need to soften our impact on the world around us.
 
 
 Kirk
 
 _MIKE REDLER [LINK: MAILTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [EMAIL PROTECTED]_
 wrote:  Understood. But, why would I care if the sewer is a good heat sink?
 I suggested that the sewer be used as a way of discharging water after it
 had absorbed heat from inside the house (or apartment).
 
 I'm interested in finding a medium which is better than hot summer air
 for cooling the condenser and proposed that water, already cooled from
 being underground has the same benefit as geoexchange without the cost of
 digging a hole.
 
 - Redler
 
 Kirk McLoren wrote:
 
 Sewer lines are engineered for the load. Trust me they didnt install
 larger pipes so you can use them as a heat sink.
 
 The smaller the load the cheaper to refrigerate. A "koolsuit" would take
 maybe 300 watts.
 
 The rule of thumb in ac sizing is a ton per dozen occupants.
 
 
 Kirk
 
 _MIKE REDLER [LINK: MAILTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [EMAIL PROTECTED]_
 wrote:  Bob, Joe, et al
 
 Sure, that much I knew. But, what I meant by "on the cheap" was to use
 the existing infrastructure (i.e. existing, underground water lines) as
 the ground source instead of requiring a new hole to be dug. Sewer lines
 could be used as a conduit for sending heat out of the house (or
 apartment). Perhaps the heated water could be contained and used as
 domestic hot water for the laundry (for example). I know that there is at
 least one company in Florida that pumps heat from one's attic into the
 domestic hot water supply so, it's quite possible.
 
 Using city water and sewer lines as conduit for ground sourcing wouldn't
 be a closed loop and I'm not sure of the volume (cost) of water required
 for it to be effective. The part I like about it is the apparent low cost
 in implementing it. In areas of the city where digging a hole gets
 complicat

Re: [Biofuel] was...GeoExchange, on the cheap

2006-08-04 Thread bob allen
I've been sleeping on a waterbed for lets see about 35 years. The only time my 
back hurts is when I 
travel and sleep on anything  but a waterbed. In the summer we peel back the 
cover and get the 
coolth.


AltEnergyNetwork wrote:
 Whoa, you still sleep on a waterbed? ;-)
 I had one years ago, the good ones with the coils for added support.
 Had to get rid of it after about 8 months because of back pain and 
 restless. nights. They are really bad for your back as they offer very little 
 support. Anyone that I know who ever
 had one got rid of theirs, long time ago as well. Not just my opinion, 
 believe me, your back will pay from it years from now if you keep using one 
 for long enough.
 
 Thermoelectric cooling and heating could be much more more efficient than AC 
 for localised use such as thermoelectric liquid cooled/heated water for bed 
 blankets, cooling vests. Eliminates EMF flowing close to the body,
 possible hazardous fire risks, dual heating/cooling and uses approx 70% less 
 power than traditional AC. eliminates those hot, sticky sheets and lowers the 
 need for running your larger cooling unit.
 Sounds like an ad, huh? Lot's of cool applications, me thinks,
 
  Portable units get more difficult because you have to be able to provide 
 about 4.8 amps peak / per duty cycle
 and about 1/2 amp continuous.
 
 regards
 tallex
 
 
  ---Original Message---
  From: Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] GeoExchange, on the cheap
  Sent: 04 Aug '06 14:23
  
  Hey Kirk;
  
  Ever slept on a waterbed that got unplugged and woken up at 4 am
  shivering?  Cooling my beduh ...no thanks.
  
  Joe
  
  Kirk McLoren wrote:
  
  
  Yes but using water like that certainly is only possible for a few. Most
  water systems are stressed already. The best method would be to use the
  latent heat of evaporation. It is important to know the relative humidity
  where you are.
  
  The koolsuit is a legitimate suggestion. 10 pounds of ice in a backpack
  with circulatory system for arms and legs is a viable low energy low
  impact system.
  
  1 pound of water water will absorb 1 BTU when raised 1 degree F. If you
  need many BTU the volume becomes considerable.
  
  Just as using fluorescent instead of tungsten makes sense so does limiting
  cooling to a suit and mattress also make sense.
  
  We need to soften our impact on the world around us.
  
  
  Kirk
  
  _MIKE REDLER [LINK: MAILTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]_
  wrote:  Understood. But, why would I care if the sewer is a good heat sink?
  I suggested that the sewer be used as a way of discharging water after it
  had absorbed heat from inside the house (or apartment).
  
  I'm interested in finding a medium which is better than hot summer air
  for cooling the condenser and proposed that water, already cooled from
  being underground has the same benefit as geoexchange without the cost of
  digging a hole.
  
  - Redler
  
  Kirk McLoren wrote:
  
  Sewer lines are engineered for the load. Trust me they didnt install
  larger pipes so you can use them as a heat sink.
  
  The smaller the load the cheaper to refrigerate. A koolsuit would take
  maybe 300 watts.
  
  The rule of thumb in ac sizing is a ton per dozen occupants.
  
  
  Kirk
  
  _MIKE REDLER [LINK: MAILTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]_
  wrote:  Bob, Joe, et al
  
  Sure, that much I knew. But, what I meant by on the cheap was to use
  the existing infrastructure (i.e. existing, underground water lines) as
  the ground source instead of requiring a new hole to be dug. Sewer lines
  could be used as a conduit for sending heat out of the house (or
  apartment). Perhaps the heated water could be contained and used as
  domestic hot water for the laundry (for example). I know that there is at
  least one company in Florida that pumps heat from one's attic into the
  domestic hot water supply so, it's quite possible.
  
  Using city water and sewer lines as conduit for ground sourcing wouldn't
  be a closed loop and I'm not sure of the volume (cost) of water required
  for it to be effective. The part I like about it is the apparent low cost
  in implementing it. In areas of the city where digging a hole gets
  complicated, this might be an effective alternative.
  
  -Redler
  
  bob allen wrote:
  
  It's being done all over the country.  It's called ground source heat
  pumps.  the condenser uses the ground (more specifically water in it)   as
  the heat sink.  It is fairly simple set up if you have a well. If   not a
  contractor Takes a back hoe and lays plastic pipe horizontally   for
  hundreds of feet a couple of feet down.[LINK:
  http://www.geoexchange.org/] http://www.geoexchange.org/now if you
  mean is anybody rolling their own water cooled air   condenser, I don't
  know.Mike Redler wrote:
  
  Hi everyone,As with many in this forum, I've been trying to stay cool
  today without   switching on the AC. It's tempting