[biofuel] Doing it once is already hard Was: doo doo

2003-01-12 Thread csakima

About fabricating the WTC attacks ... I'm not gonna debate whether it was
.. or not cause I have NO proof for what I'm about to say.

I'm simply gonna comment that there is ONE strange thing that's always
bothered me about the WTC incident.  TWO separate planes driven by TWO sets
of terrorists strike TWO entirely different buildings (towers).   Yet EACH
of these two physically separated incidences ... brought down BOTH building
STRAIGHT DOWN.   DEMOLITION PERFECT.   Like those demolitions you see on
the news sometime ... bringing down old buildings.

Now remember ... those demolitions you see on the news  they're done by
explosives experts.  The building is studied for weeks ... the charges
precisely placed.  CAREFULLY placed.  DELIBERATELY placed.  That's the kind
of precision that (supposedly) it takes to make a building come straight
down.  To avoid damaging nearby buildings.

So now a stolen aircraft hits a building at a random angle brings a building
straight down??  And the a SECOND plane hits a SECOND building??  And ALSO
brings it straight down??  The chances for a random (non deliberate charges
placed just in certain places) plane hit making it fall straight down ...
are already microscopic.   Now a second (2nd tower) repeat performance??
The odd against THAT are UNBELIEVABLE!!!

I'm NOT implying anything.  But I WILL say that it sure makes my
suspicious-o-meter needle shoot up.

Curtis

Get your free newsletter at
http://www.ezinfocenter.com/3122155/NL


- Original Message -
From: Crabb, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So tell me, whom are we bombing to rape their resources? Afghanistan?  I
suppose that is a flimsy excuse we facricated the WTC attacks so that  we
can waste our time and spend money there for nothing. If we were fabricating
it.. it would have made more sense to fabricate it so that Saddam did it.
If we were going to rip off all their oil.. why didnt we do it 12 years ago?


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Doing it once is already hard Was: doo doo

2003-01-12 Thread vern_hendershott


I think you will find that any very tall building can be brought down just
as these two were when you have a very intense petrochemical fire (Jet
Fuel) burning for some time at least one third of the way down the
building. It lets one or two floors collapse at the same time and the above
floors act as a very large hammer and drive all the lower floors down until
the lower floors are all flat then the velocity of the fall does the same
to the remaining upper floors. Keep in mind that the WTC's were of an
interesting design with much of the load taken by the outer side structures
as compared to a more normal steel building with a steel frame throughout
the interior. This permitted full open floors that allowed for maximum
flexibility in floor plans to meet tenants needs.

If you will look at the pictures of the disaster take from the air a few
days later, and before the clean up was well under way I think you will see
that it was a real mess, not at all like the controlled demolition of an
older building and many of the other buildings in the area were severely
damaged to the point that several may have to be demolished.

Good thought but it is just not factual.

Best regards,
Vern




  
  csakima   
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   
biofuel@yahoogroups.com  
  net cc:  
  
   Subject:  [biofuel] Doing it 
once is already hardWas: doo  
  01/12/03 08:03 AM doo 
  
  Please respond to 
  
  biofuel   
  

  

  




 About fabricating the WTC attacks ... I'm not gonna debate whether it
was
.. or not cause I have NO proof for what I'm about to say.

I'm simply gonna comment that there is ONE strange thing that's always
bothered me about the WTC incident.Ê TWO separate planes driven by TWO sets
of terrorists strike TWO entirely different buildings (towers).ÊÊ Yet
EACH
of these two physically separated incidences ... brought down BOTH building
STRAIGHT DOWN.ÊÊ DEMOLITION PERFECT.ÊÊ Like those demolitions you see on
the news sometime ... bringing down old buildings.

Now remember ... those demolitions you see on the news  they're done by
explosives experts.Ê The building is studied for weeks ... the charges
precisely placed.Ê CAREFULLY placed.Ê DELIBERATELY placed.Ê That's the kind
of precision that (supposedly) it takes to make a building come straight
down.Ê To avoid damaging nearby buildings.

So now a stolen aircraft hits a building at a random angle brings a
building
straight down??Ê And the a SECOND plane hits a SECOND building??Ê And ALSO
brings it straight down??Ê The chances for a random (non deliberate charges
placed just in certain places) plane hit making it fall straight down ...
are already microscopic.ÊÊ Now a second (2nd tower) repeat performance??
The odd against THAT are UNBELIEVABLE!!!

I'm NOT implying anything.Ê But I WILL say that it sure makes my
suspicious-o-meter needle shoot up.

Curtis

Get your free newsletter at
http://www.ezinfocenter.com/3122155/NL


- Original Message -
From: Crabb, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So tell me, whom are we bombing to rape their resources? Afghanistan?Ê I
suppose that is a flimsy excuse we facricated the WTC attacks so thatÊ we
can waste our time and spend money there for nothing. If we were
fabricating
it.. it would have made more sense to fabricate it so that Saddam did it.
If we were going to rip off all their oil.. why didnt we do it 12 years
ago?



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor   



ADVERTISEMENT   



  [IMAGE

RE: [biofuel] Doing it once is already hard Was: doo doo

2003-01-12 Thread Myles Twete

Key difference between professional demolition and Sept.11 planes and WTC
buildings falling:  the upper floor pancaked, leading to cascade pancake
failures.  Without a side-force, or a designed-in assymmetry to floor
strength, even Newton would expect the WTC to have pancaked straight down.
No need for pros to do the job.

-Original Message-
From: csakima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 9:04 PM
To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [biofuel] Doing it once is already hard Was: doo doo


About fabricating the WTC attacks ... I'm not gonna debate whether it was
.. or not cause I have NO proof for what I'm about to say.

I'm simply gonna comment that there is ONE strange thing that's always
bothered me about the WTC incident.  TWO separate planes driven by TWO sets
of terrorists strike TWO entirely different buildings (towers).   Yet EACH
of these two physically separated incidences ... brought down BOTH building
STRAIGHT DOWN.   DEMOLITION PERFECT.   Like those demolitions you see on
the news sometime ... bringing down old buildings.

Now remember ... those demolitions you see on the news  they're done by
explosives experts.  The building is studied for weeks ... the charges
precisely placed.  CAREFULLY placed.  DELIBERATELY placed.  That's the kind
of precision that (supposedly) it takes to make a building come straight
down.  To avoid damaging nearby buildings.

So now a stolen aircraft hits a building at a random angle brings a building
straight down??  And the a SECOND plane hits a SECOND building??  And ALSO
brings it straight down??  The chances for a random (non deliberate charges
placed just in certain places) plane hit making it fall straight down ...
are already microscopic.   Now a second (2nd tower) repeat performance??
The odd against THAT are UNBELIEVABLE!!!

I'm NOT implying anything.  But I WILL say that it sure makes my
suspicious-o-meter needle shoot up.

Curtis

Get your free newsletter at
http://www.ezinfocenter.com/3122155/NL


- Original Message -
From: Crabb, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So tell me, whom are we bombing to rape their resources? Afghanistan?  I
suppose that is a flimsy excuse we facricated the WTC attacks so that  we
can waste our time and spend money there for nothing. If we were fabricating
it.. it would have made more sense to fabricate it so that Saddam did it.
If we were going to rip off all their oil.. why didnt we do it 12 years ago?


Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Doing it once is already hard Was: doo doo

2003-01-12 Thread robert luis rabello



csakima wrote:

 I'm simply gonna comment that there is ONE strange thing that's always
 bothered me about the WTC incident.  TWO separate planes driven by TWO sets
 of terrorists strike TWO entirely different buildings (towers).   Yet EACH
 of these two physically separated incidences ... brought down BOTH building
 STRAIGHT DOWN.   DEMOLITION PERFECT.   Like those demolitions you see on
 the news sometime ... bringing down old buildings.

But it wasn't the impact of the aircraft that brought those buildings down.
Burning fuel heated the steel superstructure to the point where it could no
longer support the building, and gravity did the rest.  I'd seen something
similar with the steel in my wood stove.  Burning hardwood for a season almost
always warped a steel baffle plate that directed secondary air into the stove.
I was subsequently educated by someone familiar with wood stoves that steel
becomes elastic at temperatures exceeding 1 000 F, so I had to install a
pyrometer and adjust the air intake to avoid burning my fires too hot.  (I HAD
to get biofuels into this post, somehow!)

I was in Baltimore that awful day, watching the whole episode on CNN.  I
remember telling my aunt that those buildings would come straight down if the
fire wasn't extinguished.  There was no mystery about it in my mind.


 I'm NOT implying anything.  But I WILL say that it sure makes my
 suspicious-o-meter needle shoot up.

So then, what ARE you saying?

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/9782



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/