Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles

2003-10-22 Thread robert luis rabello



James Slayden wrote:

  I think that the beauty of the Ovonic system is that it uses process
 heat
 to release the H2 from the storage tanks.  The heat generated either
 from
 an H2 ICE or a FC could also help with this:

 http://www.ovonics.com/res/2_4_solid_hydrogen/solid_hydrogen.htm


Intermetallic hydrides represent a very safe way to store hydrogen.
The difficulty with hydrides involves cost, mass and the nagging problem
of break down after repeated cycles.  The last time I checked, the
hydride necessary to give my 2.3 liter Ranger 160 km of range would cost
over $20 000--that's WITHOUT the custom heat exchange tank necessary to
liberate the gas from the metal.  This much hydride would weigh 320
kilos, plus the weight of the tank, plus the weight of the heat exchange
medium. . .

By the time all the necessary modifications have been made to store
hydrogen onboard, then burn it properly in my engine, I could easily
convert the truck to a battery electric and not suffer from the
efficiency loss involved in electrolysis.  Batteries are also
considerably cheaper than hydride.  Replacing a battery bank every three
years or so makes the cost between burning gasoline and swapping
batteries a draw, but replacing very expensive, activated hydride is a
money wasting proposition!

It's so much easier to carry hydrogen around attached to other
molecules!


robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.1stbooks.com/bookview/9782



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
 No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mk9osC/hP.FAA/3jkFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles

2003-10-22 Thread Pedro M.


  - Original Message - 
  From: murdoch 
  To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:11 AM
  Subject: Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles


  On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:40:08 +0200, you wrote:

  
  MM,
  
  Formation and reformation of hydrogen/whatsoever combinations as storage 
  techniques are obviously the way to go forward. It is however a storage 
  process that in itself require energy and I have not yet seen any 
  substantial discussions of the energy costs for this. 

  Important too is : 

  - The source of Hydrogen: it«s no renewable from the petroleum, but yes from 
the water (electrolysis).

  - The way to use it: no to burn it, but to produce water and energy to move 
vehicles.

  Regards.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles

2003-10-21 Thread James Slayden

I think that the beauty of the Ovonic system is that it uses process heat
to release the H2 from the storage tanks.  The heat generated either from
an H2 ICE or a FC could also help with this:

http://www.ovonics.com/res/2_4_solid_hydrogen/solid_hydrogen.htm

My gut tells me that although pressurized lightweight tanks are fairly
safe these days (see NGV lightweight vehicle tanks), there is what I call
the Hindenburg perception of gaseous hydrogen storage, even though that
was proven a falsity.  Liquid H2 storage is too difficult to implement and
maintain so that will be weeded out fairly quickly.  Another plus of the
metal-hydride storage is the higher energy density.  That will also be a
factor in what form H2 storage will occur in vehicles. 


James Slayden



On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Hakan Falk wrote:

 
 MM,
 
 Formation and reformation of hydrogen/whatsoever combinations as storage
 techniques are obviously the way to go forward. It is however a storage
 process that in itself require energy and I have not yet seen any
 substantial discussions of the energy costs for this. The energy has to
 come from somewhere. We have so many times agreed that hydrogen is a
 storage technology, if generated from renewable sources, and now we are
 talking about storage technologies of the storage technology. We need
 overall comparable figures, viability analysis and costs. We also need to
 know where the energy should be originating from, because this is an open
 question that everybody seems to do almost anything to avoid.
 
 We have a major energy supply problem ahead of us, not a major energy
 storage problem.
 
 Hakan
 
 At 01:51 PM 10/21/2003, you wrote:
 This article assumes onboard pressurized storage.   It should at least
 mention
 the future possibility of Liquid H2 (such as BMW has been working on) or
 metal
 hydride storage) such as Ovonic seems to have implemented with a
 modified
 Prius:
 
 http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031020/dem017_1.htmlhttp://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/
 31020/dem017_1.html
 
 As always, I'm not advocating these solutions, just mentioning them.  I
 tend to
 think a chemical solution (such as carrying H2 in molecules of
 C2H5OH)
 will
 continue to be the solution of choice for many.
 
 On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:37:59 +0200, you wrote:
 
  
  Although I can see large advantages in hydrogen as storage in
 stationary
  power generation and military mobile applications, I see that it is
 going
  to take a long time before we see the hydrogen economy for propelling
  transport in general.
  
  Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles
 
 http://energy.saving.nu/hydrogen/hydrogenstorage.shtmlhttp://energy.sav
  ing.nu/hydrogen/hydrogenstorage.shtml
  
  Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles
  By mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Carl Johnson, BA
 Physics,
  Univ of Chicago,
 http://mb-soft.com/public2/index.htmlhttp://mb-soft.com/public2/index.htmlI
 dex
  of Public
  Service Pages.
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 click here
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Biofuels list archives:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 
 Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
 To unsubscribe, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles

2003-10-21 Thread Hakan Falk


James,

I agree with you on some details, but the big picture remains and maybe you 
can give input on that,

1.  Primary energy sources.
  We also need to know where the energy should be
originating from, because this is an open
question that everybody seems to do almost
anything to avoid.

2. Lightweight pressurized tanks.
At 1500 psi, the volume problem is the same
approx. 15 times bigger than a gasoline tank.

3. Oil  NG depletion.
We have a major energy supply problem ahead of us,
not a major energy storage problem.

4. If we rapidly needed a replacement fuel for the
existing cars, pure hydrogen is not suitable,
because of the flame speed.

I have a terrible feeling that we are loosing ourselves in this hydrogen 
for cars question, which is best taken care of by biofuels in short term. 
Battery technologies for EVs are improving and beat Hydrogen in volume and 
at much better efficiency, if we include the fuel cell. Hydrogen have a 
very long way to go to come even close biodiesel hybrids. This in 
efficiency, but also in pollution if the primary source is considered. 
Solar generated hydrogen is cleaner, but then the solar/battery is much 
more efficient.

The problem is not the possible big future development and the answers we 
are seeking for hydrogen. If we should avoid major crises within the next 
10 years, efficient cars and alternative fuels must be delivered yesterday. 
Not to talk of the general energy efficiency that are needed. The current 
oil reserves seems to be overstated for political reasons and if it is so, 
the largest energy crises in human history is just around the corner. Guess 
which nation that will have the largest problem?

If we started to produce solar panels en mass and build Nuclear Power 
immediately, or even drill as much as we can, the crises is still there.

Hakan


At 06:53 PM 10/21/2003, you wrote:
I think that the beauty of the Ovonic system is that it uses process heat
to release the H2 from the storage tanks.  The heat generated either from
an H2 ICE or a FC could also help with this:

http://www.ovonics.com/res/2_4_solid_hydrogen/solid_hydrogen.htmhttp://www.ovonics.com/res/2_4_solid_hydrogen/solid_hydrogen.htm

My gut tells me that although pressurized lightweight tanks are fairly
safe these days (see NGV lightweight vehicle tanks), there is what I call
the Hindenburg perception of gaseous hydrogen storage, even though that
was proven a falsity.  Liquid H2 storage is too difficult to implement and
maintain so that will be weeded out fairly quickly.  Another plus of the
metal-hydride storage is the higher energy density.  That will also be a
factor in what form H2 storage will occur in vehicles.


James Slayden



On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Hakan Falk wrote:

 
  MM,
 
  Formation and reformation of hydrogen/whatsoever combinations as storage
  techniques are obviously the way to go forward. It is however a storage
  process that in itself require energy and I have not yet seen any
  substantial discussions of the energy costs for this. The energy has to
  come from somewhere. We have so many times agreed that hydrogen is a
  storage technology, if generated from renewable sources, and now we are
  talking about storage technologies of the storage technology. We need
  overall comparable figures, viability analysis and costs. We also need to
  know where the energy should be originating from, because this is an open
  question that everybody seems to do almost anything to avoid.
 
  We have a major energy supply problem ahead of us, not a major energy
  storage problem.
 
  Hakan
 
  At 01:51 PM 10/21/2003, you wrote:
  This article assumes onboard pressurized storage.   It should at least
  mention
  the future possibility of Liquid H2 (such as BMW has been working on) or
  metal
  hydride storage) such as Ovonic seems to have implemented with a
  modified
  Prius:
  
  http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031020/dem017_1.htmlhttp://biz.yahoo.com 
 /prnews/031020/dem017_1.htmlhttp://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/
  31020/dem017_1.html
  
  As always, I'm not advocating these solutions, just mentioning them.  I
  tend to
  think a chemical solution (such as carrying H2 in molecules of
  C2H5OH)
  will
  continue to be the solution of choice for many.
  
  On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:37:59 +0200, you wrote:
  
   
   Although I can see large advantages in hydrogen as storage in
  stationary
   power generation and military mobile applications, I see that it is
  going
   to take a long time before we see the hydrogen economy for propelling
   transport in general.
   
   Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles
  
  http://energy.saving.nu/hydrogen/hydrogenstorage.shtmlhttp://energy. 
 saving.nu/hydrogen/hydrogenstorage.shtmlhttp://energy.sav
   ing.nu/hydrogen/hydrogenstorage.shtml
   
   Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles
   By mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Carl Johnson, BA
  Physics,
   Univ of Chicago,
  

Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles

2003-10-21 Thread murdoch

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:40:08 +0200, you wrote:


MM,

Formation and reformation of hydrogen/whatsoever combinations as storage 
techniques are obviously the way to go forward. It is however a storage 
process that in itself require energy and I have not yet seen any 
substantial discussions of the energy costs for this. The energy has to 
come from somewhere. We have so many times agreed that hydrogen is a 
storage technology, if generated from renewable sources, and now we are 
talking about storage technologies of the storage technology.

Agreed.  However, I guess I meant my way of looking at it to cause folks to sort
of think twice.  I mean, if we see methanol a liquid fuel worth considering
for fuel cells (as I think Mercedes has experimented with for example), we see
that it's not necessary to go through all that energy conversion you just
make the methanol.  Then you can use it in an engine.  You have then arguably
carried H2 on board and used it, in a way.

Ok, so if the methanol is reformed and then used in a fuel cell, there might be
some loss of energy, but I'm just pointing out that in a way we already get H2
on board cars, and to some extent it's just a matter of recognizing that fact.  


 We need 
overall comparable figures, viability analysis and costs. We also need to 
know where the energy should be originating from, because this is an open 
question that everybody seems to do almost anything to avoid.

We have a major energy supply problem ahead of us, not a major energy 
storage problem.

Hakan



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US  Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuel] Hydrogen as a Fuel for Automobiles

2003-10-21 Thread Hakan Falk


MM,

I have not excluded methanol or even the more interesting
ethanol in fuel cells. It is energy sources and it looks like
an interesting development. Then we are back to more
reasonable evaluations about efficiency etc., which are
bound to come up. I am fully open to the fuel cell technology,
which a think is the more tangible development advances
in this. I am also for stationary hydrogen use in storage
technologies for power generation etc. where large and
safe lower pressure storages can be used. Techniques
that we are able to do and manage with security. That is
exiting, maybe economical and a lot safer. It would for
sure be needed.

Hakan

At 04:11 AM 10/22/2003, you wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:40:08 +0200, you wrote:

 
 MM,
 
 Formation and reformation of hydrogen/whatsoever combinations as storage
 techniques are obviously the way to go forward. It is however a storage
 process that in itself require energy and I have not yet seen any
 substantial discussions of the energy costs for this. The energy has to
 come from somewhere. We have so many times agreed that hydrogen is a
 storage technology, if generated from renewable sources, and now we are
 talking about storage technologies of the storage technology.

Agreed.  However, I guess I meant my way of looking at it to cause folks 
to sort
of think twice.  I mean, if we see methanol a liquid fuel worth considering
for fuel cells (as I think Mercedes has experimented with for example), we see
that it's not necessary to go through all that energy conversion you just
make the methanol.  Then you can use it in an engine.  You have then arguably
carried H2 on board and used it, in a way.

Ok, so if the methanol is reformed and then used in a fuel cell, there 
might be
some loss of energy, but I'm just pointing out that in a way we already get H2
on board cars, and to some extent it's just a matter of recognizing that 
fact.


  We need
 overall comparable figures, viability analysis and costs. We also need to
 know where the energy should be originating from, because this is an open
 question that everybody seems to do almost anything to avoid.
 
 We have a major energy supply problem ahead of us, not a major energy
 storage problem.
 
 Hakan
 




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
Rent DVDs from home.
Over 14,500 titles. Free Shipping
 No Late Fees. Try Netflix for FREE!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mk9osC/hP.FAA/3jkFAA/FGYolB/TM
-~-

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/