Re: [biofuels-biz] Interesting Customer perception note

2003-01-30 Thread James Slayden

Hey Ed,

Out here in Cali there might be sensitivity to it, and on that note it
kinda defeats the purpose of the carbon sequestering and being a
renewable.

I think that securing a known feedstock will be of value for marketing
purposes.  I was thinking along the lines of having different 'grades' of
fuel based on feedstock.  It could be used very effectively in a marketing
campaign.  Something like the following:

B100-M = Mixed feedstock source (could be animal, vegetable, SVO, or WVO, 
 GMO and/or non-GMO)

B100-V = Vegetable based feedstock (GMO or non-GMO, but not Organic)

B100-O = Organic based feedstock

V and O could be used together in the following manner:

B100-VO = Vegetable and Organic feedstock


It would be a good thing to distinguish the product from other producers
as well as maybe trademarking some nifty name for the product.  Although
it is really a 'perception' issue, it is a great marketing tool that can
be used to one's advantage.  It would be difficult to convince people of
the carbon sequestering of animal based BD.  ;-)


James



On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Neoteric Biofuels Inc wrote:

 James: side issue...how do people feel about the fact that much
 biodiesel will be coming from animal fats, especially in warm climates?
 
 Will commercial biodiesel need to be sold as veg and non-veg origin,
 aside from this WVO/SVO source issue, (which is silly, there is no CO
 sequestering advantage to new oil versus oil that spent a week in a
 fryer).
 
 Ed
 
 
 On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 10:43 AM, James Slayden wrote:
 
  Hola,
 
  In talking with someone recently who is interested in purchasing some
  biodiesel, and interesting comment came up in our email exchange.  He
  indicated that he was more interested in biodiesel made from crude VO
  than
  that made of WVO. I was trying to convince him that the WVO option was
  better due to the recyclable nature of the WVO, but he insisted that
  the
  CO sequestering was better of the more recent growing cycle.  I had a
  difficult time convincing him that it was the same  but oh well. 
  He
  didn't even care about the GMO feedstock issue!!
 
  I guess what this leaves me with is a customer perception problem of
  crude
  VO vs. WVO based biodiesel.  I am wondering why that perception issue
  exists and how to overcome it in talking w/ people who are not
  biodiesel
  geeks.  I know that most of the folks at the Berkley BD Co-op are
  religiously pro-WVO BD and will absolutely not put GMO-VO biodiesel in
  their vehicles.  So there is the dichotomy in interest of the different
  feedstocks for biodiesel.
 
  Any thoughts?
 
  James Slayden
 
 
 
  Biofuels at Journey to Forever
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
  Biofuel at WebConX
  http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
  List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
  http://archive.nnytech.net/
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ADVERTISEMENT
 
 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Interesting Customer perception note

2003-01-29 Thread Neoteric Biofuels Inc

James: side issue...how do people feel about the fact that much 
biodiesel will be coming from animal fats, especially in warm climates?

Will commercial biodiesel need to be sold as veg and non-veg origin, 
aside from this WVO/SVO source issue, (which is silly, there is no CO 
sequestering advantage to new oil versus oil that spent a week in a 
fryer).

Ed


On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 10:43 AM, James Slayden wrote:

 Hola,

 In talking with someone recently who is interested in purchasing some
 biodiesel, and interesting comment came up in our email exchange.  He
 indicated that he was more interested in biodiesel made from crude VO 
 than
 that made of WVO. I was trying to convince him that the WVO option was
 better due to the recyclable nature of the WVO, but he insisted that 
 the
 CO sequestering was better of the more recent growing cycle.  I had a
 difficult time convincing him that it was the same  but oh well.  
 He
 didn't even care about the GMO feedstock issue!!

 I guess what this leaves me with is a customer perception problem of 
 crude
 VO vs. WVO based biodiesel.  I am wondering why that perception issue
 exists and how to overcome it in talking w/ people who are not 
 biodiesel
 geeks.  I know that most of the folks at the Berkley BD Co-op are
 religiously pro-WVO BD and will absolutely not put GMO-VO biodiesel in
 their vehicles.  So there is the dichotomy in interest of the different
 feedstocks for biodiesel.

 Any thoughts?

 James Slayden



 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Interesting Customer perception note

2003-01-29 Thread Kenneth Kron

Sounds to me like the one that got away, I don't hear this kind of 
thinking very much and I'd say your customer has a weak or non-existent 
science background so I wouldn't try to approach it from a scientific 
point of view.

I would tell them it was a very intersesting perspective that you had 
not thought of before and ask them how they came to that conclusion?  
The closest analogy I can think of would be the recycling analogy. Would 
they think it would make more sense to store used paper in a warehouse 
and cut down new trees to make paper?  There's probably a better analogy 
out there...\

kk

James Slayden wrote:

 Hola,

 In talking with someone recently who is interested in purchasing some
 biodiesel, and interesting comment came up in our email exchange.  He
 indicated that he was more interested in biodiesel made from crude VO than
 that made of WVO. I was trying to convince him that the WVO option was
 better due to the recyclable nature of the WVO, but he insisted that the
 CO sequestering was better of the more recent growing cycle.  I had a
 difficult time convincing him that it was the same  but oh well.  He
 didn't even care about the GMO feedstock issue!!

 I guess what this leaves me with is a customer perception problem of crude
 VO vs. WVO based biodiesel.  I am wondering why that perception issue
 exists and how to overcome it in talking w/ people who are not biodiesel
 geeks.  I know that most of the folks at the Berkley BD Co-op are
 religiously pro-WVO BD and will absolutely not put GMO-VO biodiesel in
 their vehicles.  So there is the dichotomy in interest of the different
 feedstocks for biodiesel.

 Any thoughts?

 James Slayden







 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service 
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [biofuels-biz] Interesting Customer perception note

2003-01-29 Thread Tricia Liu

Fiber of the future available today!

 Kenaf is a 4,000 year old NEW crop with roots in ancient Africa. A member
of the hibiscus family (Hibiscus cannabinus L), it is related to cotton and
okra, and grows well in many parts of the U.S. It offers a way to make paper
without cutting trees. Kenaf grows quickly,rising to heights of 12-14 feet
in as little as 4 to 5 months. U.S. Department of Agriculture studies show
that kenaf yields of 6 to 10 tons of dry fiber per acre per year are
generally 3 to 5 times greater than the yield for Southern pine trees, which
can take from 7 to 40 years to reach harvestable size...


More details
http://www.greenla.com/recycling/index.htm


- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Kron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuels-biz@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [biofuels-biz] Interesting Customer perception note


 Sounds to me like the one that got away, I don't hear this kind of
 thinking very much and I'd say your customer has a weak or non-existent
 science background so I wouldn't try to approach it from a scientific
 point of view.

 I would tell them it was a very intersesting perspective that you had
 not thought of before and ask them how they came to that conclusion?
 The closest analogy I can think of would be the recycling analogy. Would
 they think it would make more sense to store used paper in a warehouse
 and cut down new trees to make paper?  There's probably a better analogy
 out there...\

 kk

 James Slayden wrote:

  Hola,
 
  In talking with someone recently who is interested in purchasing some
  biodiesel, and interesting comment came up in our email exchange.  He
  indicated that he was more interested in biodiesel made from crude VO
than
  that made of WVO. I was trying to convince him that the WVO option was
  better due to the recyclable nature of the WVO, but he insisted that the
  CO sequestering was better of the more recent growing cycle.  I had a
  difficult time convincing him that it was the same  but oh well.  He
  didn't even care about the GMO feedstock issue!!
 
  I guess what this leaves me with is a customer perception problem of
crude
  VO vs. WVO based biodiesel.  I am wondering why that perception issue
  exists and how to overcome it in talking w/ people who are not biodiesel
  geeks.  I know that most of the folks at the Berkley BD Co-op are
  religiously pro-WVO BD and will absolutely not put GMO-VO biodiesel in
  their vehicles.  So there is the dichotomy in interest of the different
  feedstocks for biodiesel.
 
  Any thoughts?
 
  James Slayden
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/.




 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 Biofuels at Journey to Forever
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 Biofuel at WebConX
 http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
 List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
 http://archive.nnytech.net/
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://webconx.green-trust.org/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/