RE: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Per Jessen
Charles Buckley wrote:

 And then there is SORBS, which the ETH use, who have chosen to put the
 shared server I use for mail on a blacklist for some reason.

mail.mauto.com is indeed listed by sorbs - I would check that your
server hasn't been compromised.  Look for traces of an ssh brute force
attack perhaps. 

 Everyone is going crazy about security, so you're likely to see a
 proliferation of providers offering to maintain blacklists, who will
 do it badly.

There is already plenty of such lists - I don't think the number is
likely to grow a awful lot.  

 Much better would be to let the users determine what is spam and what
 is not, getting the ISP out of the role of having to play judge on a
 topic they don't master.

Nah, leave the spam-filtering to us :-)
The user and the ISP both have better things to do.



/Per Jessen, Herrliberg

-- 
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


RE: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Daniel Kamm
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 10:54 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:

commercial

 Nah, leave the spam-filtering to us :-)
 The user and the ISP both have better things to do.

/commercial

:-D
 - Dan

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


RE: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Per Jessen
Per Jessen wrote:

 Charles Buckley wrote:
 
 And then there is SORBS, which the ETH use, who have chosen to put
 the shared server I use for mail on a blacklist for some reason.
 
 mail.mauto.com is indeed listed by sorbs - I would check that your
 server hasn't been compromised.  Look for traces of an ssh brute force
 attack perhaps.

Uh, sorry - I overlooked that you said shared.  Well, according to
SORBS, the server got listed because mail was sent to a spamtrap on 13
August.  It could be one of your co-sharers ...  if I were you, I'd
talk to q-x.ch, and ask them what they're doing about it.



/Per Jessen, Herrliberg

-- 
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


RE: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Charles Buckley
I'm far ahead of you -- I already knew all this, and have done all the right
steps.  The server uses strictly SMTP_AUTH; it has not been compromised
beyond the account details of the spammer being circulated.  

The provider moved instantaneously to identify the offender and kick them
out.  The compromised SMTP account is now closed.  But, just as Sunrise,
they are not willing to pay the fee to SORBS to change the status on the
list.  Instead, they have offered to set up a SMART host for me, but that
hasn't happened yet.  

Perhaps this would be a good insurance line -- insuring against Rufmord from
all these neighbourhood network grannies.  But I somehow feel that dealing
with the insurance Bürokraten would be worse than dealing with these issues
by finding ways to protect from SPAM that don't involve hiring a bunch of
self-appointed busybodies to strategically misinterpret actions and
blackmail money out of people who add value by creating arbitrary sets of
losers.  Are we talking about mature individuals here?

The ETH should know better than to be using such people anyway -- I have
informed them of the problem.

Charles

-Original Message-
From: Per Jessen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 12:03 PM
To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Subject: RE: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club

Per Jessen wrote:

 Charles Buckley wrote:
 
 And then there is SORBS, which the ETH use, who have chosen to put
 the shared server I use for mail on a blacklist for some reason.
 
 mail.mauto.com is indeed listed by sorbs - I would check that your
 server hasn't been compromised.  Look for traces of an ssh brute force
 attack perhaps.

Uh, sorry - I overlooked that you said shared.  Well, according to
SORBS, the server got listed because mail was sent to a spamtrap on 13
August.  It could be one of your co-sharers ...  if I were you, I'd
talk to q-x.ch, and ask them what they're doing about it.



/Per Jessen, Herrliberg

-- 
http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Fabian Wenk

Hello Charles

Charles Buckley wrote:

The ETH should know better than to be using such people anyway -- I have
informed them of the problem.


At ETH Zurich it depends to which subdomain you are sending 
e-mail, because some departments run their own mail server with 
their own policies.


But I guess most others depend on the mail service provided from 
Informatikdienste (ID). I once had a chance to attend a 
presentation of their mail setup (especialy the mx hosts with the 
spam and virus filtering) and therefore I know that they are using 
a few DNS Blacklists to drop mail at the smtp communication. But I 
don't remember which. Contacting the postmaster at ethz.ch should 
help.



bye
Fabian
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] verrizon and swisscom in the schoolyard

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Philippe Strauss
rustine:/etc/smokeping# traceroute 62.202.14.193
traceroute to 62.202.14.193 (62.202.14.193), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  fa0-0.rt1.plo1.dfinet.net (195.70.0.65)  1.500 ms  0.675 ms  0.875 ms
 2  fa0-6.sw-bb2.cc.dfinet.net (195.70.11.1)  1.093 ms  1.556 ms  0.847 ms
 3  gi0-1.rt-b1.cc.dfinet.net (195.70.0.3)  1.117 ms  1.020 ms  0.847 ms
 4  POS8-1-0.GW2.GVA2.ALTER.NET (146.188.70.101)  2.361 ms  1.036 ms  1.503 ms
 5  GigabitEthernet3-0.CR3.GVA2.ALTER.NET (146.188.6.5)  0.998 ms  2.059 ms  
0.921 ms
 6  so-2-2-0.XR1.ZUR4.ALTER.NET (146.188.2.85)  5.754 ms  4.690 ms  5.358 ms
 7  so-2-0-0.TL2.ZUR3.ALTER.NET (146.188.3.97)  5.090 ms  4.691 ms  4.775 ms
 8  so-4-0-0.IR1.NYC12.ALTER.NET (146.188.3.201)  91.318 ms  91.107 ms  91.291 
ms
 9  0.so-0-2-0.IL3.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.23.57)  91.972 ms  92.164 ms  92.144 
ms
10  0.so-7-0-0.XL3.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.10.21)  91.724 ms  91.529 ms  91.444 
ms
11  510.ATM6-0.IG4.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.20.57)  91.472 ms  91.618 ms  91.574 
ms
12  swisscom-oc3-gw.customer.alter.net (157.130.219.226)  95.619 ms  95.028 ms  
94.691 ms
13  i79zhb-005-pos4-0.bb.ip-plus.net (138.187.159.5)  221.616 ms  209.767 ms  
216.794 ms
14  tge3-3.bwrt1inb.bluewin.ch (195.186.0.113)  98.431 ms  98.851 ms  98.780 ms
15  if98.ip-plus.bluewin.ch (195.186.0.98)  98.910 ms  98.789 ms  99.633 ms
16  ge0-1.bwrtrip1zhb.bluewin.ch (195.186.120.178)  98.896 ms  98.716 ms  
98.524 ms
17  ge0-2.bwrtrip1zhh.bluewin.ch (195.186.55.226)  98.790 ms  98.805 ms  99.091 
ms
18  ge0-2.bwadf2zhh.bluewin.ch (195.186.122.131)  99.276 ms  100.072 ms  99.006 
ms
19  193.14.202.62.fix.bluewin.ch (62.202.14.193)  111.280 ms  112.007 ms  
111.729 ms
20  * * *


behave yourself, boys!


-- 
Philippe Strauss
av. de Beaulieu 25
1004 Lausanne
http://philou.ch
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


RE: [swinog] UCEProtect Blacklist -- join the club

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Daniel Kamm
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 12:29 +0100, Charles Buckley wrote:
 The provider moved instantaneously to identify the offender and kick them
 out.  The compromised SMTP account is now closed.  But, just as Sunrise,
 they are not willing to pay the fee to SORBS to change the status on the
 list. 

As ISP you don't have to pay a fee for delisting at SORBS. Simply mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and tell them your ASN. Without ASN your mail
will be dropped.

Cheerio
 - Dan

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] adobe.com down?

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Yves

working also over sunrise.

cheers yves

Quoting Silvan Gebhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


working also from init7

regards, silvan

Am 07.11.2007 um 14:24 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:


http://www.adobe.com/de/

is working from Bluewin.

Cheers,
Günti

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Weiler  
 - Kabelfernsehen Boedeli AG

Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:19 PM
To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Subject: [swinog] adobe.com down?

Hi all

I'm getting no answer from the adobe.com or adobe.de site. Looks   
like adobe is not reachable at the moment.


Can anybody confirm this?

Andreas Weiler
Kabelfernsehen Boedeli AG

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog





ServerBeach.ch your professional hosting provider


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


[swinog] adobe.com down?

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Andreas Weiler - Kabelfernsehen Boedeli AG
Hi all

I'm getting no answer from the adobe.com or adobe.de site. Looks like
adobe is not reachable at the moment.

Can anybody confirm this?

Andreas Weiler
Kabelfernsehen Boedeli AG

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


RE: [swinog] adobe.com down?

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Robert.Guentensperger
http://www.adobe.com/de/

is working from Bluewin.

Cheers,
Günti 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Weiler - 
Kabelfernsehen Boedeli AG
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:19 PM
To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Subject: [swinog] adobe.com down?

Hi all

I'm getting no answer from the adobe.com or adobe.de site. Looks like adobe is 
not reachable at the moment.

Can anybody confirm this?

Andreas Weiler
Kabelfernsehen Boedeli AG

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re[2]: [swinog] adobe.com down?

2007-11-07 Diskussionsfäden Andreas Weiler - Kabelfernsehen Boedeli AG

Now also reachable from here again.
Looks like there was a problem:
http://www.heise.de/foren/go.shtml?read=1msg_id=13843701forum_id=10541showthread=1

greetz,
Andreas Weiler


Am Mittwoch, 7. November 2007 um 14:35 schrieben Sie:

Y working also over sunrise.

Y cheers yves

Y Quoting Silvan Gebhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 working also from init7

 regards, silvan

 Am 07.11.2007 um 14:24 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 http://www.adobe.com/de/

 is working from Bluewin.

 Cheers,
 Günti

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Weiler  
  - Kabelfernsehen Boedeli AG
 Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:19 PM
 To: swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 Subject: [swinog] adobe.com down?

 Hi all

 I'm getting no answer from the adobe.com or adobe.de site. Looks   
 like adobe is not reachable at the moment.

 Can anybody confirm this?

 Andreas Weiler
 Kabelfernsehen Boedeli AG

 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog



Y 
Y ServerBeach.ch your professional hosting provider


Y ___
Y swinog mailing list
Y swinog@lists.swinog.ch
Y http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog