Re: [systemd-devel] Shutdown root fs on loop device

2016-04-22 Thread Alexandre Detiste
 Or use a wrapper.

#include 
#include 
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
argv[0] = "@ntfs-3g";
execv("/usr/bin/ntfs-3g", argv);
perror("ntfs-3g-wrapper");
return 1;


2016-04-22 13:02 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Torcz :
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:49:09AM +0200, Michael Lipp wrote:
>
> You have to patch ntfs-3g to marks itself as non-killable
> root storage provider (with '@'):
> https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/RootStorageDaemons/
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] How to properly write an umbrella unit

2015-07-21 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Le mardi 21 juillet 2015, 13:43:48 Marc Haber a écrit :
 This works as designed. Unfortunately, my Distribution's build tools
 don't handle package-provided targets too well, and I feel that using
 a target here is kind of wrong anyway.

Hi,

Package-provided targets works well,
but by default debhelper will try to enable everything.

You'd need to overide dh_systemd_enable  dh_systemd_start:

https://sources.debian.net/src/systemd-cron/1.5.2-1/debian/rules/

| override_dh_systemd_enable:
|   # Only enable cron.target, it pulls in all the others via .timer files.
|   dh_systemd_enable cron.target
|
| override_dh_systemd_start:
|   # Only start cron.target, it pulls in all the others via .timer files.
|   dh_systemd_start cron.target


 
 Can I write my nifty.target as a service? I have seen in this case
 nifty.service files with Exec=/bin/true to basically create a no-op
 service, but that's ugly.

PostgreSQL does that for some reason:
https://sources.debian.net/src/postgresql-common/169/systemd/postgresql.service/

 How would one handle this situation in the clear, recommended way?
Can't help for this.

Greets,

Alexandre
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] clarification on daemon-reload

2015-05-18 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Le lundi 18 mai 2015, 07:51:18 Igor Bukanov a écrit :
 What I would like to know is what is the exact behavior of systemctl
 daemon-reload. I am writing a service that creates/modifies other
 units by placing files under /run and I would like to know what are
 the limitations. In my case I cannot use a systemd.generator as the
 service depends on a mounted directory.

You could have a generator that first create a one-shot .service
if it's directory is not mounted at boot.

This one-shot .service looks like that:
| [Unit]
| RequiresMountsFor=/directory
| After= 
|
| [Service]
| Type=oneshot
| ExecStart=/bin/sh -c /usr/bin/systemctl daemon-reload ; /usr/bin/systemctl 
try-restart your-service

At it's second run (when called by daemon-reload), the generator does the right 
thing.

The /bin-sh -c ... is needed to encapsulate the try-restart;
if it's not there, as this .service file doesn't exist anymore; the try-restart 
is never run.

It's ugly, but it works reliably.

Alexandre Detiste
 
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] need sponsor for systemd-cron

2015-04-28 Thread Alexandre Detiste
sorry, sent to wrong list !!

2015-04-28 12:39 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Detiste alexandre.deti...@gmail.com:
 I need a sponsor to upload an update of this package.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] DBus api of systemd user instance

2015-03-07 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi Ragnar,

I found out and published answer on your Github bug tracker 
https://github.com/rthomsen/kcmsystemd/issues/17 .

It seems as simple a using Qt's buitlin QDBusConnection::sessionBus()
(qdbusviewer does that).

Alexandre


Le samedi 7 mars 2015, 08:45:42 Mantas Mikulėnas a écrit :
 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Ragnar Thomsen rthoms...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hey List,
 
  Does the user instance of systemd expose a dbus api?
 
 
 Yes, that's what `systemctl` uses.
 
 
  If yes, how does one access it?
 
 
 Much like the system instance – either over the DBus user bus, or over
 the dedicated private socket ($XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/systemd/private).
 
 ~
 
 Although, to have the user bus, you'll need to obtain user/dbus.service 
 user/dbus.socket from somewhere.
 
 They were added DBus 1.9 just a few weeks ago, but you can also get them
 separately from https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd/User#D-Bus.
 
 ...and then you might (or might not, I forgot) need to point user@.service
 at it:
 
 # system/user@.service.d/bus.conf
 [Service]
 Environment=DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=kernel:path=/dev/kdbus/%I-user/bus;unix:path=/run/user/%I/bus
 
 ~
 
 So you'll still need to use the private socket (at least as fallback), I
 think.
 
 

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] directive for executing a script on service failure

2015-02-06 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Le vendredi 6 février 2015, 21:23:14 Mantas Mikulėnas a écrit :
 On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:26 PM, George Karakougioumtzis 
 mad-proffes...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi. Congrats for the near perfect job on systemd! I was searching for a
  directive to execute a script upon systemd service failure. I would like
  to receive desktop notifications about such  failures. I stumbled upon
  OnFailure and FailureAction but these have hardcoded list of actions?
 
 
 One of those actions is start an arbitrary unit, which could handle
 notifications... Unfortunately it doesn't actually pass any failure
 information to that unit. 
Hi,

OnFailure= can be an instanciated unit, like OnFailure=failure@%i.service
then your failure@.service include this line

[Service]
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/user_notification %i

then your notification script get failed service name as argv[1]

 Maybe others will have better suggestions.

for user notification I use this, I guess it's not optimal:

#!/bin/bash
user=$(loginctl list-sessions | grep seat0 | awk '{print $3}')
if [ -n $user ]
then
export DISPLAY=:0
su $user -c notify-send '$1 FAILED' -i 
/usr/share/icons/oxygen/48x48/status/dialog-warning.png  
else
echo $1 FAILED  | wall
fi
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] idle daemon sleep

2014-12-30 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Le mercredi 31 décembre 2014, 08:23:51 Mantas Mikulėnas a écrit :
 Even for .timer units, systemd simply sleeps until it's actually time
 for the next event – like cron, or Task Scheduler for that matter.
 There shouldn't be any is it time yet?.

In fact, many people complain that cron does wakes up their laptop every minute;
and that increase battery consumption, while systemd timers doesn't suffer from 
this.

http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?crond
[ Additionally,  cron  checks each minute to see if its spool directory's
[ modtime (or the modtime on /etc/crontab) has changed

http://content.hccfl.edu/pollock/unix/crontab.htm
[ Each minute the cron daemon wakes up and compares the crontab file entries 
against the current time.
[ If the five fields match the current minute then the command is executed.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemctl: print unit package in status

2014-12-18 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi,

You could maybe think of adding some Package= ou SourcePackage=
attribute in units to let users
known where this unit came from.

This would work like SourcePath= does for generated units.

Alexandre Detiste

2014-12-18 10:08 GMT+01:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:

 On 12/18/2014 04:00 AM, Spencer Baugh wrote:

 When printing the status of a unit, open a connection to the session bus
 and query PackageKit for the package that the unit file belongs
 to. Print it if PackageKit knows.


 There are gazillion package manager in the wild and this will significantly
 delay the output of the status command which makes this something you should
 be carrying downstream.

 JBG
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] update TODO

2014-11-20 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi,

 What's the usecase for setting empty environment variables?
 
 JBG

I use it to pass along information in my generator:

Environment=MAILTO= means don't send any mail in case of failure.

By the default the mail would be sent the to value of User=@localhost .

The support for this is already there, this patch merely add a test.

Le jeudi 20 novembre 2014, 22:27:30 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson a écrit :
 
 On 11/20/2014 08:18 PM, Iago López Galeiras wrote:
  Empty environment variables in Environment= and EnvironmentFile= options
  work.
 

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl show environment quoting

2014-11-11 Thread Alexandre Detiste
 I made some minimal changes to git now:
 
 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=27e9c5af817147ea1c678769e45e83f2e4b4ae96

Thanks !
 
 This tries to improve things a bit, but I figure it might break stuff for you.

No it doesn't break anything since sendmail already forbid spaces in MAILTO.

The 3 lines of error handling that check for loose words will become
dead code; but we need to keep those for backward compatibility.

This may help other people too:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-July/200859.html

 I will now escape spaces and newlines inside the strings to the usualy C 
 \x012
 syntax. This means spaces now become \x020. 

As I understand 'escaped = xescape(str, \n );'
will let the '@' unaffected : cool.

 This makes the output reversible, but of course looks 
 awful if env vars really contain spaces...

I guess from the man page this fits nicely with the spirit of this sub-command.
e.g. : display of ExecStart= that looks like a JSON thingy.

Alexandre Detiste
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] generator logging during daemon-reload

2014-11-10 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Le lundi 10 novembre 2014, 14:32:49 Lennart Poettering a écrit :
  I know that generators should log to /dev/kmsg during early boot.
 
 Correct!

Yes, but then the log appears as a ugly big chunck without the timestamp  host 
on the left; 
except the first line. Is it ok to reopen /dev/ksmg for each line writen to 
avoid this ?

Google gave me this:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/35639/how-can-i-write-to-dmesg-from-command-line

With take me back here :-) ! which is easy to understand.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/journal/journald-kmsg.c

 (...) deadlocks (...)
Ok, I indeed got some while doing tests for my /var/spool/cron/crontabs problem.

I finally settled to generate a kind of 'transient' service that does a 
daemon-reload ; restart cront.target _only_ 
if this path doesn't exist; and it iself contains a 
ConditionDirectoryNotEmpty=/var/spool/cron/crontabs
to avoid needless daemon-reload.

The twist: on the second run of the generator, this path now _does_ exist; 
so this service doesn't generate itself again.
At first, I had used 'ExecStartPost=' for the restart part ; 
but the .service simply vanish during the daemon-reload and can never finish.
(this behaves like a self-modifying shell script)

Now I do this, it turns the ExecStart in a kind of atomic operation:

  ExecStart=/bin/sh -c /bin/systemctl daemon-reload ; /bin/systemctl 
try-restart cron.target

https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/bin/systemd-crontab-generator#L471

 Generators really really shouldn't talk to any other services, and
 this means for logging they should log to /dev/kmsg or suchlike.

So we should also avoid sending mail with /usr/sbin/sendmail , for example ?

Thanks,

Alexandre Detiste
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] generator logging during daemon-reload

2014-11-10 Thread Alexandre Detiste
 Yes, but then the log appears as a ugly big chunck without the
 timestamp  host on the left; 
  except the first line. Is it ok to reopen /dev/ksmg for each line
  writen to avoid this ?
 
 Not sure I follow?

This might be a trivial problem; it's just that there are really few people
writing generators or outputing do /dev/kmsg .

Here is a sample test case the 2 different behaviours,
maybe a flush after the write would do it:

root@antec:/home/tchet# cat log
4 log1: log1
4 log2: log2
4 log3: log3
4 log4: log4
root@antec:/home/tchet# LANG=C dd if=log of=/dev/kmsg
0+1 records in
0+1 records out
60 bytes (60 B) copied, 0.000114992 s, 522 kB/s
root@antec:/home/tchet# while read level pgm msg; do echo $level $pgm $msg  
/dev/kmsg; done  log
root@antec:/home/tchet# journalctl -n
...
nov 10 20:25:06 antec log1: log1
4 log2: log2
4 log3: log3
4 log4: log4
nov 10 20:25:20 antec log1: log1
nov 10 20:25:20 antec log2: log2
nov 10 20:25:20 antec log3: log3
nov 10 20:25:20 antec log4: log4
 
 Yes, that's really not an OK thing to do. /usr/sbin/sendmail ...
Ok, I don't want to test this with 20 differents MTA anyway.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


[systemd-devel] generator logging during daemon-reload

2014-11-07 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi,

I know that generators should log to /dev/kmsg during early boot.

But, when they are restarted later by systemcl daemon-reload;
is it better to write to the journal instead, by using systemd-cat for example ?
Or is it racy/forbidden ?

Greetings,

Alexandre Detiste
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


[systemd-devel] systemctl show environment quoting

2014-10-29 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi,

I stumbled on this:

$ systemctl cat cron-crontab-pi-0 | grep Environment
Environment=A=a a MAILTO=system-c...@mailinator.com B=b b C=c c
$ systemctl show cron-crontab-pi-0 -p Environment
Environment=A=a a MAILTO=system-c...@mailinator.com B=b b C=c c

- the quotes are gone.

Is this done by design, or a bug in systemctl show ?

My simple parser could be abused if someone hid a MAILTO= inside an other env 
variable.
https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/bin/mail_on_failure

Here this won't hurt, but this may causes security problems elsewhere.

Alexandre Detiste
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-cron: retrigger generator after /var is mounted

2014-10-29 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Le mercredi 22 octobre 2014, 13:07:39 Lennart Poettering a écrit :
So, I thought myself a couple of times about adding a cron generator
upstream, but always came to the conclusion that having to load the
configuration **twice** during boot-up would be suboptimal. 

 Well, you can order your reload service After=local-fs.target, which
 should do the trick. As /var might be subdivided into more submounts
 you really want to order after local-fs.target, and nothing earlier.

Ok, thanks, I have it mostly solved now.

I have my generator check for /var/spool... and writing a service in /run to 
call itself again **only** if needed.

On the second run of the generator, this service is not generated again, it 
just vanish; it acts like a transient unit.

So, on systems with /var in /, it run once; and on systems with a separate 
/var, it run twice.

It is set to run After=local-fs.target and Before=cron.target

The only remaining problem is that the added timer is not started.

Is systemctl daemon-reload really synchronous, or does it return before the 
reload if effectively done ?
(I saw the --no-block argument that make me fear this)


● cron-after-var.service
   Loaded: not-found (Reason: No such file or directory)
   Active: inactive (dead) since jeu 2014-10-30 00:00:39 CET; 13min ago
  Main PID: 370 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)

● cron-tchet-tchet-0.timer - [Cron] 40 8 * * * /home/tchet/.ben/ben.sh
   Loaded: loaded (/var/spool/cron/crontabs/tchet)
   Active: inactive (dead)
 Docs: man:systemd-crontab-generator(8)

https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/bin/systemd-crontab-generator#L405

Alexandre Detiste___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] transforming Iptables bash script to systemd service file -help

2014-10-23 Thread Alexandre Detiste
2014-10-22 13:37 GMT+02:00 Simon McVittie simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk:
 all it would need is for systemd to support StandardInput=/a/file/path

That feature would be nice.
I have a direct use for this.
Doing '/bin/echo -e line1\\nline2\\nline3 | command' is ugly.

https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/bin/systemd-crontab-generator#L229
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/crontab.html
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


[systemd-devel] systemd-cron: retrigger generator after /var is mounted

2014-10-22 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi,

I have been maitaining systemd-crontab-generator for some months,
this is a generator developped outside of systemd that translates
the crontabs in timer   service units.

I have two unresolved bugs in our tracker that I don't know how to 
tackle in the most systemd-way.

Maybe you know better.

Here they are:

https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/issues/26
-) how can I trigger a rerun of the generator after /var is mounted.

There is already a trigger on PathChanged=/var/spool/cron/crontabs,
but this doens't work, because cron.target is started after /var is mounted.

I already noticed the presence of /run/systemd/generator/var.mount;
but I don't know how to glue it together.

Current trigger units:
https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/units/cron-update.path.in
https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/units/cron-update.service.in

---

https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/issues/12

- ) if a lenghty weekly/monthly/yearly persistent job is aborted by a shutdown,
it is not restarted on next reboot.

---

Alexandre Detiste
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-cron: retrigger generator after /var is mounted

2014-10-22 Thread Alexandre Detiste
  -) how can I trigger a rerun of the generator 
 
 generators are rerun if you issue systemctl daemon-reload

I already know, 

this is what our trigger unit does.
https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/units/cron-update.service.in
https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/units/cron-update.path.in

 ... after /var is mounted.
this is the point I didn't get right.
Would linking cron-update.service in new folder 
(/usr)/lib/systemd/system/var.mount.wants/ 
do the trick ?

I currently start it from /etc/rc.local

 it's OK to cover /etc/cron.daily and friends natively with a generator
The issue with a generator is there must be some name mangling
to ensure that the units have an unique name and
unit name like 'cron-root-13.timer' in systemctl list-timers are not user 
friendly.
(we use now cron-$filename-$userid-$pkey.timer )

That is why cron.hourly|daily|weekly ... are provided as static units
that can be safely referenced in man pages;
this way systemd-cron can even work with an empty /etc/crontab .

 (and that's easy as the stuff is in
 /etc), but for the per-user stuff stored in /var it is a better idea
 to just leave traditional crond around, however, with one trick: only
 start it as soon as there is a file dropped into the cron subdir in
 /var. This way, users can use cron as they always did: as long as they
 did not install any user cronjobs everything works fine without crond
 started, and then when they install user cronjobs crond magically gets
 started in the background. The way how users install cronjobs is by
 invoking crontab -e anyway, and that tool needs to be installed
 anyway of the crond package, hence installing crond in a way that it
 is triggered via a crond.path unit should be OK too.
 
 Hope that makes sense?
That makes sense, but I'm not responsible for packaging 'cron' in Debian;
that must also work for sysvinit. I doubt someone will like this halfhalf 
solution.

The crontab shipped with systemd-cron is written in python and can't be setgid 
like the real crontab;
so I asked if vixie-crontab could be shipped in an extra standalone package,
but I don't expect much more.


  - ) if a lenghty weekly/monthly/yearly persistent job is aborted by a 
  shutdown,
  it is not restarted on next reboot.
 
 Hmm, could you file a bug about this issue on fdo bz? we should
 probably cover for this nicely.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85321

Ok it's done, it would benefit native units too.

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-cron: retrigger generator after /var is mounted

2014-10-22 Thread Alexandre Detiste

 Or to put this differently we will not create. come up with, ship ( and 
 thus support those ) generators but expect consumers of systemd to use 
 systemd and it's format natively in their environment.
 
 Alexandre why did you decide to write that generate to begin with?

Hi, 

I've been using the systemd-cron Debian package since 2013/10 to take care of 
/etc/cron.daily/
I soon noticed it wasn't processing the crontabs , I added a symlink on 
/etc/cron.weekly/
to emulate the one I cared about and forgot about it.

Then in june there was a bug filled to remove the Provides: cron-daemon 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752376

This prompted me to find a better solution.

Konstantin Stepanov and 
 




 Why not migrate what needs to be migrated to native system timer formats 
 for those relevant component and leave the rest be handled by the 
 traditional cron daemons since those two components complement each 
 others shortcomings ?

The rest ? The generator can now handle all possible cases

 
 JBG

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-cron: retrigger generator after /var is mounted

2014-10-22 Thread Alexandre Detiste
(sorry mail fired up too soon)

 Or to put this differently we will not create. come up with, ship ( and 
 thus support those ) generators but expect consumers of systemd to use 
 systemd and it's format natively in their environment.
 
 Alexandre why did you decide to write that generate to begin with?

Hi, 

I didn't wrote it.

I've been using the systemd-cron Debian package since 2013/10 to take care of 
/etc/cron.daily/
I soon noticed it wasn't processing the crontabs , I added a symlink on 
/etc/cron.weekly/
to emulate the one I cared about and forgot about it.

Then in june there was a bug filled to remove the Provides: cron-daemon 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752376

This virtual package cron-daemon act as a gear box that lets users switch
at their will from one cron daemon to another. It documents a specific interface
( /etc/crontab , /etc/cron.*/ ...)

Without this Provides:, systemd-cron would had been useless.
This prompted me to find a better solution.

Konstantin Stepanov (https://github.com/kstep/systemd-crontab-generator)
and Dwayne bent (static units, build infrastructure)
kindly agreed to let me merge their respective projects to get a full feature
systemd-cron package.

Then I went on with development.


 Why not migrate what needs to be migrated to native system timer formats 
 for those relevant component 
I have no power over this.

 and leave the rest be handled by the 
 traditional cron daemons since those two components complement each 
 others shortcomings ?

The rest ? The generator can now handle all possible cases;
it just doesn't send emails like cron; but that will remain an wontfix I guess.

Alexandre Detiste


___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-cron: retrigger generator after /var is mounted

2014-10-22 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Why not migrate what needs to be migrated to native system timer formats

This would be the responsability of each individual package manager;
after some policy would have mandated it and it's too late before the release 
freeze.
Debian only ships exaclty one timer now: systemd-tmpfiles-clean.timer 

This may evolve next year after Jessie is released.

I would then adapt systemd-cron not to process /etc/cron.d/$(package) 
if (/usr)/lib/systemd/system/$(package).timer exists . 

I'll asks what the others downstreams (Arch...) think of it;
if it might already be implented that way.

Alexandre



___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel