Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks
> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:41:12 -0400 > From: Serge Wroclawski > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks > > I think the number of tags in this kind of proposal would balloon > quickly, so let me suggest instead that tags of this nature be put on > the changeset, with a then request to bot authors to check object > history and changesets, rather than more tags on the object. > > In other words, use the changeset to hold this (what I think of as) > metadata, rather than the object itself. i don't understand on how that would be the case. after execution of the task the corresponding tag gets deleted anyway since they are only temporarily. i can't see on how changesets should be better. you would have to start a changeset per deadline and that's even more complicated, since it cannot be done easily within tag editors. also fellow mappers would never know that someone else already has a changeset prepared, since mostly people check the tags only. flaimo ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks
I think the number of tags in this kind of proposal would balloon quickly, so let me suggest instead that tags of this nature be put on the changeset, with a then request to bot authors to check object history and changesets, rather than more tags on the object. In other words, use the changeset to hold this (what I think of as) metadata, rather than the object itself. - Serge ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks
2011/4/24 Flaimo : > i have started a proposal for simple automated tasks. i will leave it > in the RFC state until someone, who knows how to create a bot, can > provide a prototype for a small imited bbox, so we can see if this one > is actually doable (performance and security wise). > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/automated_tasks I agree that there might be some cases where this could be of use, maybe you should make up better examples, because the ones in the proposal don't convince me. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks
i have started a proposal for simple automated tasks. i will leave it in the RFC state until someone, who knows how to create a bot, can provide a prototype for a small imited bbox, so we can see if this one is actually doable (performance and security wise). http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/automated_tasks flaimo ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
