Re: [Tagging] Survey of street/road layouts and their tagging

2014-12-14 Thread Steve Doerr
When I see 'facultatif' in French, I normally translate this as 
'optional' in English. You will find 'facultative' in the Oxford English 
Dictionary, but it will be a meaningless word to most English people.


Steve

On 14/12/2014 10:35, Ulrich Lamm wrote:


Am 13.12.2014 um 10:56 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org 
mailto:tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org:



Message: 4
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:14:29 +
From: SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk 
mailto:li...@atownsend.org.uk

To:tagging@openstreetmap.org mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Survey of street/road layouts and their tagging
Message-ID: 548b1465.60...@atownsend.org.uk 
mailto:548b1465.60...@atownsend.org.uk

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

On 12/12/2014 13:13, Ulrich Lamm wrote:


Seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Tables_of_street_layouts



This could benefit from an explanation of what problem you're trying to
solve here.  The wiki's full of I think we should tag X like Y pages
but without any arguments for a change to motivate mappers to change
their habits it's not going to happen.

Currently, for example, obligatory is used only 40 times, and 10 of
those are nudism:

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=obligatory#values

Also the mainly biological term facultative is used as if it's an
accepted tag, but there are only 49 uses, in the centre of Bremen:

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cycleway=facultative

(and it's not common English by any stretch of the imagination - maybe
versions of it are more used in Romance languages where the latin root
is more obvious)

Cheers,

Andy


All tags I've written in purple are innovative. I. e., they are an 
outcome of logical delibaration, not a record of frequent practice.

Even myself I didn't use them before suggesting them.
But only watching practice, we'll never get a set of uneqivocal tools.
As I've written in the notes, I have preferred the term 
obligatory, as it is common in many languages, and it is part of the 
official description of the round blue French traffic sign piste ou 
bande cyclable obligatoire = obligatory cycletrack or cycle lane.
The counterpart (rectangular blue French sign)  is piste ou bande 
cyclable conseillée et réservée = advisory-and-reserved cycletrack 
or cycle lane. There, I suggest facultative or simply free for 
cycletracks and soft_lane fpr cycle lanes. That kind of cycletracks 
(in Germany Radweg ohne Benutzungspflicht, cycletrack-design without 
signpost) may be used only by cyclists, but needn't be used by them. 
The British traffic law has a similar status for its _strict_ cycle 
lanes, called mandatory, which puzzles readers of other native 
languages, as according to dicitionaries mandatory is almost 
synonyme with obligatory.


I think it doesn't matter if the term obligatory or the term 
facultative is also used for other than road traffic features, 
unless the other usage would be in contradiction to the road traffic use.


Cheers
Ulrich


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] Survey of street/road layouts and their tagging

2014-12-12 Thread Ulrich Lamm
Hi,

as an approach for the development of a set of unequivocal tools for the 
description of all kinds of road layouts,
I've made a large (though not conceise) list with graphics of the layouts and 
their conventional and innovative taggings.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Tables_of_street_layouts

Yours'

Ulrich
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Survey of street/road layouts and their tagging

2014-12-12 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
It seems to be promoting cycleway=obligatory and similar tagging
conflicting
with existing usage of this case (cycleway=lane/opposite_lane/opposite/etc).

This is a good idea, but poorly executed - it needs a new, currently unused
key.

2014-12-12 14:13 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm ulamm.b...@t-online.de:

 Hi,

 as an approach for the development of a set of unequivocal tools for the
 description of all kinds of road layouts,
 I've made a large (though not conceise) list with graphics of the layouts
 and their conventional and innovative taggings.

 See
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Tables_of_street_layouts

 Yours'

 Ulrich
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Survey of street/road layouts and their tagging

2014-12-12 Thread SomeoneElse

On 12/12/2014 13:13, Ulrich Lamm wrote:


See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Tables_of_street_layouts



This could benefit from an explanation of what problem you're trying to 
solve here.  The wiki's full of I think we should tag X like Y pages 
but without any arguments for a change to motivate mappers to change 
their habits it's not going to happen.


Currently, for example, obligatory is used only 40 times, and 10 of 
those are nudism:


http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=obligatory#values

Also the mainly biological term facultative is used as if it's an 
accepted tag, but there are only 49 uses, in the centre of Bremen:


http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cycleway=facultative

(and it's not common English by any stretch of the imagination - maybe 
versions of it are more used in Romance languages where the latin root 
is more obvious)


Cheers,

Andy


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging