Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 10. März 2012 00:06 schrieb Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com:
 I *think* a fitness station is a stop on a fitness trail.


+1
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-June/002572.html
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:route%3Dfitness_trail

cheers,
Martin

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-09 Thread Erik Johansson
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 18:16, Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
 On 08/03/2012 16:54, Clifford Snow wrote:

 I do not see gym listed as a value for the tag amenity.  I would like to
 see it as a recognized key value for amenity.  Taginfo,
 http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/amenity
 shows 644 gym, 8 Gym and some forms of health_club.

 Gym is defined as A membership organization that provides a range of
 facilities designed to improve and maintain physical fitness and
 health.  In my town of Seattle, neighborhoods have numerous gyms that
 fit the definition.

 What is the correct process to get gym approved.  I'd also like to see
 it added to potlatch2.  I have found a public domain icon that could be
 used.

 Any suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated.


 The term gym is ambiguous, as it can also mean gymnasium. ie a place at a
 school for sports, or a place for doing gymnastics etc.
 I think its best to avoid the term for tagging.

 I would suggest a tag of something like fitness_centre or fitness_club,
 which are clearer what they mean. Also, it should probably be under the key
 for leisure, not amenity.

 So a tag of leisure=fitness_centre or leisure=fitness_club

You mean: leisure=sport_centre

Serisouly if you want to map gyms please try to make the documentation
better, it's currently a mess. I've undeleted amentiy=gym, so this FAQ
doesn't come up again.



-- 
/emj

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-09 Thread Erik Johansson
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:04, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 18:16, Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
 On 08/03/2012 16:54, Clifford Snow wrote:

 I do not see gym listed as a value for the tag amenity.  I would like to
 see it as a recognized key value for amenity.  Taginfo,
 http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/amenity
 shows 644 gym, 8 Gym and some forms of health_club.

 Gym is defined as A membership organization that provides a range of
 facilities designed to improve and maintain physical fitness and
 health.  In my town of Seattle, neighborhoods have numerous gyms that
 fit the definition.

 What is the correct process to get gym approved.  I'd also like to see
 it added to potlatch2.  I have found a public domain icon that could be
 used.

 Any suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated.


 The term gym is ambiguous, as it can also mean gymnasium. ie a place at a
 school for sports, or a place for doing gymnastics etc.
 I think its best to avoid the term for tagging.

 I would suggest a tag of something like fitness_centre or fitness_club,
 which are clearer what they mean. Also, it should probably be under the key
 for leisure, not amenity.

 So a tag of leisure=fitness_centre or leisure=fitness_club

 You mean: leisure=sport_centre

 Serisouly if you want to map gyms please try to make the documentation
 better, it's currently a mess. I've undeleted amentiy=gym, so this FAQ
 doesn't come up again.


I added a picture to the wikipage to show the problem:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dgym



-- 
/emj

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-09 Thread Andreas Labres
On 09.03.12 11:04, Erik Johansson wrote:
 You mean: leisure=sport_centre

probably leisure=sport*s*_centre ;)

But leisure=fitness_centre would make sense to me (it's different from, say, a
soccer club).

BTW, can anybody tell me what is ment with those 622 fitness_stations?
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=fitness_station

/al

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-09 Thread Craig Wallace

On 09/03/2012 10:04, Erik Johansson wrote:

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 18:16, Craig Wallacecraig...@fastmail.fm  wrote:


The term gym is ambiguous, as it can also mean gymnasium. ie a place at a
school for sports, or a place for doing gymnastics etc.
I think its best to avoid the term for tagging.

I would suggest a tag of something like fitness_centre or fitness_club,
which are clearer what they mean. Also, it should probably be under the key
for leisure, not amenity.

So a tag of leisure=fitness_centre or leisure=fitness_club


You mean: leisure=sport_centre


I think a fitness centre is a bit different to a sports centre.
A fitness centre usually has facilities for weight lifting, and exercise 
machines, treadmills etc.
Whereas a sports centre is usually larger, and has games halls, pitches 
etc. Though a lot of sports centres also include some sort of fitness 
centre within them.


So I think some sort of different tagging would be useful. Maybe fitness 
centres/gyms could be tagged as leisure=sports_centre + sport=fitness ?


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 9. März 2012 14:15 schrieb Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm:
 I think a fitness centre is a bit different to a sports centre.
 A fitness centre usually has facilities for weight lifting, and exercise
 machines, treadmills etc.
 Whereas a sports centre is usually larger, and has games halls, pitches etc.
 Though a lot of sports centres also include some sort of fitness centre
 within them.

 So I think some sort of different tagging would be useful. Maybe fitness
 centres/gyms could be tagged as leisure=sports_centre + sport=fitness ?


I am in favour of leisure=fitness_centre instead of subtagging
sports-centre. As you pointed out: »I think a fitness centre is a
bit different to a sports centre.«

cheers,
Martin

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-09 Thread Stephen Hope
I *think* a fitness station is a stop on a fitness trail.  Some parks and
children's camps have a marked trail that you travel along, and at each
stop there is some sort of activity to do - a rope climb, step climb,
balance beam, tire running, pull up bar, that sort of thing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitness_trail

Stephen


On 9 March 2012 22:04, Andreas Labres l...@lab.at wrote:

 On 09.03.12 11:04, Erik Johansson wrote:
  You mean: leisure=sport_centre

 probably leisure=sport*s*_centre ;)

 But leisure=fitness_centre would make sense to me (it's different from,
 say, a
 soccer club).

 BTW, can anybody tell me what is ment with those 622 fitness_stations?
 http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=fitness_station

 /al

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-09 Thread Jon Bigus Fatfrog
Sorry to butt in but it can also be these places in parks that are like
outside gyms. The normal equipment you find in a gym but in a park!

On March 9, 2012 3:06:19 PM PST, Stephen Hope wrote:
 I *think* a fitness station is a stop on a fitness trail.  Some parks and
 children's camps have a marked trail that you travel along, and at each
 stop there is some sort of activity to do - a rope climb, step climb,
 balance beam, tire running, pull up bar, that sort of thing.
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitness_trail
 
 Stephen
 
 
 On 9 March 2012 22:04, Andreas Labres l...@lab.at wrote:
 
  On 09.03.12 11:04, Erik Johansson wrote:
   You mean: leisure=sport_centre
 
  probably leisure=sport*s*_centre ;)
 
  But leisure=fitness_centre would make sense to me (it's different from,
  say, a
  soccer club).
 
  BTW, can anybody tell me what is ment with those 622 fitness_stations?
  http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=fitness_station
 
  /al
 
  ___
  Tagging mailing list
  Tagging@openstreetmap.org
  http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-09 Thread Clifford Snow



I understand the issue with the tag value of gym.  I talked to the owner
of a gym I use.  He said that they typically use gym in conversation with
others in the business.  Fitness club/center is also used.  He
differentiated gym/fitness center with health clubs in the range of
services offered.  A health club will offer services such as massage,
tanning, juice bars, etc while a gym has fewer services.   (Health clubs
can charge more.)

I would be happy with the tag Fitness Center instead.  However, I'm
concerned that there are hundreds of gym values for the amenity tag.   A
quick search showed that some of the gyms are actually school gymnasiums.
 Wikipedia has gymnasium as a disambiguation reference.  Perhaps school
gyms should be encouraged to use the full name to avoid confusion.

Use of the tag leisure instead of amenity to me is not accurate.
 Leisure activities are golf, softball, tennis, etc.  Fitness isn't a
leisure activity.  A lot of us go to a gym so we can be better at our
leisure activities.  To me fitness centers are more related to health than
leisure.  I'd prefer to use the tag amenity instead.

Thoughts?

Clifford
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-09 Thread sabas88
Il giorno 10/mar/2012 06:49, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us ha
scritto:

  To me fitness centers are more related to health than leisure.
 I'd prefer to use the tag amenity instead.

 Thoughts?

I feel like I'm in prison when I go to the gym[0]…


 Clifford

Stefano

[0] wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Prison



 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] gym as an amenity value

2012-03-08 Thread Craig Wallace

On 08/03/2012 16:54, Clifford Snow wrote:

I do not see gym listed as a value for the tag amenity.  I would like to
see it as a recognized key value for amenity.  Taginfo,
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/amenity
shows 644 gym, 8 Gym and some forms of health_club.

Gym is defined as A membership organization that provides a range of
facilities designed to improve and maintain physical fitness and
health.  In my town of Seattle, neighborhoods have numerous gyms that
fit the definition.

What is the correct process to get gym approved.  I'd also like to see
it added to potlatch2.  I have found a public domain icon that could be
used.

Any suggestions on how to proceed would be appreciated.


The term gym is ambiguous, as it can also mean gymnasium. ie a place 
at a school for sports, or a place for doing gymnastics etc.

I think its best to avoid the term for tagging.

I would suggest a tag of something like fitness_centre or 
fitness_club, which are clearer what they mean. Also, it should 
probably be under the key for leisure, not amenity.


So a tag of leisure=fitness_centre or leisure=fitness_club

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging