Re: [Talk-us] Flash Map Mobs!
Clarification - I don't think Meetup itself allows notification by text message. I think that's something you would have to set up yourself using a different service. (That's why I said it was a long term idea...it probably takes some work and I'm not sure what particular tools people use.) I was under the impression you announced the day of - if you announce more in advance, text isn't so important. :) Eleanor On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Hey Eleanor, > > Thanks for sharing your ideas. > > > On Oct 18, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Eleanor Tutt <eleanor.t...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Very cool & good pointers! > > > > Am I correct that you set the location on Meetup in the morning and then > you meet in the afternoon? (i.e., quick & "flash mob"-y?) That sounds like > a lot of fun as it wouldn't take a lot of pre-planning or worrying about > expectations. > > Until now I have picked the location a few days - a week in advance. > Day-of would be interesting too, especially in combination with your idea > below: > > > > It might be worth promoting the *idea* of the flash map mob as a > permanent Meetup event - you could probably make it sticky so it always > shows up on the front of the page, but without a set date attached (does > Meetup allow that?) That could help with awareness/excitement I think. > > I think that is a great idea and I am going to try it right away. > > > > Long-term, the "generic" meetup might even have a way to text to opt in > to "flash map mob" notifications - I know I have opted into several text > notification services from local organizing groups and I definitely notice > those announcements more than I would notice a Meetup for day-of > announcements. I'd be sad if I missed the flash map mob b/c I wasn't > checking Meetup and/or email! YMMV depending on how people typically > organize in Salt Lake City. > > I didn’t know Meetup had such sophisitcated methods of letting folks know > about events and have them RSVP by text message too! Do you know how to set > that up? > > Thanks, > Martijn > > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] OpenStreetMap US elections: October 12 townhall with candidates
Michael - Let me start with where we agree! I share your enthusiasm for Martijn's position statement (and I am basing that on the position statement itself - NOT Martijn's contribution history) and I will concede that it would make sense for *one* of the OSM US board members to have in-depth mapping experience (though, honestly, if none of the elected board members end up having in-depth mapping experience they can call upon established community members for guidance.) However, as others have said, OSM US needs a diverse board with different skillsets. I have worked with and served on many boards and the best functioning boards have a variety of perspectives represented (I second Mike Thompson's list above as a good starting point.) In fact, I specifically do NOT want a board with only "heavy mappers" represented - because to grow our community we need new mappers, and new-ish mappers will understand their perspective better than established mappers. There are also many valid reasons why someone may not make a lot of edits to OSM. To give one example - perhaps, like myself, they are a community organizer. There have been several times that I have intentionally *not* mapped something, because I know that someone else in my city who has been curious about OSM has an interest in the place. Instead of doing the fun work of adding to OSM under my own name, I will often do the hard (and - based on your post - apparently thankless?) work of introducing OSM to someone else, telling them something like, "hey - here's a perfect thing to add! your favorite restaurant isn't on the map yet." In other words, the number of edits made does NOT correlate to a person's investment of time and energy into OSM as a map *and* a community of people. The OSM US board needs to inspire and support a community of people - their job is not to edit the map. Thanks, Eleanor PS: I also appreciate that Randy Meech mentioned gender in his post - I believe that encouraging women to join, contribute, and *stay involved in* the OSM US community (because it isn't just a "pipeline" problem) is critical to OSM US's long-term growth, and electing competent women to the board (like the candidates running!) is one way we can encourage participation. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Mike Thompsonwrote: > Michael, I appreciate your interest, research and opinions. Thank you for > sharing it with us. > > To continue to build on the success of OSM in the US, we need people with > diverse skill sets. Alex has already listed some of them. Here is a list, > in no particular order: > * yes, editing the map > * software development > * server administration > * documentation creating/ wiki editing / tutorial creation > * outreach > * communication / pr > * legal > * ability to organize events / projects > * ability to teach others about osm > * ability to inspire others to join OSM / use OSM > * ability to form partnerships with third parties (governmental, non > governmental, commercial, other open projects) > * "supervise, control, direct and manage" (part of what the bylaws call > for the board to do). > * (probably others I overlooked) > > Not everyone can be - or need be - a "heavy mapper." I will be > considering skills, experience and ideas in all of the above areas in > making my decision. > > Mike > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Randy Meech > wrote: > >> Wow Michael, that sure is an all-male US board you're suggesting. I hope >> nobody heeds you our we have bigger problems than I thought. >> >> The question of growth in the US is complex, as is the question of gender >> and contributing to communities such as this. Communities, that is to say, >> that have zero self-awareness about the problems in a message like this. >> Who knows: maybe threads like this explain the edit history, too. >> >> One thing that's certain is that there is no correlation between the work >> of a competent board member and making edits. Things like leadership, >> fundraising, organizing, project management, events, etc. are part of the >> work of a board. >> >> It's too bad we also require the ability to don a radiation suit to deal >> with threads like this. >> >> -Randy >> Dear US electorate, >> >> Am Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:50 -0700 schrieb Alex Barth: >> > And - it's not to late to run for elections! Get your name up on the >> > list by October 10th. >> > >> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/ >> United_States/Elections/2015#Candidates >> >> And this is my censorious analysis reviewing all candidates: >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nakaner/diary/36098 >> >> *Summary* I think that some candidates are suitable and some are not >> suitable. It looks as the number of edits and the time since the first >> map edit is proportional to the suitability of each candidate (with some >> exceptions). >> >> You, the US community, have got some very great candidates which have
[Talk-us] Join us for summer mapathon BINGO - weekend of Aug 1
Hello! We've got our next OSM US quarterly mapathon coming up the weekend of August 1st - obviously you can host a mapathon in your area any time of the year, but it's also pretty awesome to know that people are mapping across the country at the same time. :) If you want an idea for a theme, we created an OpenStreetMap mapathon BINGO card (https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/439/18875377873_968818d547_z.jpg) that includes images of (and tagging conventions for) summery things to add to OSM. Ice cream shops! BBQ pits! Car washes! Swimming pools! Let's get 'em all into OpenStreetMap. You can read more on our blog post here: http://openstreetmap.us/2015/07/summer-mapathon-bingo/ If you're organizing a mapathon, please add it to the wiki page here so that everyone knows about it: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapathon/US_Summer_Mapathon_2015 We also have a new OSM US slack channel for current future mapathon organizers to informally chat about ideas/outreach strategies/successes/etc. - send me your email (elea...@openstreetmap.us) if you would like an invite. Thanks! Eleanor ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [OSM-talk] Some thoughts against remote mapping
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:07 AM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote: What I've been mulling over is the home location data on the profile. Right now it's close to useless. I'd like to be able to set multiple areas (not points) and rate them can survey / good local knowledge / particularly interested. ^^^ This is an excellent idea and a feature I would definitely use. Also, this thread is of great interest to me, but I'm entering it quite late and many points have already been discussed. I'll just say a few things: 1) I am thankful to Erica Hagen for her original post, as I think these are critical things to think about. 2) Hagen's point that there are degrees of local that we are failing to account for reminds me of many discussions I've had in my own community about what it means to be from a place, whose voices are viewed as representative of a neighborhood, who has access to power, etc. While much of the discussion here has been in the context of international/humanitarian mapping, these same questions play out on a micro scale in cities and neighborhoods. It is worth thinking about who is mapping in your own community and whether you are working to involve neighborhood residents, do offline outreach, etc. at home. Thanks, Eleanor ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-us] Facts about the world
Hi, Serge. As a member of the chapter board, I feel a bit erased? misrepresented? by your email. It hurt, especially because I think you and I share some common ground about why we map and that it is important to feel a connection to a place. At any rate, while you are more qualified to speak to the history of OSM as a whole than I am, I do want to say a few things that will maybe help you get the know my personal history with OSM: - When I was new to OSM and first learned about editathons, I didn't know anyone involved with OSM or have any preconceived ideas about the project. All I knew was that editathons sounded amazing, so I made the effort to connect with other local mappers and start building more of a community in my region. My first editathon - led by another community member - involved walking around outdoors on a college campus. My second editathon - led by myself - involved walking around outdoors in a neighborhood commercial district. In my experience, editathons have always been a way for community members to get together and map in whatever manner made the most sense - sometimes outdoors, sometimes indoors. There can be value in both. - I remember Paul's post, I was elected to the chapter board, and - it's true! - I don't have very many OSM edits compared to many members of the community. That doesn't mean I don't go out and map my community - I described in a different email how I do so. But I contribute in other ways as well. Last month, I led a group of students in a survey of a nearby neighborhood. I spent hours walking through the neighborhood with them, helping mark points, and then helping them enter their data when they returned. I did not personally make a single edit with my OSM user name. However, I contributed to those edits invisibly, behind the scenes, and I believe several of those students will become regular contributors. Thanks for reading! Eleanor On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: Eleanor, I want to clarify some things: On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Eleanor Tutt eleanor.t...@gmail.com wrote: Paul - If perception of mapping in the US isn't aligning with reality, we probably *do* need to do a better job as a chapter board of telling the full story. I believe that the story that the board tells reflect the overall experience of the board. Paul did an analysis of the mapping activites of the prospective board members before they were elected. Some of the board members are not active OSM mappers, so it shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that people who don't do manual surveying don't talk about manual surveying. I see what you mean about the blog posts, though I do think your interpretation is a bit harsh. For example, the mapathon post that you characterize as an indoor event, while it does admittedly have a photo of people at computers, also makes it clear that the theme for the upcoming mapathon is the great outdoors. The events are characterized as Edit-a-thons and they were designed to be run indoors. They were essentially a response from some members of the community who felt that Mapping Parties were not for them. The advantage of an Edit-A-Thon is that they can be run indoors (unlike Mapping Parties), but if you look at most Edit-A-Thons going on next week, and you look at the history of them (look at the talk-us archives) they're still largely indoor events. The only reason that OSM NYC runs them as outdoor events is that I believe strongly that the experience of going out and surveying has value- not only data quality value, but emotional value. There's value in being connected to the place you live that can't be captured via areal photo or governmental dataset. - Serge ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Facts about the world
Thanks so much, Serge - seriously. Your apology means a lot to me. Happy mapping! Eleanor On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Eleanor Tutt eleanor.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Serge. As a member of the chapter board, I feel a bit erased? misrepresented? by your email. It hurt, especially because I think you and I share some common ground about why we map and that it is important to feel a connection to a place. You're right that I painted everyone with the same brush, and that wasn't my intent; I'm sorry. It's hard to be critical of an organization and not the individuals, but you're right, I probably could have done a better job. At any rate, while you are more qualified to speak to the history of OSM as a whole than I am, I do want to say a few things that will maybe help you get the know my personal history with OSM: There are people on this list who were involved in OSM longer than me. I don't believe I have special qualifications beyond being there. When I was new to OSM and first learned about editathons, I didn't know anyone involved with OSM or have any preconceived ideas about the project. All I knew was that editathons sounded amazing, so I made the effort to connect with other local mappers and start building more of a community in my region. My first editathon - led by another community member - involved walking around outdoors on a college campus. My second editathon - led by myself - involved walking around outdoors in a neighborhood commercial district. In my experience, editathons have always been a way for community members to get together and map in whatever manner made the most sense - sometimes outdoors, sometimes indoors. There can be value in both. I remember Paul's post, I was elected to the chapter board, and - it's true! - I don't have very many OSM edits compared to many members of the community. That doesn't mean I don't go out and map my community - I described in a different email how I do so. But I contribute in other ways as well. Last month, I led a group of students in a survey of a nearby neighborhood. I spent hours walking through the neighborhood with them, helping mark points, and then helping them enter their data when they returned. I did not personally make a single edit with my OSM user name. However, I contributed to those edits invisibly, behind the scenes, and I believe several of those students will become regular contributors. Maybe time erases this stuff, and that's a good thing. Again, my apologies. Especially as someone who doesn't have a car, I know the challenge that mapping can be for folks like us, and major kudos to you for your mapping and community work. - Serge ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Say hello to the scholarship winners to State of the Map US 2015
Good morning! I'm excited to be able to announce the winners of scholarships to State of the Map US 2015. We had 230+ incredible OpenStreetMap contributors from across the globe apply for scholarships, and I know the selection committee had an* incredibly difficult time* narrowing it down to 30 winners. However - *30 winners! * That's* a lot of people* who will be joining us at SOTMUS in NYC who would not otherwise have been able to attend. A big thank you goes to our scholarship sponsors American Red Cross, Google, the World Bank and Mapbox, who made bringing these folks to State of the Map US possible. Thanks also to individual OpenStreetMap community members who donated to the scholarship pool to support bringing more people and perspectives to State of the Map US - I'm proud to be part of such a generous community! Here's our full blog post on scholarships - I've also listed names below if you don't feel like clicking through. http://openstreetmap.us/2015/04/scholarships/ - Nohely Alvarez - Alexandria M. Barnes - Javier Carranza - Eleanor Davis - Wendy Delva - Sriharsha Devulapalli - Katie Filbert - Carolyn Fish - Vitor George - Mara Gittleman - Juho Häppölä - Md. Ahasanul Hoque - Geoffrey Kateregga - Srinivas Kodali - Juan Ignacio Lacueva - Heather Leson - Ievgeniia Luchnykova - Zukhanye Mayekiso - Stephanie Nguyen - Kazeem Kayode Owolabi - Victor Ramirez - Frédéric Rodrigo - Destry Maria Sibley - Alsino Skowronnek - Dewi Sulistioningrum - Matt Toups - Mishka Vance - Eugene Alvin Villar - Rodolfo Wilhelmy - Rebecca Williams Thanks! Eleanor ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Facts about the world
Hello! While I think that (vetted, high quality) imports and armchair mapping have the ability to improve OSM, especially for things like building footprints that are hard to survey on the ground without traipsing across private property, I certainly hope that people do not view the US as *exclusively* importers and armchair mappers. My preferred way of contributing to OSM is via on the ground field work. I believe the structure for participatory mapping that OSM provides is important in part because it distributes power and allows residents to map what matters to them in their communities. How do I map, as a US resident living in the Midwest? 1) I don't drive, so I take the bus everywhere. Because I work for a community development non-profit, my travels take me all over my city and region. I will often take notes on scratch paper as I pass key intersections/assets and later (when I have time) add these items to OSM 2) I also organize mapathons in my community, providing basic instruction on mapping using Field Papers and/or GPS devices (I personally prefer paper, but a local university lets us borrow GPS devices and getting to play with tech is fun for lots of our participants). While current OSM contributors are the ones most likely to attend mapathons, I focus on finding residents of the neighborhood who may not have heard of OSM before. One mapathon I held included a home base in a storefront art gallery so that we could catch strangers walking by and give them a Field Papers atlas and basic instructions. If anyone on the list is interested in organizing a mapathon in their community, OpenStreetMap US has a mapathon weekend coming up April 11-12 with the theme The Great Outdoors. http://openstreetmap.us/2015/01/2015-mapathons/ If you need help, I'm happy to talk with you about how I organize mapathons...I'm not an expert by any means, but I've picked up a few things over time. Thanks! Eleanor On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, On 04/03/2015 02:41 AM, stevea wrote: Erring on the side of high ground safety might be a good place to plant an initial flag, but if it's location is wrong and we need to move it to a more accurate place, we must do so. Frankly - no. OSM does not depend on the inclusion of third party data sources for its quality. Taking a high ground safety approach with regards to third-party rights in data might cut us off from some third party data sources but then re-publishing these third party sources in OSM clothes doesn't do us much good anyway. If an individual is desperate to use a third party data source, let them do the due diligence on the legality of the source, but it certainly isn't us who must move our flag to make it (even) easier to swamp us with (often low quality) third-party data. It sounds like it is getting a bit shrill. I'll say it again: I wish light, not heat. I would be absolutely thrilled if more people, especially more Americans, would stop thinking about what data they could take and add to OSM, and instead grab a GPS, or their car, or their boots, or bicycle, or mobile phone, or all of that, and simply map stuff. It seems to me that in the USA, what people think about OSM is one of these two: (a) A project for hackers and couch potatoes who trawl their county web pages and other sources to look for stuff they could upload to OSM (because it's such a big country and nobody could possibly, yadda yadda yadda) (b) A project for people who roll up their sleeves, travel to places of humanitarian crises, and help those in need by creating maps where the government hasn't done their job well. The idea that you could also roll up your sleeves and map your own backyeard, village, town, or city quarter, instead of copying from official bicycle route publications, official railway brochures, or stuff that the administration has done, seems to occur to very few people, and others will say: OpenStreetMap is cool, but I don't think that actually going out and doing a survey is a good use of my time. I'm really sad that time and time again we have to fight about whether or not a specific source is permitted to be used in OSM, when we could just collect the facts ourselves and therefore be completely free of any legal implications (and also free of errors that others may have made). Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Facts about the world
Serge - Thanks for the detailed response! I think I do recall seeing your blog post in the past, but I reread it now and your concerns - especially who decides what gets shown on the map - very much resonate with me. Paul - If perception of mapping in the US isn't aligning with reality, we probably *do* need to do a better job as a chapter board of telling the full story. I see what you mean about the blog posts, though I do think your interpretation is a bit harsh. For example, the mapathon post that you characterize as an indoor event, while it does admittedly have a photo of people at computers, also makes it clear that the theme for the upcoming mapathon is the great outdoors. Eventually, most people do enter the data they collect in the field into the OSM while at a computer, and as a mapathon organizer, I don't always remember to take good action shot photos. Rather than assume no one set foot outdoors, why not assume that no one remembered to stop mapping to take a photo, because mapping outdoors is really fun? I also hope you'll keep in mind that conferences involve a lot of logistics which need to be communicated - for example, our amazing SOTM US scholarship program required two posts (to announce availability and to announce winners). While a mapathon can be a success without a blog post (though we probably *should* write more blog posts), a scholarship program will not get applicants or donors without a moderate level of publicity. Finally, to lighten things up, here is a photo of a kitten and a Field Papers atlas pre-mapathon. https://twitter.com/eleanortutt/status/583729143822450689 Thanks! Eleanor On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: Eleanor, I don't see a reason not to be public with my reply to you. I organize mapping parties during the warmer months (have one next week) and during the colder months, organize indoor mapping events. The indoor events tend to get less participants than the outdoor ones, which is surprising. Why do I map outdoors? To me, the importance of OSM is in two part. Firstly and most importantly to me, OSM is part of a larger group of activites that I participate in regarding the Free Software and Free Culture worlds. I see OSM as part of that larger effort that I care about. I'm not a Geo person- rather I'm someone who has a passion for providing universal access and personal empowerment, and I see OSM as one means to that end. When we think about OSM, I do think we want to consider issues of lifespan. Will OSM be necessary if we had every town or county in the US providing us full access to their data, and we had access to every business data. If we had that, at least in the US, OSM would be largely redundant. But the fact is, we don't. In the meantime, here in the US and around the world, there is a desperate need for access to high quality geographic data. I don't know if you read a blog post I made about a year ago ( http://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2014/01/04/why-the-world-needs-openstreetmap/ ) but we can't hand off this much power to third parties, even ones who act benevolently for the moment. Instead, this needs to be in the hands of all of us- every single one of us. Mapping can be hard work. The day after a big mapping party, I sometimes need to just sit in my apartment alone. The whole experience can be exhausting. But I do it because it's important. It's important to think about these spaces as *ours*. This is why projects like the NYC Community Garden Mapping project here in NYC are important (http://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2014/12/01/nyc-blooms-with-openstreetmap/), because we can't rely just on governments or companies to tell us what our world looks like. It's great to do humanitarian mapping, and it's awesome and amazing that we have access to resources like governmental datasets and imagery, but those can't substitute for going out and doing the work of looking at our neighborhoods for ourselves. That's why I map, and that's why I organize local mapping events. - Serge ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Last day for State of the Map US scholarships!
Hello, friends - today is the last day to apply for State of the Map US scholarships. Luckily, the scholarship application is quick easy - so if you need financial assistance to make it to New York City in June, you still have time to fill out an application. If you help organize your local OpenStreetMap community, please share this important deadline with your fellow mappers. It's not too late! http://stateofthemap.us/scholarships/ After you apply for a scholarship, I also urge you to submit a talk proposal - those proposals are due on March 22 and we want to hear your ideas. http://stateofthemap.us/talk/ Thanks so much, Eleanor ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Why does the USA currently lag in OSM map quality?
+1 to Bryce's comments about reaching out to existing communities with shared interests who may be using other tools/methods currently. This conversation reminds me a of a presentation I saw on Missouri's recent attempts to survey people about internet access and map broadband coverage, including in rural areas. They had luck with outreach by setting up booths at State and County Fairs - that seemed to be where enough people gathered at once to make the outreach worth the time effort (although they often used pins and paper maps to gather their data given spotty coverage). I wonder if anyone has ever had an OSM State Fair mapping party? Eleanor On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: I'm thinking if they wanted broader input, they'd use the mailing list and not the forum. But I think a big part of it is the US is very large, and very empty. Plot out a wall size map of the US, now pin the tail on the map. Unless you bumped a wall on the way there or have an acute sense of space with your eyes closed and managed to stab somewhere in the Coruscant-like DFW megaplex (seriously, drive US 75 south into DFW at night and you'll go over a rise near Anna, TX from which DFW appears to roll from where you are all the way to the horizon ahead of you; it's probably geographically larger than several of the smallest states by area, possibly even combined), you probably just pinned the tail to a part of the country that is just as empty now as before Manifest Destiny. Possibly even emptier given The Removal and two waves of urbanization. People map where they know. People know where they are. Where are the people in the US? Well, if you take the top ten most populated metropolitan statistical areas in the US, you account for 97% of the US population, and with the exception of Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, they're all within a day's bicycle ride or less of an ocean (I'm including places as far in as Portland given I've made that ride to the ocean by bicycle before, and I'm not even horribly fit or in great shape). Extend it out to the top 100 metropolitan statistical areas, and you leave a very small fraction of 1% of the US population to account for the remaining 281 metropolitan statistical areas and 536 micropolitan statistical areas. TL;DR, Hitchhiker's Guide validated version: When randomly sampled by township and range, averaged out and rounded to the nearest integer, the population of the US is 0. It's easy and fun to hypothesize about why OSM is crummy in the US, but it's vastly more useful to think of ways to improve it. I don't think I'm speaking in the hypothetical here. Increasing awareness through mapping parties/events seems to help a lot in urbanized areas, but we still haven't figured out how to apply that to the rest of the country. Tools like MapRoulette and fixme can guide existing mappers to areas that are probably in need of help. Are there methods of remote sensing (street-level imagery, data from other places on the internet) that could help us with the locality problem? TL;DR for the next two paragraphs: OSM tends to fall somewhere on or between esteem and self-transcendence on Maslow's hierarchy. The rural extreme struggles with the physiological and can't take safety for granted, and it's going to take something on the order of a New Deal that directly benefits with improving access to sanitation, food, water, electricity, and internet to less than 1% of the population that is going dozens of miles for food and water (or collecting both in situ), generating what limited electricity they have access to themselves, and whose trip to the toilet still involves shoes and a shovel, to do much of anything to change this within my lifetime. Given the political climate of the country, I think it goes without saying that this isn't going to happen. Speaking from experience, OSM is a bandwidth intensive project, particularly when working with geography so freaking huge as the US. And for the sake of this conversation, I'm lumping in the likes of Kellyville, Oklahoma, with all of it's 500 acres and 1100 people simply because that's large enough to have electricity, indoor plumbing and store, and some hope of getting anything viable in terms of internet access (even if only through a limited bandwidth library/cafe wifi hotspot) as urban. That's relatively easy to spark the same way as it is in larger places: Just find the like-minded individuals, spark the interest and you'll get crazy detailed maps for their part of the world, and some interesting applications come out of it. I've seen it happen in Portland (where it gripped the imagination of my hometown a bit more tightly than I expected), I'm watching it start to happen again in Tulsa now.
[Talk-us] Scholarship applications open for State of the Map US!
You may have seen that early bird registration to State of the Map US at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City opened this week: http://openstreetmap.us/2014/12/early-bird/ Well, today I'm happy to announce that scholarship applications are also open for anyone needing a little extra help to join us at State of the Map US: *http://openstreetmap.us/2015/01/scholarships/ http://openstreetmap.us/2015/01/scholarships/* Our goal is to ensure a welcoming, inclusive, community-focused State of the Map US, and scholarships are one way we're working to accomplish that goal. We're offering four levels of financial support - a free ticket to the conference, $500, $1,000, or $1,500 - depending on your self-identified need and whether you are traveling within the United States or internationally. If you’re contributing to the OpenStreetMap community in an interesting way – whether that’s by organizing meetups, making maps, adding data, writing code or documentation, or something else – and financial help will make the difference in whether you can come to State of the Map US, we urge you to apply! No matter where you live, we welcome your application. Applications are due March 15, 2015. *http://openstreetmap.us/2015/01/scholarships/ http://openstreetmap.us/2015/01/scholarships/* I hope to see you in New York City! Thanks, Eleanor Tutt ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Statistics of board candidate edits
At this point, the number of edits conversation seems well covered, so I'll keep this first part brief. I think there are three important areas of growth for OpenStreetMap US: 1) The OSM map itself (more completeness/coverage, whether through individual edits or well-vetted bulk data imports) 2) The OSM US mapping community (more editors, more diversity, more resources for beginners) 3) The OSM US organization (completing 501c3 status work, improving bylaws/processes - such as staggered board terms) Ideally, the elected board should have a mix of expertise in order to be able to address each of those areas of growth. In my statement (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/eleanortutt/diary/23934), I focused on my desire to focus on introducing neighborhood leaders (as a relatively untapped source of enthusiasm and local knowledge) to OpenStreetMap as well as continuing the strong work the current board has done in supporting editathons/mapathons. Based on this conversation, I have some additional expertise I would like you to consider when voting that I did not cover in my statement: * I have experience providing technical assistance to small 501c3s on best practices for organizational bylaws and management systems * I have been on the core organizing team for three major events in 2014 (the meeting of the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership, the Build for STL hackathon and OpenStreetMap editathon, and a local conference with the theme Data and the Arts for Social Change) * In addition to the large-scale events above, I've organized multiple OSM editathons/workshops in St. Louis in 2014, and I am leading the new St. Louis Maptime chapter * I have advocated for open source GIS tools, open data, and OSM continuously during my 7+ years of working as a data analyst in the community development field, and I have learned a lot about what works and what doesn't in terms of encouraging new editors and where the pain points are for new editors as they move from their first edit to actually becoming regular contributors * Like Alyssa, I am currently submitting a proposal to host the next SOTM US with other St. Louis OSM contributors Many thanks, Eleanor On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote: On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: While a candidate may have other skills, I'd want to hear from them in their manifesto why those skills make up for their complete lack of OpenStreetMap experience, and why they would be more able to apply those skills as a board member, rather than volunteering them without being a board member. Paul, I would hope we are selecting candidates with the skills needed to serve on the US Chapter's Board. It seems the two biggest functions are finance and the running of the SOTM-US conference. We are not selecting editor-in-chief. My experience in selecting board members for non profits is to find the best individual to fill the needs of the organization. These usually include the ability to raise monies, organize, communicate and plan. Additionally, in some positions, leadership skills are necessary. We all know great mappers, but not many would do well on the Board. On the other hand, we know of people that have no mapping experience but would do great on our board. Let elect individuals that can help us grow OSM. Ask yourself which of the candidates will best serve the needs of the community? If you do, I think you'll see that the number of edits has little to do with serving on the Board. Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us