On 14 June 2011 15:51, Jonas Krückel jona...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 14.06.2011 um 15:43 schrieb andrzej zaborowski:
On 14 June 2011 15:29, Jonas Krückel jona...@googlemail.com wrote:
Once we move on to ODbL however, this will change and we will get
the much more interesting 'raw' data.
Which we can't re-use in OSM however.
Maybe you should explain why not, because from my understanding this data
would be in an OSM compatible license because of the share-a-like aspect of
ODbL [1].
That means we can mix it with OSM, but not contribute it back to OSM
because the new contributor terms don't allow using ODbL licensed
data.
Someone on IRC mentioned that the situation would be clearer under
ODbL, too, but I think this is a false positive. Additionally with
ODbL Navigon may take the position that they made a produced work.
Yes, their POI packages maybe produced work and could be proprietary, but
they would still have to release the processed OSM data from in between,
which as I stated above might be more interesting to us.
All that is only on how I understand the license and I'm not an expert on
this.
I'm not an expert either, perhaps you're right they'd have to release
the processed data.
Also, I think it would be appropriate to continue this discussion on
legal-talk.
Ok.
Cheers
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
