On 14 June 2011 15:51, Jonas Krückel <jona...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 14.06.2011 um 15:43 schrieb andrzej zaborowski: > On 14 June 2011 15:29, Jonas Krückel <jona...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Once we move on to ODbL however, this will change and we will get >> the much more interesting 'raw' data. > > Which we can't re-use in OSM however. > > Maybe you should explain why not, because from my understanding this data > would be in an OSM compatible license because of the share-a-like aspect of > ODbL [1].
That means we can mix it with OSM, but not contribute it back to OSM because the new contributor terms don't allow using ODbL licensed data. > > Someone on IRC mentioned that the situation would be clearer under > ODbL, too, but I think this is a false positive. Additionally with > ODbL Navigon may take the position that they made a produced work. > > Yes, their POI packages maybe produced work and could be proprietary, but > they would still have to release the processed OSM data from in between, > which as I stated above might be more interesting to us. > All that is only on how I understand the license and I'm not an expert on > this. I'm not an expert either, perhaps you're right they'd have to release the processed data. > Also, I think it would be appropriate to continue this discussion on > legal-talk. Ok. Cheers _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk