Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (service=parking aisle)
Lennard voor den Dag schrieb: Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: Looking at the comments page, it seems that the (unmodified) proposal was already rejected two weeks ago. Can someone ellaborate on the status of this tagging proposal? That earlier proposal was highway=parking_aisle, not service=parking_aisle (with highway=service) as it stands now, IIRC. But its not getting better, the service key is already in use by the railways guys. Even a path is called highway in osm, why change it ? By the way, highway:service serves it well ... Thorsten ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (service=parking aisle)
On Aug 5, 2008, at 08:53, Thorsten Feles wrote: Lennard voor den Dag schrieb: That earlier proposal was highway=parking_aisle, not service=parking_aisle (with highway=service) as it stands now, IIRC. But its not getting better, the service key is already in use by the railways guys. Even a path is called highway in osm, why change it ? I don't see the conflict: For railways, service=* distinguishes between different types of service lines, for highways it distinguishes between different type of service roads. It's not like you're going to tag a way with both, is it? By the way, highway:service serves it well ... And railway:service for the other use? Cheers Robert ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (service=parking aisle)
Robert Vollmert schrieb: On Aug 5, 2008, at 08:53, Thorsten Feles wrote: Lennard voor den Dag schrieb: That earlier proposal was highway=parking_aisle, not service=parking_aisle (with highway=service) as it stands now, IIRC. But its not getting better, the service key is already in use by the railways guys. Even a path is called highway in osm, why change it ? I don't see the conflict: For railways, service=* distinguishes between different types of service lines, for highways it distinguishes between different type of service roads. It's not like you're going to tag a way with both, is it? By the way, highway:service serves it well ... And railway:service for the other use? from a logical point, yes, railway:service would be right approach. In my eyes service should be used only real service: points not for rails or streets, they should be highway:service or railway:service Thorsten ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (service=parking aisle)
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Robert Vollmert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lways guys. Even a path is called highway in osm, why change it ? I don't see the conflict: For railways, service=* distinguishes between different types of service lines, for highways it distinguishes between different type of service roads. It's not like you're going to tag a way with both, is it? Give that man a medal. Cheers, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (service=parking aisle)
Cast your vote at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/service%3Dparking_aisle___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (service=parking aisle)
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: Looking at the comments page, it seems that the (unmodified) proposal was already rejected two weeks ago. Can someone ellaborate on the status of this tagging proposal? That earlier proposal was highway=parking_aisle, not service=parking_aisle (with highway=service) as it stands now, IIRC. -- Lennard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
