Re: [Talk-at] Gefahr durch Internet-Bergrouten

[Kevin Kofler]

Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> ich habe mir zu diesem zweck eine liste mit mir bekannten renderern
> angelegt und mir angesehen, ob diese unterschiede in den tags sac_scale
> und trail_visibility darstellen (nix=keine unterscheidung):

Ich denke, da muß man schon unterscheiden: Von der ÖPNVKarte erwarte ich 
nicht wirklich, daß sie die Schwierigkeit von Wanderwegen oder Steigen 
anzeigt (da dienen eingezeichnete Wege ja nur der Orientierung, damit man 
die Öffi-Haltestellen findet), von einer Karte, die sich HikeBikeMap nennt 
(also mit "Hike" im Namen!) hingegen sollte man das schon erwarten können! 
(Jene Karte ist aber leider weder für Hike noch für Bike wirklich 
zufriedenstellend, für Radfahrer ist die OpenCycleMap wesentlich besser 
geeignet. Die Hike Map rendert z.B. keine Radfahrerlaubnis gegen die 
Einbahn, ist also als Radfahrkarte in Städten nicht wirklich brauchbar. Und 
am Land braucht man die benannten/numerierten Radwege, die es auf der 
HikeBikeMap-Webseite nur in einem standardmäßig deaktivierten Overlay von 
Lonvia (waymarkedtrails.org) gibt, im HikeBikeMap-Layer selbst (und daher 
auch, wenn man die HikeBikeMap z.B. in Marble anzeigt) fehlen sie komplett.)

Kevin Kofler


___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [OSM-ja] 自然災害伝承碑データのインポート

[yuu hayashi]

hayashiです。

「start_date=江戸時代」についてですが、

現時点では、{start_date=1603..1868; historic:period=edo}
あるいは、「historic:period=edo（srart_dateなし）」
とするのが良いと思います。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic:period


以下、余談ですが...
「start_date=江戸時代」としたい気持ちはわかります。
日本国内の地物は「和暦」で表記されているので調査結果をそのまま入力するためには和暦での入力が必要になりますからね。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA_talk:Key:start_date


2020年9月21日(月) 19:48 tomoya muramoto :

> インポート用のgeojsonデータと、descriptionを外部リンクするためのhtmlファイルを作成しました。
> https://github.com/tankaru/Japan-GSI-Import
>
> お時間あればデータのチェックをお願いいたします。
>
> muramoto
>
>> ___
> Talk-ja mailing list
> Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
>
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging modal filters and school streets

[Stephen Colebourne]

I don't think it can be a barrier value because we need to record what kind
of barrier it is, such as gate, swing gate or bollard (or planter which is
undocumented but in use)

Two of the modal_filter are mine, and some people are objecting in
comments. I do think modal_filter=yes is too narrow, as I'd really like to
cover school streets.

I don't think it can be traffic_restriction because a road could be "no
stopping" and a school Street for example.

Stephen



On Mon, 21 Sep 2020, 19:16 Dan S,  wrote:

> Hi
>
> That could be a good idea.
>
> How about barrier=modal_filter? Using barrier=* we might expect it to
> be on the barrier itself (e.g. a row of bollards/planters), perhaps
> less appropriate if a whole street area with camera-based enforcement.
> But, after all, they're all intended as a barrier to some forms of
> traffic.
>
> In what sense is traffic_restriction "taken"? I see there are plenty
> of "traffic_restriction=no_stopping" tagged. Could this sit alongside?
>
> BTW, according to taginfo, in the UK there are 4 "modal_filter=yes"
> and various notes/descriptions mentioning "modal" that could be a good
> way to find examples:
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=modal#keys
>
>
> Best
> Dan
>
> Op ma 21 sep. 2020 om 18:21 schreef Stephen Colebourne <
> scolebou...@joda.org>:
> >
> > Given we have hundreds of existing and new modal filters* and school
> > streets**, I think we could do with having a *high level* tag for them
> > that captures the concept.
> >
> > Currently, these are hard to find as they can be represented in many
> > ways. eg. for modal filters:
> > - highway=cycleway
> > - highwat=footway
> > - highway=service/residential with motor_vehicle=no
> > - plus potential associated barrier=xxx
> >
> > School streets are no more than a motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (xxx)
> > which again loses the semantic meaning.
> >
> > What I'd like is a new tag that captures the high level concept. It
> > would be a bit like traffic_calming, but I don't think that adding
> > more values to that is appropriate. Any new value would go on the way
> > that is no longer open. These are generally verifiable on the ground,
> > even for filters that were added in the 1970s.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't have a great name. "traffic_restrictions" is
> > taken as is "traffic_control". My best suggestion is
> > "traffic_intervention=modal_filter"/"school_street", as they are
> > essentially interventions by local government to better manage the
> > street space.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> > Stephen
> >
> > * a "modal filter" is a place where the road is closed, or made one
> > way for the purposes of controlling traffic, such as to stop rat
> > running. It is commonly linked to Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs)
> > but they have been around for 50 years, and are generally easy to
> > spot.
> >
> > ** a "school street" is a street that is only accessible by residents
> > at school drop-off and pick-up time
> >
> > ___
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Attributions manquantes : Ville de Sautron

[Yves P.]

> Bonjour, tu suis la procédure et tu mets à jour
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution ?

Je suis au courant ;)

Je saisi des notes pour des DAE et ça m'occupe pas mal. Si personne n'a le 
temps de s'en occuper, je ferais ça… un jour :)

__
Yves
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Attributions manquantes : Ville de Sautron

[osm . sanspourriel]

Bonjour, tu suis la procédure et tu mets à jour
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
 ?

Le 21/09/2020 à 21:42, Yves P. - yves.prat...@gmail.com a écrit :

https://sautron.fr/en/bu/289447/63104/carrefour-express


__
Yves



___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[OSM-talk-fr] Attributions manquantes : Ville de Sautron

[Yves P.]

https://sautron.fr/en/bu/289447/63104/carrefour-express

__
Yves



___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-us] United States Bicycle Route System ballot(s) pending AASHTO approval

[Eric H. Christensen via Talk-us]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 18, 2020 1:53 PM, stevea  wrote:

> There are at least four new national bicycle routes "pending" in the USBRS! 
> (Ballots by state Departments of Transportation before AASHTO's Autumn 2020 
> round):

> USBR 201 in Maryland.

This one has now been completed.  The way is only good in one direction 
(east-to-west), however, and doesn't take into account the dual carriageways 
along the way.  I like to see the nice, pretty straight line on the relation so 
I'm not sure if a separate relation is needed for going the opposite direction 
(east bound) or if one should just tag the other side of the road where 
applicable.  In any case, this is done for the most part.

- Sparks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: ProtonMail
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=v376
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-GB] GIS Support Officer

[BD]

Hello,   Came across this advert, maybe someone will be interested:  GIS 
Support Officer for Forestry Commission England  
www.civilservicejobs.service.gov.uk www.civilservicejobs.service.gov.uk   This 
looks like a job between customer services, project management and GIS 
management with some learning opportunities.  Temp role but home working 
available :)   Cheerio!  dzidek23
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging modal filters and school streets

[Dan S]

Hi

That could be a good idea.

How about barrier=modal_filter? Using barrier=* we might expect it to
be on the barrier itself (e.g. a row of bollards/planters), perhaps
less appropriate if a whole street area with camera-based enforcement.
But, after all, they're all intended as a barrier to some forms of
traffic.

In what sense is traffic_restriction "taken"? I see there are plenty
of "traffic_restriction=no_stopping" tagged. Could this sit alongside?

BTW, according to taginfo, in the UK there are 4 "modal_filter=yes"
and various notes/descriptions mentioning "modal" that could be a good
way to find examples:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=modal#keys


Best
Dan

Op ma 21 sep. 2020 om 18:21 schreef Stephen Colebourne :
>
> Given we have hundreds of existing and new modal filters* and school
> streets**, I think we could do with having a *high level* tag for them
> that captures the concept.
>
> Currently, these are hard to find as they can be represented in many
> ways. eg. for modal filters:
> - highway=cycleway
> - highwat=footway
> - highway=service/residential with motor_vehicle=no
> - plus potential associated barrier=xxx
>
> School streets are no more than a motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (xxx)
> which again loses the semantic meaning.
>
> What I'd like is a new tag that captures the high level concept. It
> would be a bit like traffic_calming, but I don't think that adding
> more values to that is appropriate. Any new value would go on the way
> that is no longer open. These are generally verifiable on the ground,
> even for filters that were added in the 1970s.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have a great name. "traffic_restrictions" is
> taken as is "traffic_control". My best suggestion is
> "traffic_intervention=modal_filter"/"school_street", as they are
> essentially interventions by local government to better manage the
> street space.
>
> Any thoughts?
> Stephen
>
> * a "modal filter" is a place where the road is closed, or made one
> way for the purposes of controlling traffic, such as to stop rat
> running. It is commonly linked to Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs)
> but they have been around for 50 years, and are generally easy to
> spot.
>
> ** a "school street" is a street that is only accessible by residents
> at school drop-off and pick-up time
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Tagging modal filters and school streets

[Stephen Colebourne]

Given we have hundreds of existing and new modal filters* and school
streets**, I think we could do with having a *high level* tag for them
that captures the concept.

Currently, these are hard to find as they can be represented in many
ways. eg. for modal filters:
- highway=cycleway
- highwat=footway
- highway=service/residential with motor_vehicle=no
- plus potential associated barrier=xxx

School streets are no more than a motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (xxx)
which again loses the semantic meaning.

What I'd like is a new tag that captures the high level concept. It
would be a bit like traffic_calming, but I don't think that adding
more values to that is appropriate. Any new value would go on the way
that is no longer open. These are generally verifiable on the ground,
even for filters that were added in the 1970s.

Unfortunately, I don't have a great name. "traffic_restrictions" is
taken as is "traffic_control". My best suggestion is
"traffic_intervention=modal_filter"/"school_street", as they are
essentially interventions by local government to better manage the
street space.

Any thoughts?
Stephen

* a "modal filter" is a place where the road is closed, or made one
way for the purposes of controlling traffic, such as to stop rat
running. It is commonly linked to Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs)
but they have been around for 50 years, and are generally easy to
spot.

** a "school street" is a street that is only accessible by residents
at school drop-off and pick-up time

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[OSM-talk-fr] [OSM talk-fr] [Annonce]: Quatre nouvelles couches thématiques disponibles sur magOSM

[Camille Scheffler]

Bonjour à tou.te.s, 

Contributrice OpenStreetMap dans la vie, je m’intéresse également à OSM dans le 
cadre de mes études de géomatique. Au cours de mon stage au sein de Magellium 
j’ai ainsi pu travailler sur le projet magOSM 
 qui propose désormais 4 nouvelles 
couches de données thématiques:

la couche des itinéraires de trains: qui présente les différents itinéraires 
ferroviaires à l’échelle de la France métropolitaine incluant les TGV, les TER, 
les Intercités, ainsi que les RER et les Transiliens: [visualisation 

 - fiche de métadonnées 
]

la couche des structures sociales: créée en collaboration avec Donat Robaux, 
avec qui nous avons pu réfléchir sur l’implication du terme de structures 
sociales dans l’écosystème OSM: [visualisation 

 -  fiche de métadonnées 
]

les couches des  propositions de constructions (tag proposed) et des 
constructions, créées en complémentarité car représentant deux états successifs 
dans le processus de construction d’un élément dans la base de données: 
[visualisations 

 - fiche de métadonnées constructions 

 & fiche de métadonnées propositions de constructions 
]

J’espère que ces données vous seront utiles, en tous cas n’hésitez à nous 
communiquer vos retours sur ces nouvelles couches. L’ajout d'autres couches 
thématiques reste également ouvert à vos suggestions et/ ou contributions :) 

Au plaisir d’échanger avec vous, 
Camille Scheffler 
User:Camischflr ___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it] Webinar sulla cura di OSM

[Luca Delucchi]

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 09:50, Cascafico Giovanni 
wrote:

> Si, confermo domani martedì 22 alle 21.
>
> Qualcuno ha delle preferenze sul server jitsi?
>

io  solitamente utilizzo uno di https://iorestoacasa.work


> Per chi ha già usato la piattaforma, qual'è il metodo più pratico per
> verbalizzare?
>

non ho idea, di solito verbalizza uno dopo

-- 
ciao
Luca

www.lucadelu.org
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Webinar sulla cura di OSM

[Fintocubano]

Potete mettere qui il link su come/dove partecipare al webinar? 
E se ci sono delle istruzioni particolari per accedere (per chi non ha mai
partecipato?).



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Sources pour mise à jour d'aire d'autoroute ?

[osm . sanspourriel]

Bonjour,

je mets fixme=geometry.

Le 21/09/2020 à 14:56, Yves P. - yves.prat...@gmail.com a écrit :

Du coup je l'ai rajouté et enlevé partiellement les autres bâtiments.
À suivre avec la prochaine orthophoto :)


S'ils figurent toujours au cadastre et/ou sur les orthos, je préfère
mettre un end_date que :

fixme=Bâtiment plus récent regroupant le restaurant et la boutique de la
station service. Pas encore visible, ni sur le cadastre, ni sur les
photos aériennes. (cf. source du changeset)

Jean-Yvon



___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Sources pour mise à jour d'aire d'autoroute ?

[Yves P.]

> Je fais comme toi sauf que j'utilise fixme au lieu de source (genre 
> fixme="Contours du batiment approximatif" ou blabla similaire).

Itou :)


> Si tu te mets sur Maxar on voit les terrassements.

Je n'avais pas "percuté". Ça correspond bien à la forme du bâtiment sur le plan 
d'intervention.

Du coup je l'ai rajouté et enlevé partiellement les autres bâtiments. À suivre 
avec la prochaine orthophoto :)

Merci pour le coup d'œil :)

__
Yves___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-ja] 自然災害伝承碑データのインポート

[tomoya muramoto]

インポート用のgeojsonデータと、descriptionを外部リンクするためのhtmlファイルを作成しました。
https://github.com/tankaru/Japan-GSI-Import

お時間あればデータのチェックをお願いいたします。

muramoto

>
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OSMdata

[Denis Chenu]

Bonjour,

Très belle démonstration et projet !

Ce que je ne vois pas pour une diffusion plus large : c'est comment
rapporter/remonter les «erreurs» (et les remarques) sur la carte.
J'ai bien cliqué sur le bouton en point d'interrogation en haut à droite
, je la trouve peux claire pour une large diffusion.

Quand je parle des erreurs, cela peut être sur la carte ou sur la façon
de les récupérer. Donc 2 liens différents : comment contribuer à
openstreetmap et comment remonter les erreurs ici(cf exemple).

Denis
exemple : les piscines ne remonte pas toutes, pas celle en
leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimming

Le 19/09/2020 à 19:38, Zimmy ZIMMERMANN a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous avons beaucoup travaillé jusqu'à aujourd'hui pour absorber vos
> remarques et ajouter de la convivialité à l'utilisation du
> démonstrateur de données OSM.
> Nous aimerions relancer le Conseil d'Administration d'OpenStreetMap
> FRANCE pour rendre plus largement visible cette adresse qui n'a en
> réalité circulé que auprès des connaisseurs.
>
> Le site est toujours à cette adresse : demo.openstreetmap.fr
> 
>
> Pour la circonstance : un clin d'oeil
> 
>  aux
> Journées Européennes du Patrimoine
> 
> ;-)
> Nous serons alors en mesure de passer la 2e étape qui est celle de la
> confrontation à l'usage du public hors sphère OSM.
>
> Avez-vous des réserves à prendre en compte avant la diffusion plus large ?
> Au plaisir de vous lire,
>
> Jean-Louis & Karl
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Sources pour mise à jour d'aire d'autoroute ?

[Topographe Fou]

 Bonjour,Je fais comme toi sauf que j'utilise fixme au lieu de source (genre fixme="Contours du batiment approximatif" ou blabla similaire).Un fixme= a l'avantage de déclencher une alerte côté outils d'analyses qualité et amener quelqu'un à corriger dès que possible. Par ailleurs source='memory' correspond à une modification effectuée de mémoire et non pas un relevé depuis des photos ou sur le terrain.   LeTopographeFou   De: osm.jlzimmerm...@gmail.comEnvoyé: 21 septembre 2020 10:35 AMÀ: talk-fr@openstreetmap.orgRépondre à: talk-fr@openstreetmap.orgObjet: Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Sources pour mise à jour d'aire d'autoroute ?  Bonjour,Si tu te mets sur Maxar (ID) on voit les terrassements. Après ce que je fais souvent c'est une géométrie grossière et probable et je met source=memoryLe lun. 21 sept. 2020 à 08:22, Yves P.  a écrit :Bonjour,Près d'Auxerre, l'aire de Venoy Grosse Pierre sur l'A6 (direction Paris - Lyon) n'est plus à jour. Un nouveau bâtiment regroupant la boutique Total et le Mc Do à été construit.Mais il n'apparait pas ni sur le cadastre, ni sur BDOrtho IGN, ni sur Maxar or Ortho HR, ni même chez Google.Existe-t-il d'autres sources potentielles pour faire la mise à jour ?__YvesL'aire : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475643814Le nouveau bâtiment : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aire_de_Venoy-Grosse_Pierre_-_Boutique.jpg


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Sources pour mise à jour d'aire d'autoroute ?

[Zimmy ZIMMERMANN]

Bonjour,
Si tu te mets sur Maxar (ID) on voit les terrassements. Après ce que je
fais souvent c'est une géométrie grossière et probable et je met
source=memory

Le lun. 21 sept. 2020 à 08:22, Yves P.  a écrit :

> Bonjour,
>
> Près d'Auxerre, l'aire de *Venoy Grosse Pierre *sur l'A6 (direction Paris
> - Lyon) n'est plus à jour. Un nouveau bâtiment regroupant la boutique Total
> et le Mc Do à été construit.
> Mais il n'apparait pas ni sur le cadastre, ni sur BDOrtho IGN, ni sur
> Maxar or Ortho HR, ni même chez Google.
>
> Existe-t-il d'autres sources potentielles pour faire la mise à jour ?
>
> __
> Yves
>
> L'aire : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475643814
> Le nouveau bâtiment :
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aire_de_Venoy-Grosse_Pierre_-_Boutique.jpg
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is "Licence Ouverte v2.0" OdbL compatible?

[Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk]

Sep 21, 2020, 03:59 by legal-talk@openstreetmap.org:

> Hello,
> In New Caledonia we have some geo data available
> https://data.gouv.nc/explore/?disjunctive.theme=explore.popularity_score
>
> The Licence of some of them is "Licence Ouverte v2.0"
> https://www.etalab.gouv.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ETALAB-Licence-Ouverte-v2.0.pdf
>
> As far as I can guess, this licence seems to be free enough to be
> OpenStreetMap OdbL compatible.
>
Is there English text if license available somewhere?

I am not a lawyer, I looked only at Google translate but it
seems to be compatible.

Again: I am not a lawyer, I looked only at Google translate

And that is why creating your own license is stupid: you 
should use existing one.

>
> Others are in "CC BY-NC-SA 4.0", "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0", "CC BY-ND 4.0", "CC
> BY-NC 4.0" or "CC BY-SA 4.0",,are not OdbL compatible, I think.
>
> Can someone with more knowledge than I confirm this?
>

"CC BY-NC-SA 4.0", "CC BY-NC-ND 4.0", "CC BY-ND 4.0", "CC BY-NC 4.0"
are completely unsuitable - importing into OSM would create a derivative work
(or later edits would do this), what is forbidden by ND (no derivative works),
NC (no commercial use) is fundamentally incompatible with ODBL
allowing also commercial use

Data under a CC-BY 4.0 licence can become compatible with OSM,
after some boilerplate waiver has been signed

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Creative_Commons
pointing to https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

(I also added part of earlier message onto that Wiki page
as I am basically 100% sure that it is correct)

>
> Thank you
>
> Hendrik Oesterlin
> New Caledonia
>
> ___
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>

___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [Talk-it] Webinar sulla cura di OSM

[Alessandro Sarretta]

On 21/09/20 09:49, Cascafico Giovanni wrote:

Si, confermo domani martedì 22 alle 21.

Ottimo!

Qualcuno ha delle preferenze sul server jitsi?
Per chi ha già usato la piattaforma, qual'è il metodo più pratico per
verbalizzare?


Non so se ci siano delle funzionalità apposite in Jitsi (non mi pare).

A me verrebbe da attivare un pad con scrittura condivisa, ad es. in 
https://framapad.org/it/


Ale



Il 20/09/20, Andrea Albani ha scritto:

Ciao,

visti i risultati del poll su framadate in cui si converge sul 22 p.v. ore
21, confermi questa come data/ora ?

Grazie

Ciao

Il giorno mar 8 set 2020 alle ore 11:20 Cascafico Giovanni <
cascaf...@gmail.com> ha scritto:


A seguito di una proposta di Alessandro Sarretta, questa discussione
per organizzare un webinar sul "giardinaggio", interazione con nuovi
utenti, alert vandalismi e strumenti correlati.

Obiettivo: dal verbale stendere delle linee guida e buone pratiche
attraverso whodidit, osmcha ecc.

Dove:
uno dei server jitsi [1] TBD

Quando:
framadate [2]

[1] https://iorestoacasa.work/server.html
[2] https://framadate.org/osmgarden

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it


___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

--
--

Alessandro Sarretta

skype/twitter: alesarrett
Web: ilsarrett.wordpress.com 

Research information:

 * Google scholar profile
   
 * ORCID 
 * Research Gate 
 * Impactstory 

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Webinar sulla cura di OSM

[Cascafico Giovanni]

Si, confermo domani martedì 22 alle 21.

Qualcuno ha delle preferenze sul server jitsi?
Per chi ha già usato la piattaforma, qual'è il metodo più pratico per
verbalizzare?

Il 20/09/20, Andrea Albani ha scritto:
> Ciao,
>
> visti i risultati del poll su framadate in cui si converge sul 22 p.v. ore
> 21, confermi questa come data/ora ?
>
> Grazie
>
> Ciao
>
> Il giorno mar 8 set 2020 alle ore 11:20 Cascafico Giovanni <
> cascaf...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> A seguito di una proposta di Alessandro Sarretta, questa discussione
>> per organizzare un webinar sul "giardinaggio", interazione con nuovi
>> utenti, alert vandalismi e strumenti correlati.
>>
>> Obiettivo: dal verbale stendere delle linee guida e buone pratiche
>> attraverso whodidit, osmcha ecc.
>>
>> Dove:
>> uno dei server jitsi [1] TBD
>>
>> Quando:
>> framadate [2]
>>
>> [1] https://iorestoacasa.work/server.html
>> [2] https://framadate.org/osmgarden
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-it mailing list
>> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>>
>

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[OSM-talk-fr] Sources pour mise à jour d'aire d'autoroute ?

[Yves P.]

Bonjour,

Près d'Auxerre, l'aire de Venoy Grosse Pierre sur l'A6 (direction Paris - Lyon) 
n'est plus à jour. Un nouveau bâtiment regroupant la boutique Total et le Mc Do 
à été construit.
Mais il n'apparait pas ni sur le cadastre, ni sur BDOrtho IGN, ni sur Maxar or 
Ortho HR, ni même chez Google.

Existe-t-il d'autres sources potentielles pour faire la mise à jour ?

__
Yves

L'aire : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475643814
Le nouveau bâtiment : 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aire_de_Venoy-Grosse_Pierre_-_Boutique.jpg





___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr