[talk-au] Implications of license change on use of Australian data sources (e.g. nearmap)

2009-12-09 Thread Roy Wallace
If The License Change goes ahead, will that have any influence on, say, the
legality of tracing from nearmap imagery?

Does it appear as though some contributions will have to be removed if The
License Change happens?

If so, what kind of contributions?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Implications of license change on use of Australian data sources (e.g. nearmap)

2009-12-09 Thread Liz
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
 Nearmap allows in their TC's to derive data, the data is under the
 license of the person deriving it chooses to release it under.

 The bigger issue was the AU Govt data, but that has fixed it self
 since it was relicensed as cc-by from cc-by-sa

but it still is not clear if the au govt data can go into the ODbL because it 
can never be owned by OSMF 



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Implications of license change on use of Australian data sources (e.g. nearmap)

2009-12-09 Thread Roy Wallace
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
 2009/12/9 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
 If The License Change goes ahead, will that have any influence on, say, the
 legality of tracing from nearmap imagery?
 Does it appear as though some contributions will have to be removed if The
 License Change happens?
 If so, what kind of contributions?

 Nearmap allows in their TC's to derive data, the data is under the
 license of the person deriving it chooses to release it under.

Hmm...the following is from http://www.nearmap.com/legal/community-licence.aspx:

If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include
that information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute
it to others under a Creative Commons licence.

Does that not imply that the derived information may only be
distributed to others under a Creative Commons licence? Maybe I'm
reading this incorrectly?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Implications of license change on use of Australian data sources (e.g. nearmap)

2009-12-09 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
 Although. If CC-BY-SA isn't likely to stand in Australia for OSM
 it isn't likely to stand for anyone else either
If its good enough for the Au guvmint, who can afford lawyers, it is probably 
protective in Au.


-- 
You have had a long-term stimulation relative to business.


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread Sam Couter
Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
 Make sure if you are going to enter fuel information then you include all 
 types, (lpg, 91, 95, 98 octane, diesel, etc)

More: Automotive LPG is different tax-wise from barbecue LPG and
therefore sold and dispensed differently, sometimes you can refill your
own LPG bottle and sometimes you can only buy a full one or swap an empty
one for a full one. Alpine diesel is a different fuel from normal diesel
and usually only sold during the winter months in alpine areas. Ethanol is
for drinking and swindling motorists and governments out of some cash so
it should be noted for those of us who'd rather push the car than put E10
in it. Also some servos have pre-mixed two-stroke fuel, kerosene or
firewood available, just in case you drive a ride-on mower or a
wood-fired traction engine with satnav.

Or maybe that's going a little too far.
-- 
Sam Couter |  mailto:s...@couter.id.au
OpenPGP fingerprint:  A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05  5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Using Nearmap with JOSM

2009-12-09 Thread Dieter
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
 don't like about Potlatch. I started with Potlatch, switched to JOSM, then
 went back to Potlatch. There weren't enough extra features in JOSM to
 justify using a separate app in offline mode, for my liking...

IMO there is one very important feature to be mentioned: The validator
plugin.
It is way too easy to enter bad data with Potlatch. JOSM will tell
you when you try to upload unconnected ways or non-closed area, etc.
With potlatch, you will never be told something is wrong unless you
keep an eye on keep right! where you see what's wrong a few days
later.

Best regards from Germany
Dieter



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread John Smith
2009/12/9 Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au:
 and usually only sold during the winter months in alpine areas. Ethanol is
 for drinking and swindling motorists and governments out of some cash so

As if the govt doesn't get enough tax already, and they get tax on top
of tax when the GST kicks in.

Anyway, this is getting off topic, the fields from the BP are as
following, most are binary fields (Y or N), no idea what the other
field is for.

NAME,X,Y, LocationNo, Street, Town, State, Postcode,
Phone, Unlead, PremiumUnlead, BPUltimate, E10, Diesel,
Any_Autogas, Hours_24, Trailers, LPGBottle, Toilets,
CarWash, CleanGo, SuperWash, Other, Pay, EFTPOS,
GIFT_CARD, ATM, Restaurant, TruckStops, Express,
BP_UltimateDiesel

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread John Smith
2009/12/9 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
 On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Sam Couter wrote:
 Ethanol is
 for drinking and swindling motorists and governments out of some cash so
 it should be noted for those of us who'd rather push the car than put E10
 in it.

 I thought E10 was so I didn't have to pay a 30c per litre premium to put 95
 octane fuel in a car.

The problem with E10 for most cars is it doesn't recognise the extra
oxygen atom so the car runs less effiecent by about 3% which is why
it's 3% cheaper most of the time, however cars in the US can run up to
E85 because the chip in the car can auto sense the extra oxygen and
alter the the fuel/air mix.

The other problem for older cars is the the fuel line may not be able
to cope with the ethernol and can eat the rubber/plastic away,
most/all modern cars don't suffer this problem.

Of course by using ethernol you are burning food, luckily most of
which is from sugar cane in Australia, which has about an 8x return of
energy unlike the silly americans burning corn which doesn't even
break even energy wise and it's driving up the cost of fertilisers etc
and making food production more expensive and so the world goes on
starving.

Of course if they pumped the waste from coal fire power plants into
green houses that have water tanks full of algea and then turn the
algea into fuel you gat something like 40,000-80,000L of ethernol per
acre, it gets rid of all the emissions in a safe manner and we don't
need to import crude oil.

But of course that would be too smart so we can't have that.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread Liz
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
 Anyway, this is getting off topic, the fields from the BP are as
 following, most are binary fields (Y or N), no idea what the other
 field is for.

 NAME,X,Y, LocationNo, Street, Town, State, Postcode,
 Phone, Unlead, PremiumUnlead, BPUltimate, E10, Diesel,
 Any_Autogas, Hours_24, Trailers, LPGBottle, Toilets,
 CarWash, CleanGo, SuperWash, Other, Pay, EFTPOS,
 GIFT_CARD, ATM, Restaurant, TruckStops, Express,
 BP_UltimateDiesel

give us some practical examples and we can go and visit our local BP servos 
and try to work out what Other is


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread Steve Bennett
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:52 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:


 NAME,X,Y, LocationNo, Street, Town, State, Postcode,
 Phone, Unlead, PremiumUnlead, BPUltimate, E10, Diesel,
 Any_Autogas, Hours_24, Trailers, LPGBottle, Toilets,
 CarWash, CleanGo, SuperWash, Other, Pay, EFTPOS,
 GIFT_CARD, ATM, Restaurant, TruckStops, Express,
 BP_UltimateDiesel


Can we really maintain this? These services come and go fairly frequently.

Also, if you're doing a bulk import, how do you avoid double tagging
existing servos?

Steve
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread John Smith
2009/12/9 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
 give us some practical examples and we can go and visit our local BP servos
 and try to work out what Other is

AA Oakleigh 145.09  -37.88  5362162 - 168 Warrigal Rd   Oakleigh
VIC 3166
AA Reservoir145.02  -37.72  372235 - 37 Gisborne Cres   Reservoir   
VIC 3073
BP Capalaba 153.19  -27.52  4208Corner Of Old Cleveland Road And
Dollery RoadCapalabaQLD 4157
BP Connect Eagle Vale   150.82  -34.03  2806Cnr Eagle Vale Dr  Gould
Rd  Eagle Vale  NSW 2558
BP Connect Elizabeth Vale   138.68  -34.74  5204Cnr Main North Rd 
Hogarth Rd  Elizabeth Vale  SA  5112
BP Connect Loganholme   153.19  -27.69  81424120 Pacific
MotorwayLOGANHOLME  QLD 4129
BP Connect Wembley  115.82  -31.94  6211240 Cambridge StWembley 
WA  6014
BP Darlington   138.58  -35.01  59451483 South Rd   Darlington  SA  
5047
BP Express Modbury  138.68  -34.83  9132931 North East Rd   Modbury 
SA  5092
BP Georges Hall 151 -33.92  9513Cnr Marion St  Surrey Ave  GEORGES 
HALLNSW 2198
BP Granville151 -33.83  558527 Woodville Road   Granville   
NSW 2142
BP Holden Hill  138.67  -34.85  5965724 North East Road Holden Hill 
SA  5088
BP Kelmscott116.02  -32.12  54962907 Albany Highway Kelmscott   
WA  6111
BP Kootingal Country Inn151.05  -31.06  85912 Chelmsford St 
Kootingal   NSW 2352
BP Loftus   151.05  -34.05  899 127 Loftus avenue   loftus  NSW 
2232
BP Marmor   150.74  -23.69  5360Bruce Hwy   Marmor  QLD 4702
BP Seven Hills  150.94  -33.77  985 156 Prospect HwySeven Hills 
NSW 2147
BP Steel River  151.73  -32.89  582310 Murray Dwyer Circuit Mayfield West   
NSW 2304
BP Tarneit  144.69  -37.85  5801CORNER OF DERRIMUT ROAD AND SAYERS
ROADTARNEIT VIC 3029

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Implications of license change on use of Australian data sources (e.g. nearmap)

2009-12-09 Thread James Livingston
On 09/12/2009, at 6:38 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
 If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include
 that information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute
 it to others under a Creative Commons licence.
 
 Does that not imply that the derived information may only be
 distributed to others under a Creative Commons licence? Maybe I'm
 reading this incorrectly?

As mentioned by others, the obvious thing to do is ask the NearMap guys (I've 
explicitly CC'd Alex, in case he isn't reading the list) what they meant - 
that's more important than what they actually wrote, since we'd obviously want 
to be nice to them.

But just going off what is written there, if the person tracing owns it (in the 
copyright holder sense), then they can license it however they want. In that 
case, a CC license is just an option (and it says may not may only or 
must).


With respect to ODbL, I think import CC-BY data into an ODbL database is fine - 
we'd fulfil the attribution requirement (CC-BY-SA wouldn't be, on the other 
hand). The problem if OSM goes ahead with the re-license would be the 
contributor terms, that means you can't import CC-BY data without the copyright 
holders approval.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread John Smith
2009/12/9 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
 Can we really maintain this? These services come and go fairly frequently.

Just keep a list of nodes/ways and the location ID and it should be
trivial to keep up to date.

 Also, if you're doing a bulk import, how do you avoid double tagging
 existing servos?

You can pull nodes within a few hundred metres and try to auto match,
or manual import.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread James Livingston
On 09/12/2009, at 8:26 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
 Can we really maintain this? These services come and go fairly frequently.

Individual things like whether they have LPG filling for bbqs maybe, but servos 
don't move that often (usually taken over by another one). In any case, it's 
probably not going to get out of date any worse than restaurant names/cuisines 
or a lot of other things.

If the BP data has IDs for servos, just put that into OSM too, and match it up 
if/when they release updated data.


 Also, if you're doing a bulk import, how do you avoid double tagging existing 
 servos?

I'd suggest doing something like import if there is not an existing 
amenity=fuel within X distance, flag it for manual checking if there is.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread John Smith
2009/12/9 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
 I'd suggest doing something like import if there is not an existing 
 amenity=fuel within X distance, flag it for manual checking if there is.

The only problem with that is where you get 2 or 3 service stations
close/next to each other.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread James Livingston
On 09/12/2009, at 8:41 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
 On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:37 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
 I'd suggest doing something like import if there is not an existing 
 amenity=fuel within X distance, flag it for manual checking if there is.
 
 
 Ah, didn't know that kind of thing was possible, cool.

It's probably not in any of the editor, like JOSM, but if someone was going to 
write a small script that converts the data it wouldn't be hard to make it 
check a planet extract (or the main db) as well.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread Ross Scanlon
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:14:32 +1100
Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au wrote:

 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
  Make sure if you are going to enter fuel information then you include all 
  types, (lpg, 91, 95, 98 octane, diesel, etc)
 
 More: Automotive LPG is different tax-wise from barbecue LPG and
 therefore sold and dispensed differently, sometimes you can refill your
 own LPG bottle and sometimes you can only buy a full one or swap an empty
 one for a full one.

The lpg in the BP data is for automotive lpg.

If Chris is going to do a bulk import then the inclusion of fuel:type tags 
would be very easy.

-- 
Cheers
Ross

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread Sam Couter
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
 The problem with E10 for most cars is it doesn't recognise the extra
 oxygen atom

Australian electronic fuel injection systems have O2 sensors, this isn't
a problem. The reduced energy of E10 compared to the same volume of petrol
is a problem, is basic physics, and can't be changed.

 and making food production more expensive and so the world goes on
 starving.

People don't starve for a worldwide lack of food, they starve because the
excess of food is in the wrong place, ie, not their belly. This is caused
by world politics, corruption, local warlords, complete lack of central
government in some places, etc, and the application of more food in places
that already have enough won't fix any of that.

 Of course if they pumped the waste from coal fire power plants into
 green houses that have water tanks full of algea and then turn the
 algea into fuel you gat something like 40,000-80,000L of ethernol per
 acre, it gets rid of all the emissions in a safe manner and we don't
 need to import crude oil.
 
 But of course that would be too smart so we can't have that.

Ethanol producers have pulled a fast one on the public and hooked
government subsidies to create a very profitable and completely
unsustainable industry. They won't let that go. Your solution still isn't
carbon neutral either because you're burning coal, but that's a hell of a
lot better than burning coal *and* oil. Our only feasible truly carbon
neutral options are solar and nuclear. Solar's expensive and nuclear
scares the NIMBYs even though it releases less radioactive waste than
burning coal.
-- 
Sam Couter |  mailto:s...@couter.id.au
OpenPGP fingerprint:  A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05  5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread Sam Couter
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
 As if the govt doesn't get enough tax already, and they get tax on top
 of tax when the GST kicks in.

The government gets *less* money from E10. Fuel excise is reduced and
its production is subsidised.

 Anyway, this is getting off topic,

Yes, but a near-incoherant rant is good fun sometimes.
-- 
Sam Couter |  mailto:s...@couter.id.au
OpenPGP fingerprint:  A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05  5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Implications of license change on use of Australian data sources (e.g. nearmap)

2009-12-09 Thread Ben Last
I'm sure Alex is reading the list, but I am too :)

If there are concerns with our license, we'll work to address them - a key
goal of ours is to support OSM and that was a firm requirement when the
license was drafted.

Cheers
Ben

2009/12/9 James Livingston doc...@mac.com

 On 09/12/2009, at 6:38 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
  If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include
  that information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute
  it to others under a Creative Commons licence.
 
  Does that not imply that the derived information may only be
  distributed to others under a Creative Commons licence? Maybe I'm
  reading this incorrectly?

 As mentioned by others, the obvious thing to do is ask the NearMap guys
 (I've explicitly CC'd Alex, in case he isn't reading the list) what they
 meant - that's more important than what they actually wrote, since we'd
 obviously want to be nice to them.

 But just going off what is written there, if the person tracing owns it (in
 the copyright holder sense), then they can license it however they want. In
 that case, a CC license is just an option (and it says may not may only
 or must).


 With respect to ODbL, I think import CC-BY data into an ODbL database is
 fine - we'd fulfil the attribution requirement (CC-BY-SA wouldn't be, on the
 other hand). The problem if OSM goes ahead with the re-license would be the
 contributor terms, that means you can't import CC-BY data without the
 copyright holders approval.

 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au




-- 
Ben Last
Development Manager (HyperWeb)
NearMap Pty Ltd
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread John Smith
Ok, getting back on topic, I spent a little time this morning
generating an OSM file that can be opened in JOSM.

For those curious/interested:

http://map-data.bigtincan.com/data/BPtest.osm.bz2

I haven't included all fields, I left out the following:

[16] =  Trailers
[17] =  LPGBottle
[19] =  CarWash
[20] =  CleanGo
[21] =  SuperWash
[22] =  Other

[25] =  GIFT_CARD
[23] =  Pay

[24] =  EFTPOS
[26] =  ATM

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread Steve Bennett

[26] =  ATM


You could add a separate (or same?) amenity=atm (or whatever it is) point?

Steve
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Implications of license change on use of Australian data sources (e.g. nearmap)

2009-12-09 Thread Alex Kwiatkowski
I've just got a response from our legal team and this is what they say.

We are always keen to clear up any uncertainties regarding derived works.
Our requirement is that derived works are availlable to others, using a
Creative Commons style license. In other words, we share the same approach
as OSM. We know that OSM is looking to move to another open type license,
and the intention is to support whatever license that OSM might use in the
future (so long as that license is an open license, of course). Our legal
people are aware that we might need to change the wording to make this
clearer. In the mean time, you can take it as a given that derived works can
be created under a Creative Commons OR similar license.

I hope that clears it up for you guys and feel free to get in contact with
me if you have any other queries.



On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:32 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:

 On 09/12/2009, at 6:38 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
  If you derive information from observing our PhotoMaps, and include
  that information in a work, you will own that work, and may distribute
  it to others under a Creative Commons licence.
 
  Does that not imply that the derived information may only be
  distributed to others under a Creative Commons licence? Maybe I'm
  reading this incorrectly?

 As mentioned by others, the obvious thing to do is ask the NearMap guys
 (I've explicitly CC'd Alex, in case he isn't reading the list) what they
 meant - that's more important than what they actually wrote, since we'd
 obviously want to be nice to them.

 But just going off what is written there, if the person tracing owns it (in
 the copyright holder sense), then they can license it however they want. In
 that case, a CC license is just an option (and it says may not may only
 or must).


 With respect to ODbL, I think import CC-BY data into an ODbL database is
 fine - we'd fulfil the attribution requirement (CC-BY-SA wouldn't be, on the
 other hand). The problem if OSM goes ahead with the re-license would be the
 contributor terms, that means you can't import CC-BY data without the
 copyright holders approval.




-- 

Regards Alex Kwiatkowski

Email: alex.kwiatkow...@nearmap.com
Mobile: 0421 794 183
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread John Smith
2009/12/10 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
    [26] =  ATM


 You could add a separate (or same?) amenity=atm (or whatever it is) point?

I added

tag k='amenity:atm' v='no' /
tag k='amenity:eftpos' v='yes' /
tag k='rent:trailers' v='no' /
tag k='rent:lpg_bottles' v='no' /
tag k='amenity:carwash' v='no' /
tag k='amenity:cleango' v='no' /
tag k='amenity:superwash' v='no' /

Also if people have better suggestions for tag names I'm happy to
update the file, just the best ones I could think of at the time.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread John Smith
Also I think some of the co-ords are way off, there is 2 BP locations
in Carnarvon for example and when you zoom in on them there doesn't
look to be a service station anywhere within the vicinity.

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Australia BP service station dataset - suitable for bulk import?

2009-12-09 Thread Steve Bennett
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:39 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:


 The 2 BP's along the Bruce Highway north of Brisbane aren't located
 properly either, it looks like they've simply used address to geo
 lookups and when the addresses are specific they co-ords go wonky,
 wonder if they want more accurate co-ords...


Dear BP,
  We gather that you have misplaced several of your service stations. We are
pleased to inform you that we have located them at the following locations:
...  We trust this puts your mind at ease.

Love,
OpenStreetMap
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au