Re: [talk-au] Large number of Tasmanian boundaries removed
NP then. Simon Am 26.04.2017 um 13:55 schrieb Andrew Davidson: > Yeap, it was a undiscussed import from a dataset we don't have > permission to use in OSM. Don't be surprised if you see a large number > of LGA boundaries disappear in Queensland as well (same > story...private import from dataset we can't use). > > On 26/04/17 21:36, Simon Poole wrote: >> Not sure if anybody from the AUS community actually follows >> https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/876-countries-compare-2017-04-26 >> >> , but a large number of boundaries in Tasmania were deleted yesterday, >> for example: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6269038/history >> >> I didn't see any prior discussion here and they may not be legit. >> >> Simon >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> > > ___ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Large number of Tasmanian boundaries removed
Yeap, it was a undiscussed import from a dataset we don't have permission to use in OSM. Don't be surprised if you see a large number of LGA boundaries disappear in Queensland as well (same story...private import from dataset we can't use). On 26/04/17 21:36, Simon Poole wrote: Not sure if anybody from the AUS community actually follows https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/876-countries-compare-2017-04-26 , but a large number of boundaries in Tasmania were deleted yesterday, for example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6269038/history I didn't see any prior discussion here and they may not be legit. Simon ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] Large number of Tasmanian boundaries removed
Not sure if anybody from the AUS community actually follows https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/876-countries-compare-2017-04-26 , but a large number of boundaries in Tasmania were deleted yesterday, for example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6269038/history I didn't see any prior discussion here and they may not be legit. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Roadside rest areas tagged as camp sites
We'll get there. Crossed posts. No rush. highway=rest_area rest_area:camping=caravan ? My previous post had :conditional ... and that is wrong. I don't know about applying camp_site tags to rest areas, maybe. Will think on it. On 26-Apr-17 05:29 PM, David Bannon wrote: Hmm, at risk of answering my own question, there is a key, camp_site=* that is intended to apply to tourism=camp_site. Could you apply it to a rest area as well ? highway=rest_area camp_site=basic caravan=yes tent=no David On 26/04/17 17:17, David Bannon wrote: On 25/04/17 20:33, Warin wrote: Take the respective 'tourism=camp_site' data to 'highway=rest_area' with 'caravan=yes'. Just what will that mean then ? That a caravan can pull into the rest area ? We will loose the information that camping is, at least primafacie allowed/practical ? I don't think thats a good solution, if you then apply it to other states, a disaster (NSW notoriously anti "free camping"). David ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Roadside rest areas tagged as camp sites
On 26-Apr-17 05:17 PM, David Bannon wrote: On 25/04/17 20:33, Warin wrote: Take the respective 'tourism=camp_site' data to 'highway=rest_area' with 'caravan=yes'. Just what will that mean then ? That a caravan can pull into the rest area ? We will loose the information that camping is, at least primafacie allowed/practical ? I don't think thats a good solution, if you then apply it to other states, a disaster (NSW notoriously anti "free camping"). If 'camping' is 'allowed/practical' in rest areas .. then the tag highway=rest_area has the information you require? Or do you have another solution/idea? rest_area:condition:camping=caravan ?? Tagging them as tourism=camp_site looses the rest area information, which is what they are intended for, there primary function. It also implies use by tents, and that can be deceptive. The tag caravan=yes, as you say, would indicate access, but also use of the rest area. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Roadside rest areas tagged as camp sites
Hmm, at risk of answering my own question, there is a key, camp_site=* that is intended to apply to tourism=camp_site. Could you apply it to a rest area as well ? highway=rest_area camp_site=basic caravan=yes tent=no David On 26/04/17 17:17, David Bannon wrote: On 25/04/17 20:33, Warin wrote: Take the respective 'tourism=camp_site' data to 'highway=rest_area' with 'caravan=yes'. Just what will that mean then ? That a caravan can pull into the rest area ? We will loose the information that camping is, at least primafacie allowed/practical ? I don't think thats a good solution, if you then apply it to other states, a disaster (NSW notoriously anti "free camping"). David ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Roadside rest areas tagged as camp sites
On 25/04/17 20:33, Warin wrote: Take the respective 'tourism=camp_site' data to 'highway=rest_area' with 'caravan=yes'. Just what will that mean then ? That a caravan can pull into the rest area ? We will loose the information that camping is, at least primafacie allowed/practical ? I don't think thats a good solution, if you then apply it to other states, a disaster (NSW notoriously anti "free camping"). David ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
