Re: [talk-au] Practicality of mapping high-speed motor-traffic routes as cycle routes

2020-04-13 Thread Dongchen Yue
It’s certainly true that some people rely on motorway routes (I agree that the 
solution for family-friendly routes would be a different renderer, until 
conditions change in Australia). However, regarding the bike symbol on the M2 
on the Mapillary example, it’s designed to be a sign of caution instead of a 
route guide 
(https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/documents/business-industry/partners-and-suppliers/lgr/cycling-aspects-of-austroads-guides.pdf
 
<https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/documents/business-industry/partners-and-suppliers/lgr/cycling-aspects-of-austroads-guides.pdf>).

> Am 13.04.2020 um 7:21 PM schrieb Andrew Harvey :
> 
> Example of a dedicated bicycle crossing on a motorway entry ramp on the M2 in 
> Sydney https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/3HCnt9rSnC2Z9OLn0GSslA 
> <https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/3HCnt9rSnC2Z9OLn0GSslA> and on the M7 in 
> Sydney https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/JGrFtWbs5DYbMywYpVetoA 
> <https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/JGrFtWbs5DYbMywYpVetoA>.
> 
> The M7 Shared Path is is a completely different thing, it's a shared path and 
> off road, but as you can see above on the M7 motorway itself there is clearly 
> dedicated bicycle signage and infrastructure.
> 
> Who says it's not recommended to cycle on the motorway? I've never seen a 
> sign to say this. Whether it's common or not is irrelevant we mostly map the 
> infrastructure on the ground not the traffic level of the road. 
> 
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 19:11, Dongchen Yue  <mailto:yuedongche...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> The most noticeable example in Sydney would be the M7 Shared Path 
> (https://www.westlinkm7.com.au/about/shared-path 
> <https://www.westlinkm7.com.au/about/shared-path>), which is a ~40km 
> uninterrupted bi-directional path alongside the M7 Motorway with normally 
> (though obviously not currently) very high usage for recreational cycling. 
> However, although cycling on the motorway shoulders is neither recommended 
> nor common, it’s been mapped on OSM as the cycle route „M7s" 
> (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-33.83065/150.85767=C 
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-33.83065/150.85767=C>) along 
> with the „M7 Cycleway“ route.
> 
>> Am 13.04.2020 um 6:52 PM schrieb Ewen Hill > <mailto:ewen.h...@gmail.com>>:
>> 
>> Hi Dongchen,
>>Can you provide a couple of examples please so we can review and discuss 
>> them. There may be good reasons (the red carpet Gardiners Creek cycle path 
>> in Melbourne hangs under the freeway might appear incorrect but is not). 
>> 
>>  Ewen
>> 
>> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 18:20, Dongchen Yue > <mailto:yuedongche...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I’ve noticed many motorway shoulders in Australia (especially in Sydney) 
>> being mapped as cycle routes on OSM. Although this seems to be a common 
>> approach for motorways/other high-speed roads in Australia of which cycling 
>> is allowed on, I can hardly imagine it to be of any practical use (i.e. 
>> providing convenient and safe connections for people cycling).
>> 
>> Foremostly, this mapping approach defies the general purpose of cycle routes 
>> (both from an engineering perspective and the official OSM Wiki), that is, 
>> guiding people onto safe & convenient ways. Although cycling on most 
>> motorway shoulders in Australia is technically permitted and commonly done 
>> by the very few “strong and fearless” people (only ~1%, as indicated in past 
>> transport research), it’s both subjectively and statically quite unsafe, 
>> which gives no use to most people when rendered on tiles such as 
>> OpenCycleMap.
>> 
>> Also, these mapped motorway/high-speed road routes aren’t officially 
>> endorsed routes whatsoever, and are always referred to as separate pieces of 
>> infrastructure (e.g. “… cycleway”) by cycle-lobbying groups.
>> Afterall, these “routes” probably shouldn’t be mapped at all, since they 
>> aren’t much use to most people; tagging them with ‘cycling’: ‘designated’ 
>> and ‘cycleway’: ‘shoulder’ would be sufficient enough. What do you think of 
>> this solution?
>> 
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Dongchen Yue
>> ___
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au 
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au>
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Warm Regards
>> 
>> Ewen Hill
>> Internet Development Australia
> 
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au 
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au>

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Practicality of mapping high-speed motor-traffic routes as cycle routes

2020-04-13 Thread Dongchen Yue
The most noticeable example in Sydney would be the M7 Shared Path 
(https://www.westlinkm7.com.au/about/shared-path 
<https://www.westlinkm7.com.au/about/shared-path>), which is a ~40km 
uninterrupted bi-directional path alongside the M7 Motorway with normally 
(though obviously not currently) very high usage for recreational cycling. 
However, although cycling on the motorway shoulders is neither recommended nor 
common, it’s been mapped on OSM as the cycle route „M7s" 
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-33.83065/150.85767=C 
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-33.83065/150.85767=C>) along 
with the „M7 Cycleway“ route.

> Am 13.04.2020 um 6:52 PM schrieb Ewen Hill :
> 
> Hi Dongchen,
>Can you provide a couple of examples please so we can review and discuss 
> them. There may be good reasons (the red carpet Gardiners Creek cycle path in 
> Melbourne hangs under the freeway might appear incorrect but is not). 
> 
>  Ewen
> 
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 at 18:20, Dongchen Yue  <mailto:yuedongche...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I’ve noticed many motorway shoulders in Australia (especially in Sydney) 
> being mapped as cycle routes on OSM. Although this seems to be a common 
> approach for motorways/other high-speed roads in Australia of which cycling 
> is allowed on, I can hardly imagine it to be of any practical use (i.e. 
> providing convenient and safe connections for people cycling).
> 
> Foremostly, this mapping approach defies the general purpose of cycle routes 
> (both from an engineering perspective and the official OSM Wiki), that is, 
> guiding people onto safe & convenient ways. Although cycling on most motorway 
> shoulders in Australia is technically permitted and commonly done by the very 
> few “strong and fearless” people (only ~1%, as indicated in past transport 
> research), it’s both subjectively and statically quite unsafe, which gives no 
> use to most people when rendered on tiles such as OpenCycleMap.
> 
> Also, these mapped motorway/high-speed road routes aren’t officially endorsed 
> routes whatsoever, and are always referred to as separate pieces of 
> infrastructure (e.g. “… cycleway”) by cycle-lobbying groups.
> Afterall, these “routes” probably shouldn’t be mapped at all, since they 
> aren’t much use to most people; tagging them with ‘cycling’: ‘designated’ and 
> ‘cycleway’: ‘shoulder’ would be sufficient enough. What do you think of this 
> solution?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Dongchen Yue
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au 
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Warm Regards
> 
> Ewen Hill
> Internet Development Australia

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] Practicality of mapping high-speed motor-traffic routes as cycle routes

2020-04-13 Thread Dongchen Yue
Hi all,

I’ve noticed many motorway shoulders in Australia (especially in Sydney) being 
mapped as cycle routes on OSM. Although this seems to be a common approach for 
motorways/other high-speed roads in Australia of which cycling is allowed on, I 
can hardly imagine it to be of any practical use (i.e. providing convenient and 
safe connections for people cycling).

Foremostly, this mapping approach defies the general purpose of cycle routes 
(both from an engineering perspective and the official OSM Wiki), that is, 
guiding people onto safe & convenient ways. Although cycling on most motorway 
shoulders in Australia is technically permitted and commonly done by the very 
few “strong and fearless” people (only ~1%, as indicated in past transport 
research), it’s both subjectively and statically quite unsafe, which gives no 
use to most people when rendered on tiles such as OpenCycleMap.

Also, these mapped motorway/high-speed road routes aren’t officially endorsed 
routes whatsoever, and are always referred to as separate pieces of 
infrastructure (e.g. “… cycleway”) by cycle-lobbying groups.
Afterall, these “routes” probably shouldn’t be mapped at all, since they aren’t 
much use to most people; tagging them with ‘cycling’: ‘designated’ and 
‘cycleway’: ‘shoulder’ would be sufficient enough. What do you think of this 
solution?

Thanks in advance,
Dongchen Yue___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au