Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-26 Thread Stephen Hope
On 27 January 2011 08:58, Steve Bennett  wrote:
> Although it's a non-issue here as pointed out below, we really should
> get a policy on this. IMHO tags should reflect whatever makes the most
> sense to the most people, whether that's British, American or
> otherwise.

I'd agree, except there's a bit missing. "As long as it is not
intuitively wrong for a large minority."  Not something that applies
in this case, but there are examples where large numbers of people can
get totally the wrong idea by looking at a tag alone.  It would be
nice in those cases if we could find a more neutral term, even if it
is not the one that the majority would think of first.

Stephen

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-26 Thread Steve Bennett
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:12 AM, David Murn  wrote:
> The only issue I would have, is with the spelling of licence.  Steve
> suggested licensed but as OSM is traditionally British English, shouldnt
> licenced=yes/no be used?

Although it's a non-issue here as pointed out below, we really should
get a policy on this. IMHO tags should reflect whatever makes the most
sense to the most people, whether that's British, American or
otherwise.

Steve

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-26 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:19:45 +
SomeoneElse  wrote:

> On 26/01/2011 16:12, David Murn wrote:
> > The only issue I would have, is with the spelling of licence. Steve 
> > suggested licensed but as OSM is traditionally British English, 
> > shouldnt licenced=yes/no be used?
> > taginfo shows licenced=yes has 2 usages where licensed=yes has 9,
> > so its early enough to still rectify the discrepencies.
> >
> >
> 
> In British English licence = noun; license=verb, I believe:
> 
> http://www.future-perfect.co.uk/grammartips/grammar-tip-license-licence.asp
> 
> so "licensed=yes" is correct I think?  In American English it's 
> "license" for both I believe.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andy
> 

We are already using licensed_club because that is exactly how it is in
Au English
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Licensed_Club

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-26 Thread SomeoneElse

On 26/01/2011 16:12, David Murn wrote:
The only issue I would have, is with the spelling of licence. Steve 
suggested licensed but as OSM is traditionally British English, 
shouldnt licenced=yes/no be used?

taginfo shows licenced=yes has 2 usages where licensed=yes has 9, so its
early enough to still rectify the discrepencies.




In British English licence = noun; license=verb, I believe:

http://www.future-perfect.co.uk/grammartips/grammar-tip-license-licence.asp

so "licensed=yes" is correct I think?  In American English it's 
"license" for both I believe.


Cheers,
Andy


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-26 Thread David Murn
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:55 +1100, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:58:04 +1000
> John Smith  wrote:
> 
> > On 26 January 2011 09:21, David Murn  wrote:
> > > Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on
> > > where you are.  In [1]New York for example, a BYO establishment MUST
> > > have a liquor license.  In [2]Victoria, a BYO license (actually a
> > > permit) is for places that dont have a liquor license.
> > 
> > So what was your conclusion?
> > 
> Drink more or less?

I think the patriotic thing to do would be to visit some more licenced
premises before I reach a conclusion.  However, I think that given the
differences abound in different regions, Steve's suggestion of a binary
yes/no for both licenced and byo would be the best option unless any
further complications arise (eg, BYO beer or wine).  Steves suggested:

licenced=yes/no
byo=yes/no

The only issue I would have, is with the spelling of licence.  Steve
suggested licensed but as OSM is traditionally British English, shouldnt
licenced=yes/no be used?

taginfo shows licenced=yes has 2 usages where licensed=yes has 9, so its
early enough to still rectify the discrepencies.

David


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-25 Thread Steve Bennett

On 26/01/2011 10:21 AM, David Murn wrote:

Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on
where you are.  In [1]New York for example, a BYO establishment MUST
have a liquor license.  In [2]Victoria, a BYO license (actually a
permit) is for places that dont have a liquor license.
Now that I think about it, I was using "licensed" in the informal sense 
of "sells alcohol". That may be an Australianism.


Steve

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-25 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:58:04 +1000
John Smith  wrote:

> On 26 January 2011 09:21, David Murn  wrote:
> > Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on
> > where you are.  In [1]New York for example, a BYO establishment MUST
> > have a liquor license.  In [2]Victoria, a BYO license (actually a
> > permit) is for places that dont have a liquor license.
> 
> So what was your conclusion?
> 
Drink more or less?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-25 Thread John Smith
On 26 January 2011 09:21, David Murn  wrote:
> Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on
> where you are.  In [1]New York for example, a BYO establishment MUST
> have a liquor license.  In [2]Victoria, a BYO license (actually a
> permit) is for places that dont have a liquor license.

So what was your conclusion?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-25 Thread David Murn
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 15:33 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:08 AM, John Smith  
> wrote:
> > amenity=restaurant
> > licensed=yes/no/byo
> 
> Yeah, but they're not mutually exclusive. All four combinations exist,
> including licensed *and* byo (with corkage, usually), and licensed
> *and not* byo.

Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on
where you are.  In [1]New York for example, a BYO establishment MUST
have a liquor license.  In [2]Victoria, a BYO license (actually a
permit) is for places that dont have a liquor license.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BYOB
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_laws_of_Australia

David


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-24 Thread Steve Bennett
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:08 AM, John Smith  wrote:
> amenity=restaurant
> licensed=yes/no/byo

Yeah, but they're not mutually exclusive. All four combinations exist,
including licensed *and* byo (with corkage, usually), and licensed
*and not* byo.

licensed=yes/no
byo=yes/no

Steve

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-24 Thread SomeoneElse

On 24/01/2011 23:08, John Smith wrote:


Not all restaurants are licensed...

amenity=restaurant
licensed=yes/no/byo

Sounds good to me - thanks.

Cheers,
Andy


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-24 Thread Franc Carter
seems sensible as the tag can be applied generally

cheers
On 25/01/2011 10:08 AM, "John Smith"  wrote:
> On 24 January 2011 06:06, SomeoneElse  wrote:
>> Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced
>> restaurants?
>
> Not all restaurants are licensed...
>
> amenity=restaurant
> licensed=yes/no/byo
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-24 Thread John Smith
On 24 January 2011 06:06, SomeoneElse  wrote:
> Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced
> restaurants?

Not all restaurants are licensed...

amenity=restaurant
licensed=yes/no/byo

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] BYO restaurants

2011-01-23 Thread SomeoneElse
Hi - quick question - what's the normal way to indicate BYO vs licenced 
restaurants?


Cheers,
Andy


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au