Re: [talk-au] Looking for some Brisbane based mapper support.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 17:02, Stéphane Guillou via Talk-au < talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > and it looks quite similar to what Queensland Globe shows in its Roads and > Railway layer, so there's some more validation... > Please note though that we do not have permission to use Qld Globe data, due to it's Licence. Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Looking for some Brisbane based mapper support.
Thanks for having a go at it, Scottie. I was watching the conversation but didn't feel confident enough in my experience with highway tagging hierarchy. As a local (Brisbane but not CBD), I agree the roads that directly connect to the motorway/expressway need to at least be classified as secondary, and that Mary and Adelaide could be demoted to tertiary. Adelaide st is an interesting case in that it is very important to bus traffic but doesn't connect to the road network like others. Happy with its current state, and it looks quite similar to what Queensland Globe shows in its Roads and Railway layer, so there's some more validation... Cheers On 14/3/22 13:49, Dean Scott wrote: As a local to Brisbane, I have fixed the roads to better represent the importance of them in terms of connectivity to other roads around the Brisbane CBD. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118452195 Scottie <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118452195> Changeset: 118452195 | OpenStreetMap <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118452195> OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license. www.openstreetmap.org *From:* Graeme Fitzpatrick *Sent:* Monday, 14 March 2022 1:12 PM *To:* Andrew Davidson *Cc:* OSM Australian Talk List *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Looking for some Brisbane based mapper support. Still no response from anybody here, so might throw it out to the Tagging list to see what people world-wide think? Thanks Graeme On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: & it would have helped if I posted my original message, as I intended to! :-( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-February/015884.html As I said then, to me personally, looking at Brisbane CBD: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-27.4701/153.0343, (but the other major cities would be the same), the main grid of the busiest streets should probably be Secondary with smaller streets as either Tertiary or Minor / Unclass? One comment on the =secondary talk page pretty well agrees: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary I'm amazed though that there appears never to have been any discussion on this previously? Just looking at other major cities, most of them seem to be a mix of primary & tertiary, with only a few secondary, except for Manhattan, NY, which has lots of both primary & secondary with not that many tertiary. Thanks Graeme On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:14, Andrew Davidson wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:45 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Brought that same question up a little while back, but no response. Ah yes, sorry about that. My interest in highway classification is so low I don't think your email even registered with me. Had a read through the wiki on highway classification and it is pretty useless for deciding what to do in urban areas. Anyway let's give a week or so and then we can close that issue with a note that nobody has an opinion on the subject. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au -- Stéphane Guillou http://stragu.gitlab.io/ You can encrypt our communications by using OpenPGP. My public key 4E211060 is available on the keys.gnupg.net server. Other ways to interact with me are listed on my contact page:http://stragu.gitlab.io/contact/ ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Looking for some Brisbane based mapper support.
As a local to Brisbane, I have fixed the roads to better represent the importance of them in terms of connectivity to other roads around the Brisbane CBD. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118452195 Scottie [https://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-ed028f90468224a272961c380ecee0cfb73b8048b34f4b4b204b7f0d1097875d.png]<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118452195> Changeset: 118452195 | OpenStreetMap<https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118452195> OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license. www.openstreetmap.org From: Graeme Fitzpatrick Sent: Monday, 14 March 2022 1:12 PM To: Andrew Davidson Cc: OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] Looking for some Brisbane based mapper support. Still no response from anybody here, so might throw it out to the Tagging list to see what people world-wide think? Thanks Graeme On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com>> wrote: & it would have helped if I posted my original message, as I intended to! :-( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-February/015884.html As I said then, to me personally, looking at Brisbane CBD: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-27.4701/153.0343, (but the other major cities would be the same), the main grid of the busiest streets should probably be Secondary with smaller streets as either Tertiary or Minor / Unclass? One comment on the =secondary talk page pretty well agrees: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary I'm amazed though that there appears never to have been any discussion on this previously? Just looking at other major cities, most of them seem to be a mix of primary & tertiary, with only a few secondary, except for Manhattan, NY, which has lots of both primary & secondary with not that many tertiary. Thanks Graeme On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:14, Andrew Davidson mailto:thesw...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:45 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick mailto:graemefi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Brought that same question up a little while back, but no response. Ah yes, sorry about that. My interest in highway classification is so low I don't think your email even registered with me. Had a read through the wiki on highway classification and it is pretty useless for deciding what to do in urban areas. Anyway let's give a week or so and then we can close that issue with a note that nobody has an opinion on the subject. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Looking for some Brisbane based mapper support.
Still no response from anybody here, so might throw it out to the Tagging list to see what people world-wide think? Thanks Graeme On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > & it would have helped if I posted my original message, as I intended to! > :-( > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-February/015884.html > > As I said then, to me personally, looking at Brisbane CBD: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-27.4701/153.0343, (but the other > major cities would be the same), the main grid of the busiest streets > should probably be Secondary with smaller streets as either Tertiary or > Minor / Unclass? > > One comment on the =secondary talk page pretty well agrees: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary > > I'm amazed though that there appears never to have been any discussion on > this previously? > > Just looking at other major cities, most of them seem to be a mix of > primary & tertiary, with only a few secondary, except for Manhattan, NY, > which has lots of both primary & secondary with not that many tertiary. > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:14, Andrew Davidson wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:45 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick >> wrote: >> > >> > Brought that same question up a little while back, but no response. >> >> Ah yes, sorry about that. My interest in highway classification is so >> low I don't think your email even registered with me. >> >> Had a read through the wiki on highway classification and it is pretty >> useless for deciding what to do in urban areas. >> >> Anyway let's give a week or so and then we can close that issue with a >> note that nobody has an opinion on the subject. >> > ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Looking for some Brisbane based mapper support.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:45 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Brought that same question up a little while back, but no response. Ah yes, sorry about that. My interest in highway classification is so low I don't think your email even registered with me. Had a read through the wiki on highway classification and it is pretty useless for deciding what to do in urban areas. Anyway let's give a week or so and then we can close that issue with a note that nobody has an opinion on the subject. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] Looking for some Brisbane based mapper support.
Is anyone able to help with this map note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1985557 Which asks why so many of the streets in the Brisbane CBD are classified as secondary. Answering the question requires way more local knowledge than I have of Brisbane roads. Thanks. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
