Re: [talk-au] Routing "islands"

2012-10-14 Thread dbannon
 
 Yes Stephen, I quite agree. I would not want decisions like that
taken away from the end user. But maybe the warning should point out
that in most cases, a junction node is required. I know that now but
seems there is no easy way for a new comer to find out. (I have been
submitting tracks for  several years.) Maybe I'll have a play with
the wiki

Anyway, that "keep right" website highlighted my errors from way back,
and a heap of others, its a pretty useful tool. I have fixed a few and
will keep at the ones I know about.

David

- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Hope" 
To:
Cc:
Sent:Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:11:53 +1000
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Routing "islands"

Well, there's a couple of reasons why you might want to save it anyway
with roads close together but not joining, so JOSM can't force you not
to save it.  They might not actually join.  There's a couple of
examples near me where roads end less than a meter away from another
road, but don't join up.  Service roads, minor suburban streets and
main streets where they used to join, but the main road has so much
traffic now they've cut the connection, and a case where two new
subdivisions had a road that was supposed to join, but the first guy
stopped about a half meter short of the line, and the second one
wouldn't pay the extra, so there's a tiny gap between the roads, and a
curb. 
 Also, you might have been working on some other portion of the road,
and not near where the error is. Just last week I fixed some stuff at
one end of a road, and when I went to save it, it warned of errors at
the other end, but I can't do anything about them until I go down
there and see what the problem is.  I still want to save the work
I've done so far, though. 

 Stephen 

On 13 October 2012 15:25,  wrote:
Gee, thats pretty revealing !

I see a number of error there that I suspect I may have made, in
particular relating to ways that are close but don't join another way.
I think this highlights a lack of a "best practice" document on how to
add ways to the map. I can remember getting warnings from JOSM on the
subject, but the warnings say something to the effect that don't let
that stop you from submitting the addition. 

Considering the great tools available and the incredible effort by so
many people, its a pity we don't have that "best practice", I suspect
there is concern it may scare people away !

Hmm

 David 

  

Links:
--
[1] mailto:dban...@internode.on.net

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Routing "islands"

2012-10-14 Thread Stephen Hope
Well, there's a couple of reasons why you might want to save it anyway with
roads close together but not joining, so JOSM can't force you not to save
it.  They might not actually join.  There's a couple of examples near me
where roads end less than a meter away from another road, but don't join
up.  Service roads, minor suburban streets and main streets where they used
to join, but the main road has so much traffic now they've cut the
connection, and a case where two new subdivisions had a road that was
supposed to join, but the first guy stopped about a half meter short of the
line, and the second one wouldn't pay the extra, so there's a tiny gap
between the roads, and a curb.

Also, you might have been working on some other portion of the road, and
not near where the error is. Just last week I fixed some stuff at one end
of a road, and when I went to save it, it warned of errors at the other
end, but I can't do anything about them until I go down there and see what
the problem is.  I still want to save the work I've done so far, though.


Stephen


On 13 October 2012 15:25,  wrote:

> Gee, thats pretty revealing !
>
> I see a number of error there that I suspect I may have made, in
> particular relating to ways that are close but don't join another way. I
> think this highlights a lack of a "best practice" document on how to add
> ways to the map. I can remember getting warnings from JOSM on the subject,
> but the warnings say something to the effect that don't let that stop you
> from submitting the addition.
>
> Considering the great tools available and the incredible effort by so many
> people, its a pity we don't have that "best practice", I suspect there is
> concern it may scare people away !
>
> Hmm
>
> David
>
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Routing "islands"

2012-10-12 Thread dbannon
Gee, thats pretty revealing !

I see a number of error there that I suspect I may have made, in
particular relating to ways that are close but don't join another way.
I think this highlights a lack of a "best practice" document on how to
add ways to the map. I can remember getting warnings from JOSM on the
subject, but the warnings say something to the effect that don't let
that stop you from submitting the addition. 

Considering the great tools available and the incredible effort by so
many people, its a pity we don't have that "best practice", I suspect
there is concern it may scare people away !

Hmm

David 

- Original Message -
From: "Nick Hocking" 
To:
Cc:
Sent:Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:34:00 +1100
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Routing "islands"

Hi ben    
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/debug.html?view=routing_non_eu&lon=150.82846&lat=-33.7503&zoom=15&opacity=0.98
[1]   gets the routing outside europe  ( I had the same problem and
went looking for this url)     .
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=38081608 [2]
    paints an even gloomier picture.  I am well on the way to
fixing Canberra but the number of errors was/is amazing. I'm just
about to do the floating Islands (orange in keep right).    Nick  
        

Links:
--
[1]
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/debug.html?view=routing_non_eu&lon=150.82846&lat=-33.7503&zoom=15&opacity=0.98
[2]
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=38081608

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Routing "islands"

2012-10-12 Thread John Henderson

On 12/10/12 20:34, Nick Hocking wrote:


http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/debug.html?view=routing_non_eu&lon=150.82846&lat=-33.7503&zoom=15&opacity=0.98


> gets the routing outside europe  ( I had the same problem and went

looking for this url)


That's much better, thanks.


http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=38081608
paints an even gloomier picture.  I am well on the way to fixing
Canberra but the number of errors was/is amazing. I'm just about to
do the floating Islands (orange in keep right).


I've been giving you a bit of a hand there, but mainly outside Canberra.

I apologise for not marking things I've fixed as "ignore temporarily
(error corrected)".  That's because I thought that flag was stored on my
own PC, and not visible to all.

Many intersections in Cootamundra had no connecting node.  These are
among the things I've fixed, although that problem was obviously
pre-redaction.

John




___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Routing "islands"

2012-10-12 Thread Nick Hocking
Hi ben


http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/debug.html?view=routing_non_eu&lon=150.82846&lat=-33.7503&zoom=15&opacity=0.98

gets the routing outside europe  ( I had the same problem and went looking
for this url)


.
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=38081608


paints an even gloomier picture.  I am well on the way to fixing Canberra
but the number of errors was/is amazing. I'm just about to do the floating
Islands (orange in keep right).

Nick
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Routing "islands"

2012-10-12 Thread Alex Sims

On 12/10/2012 4:40 PM, Ben Kelley wrote:
I noticed this the other day: Geofabrik Tools has a Routing layer that 
highlights "islands".


Islands are ways that you cannot route to, and generally point to a 
problem somewhere.


The routing layer only seems to apply to Europe, and puts hashing over 
the rest of the world, although the pink "Islands" overlay does work 
for Australia.


e.g. See this section of Sydney:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=151.08138&lat=-33.86157&zoom=15

Ben,

That's quite a useful find. There seem to be all sorts of "extras" in 
the OSMI tools in that more works than the documentation or the provided 
interfaces suggest.


Alex

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] Routing "islands"

2012-10-11 Thread Ben Kelley
Hi.

I noticed this the other day: Geofabrik Tools has a Routing layer that
highlights "islands".

Islands are ways that you cannot route to, and generally point to a problem
somewhere.

The routing layer only seems to apply to Europe, and puts hashing over the
rest of the world, although the pink "Islands" overlay does work for
Australia.

e.g. See this section of Sydney:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=151.08138&lat=-33.86157&zoom=15

This shows a section of the M4 that could not be reached. It was due to a
bridge incorrectly marked as being the wrong way. (Now fixed.)

Here's another one that is not fixed yet:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=150.82846&lat=-33.75053&zoom=15

I haven't looked into that one yet, but I suspect one end of the road (or
both ends) is not connected to the surrounding streets.

It's quite a useful tool.

 - Ben Kelley.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au