Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

2018-03-19 Thread Pierre Béland
J'ai ajouté short_name pour le Québec, mais je pense effectivement que c'est 
inutile à comparer avec Ontario. Dans ce cas, le ON fonctionne sans doute à 
cause de state_code=ON.
Et effectivement, lorsque les relations de territoires sont ajoutées et 
fonctionnelles, les is_in et addr:province sont inutiles et Nominatim fourni 
correctement l'info.  


 
Pierre 
 

Le lundi 19 mars 2018 11 h 18 min 23 s HAE, Matthew Darwin 
 a écrit :  
 
  Searching on "110 Laurier Avenue West, on" in Nominatim already works (it 
finds Ottawa City hall) even though the address has no addr:province tag for 
City Halle.  So I don't think this is a good reason to be adding 
addr:province/addr:province:short_name tags. IMO.  Unless there is another use 
case I am missing.  Similarly your example of searching for "Toronto, ON" works 
fine.
 
 I'm guessing this works because the Ontario admin relation has ISO3166-2 tag 
of CA-ON
 
 
 


  On 2018-03-10 04:51 PM, Pierre Béland wrote:
 
   Non, inutile si relations. Dans relation province d'Ontario - ajouter 
short_name='ON'. 
  De cette façon, Recherche Toronto, ON
  devrait fonctionner. A essayer :)
  
   
 Pierre 
   
  
 Le samedi 10 mars 2018 15:39:53 HNE, john whelan  a 
écrit :  
  
  So you're suggesting adding short_name='ON' to ones that have 
addr:province=Ontario
 
  How would that work?
 
 addr:province=Ontario 
  addr:province:short_name=ON ?
 
  Merci John
   
   
 
   ___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

2018-03-19 Thread Matthew Darwin

Pierre,

This is a good idea, and I plan to do it.   My current challenge is to 
know what things people think "need correction".  I'm starting these 
discussions to see if there is any consensus before I go writing 
code.  If you (or anyone else) has ideas, please do post here (or 
email directly).  Obviously I will not re-build tools that already 
exist, but rather focus on Canada-specific issues (eg postal code format).


The checks I made for the City Of Ottawa are here: 
http://matthew.davintech.ca/osm/.  I will be able to re-use some of 
what I have done for Ottawa, but based on the discussion so far on 
talk-CA, the list of things that /might/ need correction is less than 
what the local community in Ottawa might consider as /possible/ issues 
for correction.


My current employer is in Montréal (previous one was in Joliette) and 
I regularly work out of Université du Québec en Outaouais so hopefully 
you'll consider me part of the local community in Quebec, even though 
I live in Ontario.  :-)



On 2018-03-10 03:27 PM, Pierre Béland wrote:


Pour revenir aux suggestions de Matthew, de façon à impliquer / 
motiver les communautés locales, ce serait d'offrir les outils et 
listes d'objets à corriger un peu comme le fait Osmose et autres 
outils de QA.




___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

2018-03-19 Thread Matthew Darwin
Searching on "110 Laurier Avenue West, on" in Nominatim already works 
(it finds Ottawa City hall) even though the address has no 
addr:province tag for City Halle.  So I don't think this is a good 
reason to be adding addr:province/addr:province:short_name tags. IMO.  
Unless there is another use case I am missing.  Similarly your example 
of searching for "Toronto, ON" works fine.


I'm guessing this works because the Ontario admin relation has 
ISO3166-2 tag of CA-ON




On 2018-03-10 04:51 PM, Pierre Béland wrote:

Non, inutile si relations. Dans relation province d'Ontario
- ajouter short_name='ON'.

De cette façon, Recherche Toronto, ON
devrait fonctionner. A essayer :)


Pierre


Le samedi 10 mars 2018 15:39:53 HNE, john whelan 
 a écrit :



So you're suggesting adding short_name='ON' to ones that have 
addr:province=Ontario


How would that work?

addr:province=Ontario
addr:province:short_name=ON ?

Merci John



___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Poorly drawn buildings #GEOG231-W18; #BC2020; #UCalgary-GEOG231; #BC2020-UCalgary

2018-03-19 Thread john whelan
I think Pierre has already identified the problem some time ago and it has
been raised with Stat Can and others who are involved with BC2020 not that
anyone admits to being responsible for BC2020 and Geoweek. So hopefully we
won't be adding more low quality buildings.

Cheerio John

On 19 March 2018 at 10:42, Matthew Darwin  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I noticed some poorly drawn (not-square) buildings in Calgary tagged with
> the hashags #GEOG231-W18;#BC2020;#UCalgary-GEOG231;#BC2020-UCalgary.  If
> you are involved in this project, you might want to review the quality. I
> added a "fixme" tag to the problems I happen to notice.
>
> ___
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


[Talk-ca] Poorly drawn buildings #GEOG231-W18; #BC2020; #UCalgary-GEOG231; #BC2020-UCalgary

2018-03-19 Thread Matthew Darwin

Hi all,

I noticed some poorly drawn (not-square) buildings in Calgary tagged 
with the hashags 
#GEOG231-W18;#BC2020;#UCalgary-GEOG231;#BC2020-UCalgary.  If you are 
involved in this project, you might want to review the quality. I 
added a "fixme" tag to the problems I happen to notice.


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca