Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state
J'ai ajouté short_name pour le Québec, mais je pense effectivement que c'est inutile à comparer avec Ontario. Dans ce cas, le ON fonctionne sans doute à cause de state_code=ON. Et effectivement, lorsque les relations de territoires sont ajoutées et fonctionnelles, les is_in et addr:province sont inutiles et Nominatim fourni correctement l'info. Pierre Le lundi 19 mars 2018 11 h 18 min 23 s HAE, Matthew Darwin a écrit : Searching on "110 Laurier Avenue West, on" in Nominatim already works (it finds Ottawa City hall) even though the address has no addr:province tag for City Halle. So I don't think this is a good reason to be adding addr:province/addr:province:short_name tags. IMO. Unless there is another use case I am missing. Similarly your example of searching for "Toronto, ON" works fine. I'm guessing this works because the Ontario admin relation has ISO3166-2 tag of CA-ON On 2018-03-10 04:51 PM, Pierre Béland wrote: Non, inutile si relations. Dans relation province d'Ontario - ajouter short_name='ON'. De cette façon, Recherche Toronto, ON devrait fonctionner. A essayer :) Pierre Le samedi 10 mars 2018 15:39:53 HNE, john whelan a écrit : So you're suggesting adding short_name='ON' to ones that have addr:province=Ontario How would that work? addr:province=Ontario addr:province:short_name=ON ? Merci John ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state
Pierre, This is a good idea, and I plan to do it. My current challenge is to know what things people think "need correction". I'm starting these discussions to see if there is any consensus before I go writing code. If you (or anyone else) has ideas, please do post here (or email directly). Obviously I will not re-build tools that already exist, but rather focus on Canada-specific issues (eg postal code format). The checks I made for the City Of Ottawa are here: http://matthew.davintech.ca/osm/. I will be able to re-use some of what I have done for Ottawa, but based on the discussion so far on talk-CA, the list of things that /might/ need correction is less than what the local community in Ottawa might consider as /possible/ issues for correction. My current employer is in Montréal (previous one was in Joliette) and I regularly work out of Université du Québec en Outaouais so hopefully you'll consider me part of the local community in Quebec, even though I live in Ontario. :-) On 2018-03-10 03:27 PM, Pierre Béland wrote: Pour revenir aux suggestions de Matthew, de façon à impliquer / motiver les communautés locales, ce serait d'offrir les outils et listes d'objets à corriger un peu comme le fait Osmose et autres outils de QA. ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state
Searching on "110 Laurier Avenue West, on" in Nominatim already works (it finds Ottawa City hall) even though the address has no addr:province tag for City Halle. So I don't think this is a good reason to be adding addr:province/addr:province:short_name tags. IMO. Unless there is another use case I am missing. Similarly your example of searching for "Toronto, ON" works fine. I'm guessing this works because the Ontario admin relation has ISO3166-2 tag of CA-ON On 2018-03-10 04:51 PM, Pierre Béland wrote: Non, inutile si relations. Dans relation province d'Ontario - ajouter short_name='ON'. De cette façon, Recherche Toronto, ON devrait fonctionner. A essayer :) Pierre Le samedi 10 mars 2018 15:39:53 HNE, john whelan a écrit : So you're suggesting adding short_name='ON' to ones that have addr:province=Ontario How would that work? addr:province=Ontario addr:province:short_name=ON ? Merci John ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Re: [Talk-ca] Poorly drawn buildings #GEOG231-W18; #BC2020; #UCalgary-GEOG231; #BC2020-UCalgary
I think Pierre has already identified the problem some time ago and it has been raised with Stat Can and others who are involved with BC2020 not that anyone admits to being responsible for BC2020 and Geoweek. So hopefully we won't be adding more low quality buildings. Cheerio John On 19 March 2018 at 10:42, Matthew Darwin wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed some poorly drawn (not-square) buildings in Calgary tagged with > the hashags #GEOG231-W18;#BC2020;#UCalgary-GEOG231;#BC2020-UCalgary. If > you are involved in this project, you might want to review the quality. I > added a "fixme" tag to the problems I happen to notice. > > ___ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
[Talk-ca] Poorly drawn buildings #GEOG231-W18; #BC2020; #UCalgary-GEOG231; #BC2020-UCalgary
Hi all, I noticed some poorly drawn (not-square) buildings in Calgary tagged with the hashags #GEOG231-W18;#BC2020;#UCalgary-GEOG231;#BC2020-UCalgary. If you are involved in this project, you might want to review the quality. I added a "fixme" tag to the problems I happen to notice. ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca