Re: [Talk-es] national way boundary names and -- caracters
I entirely agree. There's no need to give a name to a boundary, it is just a relation between the entities involved. It would be redundant for me. But as always, everyone has its opinion... El 12/04/2014 03:31, Xuacu xuacu...@gmail.com escribió: Hi Sylvain, all My best guess is that it isn't necessary to give a name to the common border. It should be a member of two relations (España and France) which have at least one name tag in it, so renderers will take care of displaying such name on the correct side of the border. Adding such Espagne--France tag only adds clutter and/or confuses renderers. Just my 2¢ :) Kind regards -- Xuacu 2014-04-10 23:00 GMT+02:00 sly (sylvain letuffe) lis...@letuffe.org: Holla Jonay, Le jeudi 10 avril 2014 22:32:00, Jonay Santana a écrit : Hello, Sylvain. I'm not very sure about what the problem is. I mean, what are you both disagreeing at? He adds on boudary ways : name:es = espana -- france name:en = spain -- france name:fr = espagne -- france etc. While other think we should either : - add no name at all on boundary ways - or at least don't use -- as separator And don't worry about your spanish, it would be great to read you in spanish besides an English version. So sorry, but it was one year, 20 years ago without practice at all ;-( google translate would be by far better than me ;-) -- sly (sylvain letuffe) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
Re: [Talk-es] national way boundary names and -- caracters
I'm also of the same opinion. El 12/04/14 19:49, Jonay Santana escribió: I entirely agree. There's no need to give a name to a boundary, it is just a relation between the entities involved. It would be redundant for me. But as always, everyone has its opinion... El 12/04/2014 03:31, Xuacu xuacu...@gmail.com mailto:xuacu...@gmail.com escribió: Hi Sylvain, all My best guess is that it isn't necessary to give a name to the common border. It should be a member of two relations (España and France) which have at least one name tag in it, so renderers will take care of displaying such name on the correct side of the border. Adding such Espagne--France tag only adds clutter and/or confuses renderers. Just my 2¢ :) Kind regards -- Xuacu 2014-04-10 23:00 GMT+02:00 sly (sylvain letuffe) lis...@letuffe.org mailto:lis...@letuffe.org: Holla Jonay, Le jeudi 10 avril 2014 22:32:00, Jonay Santana a écrit : Hello, Sylvain. I'm not very sure about what the problem is. I mean, what are you both disagreeing at? He adds on boudary ways : name:es = espana -- france name:en = spain -- france name:fr = espagne -- france etc. While other think we should either : - add no name at all on boundary ways - or at least don't use -- as separator And don't worry about your spanish, it would be great to read you in spanish besides an English version. So sorry, but it was one year, 20 years ago without practice at all ;-( google translate would be by far better than me ;-) -- sly (sylvain letuffe) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
