I entirely agree. There's no need to give a name to a boundary, it is just a relation between the entities involved. It would be redundant for me.
But as always, everyone has its opinion... El 12/04/2014 03:31, "Xuacu" <xuacu...@gmail.com> escribió: > Hi Sylvain, all > > My best guess is that it isn't necessary to give a name to the common > border. It should be a member of two relations (España and France) > which have at least one name tag in it, so renderers will take care of > displaying such name on the correct side of the border. Adding such > "Espagne--France" tag only adds clutter and/or confuses renderers. > Just my 2¢ :) > > Kind regards > -- > Xuacu > > 2014-04-10 23:00 GMT+02:00 sly (sylvain letuffe) <lis...@letuffe.org>: > > Holla Jonay, > > > > Le jeudi 10 avril 2014 22:32:00, Jonay Santana a écrit : > >> Hello, Sylvain. I'm not very sure about what the problem is. I mean, > what > >> are you both disagreeing at? > > > > He adds on boudary ways : > > name:es = espana -- france > > name:en = spain -- france > > name:fr = espagne -- france > > etc. > > > > While other think we should either : > > - add no name at all on boundary ways > > - or at least don't use -- as separator > > > > > >> And don't worry about your spanish, it would be great to read you in > >> spanish besides an English version. > > > > So sorry, but it was one year, 20 years ago without practice at all ;-( > > google translate would be by far better than me ;-) > > > > -- > > sly (sylvain letuffe) > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-es mailing list > > Talk-es@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-es mailing list > Talk-es@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es >
_______________________________________________ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
