Re: [Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
I know that tagging for the renderer is not particularly helpful, however, might it be appropriate in this instance to map the significant slopes around the edges of the crater with man_made=embankment ? There are slopes there in reality, and they are made by human activity (even if not intentionally). Interesting to read about this too, I don't know about it before. On 10 January 2015 at 10:14, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the links. an interesting read. m On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:18 AM, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote: On 10/01/2015 08:34, Marc Gemis wrote: The German wiki on historic items [1] uses historic=bomb_crater. They are displayed on the geschichtskarte [2] (sorry I don't know an example). They also refer to taginfo [3]. But I don't know whether the one you are referring to has historic value Thanks - that's exactly what it is. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:RAF_Fauld_explosion?uselang=en-GB Some of the pictures here give an idea of the size and the depth: http://www.helenlee.co.uk/tutbury/fauld.html Cheers, Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Donald Noble http://drnoble.co.uk - http://flickr.com/photos/drnoble ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
I resorted to natural=cliff on the sink hole under Eyam Edge, but there the sides were vertical. There has recently been a fair bit of discussion about extending cliff tags, and one of the cases is for non-vertical ones! Jerry On 10 January 2015 at 21:38, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote: On 10/01/2015 17:09, Donald Noble wrote: I know that tagging for the renderer is not particularly helpful, however, might it be appropriate in this instance to map the significant slopes around the edges of the crater with man_made=embankment ? There are slopes there in reality, and they are made by human activity (even if not intentionally). That does make some sort of sense - the sides (especially at the top) are quite steep. Cheers, Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-gb-westmidlands] New Street Station
At last Thursday's meetup, we discussed re-mapping New Street Station, and the challenges that will pose. One thing we will need is aerial photography, or pictures from overlooking buildings: not to trace, but for a general overview. I've made a start at collecting links, at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mappa_Mercia/New_Street_Station Please feel free to add to that. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
Re: [Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
On 10/01/2015 17:09, Donald Noble wrote: I know that tagging for the renderer is not particularly helpful, however, might it be appropriate in this instance to map the significant slopes around the edges of the crater with man_made=embankment ? There are slopes there in reality, and they are made by human activity (even if not intentionally). That does make some sort of sense - the sides (especially at the top) are quite steep. Cheers, Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
