Re: [Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
I resorted to natural=cliff on the sink hole under Eyam Edge, but there the sides were vertical. There has recently been a fair bit of discussion about extending cliff tags, and one of the cases is for non-vertical ones! Jerry On 10 January 2015 at 21:38, SomeoneElse wrote: > On 10/01/2015 17:09, Donald Noble wrote: > > I know that "tagging for the renderer" is not particularly helpful, > however, might it be appropriate in this instance to map the significant > slopes around the edges of the crater with man_made=embankment ? There are > slopes there in reality, and they are made by human activity (even if not > intentionally). > > > That does make some sort of sense - the sides (especially at the top) are > quite steep. > > Cheers, > > Andy > > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
On 10/01/2015 17:09, Donald Noble wrote: I know that "tagging for the renderer" is not particularly helpful, however, might it be appropriate in this instance to map the significant slopes around the edges of the crater with man_made=embankment ? There are slopes there in reality, and they are made by human activity (even if not intentionally). That does make some sort of sense - the sides (especially at the top) are quite steep. Cheers, Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
I know that "tagging for the renderer" is not particularly helpful, however, might it be appropriate in this instance to map the significant slopes around the edges of the crater with man_made=embankment ? There are slopes there in reality, and they are made by human activity (even if not intentionally). Interesting to read about this too, I don't know about it before. On 10 January 2015 at 10:14, Marc Gemis wrote: > Thanks for the links. an interesting read. > > m > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:18 AM, SomeoneElse > wrote: > >> On 10/01/2015 08:34, Marc Gemis wrote: >> >>> The German wiki on historic items [1] uses historic=bomb_crater. They >>> are displayed on the geschichtskarte [2] (sorry I don't know an example). >>> They also refer to taginfo [3]. But I don't know whether the one you are >>> referring to has historic value >>> >> >> Thanks - that's exactly what it is. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:RAF_Fauld_explosion?uselang=en-GB >> >> Some of the pictures here give an idea of the size and the depth: >> >> http://www.helenlee.co.uk/tutbury/fauld.html >> >> Cheers, >> >> Andy >> >> > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > -- Donald Noble http://drnoble.co.uk - http://flickr.com/photos/drnoble ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
Thanks for the links. an interesting read. m On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:18 AM, SomeoneElse wrote: > On 10/01/2015 08:34, Marc Gemis wrote: > >> The German wiki on historic items [1] uses historic=bomb_crater. They are >> displayed on the geschichtskarte [2] (sorry I don't know an example). They >> also refer to taginfo [3]. But I don't know whether the one you are >> referring to has historic value >> > > Thanks - that's exactly what it is. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:RAF_Fauld_explosion?uselang=en-GB > > Some of the pictures here give an idea of the size and the depth: > > http://www.helenlee.co.uk/tutbury/fauld.html > > Cheers, > > Andy > > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
On 10/01/2015 08:34, Marc Gemis wrote: The German wiki on historic items [1] uses historic=bomb_crater. They are displayed on the geschichtskarte [2] (sorry I don't know an example). They also refer to taginfo [3]. But I don't know whether the one you are referring to has historic value Thanks - that's exactly what it is. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:RAF_Fauld_explosion?uselang=en-GB Some of the pictures here give an idea of the size and the depth: http://www.helenlee.co.uk/tutbury/fauld.html Cheers, Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
The German wiki on historic items [1] uses historic=bomb_crater. They are displayed on the geschichtskarte [2] (sorry I don't know an example). They also refer to taginfo [3]. But I don't know whether the one you are referring to has historic value regards m [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Historical_Objects/Karteneigenschaften#Bombenkrater [2] http://geschichtskarten.openstreetmap.de/historische_objekte/translate/en/index-en.html [3] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=bomb_crater On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 9:09 AM, SomeoneElse wrote: > Has anyone got a good suggestion for tagging the crater itself? > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24384002 > > I removed the cemetery tag from it, because it isn't really. The crater's > a separate physical feature from the military exclusion zone: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321249552 > > Previously it had "landuse=basin" > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=basin?uselang=en-GB > > but I'm not too convinced about that. Any suggestions? > > Cheers, > > Andy > > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Hanbury Meeting - Fauld Crater
Has anyone got a good suggestion for tagging the crater itself? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24384002 I removed the cemetery tag from it, because it isn't really. The crater's a separate physical feature from the military exclusion zone: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321249552 Previously it had "landuse=basin" http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=basin?uselang=en-GB but I'm not too convinced about that. Any suggestions? Cheers, Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
