Re: [Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-23 Per discussione Joshua Kenney
If StatsCan is going to gather more than the just building data under the same 
licence, that would be sweet!  The other data sets from Airdrie it would be 
nice to import, eventually, are address points, neighbourhood and quadrant 
boundaries, park benches and picnic tables, and city maintained fences.

--Joshua

On 2019-04-23 10:18, john whelan wrote:
I'd check to see if it is included in the Stats Canada data first.  If not then 
the buildings will be available in the Microsoft data which is correctly 
licensed.

The open data licenses are a mine field.

Stats is looking a releasing more municipal Open Data under the Federal 
Government license.

Cheerio John

On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 11:58, Joshua Kenney 
mailto:kenney...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
If I can obtain explicit permission from the city, would I still need to
wait for the LWG approval?

--Joshua

On 2019-04-22 16:03, Jarek PiĆ³rkowski wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!
>
> To answer your first question: the non-building data sets (parks,
> address points, bus stops, etc) are not currently importable without
> further effort: we would have to get that exact licence (with text
> including "City of Airdrie") approved by the OSM Licensing Working
> Group. I don't know if the LWG would object to the attribution
> requirements, possibly not, but the approval itself might take quite a
> while anyway, as lawyer things don't move fast.
>
> --Jarek
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 15:42, Joshua Kenney 
> mailto:kenney...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hello everybody!
>> Relatively new mapper here.  I've been working on mapping my home town, and 
>> a couple of other places I've been, for the past 3 or 4 months.
>>
>> I have found that my city of Airdrie, AB has a number of datasets available 
>> under an Open Data Licence:
>>
>> http://data-airdrie.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/our-open-licence
>> The licence terms look straight forward enough, are there any additional 
>> steps I need to take to confirm compatibility with OSM?
>>
>> One of the datasets includes building footprints.  Would importing that get 
>> in the way of the import of the national data? Where can I access the 
>> national data to compare the quality?
>>
>> --Joshua
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-23 Per discussione Joshua Kenney
Thanks for that update on the current status of the building import!  I've 
checked the Stats Canada site, and they do indeed have the up-to-date building 
data from Airdrie (although stripped of the height and elevation tags).  I seem 
to be the only active mapper in Airdrie, is it possible for me to move ahead 
with importing that part of the data? I'd certainly look for more mappers to 
discuss with if I decide to move on to more of Alberta.

--Joshua

On 2019-04-22 15:15, john whelan wrote:
For building footprints there are two sources of open data that are correctly 
licensed.  One is Microsoft's building footprints and the other is the Stat Can 
released data.  The Stats Canada data is basically the municipal data released 
under the federal government's licence.

I suggest you first check with James and ask him if your city's data is in the 
Stat Can data set.

The next step having sorted out a source of open data that has an approved 
licence is to work out a process to include the data.

There is a single import of the Stat Can buildings in progress.  However a 
Toronto mapper took exception to a million buildings being added mainly in the 
West of Canada and asked the DWG to remove them.

A group of three mappers are looking at ways to "cleanse" the data using open 
source software.  Once they have arrived at an agreed acceptable solution then 
I assume the Canada wide building import will continue in some way.

So you can hang on or you can submit your own import plan.  To do this the 
local mappers have to be in agreement.  In Ottawa this meant we met over coffee.

Then you need to formally write up an import plan in the wiki.  Submit it to 
the import mailing list and answer any queries they may have.  In this case 
Nate will probably say it is already covered in the current Canada wide import 
plan so why introduce yet another plan.  It also has to be listed somewhere or 
other as an import.

It also has to be discussed in this mailing group.

The City of Ottawa was kind enough to adopt the municipal version of the 
federal government's open data licence.  It took about five years from start to 
finish to get them to be nice and adopt it.  It has been formally approved by 
the legal working group.  If you can get your city to adopt the same licence 
great.  In Ottawa it meant we could bring in bus stops etc.

Any other licence should either be approved by the Legal Working Group or you 
can put your own interpretation on it.  If challenged at a later date your 
imported data could be removed so I don't recommend this route.

In short if you have a couple of local mappers in agreement that they would 
like to import the data, and if it is available via Stat Can and they find the 
data quality acceptable then ask to be permitted to import it on this mailing 
list.  James maybe able to assist.  Only if this route is not available should 
you think about doing something else.

Cheerio John

On Mon, Apr 22, 2019, 3:42 PM Joshua Kenney, 
mailto:kenney...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Hello everybody!
Relatively new mapper here.  I've been working on mapping my home town, and a 
couple of other places I've been, for the past 3 or 4 months.

I have found that my city of Airdrie, AB has a number of datasets available 
under an Open Data Licence:

http://data-airdrie.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/our-open-licence
The licence terms look straight forward enough, are there any additional steps 
I need to take to confirm compatibility with OSM?

One of the datasets includes building footprints.  Would importing that get in 
the way of the import of the national data? Where can I access the national 
data to compare the quality?

--Joshua


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


Re: [Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-23 Per discussione Joshua Kenney
If I can obtain explicit permission from the city, would I still need to 
wait for the LWG approval?

--Joshua

On 2019-04-22 16:03, Jarek PiĆ³rkowski wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!
>
> To answer your first question: the non-building data sets (parks,
> address points, bus stops, etc) are not currently importable without
> further effort: we would have to get that exact licence (with text
> including "City of Airdrie") approved by the OSM Licensing Working
> Group. I don't know if the LWG would object to the attribution
> requirements, possibly not, but the approval itself might take quite a
> while anyway, as lawyer things don't move fast.
>
> --Jarek
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 15:42, Joshua Kenney  wrote:
>> Hello everybody!
>> Relatively new mapper here.  I've been working on mapping my home town, and 
>> a couple of other places I've been, for the past 3 or 4 months.
>>
>> I have found that my city of Airdrie, AB has a number of datasets available 
>> under an Open Data Licence:
>>
>> http://data-airdrie.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/our-open-licence
>> The licence terms look straight forward enough, are there any additional 
>> steps I need to take to confirm compatibility with OSM?
>>
>> One of the datasets includes building footprints.  Would importing that get 
>> in the way of the import of the national data? Where can I access the 
>> national data to compare the quality?
>>
>> --Joshua
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


[Talk-ca] Open Data for Airdrie AB

2019-04-22 Per discussione Joshua Kenney
Hello everybody!
Relatively new mapper here.  I've been working on mapping my home town, and a 
couple of other places I've been, for the past 3 or 4 months.

I have found that my city of Airdrie, AB has a number of datasets available 
under an Open Data Licence:

http://data-airdrie.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/our-open-licence
The licence terms look straight forward enough, are there any additional steps 
I need to take to confirm compatibility with OSM?

One of the datasets includes building footprints.  Would importing that get in 
the way of the import of the national data? Where can I access the national 
data to compare the quality?

--Joshua


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca