Re: [Talk-transit] Deleting relations
Thanks. I figured it might be the Is it time to confuse myself by trying to use two different editors scenario. Richard On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote: I couldn’t find a way in Potlatch. What I did was: a) In Potlatch add a dummy node to the relation b) Download the area containing the dummy node in JOSM c) Delete the relation in the relations list in JOSM d) Upload changes e) Delete the dummy node (I used Potlatch but could also have used JOSM as both were open – I had to refresh Potlatch to be aware of the JOSM changes first though). I hope you don’t mind me deleting it. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/193015 Ed *From:* talk-transit-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto: talk-transit-boun...@openstreetmap.org] *On Behalf Of *Richard Mann *Sent:* 10 August 2009 01:54 *To:* osm *Subject:* [Talk-transit] Deleting relations I created a relation 193015 for Pad-Reading infrastructure, not realising that someone had already done so. 193015 has no members, but I can't see any obvious way of deleting it (in Potlatch). Is it possible? Richard ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Re: [Talk-transit] Deleting relations
Yes, it does get confusing using two editors. I pressed U in Potlatch this morning to try and unselect things like I do in JOSM and suddenly all the deleted ways where I was mapping appeared. I switched to View and back to Edit to sort out that mistake. But each has different strengths and I use whichever one I feel most suited for the task (this morning I used JOSM to follow my trip from Clacton to Haverhill and back via Catterwade to check the roads were all aligned to the average of all the public traces (or in the NPE lanes, that they aligned at all – I also found two lanes that should have connected to the main road but weren’t). I also used JOSM to add a sportsground I visited at the weekend as I find it easier to use to add all the POIs, use Q to orthogonalise rectangles and so on. But this is off topic. Perhaps I should mention I added two bus stops (one with shelter) which I’ll probably have to merge when the import occurs. Ed From: talk-transit-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-transit-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Richard Mann Sent: 10 August 2009 10:08 To: Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics Subject: Re: [Talk-transit] Deleting relations Thanks. I figured it might be the Is it time to confuse myself by trying to use two different editors scenario. Richard ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Re: [Talk-transit] Railway route relations
On Monday 10 August 2009 09:10:15 Jochen Topf wrote: The infrastructure route is something different from the moving vehicles forming a route. They are two different concepts, so they deserve their own keys. A bicycle route or walking route is more like an infrastructure route, there are signs on the way. Its a physically existing thing. The moving vehicle route (which we called a line) is more ephemeral. To me signs have nothing to do with infrastructure. For me the infrastructure are the roads themselves. So to me a cycleroute is a moving vehicle route. From this follows that introducing line relations is not consistent at all, because then we have a different type of relation for public transport moving vehicle routes and private transport moving vehicle routes. -- m.v.g., Cartinus ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
