Re: [Talk-transit] Buses in Brighton, UK

2015-06-30 Thread Stephen Dawkins
I did check a bunch of stops on my street, and the NaPTAN data for Brighton
and Hove looks generally good, albeit slightly displaced in areas (and the
curious case of a stop registered twice, once in the wrong admin area).

Interestingly, I've found that the stops on the Brighton and Hove
website[1] have a different positions, in some case more accurate. Perhaps
they need to be nudged into updating NaPTAN with their data. If you dig a
bit, you can get the KML file for it here[2].

Regards
Stephen

[1]http://www.buses.co.uk/travel/live-bus-times.aspx
[2]http://bh.buscms.com/brightonbuses_all_stops.kmz?format=kmlv=9

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Roger Slevin ro...@slevin.plus.com
wrote:

 I am surprised to hear that the current NaPTAN data (which is continually
 updated) has errors in it – and I wonder therefore if the problem may lie
 in the updating of NaPTAN data in OSM.  The original upload of NaPTAN to
 OSM was done about five years ago – and therefore it would not be
 surprising to find stops missing or ones that have moved in the meantime.



 I believe that Brighton  Hove are good at maintaining the data in NaPTAN
 – but their idea of precision and yours may differ (as for public transport
 information we can be tolerant of slightly imprecise locations).  So you
 should use the latest version of NaPTAN and I can supply a copy in XML or
 CSV format if that would help.



 Best wishes



 Roger Slevin

 Traveline south east  anglia





 *From:* Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net]
 *Sent:* 30 June 2015 10:58
 *To:* Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics; Stephen Dawkins
 *Subject:* Re: [Talk-transit] Buses in Brighton, UK



 I had the NaPTAN data imported for my local patch. The data is based on
 submissions from each local authority and I think the quality varies. I
 checked about a hundred stops and ended up surveying a couple of thousand
 bus stops because the quality was so poor. Locations were missing, in
 hopelessly wrong places and the meta data was often wrong. The local
 authorities here don't seem to believe in sharing data so you may have a
 completely different result. If you plan to survey some or all of the stops
 then using NaPTAN data as a hint to find them is useful. I suggest you
 check out a few first to assess the quality before any import.

 You should email talk-gb and possibly the imports ml to see what people
 think, this ml doesn't have a wide audience

 Cheers, Chris

 On 30 June 2015 10:43:20 GMT+01:00, Stephen Dawkins elfa...@elfarto.com
 wrote:

 Hi



 I was just starting to map the bus routes in Brighton, UK, when I noticed
 that it's missing a whole bunch of bus stops. Is the any objection to bulk
 importing either the NaPTAN data to fill in all the missing stops?



 Reading the mailing lists, it seems the NaPTAN data is not ideal, but
 surely it's better than having no data at all.



 For stops that already exist, I'd like to enhance them with their NaPTAN
 identifiers, but I won't attempt to move them (the assumption being the
 existing data is probably more accurate).



 I'm fairly new to OSM and was wondering if there is any issue in doing
 this?



 Thanks  Regards

 Stephen

 --


 Talk-transit mailing list
 Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit


___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit


Re: [Talk-transit] Buses in Brighton, UK

2015-06-30 Thread Roger Slevin
I am surprised to hear that the current NaPTAN data (which is continually 
updated) has errors in it – and I wonder therefore if the problem may lie in 
the updating of NaPTAN data in OSM.  The original upload of NaPTAN to OSM was 
done about five years ago – and therefore it would not be surprising to find 
stops missing or ones that have moved in the meantime.

 

I believe that Brighton  Hove are good at maintaining the data in NaPTAN – but 
their idea of precision and yours may differ (as for public transport 
information we can be tolerant of slightly imprecise locations).  So you should 
use the latest version of NaPTAN and I can supply a copy in XML or CSV format 
if that would help.

 

Best wishes

 

Roger Slevin

Traveline south east  anglia

 

 

From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net] 
Sent: 30 June 2015 10:58
To: Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics; Stephen Dawkins
Subject: Re: [Talk-transit] Buses in Brighton, UK

 

I had the NaPTAN data imported for my local patch. The data is based on 
submissions from each local authority and I think the quality varies. I checked 
about a hundred stops and ended up surveying a couple of thousand bus stops 
because the quality was so poor. Locations were missing, in hopelessly wrong 
places and the meta data was often wrong. The local authorities here don't seem 
to believe in sharing data so you may have a completely different result. If 
you plan to survey some or all of the stops then using NaPTAN data as a hint to 
find them is useful. I suggest you check out a few first to assess the quality 
before any import.

You should email talk-gb and possibly the imports ml to see what people think, 
this ml doesn't have a wide audience

Cheers, Chris

On 30 June 2015 10:43:20 GMT+01:00, Stephen Dawkins elfa...@elfarto.com wrote:

Hi

 

I was just starting to map the bus routes in Brighton, UK, when I noticed that 
it's missing a whole bunch of bus stops. Is the any objection to bulk importing 
either the NaPTAN data to fill in all the missing stops?

 

Reading the mailing lists, it seems the NaPTAN data is not ideal, but surely 
it's better than having no data at all.

 

For stops that already exist, I'd like to enhance them with their NaPTAN 
identifiers, but I won't attempt to move them (the assumption being the 
existing data is probably more accurate).

 

I'm fairly new to OSM and was wondering if there is any issue in doing this?

 

Thanks  Regards

Stephen


  _  


Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit


Re: [Talk-transit] Buses in Brighton, UK

2015-06-30 Thread Roger Slevin
Chris

That is disappointing to hear.  My role covers the south east and east Anglia 
regions and we would be happy to receive feedback in relation to NaPTAN data, 
and we would seek to persuade relevant colleagues in individual authorities to 
make any necessary corrections to NaPTAN where it is significantly wrong.  
Resource constraints may mean that such corrections cannot be done immediately 
- but we would do our best to get factually incorrect information updated as 
soon as possible.

Roger



-Original Message-
From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net] 
Sent: 30 June 2015 11:34
To: ro...@slevin.plus.com; Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics; 
'Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics'; 'Stephen Dawkins'
Subject: Re: [Talk-transit] Buses in Brighton, UK

I offered my survey data to Hull CC and East Riding of Yorkshire council. Both 
were not interested. This was when I did my surveys, so some time ago. I guess 
they don't understand that crowd-sourcing can produce valuable data. They 
certainly both are highly resistant to releasing any data as open data unless 
they are forced to do so. Maybe this attitude drives their data quality too.

Cheers, Chris

On 30 June 2015 11:21:39 GMT+01:00, Roger Slevin ro...@slevin.plus.com wrote:
I am surprised to hear that the current NaPTAN data (which is 
continually updated) has errors in it – and I wonder therefore if the 
problem may lie in the updating of NaPTAN data in OSM.  The original 
upload of NaPTAN to OSM was done about five years ago – and therefore 
it would not be surprising to find stops missing or ones that have 
moved in the meantime.

 

I believe that Brighton  Hove are good at maintaining the data in 
NaPTAN – but their idea of precision and yours may differ (as for 
public transport information we can be tolerant of slightly imprecise 
locations).  So you should use the latest version of NaPTAN and I can 
supply a copy in XML or CSV format if that would help.

 

Best wishes

 

Roger Slevin

Traveline south east  anglia

 

 

From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net]
Sent: 30 June 2015 10:58
To: Public transport/transit/shared taxi related topics; Stephen 
Dawkins
Subject: Re: [Talk-transit] Buses in Brighton, UK

 

I had the NaPTAN data imported for my local patch. The data is based on 
submissions from each local authority and I think the quality varies. I 
checked about a hundred stops and ended up surveying a couple of 
thousand bus stops because the quality was so poor. Locations were 
missing, in hopelessly wrong places and the meta data was often wrong.
The local authorities here don't seem to believe in sharing data so you 
may have a completely different result. If you plan to survey some or 
all of the stops then using NaPTAN data as a hint to find them is 
useful. I suggest you check out a few first to assess the quality 
before any import.

You should email talk-gb and possibly the imports ml to see what people 
think, this ml doesn't have a wide audience

Cheers, Chris



___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit