Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Nick Hockingwrote: > > > Given that the *vast* majority of these (with no name) are completely > fictional, and even those that aren't, are so out of position and so > wrongly connected as to render them worse than useless, I believe that > deletion is the only sensible option. > No doubt that way too many highway=residential are fictional, but there are a number of valid, just never touched ways. Of the ones that are valid they often need alignment. Working on a Maproulette Challenge[1] for Washington state here are my findings so far: 1. Most of the old logging roads were entered as highway=residential. Even though I've gotten some pushback, I mostly delete them. If the road looks like it's a main forest service road, I convert it to either unclassified or service. 2. These highway=residential connect to state highways and tertiary roads that need significant alignment to imagery. Just delete the old data would still leave hundred of valid roads mis-aligned. 3. Next to old logging roads, are ways that should be driveways or service ways. These are easy to fix. 4. Occasionally there are valid short segments of these original ways. For those I remove the review=no tag. 5. Cleaning up Washington State is a long term process. So far about 3% have been cleared. One of the positive outcomes is I've learned how to run a geoserver to serve open data [2] from the state to aid in the cleanup. Ian Dees has offered to help me migrate off my home server to the US Chapter's account on Mapbox. The state data far exceeds what's in TIGER. If you are working in Washington, please do not rely on any TIGER overlays. Simply put, its crap. The cleanup effort is a lot of work. I'm always trying to encourage local mappers to get involve. It is work that is needs to be done to improve the quality of OSM in the States. I encourage you to work on your state. Nick - if you do decide to just delete the ways, I would recommend first communicating with the community on your plans. Your plans should include how you plan to repair broken routes in a timely manner. [1] http://maproulette.org/map/2871 [2] http://tiles.snowandsnow.us/geoserver/gwc/service/tms/1.0.0/WashingtonRoads:all_wash_roads/{zoom}/{x}/{-y}.png Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 8:14 PM, Nick Hockingwrote: > Paul wrote "Or maybe the unedited original TIGER that's still around > dropped to > highway=road. " > > > Given that the *vast* majority of these (with no name) are completely > fictional, and even those that aren't, are so out of position and so > wrongly connected as to render them worse than useless, I believe that > deletion is the only sensible option. > I don't think it's actually fictional in a lot of cases, just *super* rural and often hard to tell from aerial imagery, at least what I've seen in the Oklahoma and Kansas area. However, being able to tell the known-good stuff from a raw unknown in pretty much any renderer at a glance would be handy. For example, planning routes through Death Valley or the Oregon Siskyous. Both are known to be low quality deathtraps in TIGER. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways
On 2/25/2018 9:14 PM, Nick Hocking wrote: Paul wrote "Or maybe the unedited original TIGER that's still around dropped to highway=road. " Given that the *vast* majority of these (with no name) are completely fictional, and even those that aren't, are so out of position and so wrongly connected as to render them worse than useless, I believe that deletion is the only sensible option. Deletion is highly dependent on the quality of TIGER ways in each region: many TIGER roads near me were directly derived from government data, probably 0.1cm accuracy. I haven't gone out to collect surface type, speed limits, lane configurations confirmed road name and therefore not touched them but they're very serviceable for automobile navigation. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways
I concur that deleting unnamed and untouched TIGER ways is the way (no pun intended) to go. From my experience editing, many rural driveways mapped in TIGER were converted to highway=service with access=private (though rarely with service=driveway), though there are many more that are still just highway=residential. If these are all deleted, it's not like we can't just go through and map more driveways. (Driveway mapping doesn't often seem to be much of a focus for a lot of people anyway, though they should still get mapped eventually.) For many of these roads around Pennsylvania, I generally set what appear to be unpaved roads that go and piddle out in someone's field to highway=track, and roads connecting to houses and buildings to highway=service. Sometimes I'll fix alignment, but most of the time these fixes are sidelined in favor of my main editing goal. I don't often go and edit random TIGER roads; instead, I focus on the numbered routes in my state. On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM, Nick Hockingwrote: > Paul wrote "Or maybe the unedited original TIGER that's still around > dropped to > highway=road. " > > > Given that the *vast* majority of these (with no name) are completely > fictional, and even those that aren't, are so out of position and so > wrongly connected as to render them worse than useless, I believe that > deletion is the only sensible option. > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > -- —Albert ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2018-02-22
These are based off of Lambertus's work here: http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by asking on the talk-us@ list, others can benefit. Downloads: http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2018-02-22 Map to visualize what each file contains: http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2018-02-22/kml/kml.html FAQ Why did you do this? I wrote scripts to joined them myself to lessen the impact of doing a large join on Lambertus's server. I've also cut them in large longitude swaths that should fit conveniently on removable media. http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2018-02-22 Can or should I seed the torrents? Yes!! If you use the .torrent files, please seed. That web server is in the UK, and it helps to have some peers on this side of the Atlantic. Why is my map missing small rectangular areas? There have been some missing tiles from Lambertus's map (the red rectangles), I don't see any at the moment, so you may want to update if you had issues with the last set. Why can I not copy the large files to my new SD card? If you buy a new card (especially SDHC), some are FAT16 from the factory. I had to reformat it to let me create a >2GB file. Does your map cover Mexico/Canada? Yes!! I have, for the purposes of this map, annexed Ontario in to the USA. Some areas of North America that are close to the US also just happen to get pulled in to these maps. This might not happen forever, and if you would like your non-US area to get included, let me know. -- Dave ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us