Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

2012-07-18 Thread James Mast

Well, I've started work on repairing I-26 in TN right now myself. -James
  ___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

2012-07-18 Thread Kai Krueger

Chris Lawrence-2 wrote
 
 On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Nathan Edgars II lt;neroute2@gt; wrote:
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=33.9958lon=-81.1074zoom=13layers=M
 
 I've fixed up I-20 between the Columbia River and US 21; looks like
 the damage goes both west and east from there at least to US 1 (west)
 and I-77 (east) but I've got other things to do tonight so I can't fix
 it all.
 

I also started fixing the I-20 at the intersection to I-77, as the
Interstate system around Columbia, South Carolina is a total mess. However,
the I-77 north wards had so many issues, that I couldn't fix them all in a
single pass. I decided to do some initial fixup along the I-77, leaving a
number of intersections and the route relation broken. The question is, is
it better to fix up a small bit thoroughly, or try and get as much of the
interstate at least vaguely right as soon as possible, and leave the rest to
a second pass?

Unfortunately, I think I also ran into an editing conflict with you, as when
I wanted to upload my changes, potlatch complained about version miss match
on the I-20 relation.

As I didn't know how to fix the conflict, I lost about 15 minutes worth of
work trying to clean up the I-20 / I-77 intersection.

So another question is, what is the best way to coordinate the general
fixing of the interstate system to try and minimize editing conflicts?

Kai

 

--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Redaction-bot-is-heading-our-way-tp5717069p5717161.html
Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

2012-07-18 Thread Martijn van Exel
What is this a screenshot of? OSMZmiany, do I read that right?
Can you zoom in with that, too?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
 Well, here is a brief overview of the bot's activities for today.
 There are still a couple of areas that errored out or are still in
 progress but this should be most of it.

 http://ni.kwsn.net/~toby/OSM/redaction_bot_USA.png

 Toby

 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us



-- 
martijn van exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

2012-07-18 Thread Toby Murray
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
 What is this a screenshot of? OSMZmiany, do I read that right?
 Can you zoom in with that, too?

 On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
 Well, here is a brief overview of the bot's activities for today.
 There are still a couple of areas that errored out or are still in
 progress but this should be most of it.

 http://ni.kwsn.net/~toby/OSM/redaction_bot_USA.png


Yes, it can zoom although when you have this many nodes loaded it is
pretty slow going. I am using my own build of some software I found on
github:

https://github.com/ToeBee/OSMZmiany

It is based on LiveEditViewer but has a few extra bells like filtering
on a specific user. Also has a few extra bugs :)

I just used the Load 6h more button 3 times to get all of the edits
of the bot for today.

Toby

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

2012-07-18 Thread Phil! Gold
* Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com [2012-07-18 18:26 -0700]:
 Chris Lawrence-2 wrote
  I've fixed up I-20 between the Columbia River and US 21
 
 I also started fixing the I-20 at the intersection to I-77

I also started working on I-20, from the Georgia border.  (I had qualms
about just going with the first one Wikipedia listed on their numbered
routes in South Carolina page...)  I spent a bunch of time reconstructing
the roads that cross it, though; for a lot of them, all the
decliner/non-responder did was split them to make bridges, which ends with
the road still on one side of the Interstate and a line of nodes on the
other side, so it's not too hard to recreate the roads.

 The question is, is it better to fix up a small bit thoroughly, or try
 and get as much of the interstate at least vaguely right as soon as
 possible, and leave the rest to a second pass?

IMHO, interstate connectivity is most important, but I figure reconnecting
roads that were split to cross the interstate will get decent other chunks
of the road network functional, too.

 Unfortunately, I think I also ran into an editing conflict with you, as when
 I wanted to upload my changes, potlatch complained about version miss match
 on the I-20 relation.

I hit a conflict with someone, too, but I think I correctly integrated
both sets of changes.  It helped that the other person had been working on
a different area of the relation, and neither of us had drastically
reordered the relation members.

 So another question is, what is the best way to coordinate the general
 fixing of the interstate system to try and minimize editing conflicts?

I'm not sure.  Maybe listing the Interstates (and perhaps US Highways) on
the wiki and letting people claim them one by one?

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

2012-07-18 Thread Richard Weait
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
 * Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com [2012-07-18 18:26 -0700]:

 So another question is, what is the best way to coordinate the general
 fixing of the interstate system to try and minimize editing conflicts?

 I'm not sure.  Maybe listing the Interstates (and perhaps US Highways) on
 the wiki and letting people claim them one by one?

Talking on #osm or #osm-us before and during is always good.

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

2012-07-18 Thread Bill Ricker
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, here is a brief overview of the bot's activities for today.
 There are still a couple of areas that errored out or are still in
 progress but this should be most of it.
 http://ni.kwsn.net/~toby/OSM/redaction_bot_USA.png


Are the Red the decliners/blacklist and the Green ? whitelists ? or what
here ?

-- 
Bill
@n1vux bill.n1...@gmail.com
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

2012-07-18 Thread Toby Murray
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, here is a brief overview of the bot's activities for today.
 There are still a couple of areas that errored out or are still in
 progress but this should be most of it.
 http://ni.kwsn.net/~toby/OSM/redaction_bot_USA.png


 Are the Red the decliners/blacklist and the Green ? whitelists ? or what
 here ?

Guess it could use a little explaining for people who haven't used
this software :)

Red is deleted nodes, green is modified nodes. For normal edits it
also shows new nodes in blue but since I filtered out only bot edits
there aren't any of those. It also doesn't show changes to ways, only
nodes. I just found a way in Kansas City that lost its highway=* tag
but none of its nodes were modified so it didn't show up in this
software.

Toby

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] Redaction bot is heading our way!

2012-07-18 Thread the Old Topo Depot
I've done I5 CA from the Oregon border to exit 199/CA 138.  Ways and
(hopefully) exit ramps reconstructed; crossing ways not restored (and there
are quite a number in need of attention).  I5 relation not updated, but
I'll do that next (but not tonight)

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
 
  On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Well, here is a brief overview of the bot's activities for today.
  There are still a couple of areas that errored out or are still in
  progress but this should be most of it.
  http://ni.kwsn.net/~toby/OSM/redaction_bot_USA.png
 
 
  Are the Red the decliners/blacklist and the Green ? whitelists ? or what
  here ?

 Guess it could use a little explaining for people who haven't used
 this software :)

 Red is deleted nodes, green is modified nodes. For normal edits it
 also shows new nodes in blue but since I filtered out only bot edits
 there aren't any of those. It also doesn't show changes to ways, only
 nodes. I just found a way in Kansas City that lost its highway=* tag
 but none of its nodes were modified so it didn't show up in this
 software.

 Toby

 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us




-- 
John Novak
Novacell Technologies and the Old Topo Depot
http://www.novacell.com
585-OLD-TOPOS (585-653-8676)
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us