Re: Missing feature in NFS
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004 at 18:28 (which was Wednesday, September 8, 2004 at 17:28 where I am) 9Val wrote: MS I still dearly miss the option to be able to (ctrl+)drag-n-drop my MS filters to copy/move them. Can we please get this back? It is still there but needs Alt pressed to start drag (like d'n'd of folders in main window) OK, Alt+Drag works for moving them, but Ctrl+Alt+Drag now makes the dragged filter a subfilter of the one I drop it on. What I really need is an 'in-place' copy, i.e. copy the filter _without_ having it end up at the bottom of the list. The list for this particular account has hundreds of filters that are sorted alphabetically which differ only slightly (the filters sort virus-alerts into per-virustype folders) and having to drag them back into place is extremely unwanted. The previous behaviour of being able to ctrl-drag a filter to copy it to the location it was dropped was much easier. Furthermore, while working on this I noticed something else: because I don't normally drag something into place if the destination isn't visible, I used Ctrl+Up to move the filter into place. If you keep these keys depressed in a sufficiently long list of filters, I noticed that TB! spends so much time re-painting the criteria-frame, that before it gets a chance to update the tree of filters, another move is noticed. This leads to the situation that the tree of filters looks like an empty control with TB! frantically trying to keep the filter criteria displayed, causing one to no longer be able to know where you are in the list, and thus when to release the Up-key. It would be more logical if while the Ctrl+Up is kept depressed, TB! would update only the tree of filters and leave the criteria frame alone. Moreover, since I'm only _moving_ the filter and not changing anything in it, there is no point in repainting that frame anyway. -- Greetings, Maurice Using The Bat! v3.0.0.11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
TB to run off a USB flash drive
Hello tbbeta I'd like to see some version of TB be able to be run directly off a USB flash device, then I can carry all my e-mail around in my pocket. Anyone support this future feature request? https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3611 -- regards, Graham Using The Bat! 3.0.0.11 assisted by BayesIt! 0.6.01 under Windows XP 5.1 (Build 2600, Service Pack 1) -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. -- Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: TB to run off a USB flash drive
Hello Bernd The question is, why does TheBat still use registry-settings? Without this and using relative pathes in every part of the program it would be no problem... Obviously I agree with this - and it would make backup / restore far simpler too, However, it seems that unless someone logs something in BugTracker, these suggestions could get lost. If you support the request (and I assume you do), then please endorse / second the request. -- regards, Graham Using The Bat! 3.0.0.11 assisted by BayesIt! 0.6.01 under Windows XP 5.1 (Build 2600, Service Pack 1) -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. -- Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: S/MIME check mark still there in AB after deleting certificates
Hi Alexander! I don't understand. I was talking about one single person in the address book, let's call the person Alexander Leschinsky. This person/entry has a S/MIME certificate under Certificates. The check mark for Cert in the address book overview is active for this entry. Now I delete all certificates out of this entry, the person Alexander Leschinsky has no certificates anymore. But the check mark is still set in the overview. Ups... I think about different matter - totally different. For your case restart of The Bat! can help - AB's stored in memory and The Bat overwrite (if needed) files only on exit Ah you thought about something different. No Problem. I tried the restart right after deleting the certificate out of the entry. Did not work, it's still there after days and several restarts and upgrades of TheBat. Regards, Martin -- The Bat! v3.0.0.11 powered by Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 http://www.concarne.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
NFS: folder creation option, please get it back
Listmembers: While the NFS now has an option to have the destination folder created when necessary on the dialog for specifying it, the option to actually create the new folder then and there has disappeared. I use this quite often and have always found it an advantage of TB! over other MUA's that I didn't have to think about creating the folder before starting on the filter. While I don't doubt the usefulness of the option to have the folder auto-created, I like being able to create the folder and specify it's properties while creating a filter. Can we please get this back? -- Greetings, Maurice Using The Bat! v3.0.0.11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: TB to run off a USB flash drive
Hi Graham! Just now (on 09/13/2004 at 12:30) you dropped the lines: If you support the request (and I assume you do), then please endorse / second the request. Yes i do. But there is already a wish like this... https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0003117 -- Bye Bye, Bernd (http://www.bd-programs.de - ICQ 12962268) Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: NFS: folder creation option, please get it back
Hi Maurice and list, On Monday, September 13, 2004 at 11:59:17 GMT +0200 (which was 11:59 where I live) Maurice Snellen wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of NFS: folder creation option, please get it back: While I don't doubt the usefulness of the option to have the folder auto-created, I like being able to create the folder and specify it's properties while creating a filter. Can we please get this back? I support your suggestion. -- Regards Michael powered by The BAT! 3.0.0.11, Useless Macro Collection 1.8.845 beta, and MyMacros 1.11 with usual problems of Windows XP Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: TB to run off a USB flash drive
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:04:21 +0100, Foster, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello tbbeta I'd like to see some version of TB be able to be run directly off a USB flash device, then I can carry all my e-mail around in my Although not the best solution to this, I used to use The Batch! (http://www2.skwire.net/~n0On3/TheBatch/) with reasonable success. This is going back 1.5 years though, so I don't if it's been kept up to date. -- Kevin Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: TB to run off a USB flash drive
Hello Bernd Yes i do. But there is already a wish like this... https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0003117 Apologies for missing this item.. I did use search for INI file and registry before submitting the bug. Obviously missed it. I suggest that Max (or other) updates my entry to RELATE to the earlier one which also has a great deal of support. Nice to know that great minds think alike :-) -- regards, Graham Using The Bat! 3.0.0.11 assisted by BayesIt! 0.6.01 under Windows XP 5.1 (Build 2600, Service Pack 1) -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. -- Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: NFS: folder creation option, please get it back
Hello Maurice! On Monday, September 13, 2004, 4:59 AM, you wrote: MS While I don't doubt the usefulness of the option to have the folder MS auto-created, I like being able to create the folder and specify it's MS properties while creating a filter. Can we please get this back? I have not had occasion to need this yet, but I would definitely like the option to create the new folder, while working on creating the filter, to be there. I can see, down the road, where I will in the future be needing this capability. It's a real pain to start doing something and then have to stop, do the prerequisite elsewhere, then come back and start over. I second the request expressed in the subject line. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.0.0.11 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Some questions and feature request.
Hello, I have just upgraded to version 3.0 and would like to ask a few questions: 1)I have read on the mailing list that version 3.0 pro will have all the features of securebat. I have browsed through the menus but could not find any option to enable encryption. I also took a look to the help file but just realized that the help file has not been upgraded (when you load the help file you find written What's new in version 2). Does this mean that you cannot *yet* use such features that will be added in the future? If the feature is already available can you please help me find which option I have to check? 2)I have approx 20 accounts on the bat. When an account is created the program adds under the get new mail icon the name of the account. The accounts are sorted exactly in the order they were created. However if you lately move the accounts using alt+left mouse button in the account pane the list under the get new mail icon does not change accordingly. Any way to change also that list? BTW it would be useful to have the possibility to create account groups. For example I check every day certain account and only every week certain other accounts. Right now I have checked the option ignore check all account requests for the accounts I check weekly. Once a week I have to select them singularly to check if new mail is available. If I could create a group weekly accounts the entire proces would be easier. 3)When I was still using version 2.0 I installed bayesit antispam plugin (version 04gm). Later on I upgraded bayesit plugin by downloading the zip file of version 061 and by overwriting the files in the directory under the bat. As I read in this mailing list one of the new features of version 3.0 is an upgraded antispam plugin (am I right?). However if I look in options -- plugins I only find bayesit plugin and the version is still 04gm. Is this normal? Another question is: If I want to backup the learning ability of the filter which files do I have to save? and how do I have to proceed to restore such files? Thank you in advance for your replies. Fabio Cipparone Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: NFS: folder creation option, please get it back
At 07:22 [GMT-0500] on Monday September 13 (actual time - 8:22pm on Monday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: [snips] MS While I don't doubt the usefulness of the option to have the folder MS auto-created, I like being able to create the folder and specify it's MS properties while creating a filter. Can we please get this back? Mary I have not had occasion to need this yet, but I would definitely like Mary the option to create the new folder, while working on creating the Mary filter, to be there. I can see, down the road, where I will in the Mary future be needing this capability. It's a real pain to start doing Mary something and then have to stop, do the prerequisite elsewhere, then Mary come back and start over. If that was the case, I'd agree, but it isn't. You can tell it to auto-create, and it works fine. (I did it this morning for a new filter.) -- cheers, Mic (reply address works) I learned that it is the weak who are cruel, and that gentleness is to be expected only from the strong. Leo Rosten Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: NFS: folder creation option, please get it back
On Monday, September 13, 2004 at 20:30 (which was Monday, September 13, 2004 at 14:30 where I am) Mic Cullen [MC] wrote: MC If that was the case, I'd agree, but it isn't. You can tell it to auto-create, MC and it works fine. (I did it this morning for a new filter.) The auto-created folder will have the default settings that any newly created folder has (unread on ticker, no clean up, no limits, no viewmode). Your method would require me to create the filter with auto-create active, then do a refilter and after the folder got created go to it's properties and change them to what I wanted them to be in the first place. Also note that the option to create a new folder while in the process of defining a filter existed in OFS, therefore I consider removing this feature a step backwards. -- Greetings, Maurice Using The Bat! v3.0.0.11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: NFS: folder creation option, please get it back
Hello Mic! On Monday, September 13, 2004, 7:30 AM, you wrote: MC If that was the case, I'd agree, but it isn't. You can tell it to MC auto-create, and it works fine. (I did it this morning for a new MC filter.) Suppose you want to give the folder a different name, once created. Is that possible? I've made only four filters under the NFS to this point. I know that I should begin to practice with it more. So I'll go make a new one and see how this auto-create function goes. I can't believe how much less timid I'm getting about unfamiliar software in the last three months. I'm writing calmly to you about playing with filters and my heart isn't skipping a single beat and I'm not even tempted to begin eating a chocolate bar for breakfast! It's the wonderful support on this list that's changing me. :) -- Best regards, Mary The Bat 3.0.0.11 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: NFS: folder creation option, please get it back
On Monday, September 13, 2004, at 11:59:17 [UTC+0200] (Monday, September 13, 2004 11:59 my local time) Maurice Snellen wrote: While the NFS now has an option to have the destination folder created when necessary on the dialog for specifying it, the option to actually create the new folder then and there has disappeared. Please tell me from where this option disappeared? I have it in both Create filter... dialogs (in main menu Special and in context menu of message list). The button near the Move to the folder field is the same as in old filter system. You have the possibility to define all folder properties when using this button. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.0.11 on Windows 95 4.0 Build b) Current beta is 3.00.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[3]: 3.0.0.11 - NFS: References header field not working
Hello Stuart, Monday, September 13, 2004, 12:23:54 PM, you wrote: M Just out of curiosity, was my 4 mids theory in the right M direction? Unfortunately no MO Ha, I knew it! :-) Anyway, it's good to know it is fixed and that we don't have to look for any other theory. MO Indeed, especially since we, at least I, didn't have a clue. SC I was just about to confirm your findings when I read 9Val's reply. Oh SC well at least its fixed. It appears to be working correctly with 3.0.0.14. Looks like it was: [-] NFS : References weren't unpacked before filtering. I don't know why we couldn't have figured that out. :) -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 On Windows 98 4.10 Build # Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: NFS - how do I create a filter for old messages?
Hi Maurice Snellen - On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, at 17:39:05 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:39 AM where I live) you wrote: You can't do that with a filter. As you 'pondered' yourself: what would trigger the filter to run? It depends on how one looks at it. There are several mail clients that trigger a rule when the folder is opened, closed or a new message arrives (by a move operation). IMO, that is how rules should be triggered. TB appears to not work that way (at least it doesn't for me). You can use the main folder's deleting settings to do what you are trying to create a filter for. Go to the folder's properties and have it delete the messages after 30 days. Then go to the 'Deletion' tab. Check the option 'Use folder-specific deletion settings'. This does not work for IMAP folders. -- Best Regards, Kevin PGP Keys: idap://keyserver.pgp.com idap://europe.keys.pgp.com:11370 Using The Bat! v3.0.0.11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgpKRjrBOJoYN.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available
On Monday, September 13, 2004, 19:12, 9Val wrote: Here is a short list of changes: [-] NFS : References weren't unpacked before filtering Confirmed as fixed, thanks! -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v3.0.0.8 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available)
Didn't see this in the previous beta: Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00403EEF in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 028B1000 -- Duncan Strand www.zebs.org.uk Things I'd Do If I Ever Became An Evil Overlord: 6: I will not gloat over my enemies' predicament before killing them. Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
List of shortcut keys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Is there a published, accurate list of all shortcut keys for the bat? - -- Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag: Ecclesiastic Philosopher Critic Teacher :einsteinyoyo: == Using The Bat! 3.0.0.14 :beta: Windows XP 5.1 (2600-Service Pack 2) Ponder this: All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for enough good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke morning dayevening == 10:58 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2 Comment: iQA/AwUBQUXf4fvT94bCV8K0EQL3dwCfSE7UoHwBxUcryavwrf+Kwh+pHfUAnAhS JtaTCec0o26x2sr7zXZxUi/H =ePBu -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available
for beta part banned people : http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb30014.rar -- Keep the flame burning ! http://www.everdying.com http://www.in-flames.com ArchY mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 -- Now PLaying : Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available)
Hi Duncan Strand - On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, at 18:47:30 [GMT +0100] (which was 10:47 AM where I live) you wrote: Didn't see this in the previous beta: Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00403EEF in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 028B1000 Same here, the HTML errors are back (running IMAP). -- Best Regards, Kevin PGP Keys: idap://keyserver.pgp.com idap://europe.keys.pgp.com:11370 Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 pgpunL3khrn1u.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available)
On 2004-09-13 (19:47), you wrote:
Invalid HTML !
Confirmed :[
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
/'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl |
/'.'; `-,`--',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Polish Support |
\/\/^\---.\;;/.---/^\/\/ |
3.0.0.14 : Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Beta 11: NFS Flaws Not Addressed in This Beta!
On Mon 13-Sep-04 11:06am -0400, 9Val wrote: BM A manual filter that sets message as read does not update BM the folder list count of unread messages. IMAP/POP? POP I just checked this with beta 14. My Read filter is manual only by hotkey (Ctrl-Alt-X) and ONLY marks the message as read (as an alternate to Ctrl-M). My Ctrl-Alt-X marks the message as read but fails to change the count in the folder window. Your Ctrl-M does both. -- Best regards, Bill Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available
Hello 9Val on Monday, September 13, 2004 at 19:12:08 you wrote: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available from They're back again... :-( Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00403EEF in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 04B4E000 -- Regards Daniel The Bat! 3.0.0.14, Windows XP Build 2600, Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available
Crafted from The Desk on location in the Quality Lab. Hello 9Val, Monday, September 13, 2004, 1:12:08 PM, you wrote: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ This version downloaded and install with no problems. Thank you. -- Ethan J. Mings Principal, The Desk 99 Bronte Road - Suite 815 Oakville, Ontario, Canada. L6L 3B7 Phone 905/825-9938 Office E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quality Lab E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website http://www.ejmings.com Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Beta 11: NFS Header Field Test - Please Try
On Mon 13-Sep-04 10:38am -0400, 9Val wrote: BM Sender tests should have failed. Fixed. Thanks! It works fine. BM Delivery-To Can't reproduce Of course, I meant to write Delivered-To. I just checked again with Beta 14. In my TBBeta folder I checked to make sure that the message tested contained: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] And checked to make sure the filter said: Header field - Delivered-To: contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] All the other test filters were triggered, but not this one. As I was checking and double checking, I noticed that of all the header fields in the drop down box, only this one ends in a ':'. Is it possible the TB! is trying to find: Delivered-To:: (Note the double colon.) -- Best regards, Bill Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: TB3.0.0.11 - Address Picker Buttons (English Language) Still Corrupt
Hello Avi, The address picker buttons are working (for me) at last in TB 3.0.0.14 -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 3.0.0.14 under Windows XP Service Pack 2 2600 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available
On Monday, September 13, 2004, at 11:28:39 AM, 9Val wrote: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ I still seem to be having trouble with that darn CC. Again, CC reports 16 messages on Server, and although it reports that 16 messages are being downloaded, none actually arrive on my Computer. I have to invoke the CC another 2 or 3 times to actually have all the messages downloaded. FYI, I leave my messages on the Server if that makes any difference. -- -=Nick Andriash=- -=Creston, B.C. Canada=- Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 on Windows XP Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available
Hello Nick, Monday, September 13, 2004, 11:30:24 AM, you wrote: FYI, I leave my messages on the Server if that makes any difference. I also left my messages on the server. Just for fun I changed the setting to delete messages. When I downloaded messages the number downloaded didn't match the number that the CC reported as downloaded. The messages were deleted from the server. -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 3.0.0.14 under Windows XP Service Pack 2 2600 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Beta 11: NFS Header Field Test - Please Try
Hello Bill, BM As I was checking and double checking, I noticed that of all BM the header fields in the drop down box, only this one ends BM in a ':'. Is it possible the TB! is trying to find: BM Delivered-To:: BM (Note the double colon.) Hmm, try to use Delivered-To (note without any colon) -- 9Val Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available
On Monday, September 13, 2004, 20:30, Nick Andriash wrote: I still seem to be having trouble with that darn CC. Again, CC reports 16 messages on Server, and although it reports that 16 messages are being downloaded, none actually arrive on my Computer. I have to invoke the CC another 2 or 3 times to actually have all the messages downloaded. FYI, I leave my messages on the Server if that makes any difference. So do I (for two days) without ever seeing the same problem. FWIW. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v3.0.0.8 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!
Hello 9Val, Monday, September 13, 2004, 23:10 you wrote at mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmm, could any programmer live without variables? ;) Done. Are you leaving Pranayama-zone? -- Regards, Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!
Hello 9Val, Hmm, could any programmer live without variables? ;) Done. No. And neither without beer. I owe you a few already ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Where filter action order might matter a lot? + suggestion!
On Monday, September 13, 2004, at 11:20:33 PM, MaXxX spewed forth what is to be beheld below: So, another tiny little request: please make the variable assignment parse macros... Please please... :) ... And another suggestion, perhaps simplifying things? Condition: [Template/Variable] [..] [is/isn't/etc.] If you make it work on template strings, choosing variable and entering blahvar would work just like choosing template and entering %_blahvar... but, oh, think of the possibilities... [Template] [%DATE=ddd] [is] [Sat]- filtering on Saturdays... [Template] [%ANYPLUGINMACRO...] [is] [anything...] - filtering with plugins... I am SO drooling. -- |\ /| \~~~/ \~~~/ | \/ | /\ \~/ ICQ# 3146019 || /__\ /___\ /_\ /___\IQ# 3.14159 Famous last words: Umm... Can I UN-cast that Fireball? I think it made him mad. Flyin' high with The Bat! v2.10 RC/1 over the swamps of Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Beta 11: NFS Header Field Test - Please Try
Hello 9Val, Items in drop-down can be edited easily, so it is not necessary to have header field or to create custom for filtering Good to know, I never even thought about editing there. Are you sure it works? ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: SPAM filter not working
On Monday, September 13, 2004, 5:32 PM, you wrote: M No. What you can do even better is to include X-Text-Classification: M as a new header in Options/Preferences/Message Headers and then it will M be available to use it in your filter this way: so now I don't have kludges to deal with, and I can make it a message field, nice! M Message field - X-Text-Classification - contains - spam I'll set it up! M When you add the new header in Preferences, enter it with the colon (:) M in display as... and _without_ the colon in RFC name. I have some that have colons in BOTH, should I change them all what is the significance with/without?? -- Paul Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Jun2004 (4.1.418) (avast! version number) 0437-1 (09.09.2004) (avast! DB version number) 4.1.418 (avast! plugin version number) Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: SPAM filter not working
Hello Paul, I have some that have colons in BOTH, should I change them all what is the significance with/without?? Use no colon for RFC name. Otherwise filter will be looking for X-header:: with two colons and will not find it. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
A story about duplicated messages living on the server
Hello all! Could anybody make the test of the server/TB combination? First, create message to yourself and put your address also in Bcc field. Then send it to your POP3 server, set The Bat! to leave messages on it and try to receive mail periodically, simultaneously observing what happens. During first connection to my server The Bat! received two messages addressed to me. Both were identical (including Message-Id) because of Bcc field contents. Every next connection gave me one new message identical with originally received ones. There were two identical messages on the server and The Bat! continuously received one of them, even showing it as new in Mail Dispatcher window. There were several similar tests made, using Outlook Express, Mozilla Messenger and Sylpheed (on Linux box). All these mail clients received two original messages and then no more. The problem is probably caused by wrong interpretation of UIDL command results by The Bat!. Some servers create different UIDL-s for two identical messages, but there are servers which create identical UIDL-s in such cases. An example of POP session log is attached. I sent two test messages to myself with my address in Bcc and The Bat! found new ones each time. Sometimes this may be very frustrating if an user has Inbox overloaded with identical messages. Of course, I know that sending Bcc to myself seems stupid, but this happened not only to me in real mailing. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.0.14 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 with BayesIt! 0.6.21)[23:01:16] C: Connected to server.domain.pl, port 110 [23:01:16] S: +OK Cubic Circle's v1.31 1998/05/13 POP3 ready server_identifier [23:01:16] C: USER temp [23:01:16] S: +OK temp selected [23:01:16] C: PASS * [23:01:16] S: +OK Congratulations! [23:01:16] C: STAT [23:01:16] S: +OK 4 3574 [23:01:16] C: LIST [23:01:16] S: +OK 4 messages (3574 octets) [23:01:16] S: 1 871 [23:01:16] S: 2 871 [23:01:16] S: 3 916 [23:01:16] S: 4 916 [23:01:16] S: . [23:01:16] C: UIDL [23:01:16] S: +OK But remember to DELETE messages REGULARLY [23:01:16] S: 1 1274fda44403 [23:01:16] S: 2 1274fda44403 [23:01:16] S: 3 1690e9ea7103 [23:01:16] S: 4 1690e9ea7103 [23:01:16] S: . [23:01:16] C: RETR 1 [23:01:16] S: +OK 871 octets S: message 1 header body follows [23:01:16] S: . [23:01:16] C: RETR 2 [23:01:16] S: +OK 871 octets S: message 2 header body follows [23:01:16] S: . [23:01:16] C: RETR 3 S: message 3 header body follows [23:01:16] S: . [23:01:16] C: RETR 4 [23:01:16] S: +OK 916 octets S: message 4 header body follows [23:01:16] S: . [23:01:16] C: QUIT [23:01:16] S: +OK Was it as good for you, as it was for me? (clean as a baby) [23:02:16] C: Connected to server.domain.pl, port 110 [23:02:16] S: +OK Cubic Circle's v1.31 1998/05/13 POP3 ready server_identifier [23:02:16] C: USER temp [23:02:16] S: +OK temp selected [23:02:16] C: PASS * [23:02:16] S: +OK Congratulations! [23:02:16] C: STAT [23:02:16] S: +OK 4 3574 [23:02:16] C: LIST [23:02:16] S: +OK 4 messages (3574 octets) [23:02:16] S: 1 871 [23:02:16] S: 2 871 [23:02:16] S: 3 916 [23:02:16] S: 4 916 [23:02:16] S: . [23:02:16] C: UIDL [23:02:16] S: +OK But remember to DELETE messages REGULARLY [23:02:16] S: 1 1274fda44403 [23:02:16] S: 2 1274fda44403 [23:02:16] S: 3 1690e9ea7103 [23:02:16] S: 4 1690e9ea7103 [23:02:16] S: . [23:02:16] C: RETR 2 [23:02:16] S: +OK 871 octets S: message 2 header body follows [23:02:16] S: . [23:02:16] C: RETR 3 [23:02:16] S: +OK 916 octets S: message 3 header body follows [23:02:16] S: . [23:02:16] C: QUIT [23:02:16] S: +OK Was it as good for you, as it was for me? (clean as a baby) [23:03:16] C: Connected to server.domain.pl, port 110 [23:03:16] S: +OK Cubic Circle's v1.31 1998/05/13 POP3 ready server_identifier [23:03:16] C: USER temp [23:03:16] S: +OK temp selected [23:03:16] C: PASS * [23:03:16] S: +OK Congratulations! [23:03:16] C: STAT [23:03:16] S: +OK 4 3574 [23:03:16] C: LIST [23:03:16] S: +OK 4 messages (3574 octets) [23:03:16] S: 1 871 [23:03:16] S: 2 871 [23:03:16] S: 3 916 [23:03:16] S: 4 916 [23:03:16] S: . [23:03:16] C: UIDL [23:03:16] S: +OK But remember to DELETE messages REGULARLY [23:03:16] S: 1 1274fda44403 [23:03:16] S: 2 1274fda44403 [23:03:16] S: 3 1690e9ea7103 [23:03:16] S: 4 1690e9ea7103 [23:03:16] S: . [23:03:16] C: RETR 2 [23:03:16] S: +OK 871 octets S: message 2 header body follows [23:03:16] S: . [23:03:16] C: RETR 3 [23:03:16] S: +OK 916 octets S: message 3 header body follows [23:03:16] S: . [23:03:16] C: QUIT [23:03:16] S: +OK Was it as good for you, as it was for me? (clean as a baby) Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Re: A story about duplicated messages living on the server
On Monday, September 13, 2004, at 3:19:48 PM, Zygmunt wrote: The problem is probably caused by wrong interpretation of UIDL command results by The Bat!. The problems I've been having with TB Beta's 0.8 through 0.14 not downloading messages from the Server, may be related. My problem seems to be that TB forgets what messages it's already downloaded, and in other cases it just steadfastly refuses to download them even when they are new. -- -=Nick Andriash=- -=Creston, B.C. Canada=- Using The Bat! v3.0.0.7 on Windows XP Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available )
Hi Duncan and list, On Monday, September 13, 2004 at 18:47:30 GMT +0100 (which was 19:47 where I live) Duncan Strand wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of HTML Error (Was Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.14 Post Release is now available ): Didn't see this in the previous beta: confirmed for 3.0.0.11 Invalid HTML ! confirmed for 3.0.0.14 -- Regards Michael powered by The BAT! 3.0.0.14, Useless Macro Collection 1.8.845 beta, and MyMacros 1.11 with usual problems of Windows XP Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: SPAM filter not working
Hello Paul, Monday, September 13, 2004, 4:45:30 PM, you wrote: M Message field - X-Text-Classification - contains - spam PC I'll set it up! M When you add the new header in Preferences, enter it with the colon (:) M in display as... and _without_ the colon in RFC name. PC I have some that have colons in BOTH, should I change them all what PC is the significance with/without?? FWIW Paul, I had bad luck with header when NFS first came on line, and mine (which works) looks like this: Message Source - contains - X-Text-Classification: spam However, I may have been using the colon when I tested the header option. -- Best regards, Scott Using TB: 3.0.0.11 On Windows XP: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 And Avast!: Jun2004 (4.1.418) with DB: 0437-1 (09.09.2004) TB Plugin: 4.1.418 Current beta is 3.00.14 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
