Re[2]: Different content depending on topdomain!
Thorvald Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hej! Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 08:28, Kian Andersen wrote: I have lost the code I used and could really need that link again! Have a look at the list's mail archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg51136.html I just found it typing your full name into Google... First place... ;) Hej hej! Thanks! I now have it working again! -- Best regards, Kian Andersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush with BayesIt! 0.7.4 Windows XP Service Pack 2 (5.1.2600) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP wish (0004013: Store non-IMAP specific TB! settings locally in separate file)
Allie, On 03-11-2004 03:22, you [AM] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: AM So what happens when you wish to view those colours at another AM location with another TB! client? You can't. But you cannot do that now either. They are stored with the local cache now. AM What's the point of developing further support for an attribute that AM cannot be stored centrally for at least another TB! installation to AM make use of. This isn't what IMAP is about. No but my suggestion is to make the current functionality more solid so that clearing the local cache does not remove colour groups and memos. Naturally making this information available from all locations would be nice but I don't think this is possible as per the IMAP protocol? -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.0.1.33 Pro /thebat version env. ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.2.4: VERY Weird Behavior Duplicate Behavior, and Threading
On Wednesday, November 03, 2004 at 1:19:28 AM [GMT -0500], Keith Russell wrote: I tried to send this using TB! several hours ago. In trying to determine why it hadn't showed up on the list, I found that the same thing happened as a couple of days ago: 30 copies of the message in the Outbox, all created one minute apart! So I'm back to using Thunderbird That's your server side outbox doing that. The messages are long but I hope 9Val is reading to some extent to see that server-side Outboxes still create problems for some people. I've tried it and see how quirky it works. Sounds like you need to use those other clients then. :-) You keep saying that. I don't know whether you're being facetious, whether you're just tired of listening to me complain and trying to get rid of me ;-), or whether you're making a serious suggestion! I'm not being facetious or anything. You had said you switched to IMAP so that you could compose messages across locations. This requires working Draft folder support which TB! doesn't have. If you wish to use TB! for this, you need to put your Outbox server side and this is causing a lot of problems for you where you can't send messages. That's a showstopper. You're already using ThunderBird while testing and hoping TB! will one day work for you so, you're already doing as I am suggesting. :) The developers say that implementing a draft folder would be a very involved task. Really? I missed that discussion. I wonder why that would be the case. It has to do with the design. It would involve major code changes for Draft folder functionality to be offered. AFAIK, they don't have any foreseeable plan for this. :-) It's really not something I do a lot, either. I would just like to have it available. What I do do, though, is start writing a long message, get interrupted, and come back and finish with another client. Of course, if TB! were reliable enough to use all the time, I could stop doing that I see. :-) Not at all. Sorry if I didn't make that clear. I've actually done as much complaining on the Mulberry list as I've done here, due to all the time wasted on Waiting for server, which once it starts, displays for ever active folder before you can do anything else. Your connection to the IMAP server doesn't seem to be as good as you may be thinking. Mulberry is my benchmark in a sense. If you're waiting a long time for Mulberry, then your connection is likely to be slow. Is your IMAP server one of your ISP's servers? It sounds that way, doesn't it? But get this...I actually just upgraded my DSL connection from 640 Kbps to 1.5 Mbps! That's what makes this whole thing especially frustrating. That's what your connection is capable of, but that doesn't mean that's the connection you're getting from the IMAP server. One way to check would be to install a tool like DUMeter, that can show your connection speed as you're working with the IMAP server. At home I'm quite content with TB! since my IMAP server is on my home LAN. Messages are routinely loaded nigh unto instantaneously and the pauses are there but not ridiculously long. They're more a noted annoyance than being really distressing. I connect to my server from work. The connection is about 256KBps as determined by my home DSL connection speed. I don't always get the maximum throughput. In fact, maximum throughput is more an exception than a rule. I average about half that speed. TB! at work behaves about the same as you describe. I really doubt that you have a 1MBit/sec connection to your IMAP server and are using it all. Yes, I need to learn to stop doing this. I get really frustrated and just can't help myself. :-( The CC should be your friend. If there's an inordinately long pause, check the CC to see what's happening. If there are tasks in the queue including the one you're waiting on (after a while you can understand the various items in the queue) then clicking on another folder or message will not help. Wait a little, an IMAP 'little' that is. ;) If there's still nothing happening, delete the task at the top of the queue and see how that goes. Unfortunately, at times, the connection to the server stalls. This happens with ThunderBird but less often. There will likely be a lag for you. When you hit delete, the request is sent. When the server gets it and deletes the message, it's correspondingly done locally. Yes, but again, I expect it to take a few seconds, and not a few minutes. The delete request is a request like any other. If selecting a message for reading is taking long for you, then a delete request may take long as well. Hit delete once and move on. But you keep saying not to click around! If I move on and click somewhere else, am I not just building up the task queue again? In the case of delete, yes. I mean, delete the message by hitting delete. That's a tiny request to the server. You can move to another task like continuing to read messages. The
Re: IMAP wish (0004013: Store non-IMAP specific TB! settings locally in separate file)
On Wednesday, November 03, 2004 at 3:33:49 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: AM So what happens when you wish to view those colours at another AM location with another TB! client? You can't. But you cannot do that now either. They are stored with the local cache now. I realize this. My question was more rhetorical. :) IMO, the thing to do would be for TB! to support the message labelling as is supported by so many other IMAP clients. This colour labelling can be stored server side. No but my suggestion is to make the current functionality more solid so that clearing the local cache does not remove colour groups and memos. Those POP3 features are nice aren't they? :) Naturally making this information available from all locations would be nice but I don't think this is possible as per the IMAP protocol? I'm not sure if it's not possible. However, IMO, it's not that it would be nice. That's really how it should be. All attributes should be stored server side so that TB! clients at other locations would be able to use them and display them as well. I'd vote for working towards a working solution of that nature rather than one that works for one location only. What I wish not to see is colour groups being enhanced the way you describe and then colour labelling storable server side, and usable by other IMAP clients is never supported. -- -= Allie =- . Discoveries are made by not following instructions. __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 for IMAP mail IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP wish (0004013: Store non-IMAP specific TB! settings locally in separate file)
Allie, On 03-11-2004 12:12, you [AM] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: AM IMO, the thing to do would be for TB! to support the message AM labelling as is supported by so many other IMAP clients. This colour AM labelling can be stored server side. Yes. I agree. TB! should store this info server side. I don't know if anything can be done about memos. No but my suggestion is to make the current functionality more solid so that clearing the local cache does not remove colour groups and memos. AM Those POP3 features are nice aren't they? :) Yup! AM What I wish not to see is colour groups being enhanced the way you AM describe and then colour labelling storable server side, and usable AM by other IMAP clients is never supported. I agree. The optimal solution is the one you describe. However, I am afraid that this might mean a reduction in current functionality of CGs and memos. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.0.1.33 Pro /thebat version env. ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Macro bug
Greetings BatPeople, Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 2:01:07 AM, Ciprian wrote: C %TIME=mmdd\%- C E%- C %TIME=mmdd\%-E%- C _ C My output is: C 20041103\4 C 20041103\E C I think this is a bug, because both output lines should be the same. I do not read them as the same the %-CR means line continues .. whereas with the %-E the %- is ignored because it isnt at the end of the line. -- Cheers, \\' Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush under Windows XP ver5.1 Build 2600 using a P4 2.8Ghz, 512MB RAM with cable modem Plugins: Grisoft AVG 7.0 // BayesIt! 0.7.4 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Exchange issues (follow-up)
Just to follow up: On 20-10-2004 14:35, you [PF] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: PF Issues with the new Exchange server: PF 1) IMAP: I cannot move messages to another folder. Yes, I can dump the PF messages there but they're not re-fetched on accessing the folder. PF If I open LookOut 2003, they are clearly visible. All folders are PF set to Full synchronize in TB! The counts are correct, but not all PF messages are shown! This problem was fixed clearing the local cache. I find it very puzzling that this should become corrupted just in the exact moment the server was upgraded. TB! works just as well with Exchange 6.5 as Exchange 5.5. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.0.1.33 Pro /thebat version env. ~18 POP3, 1 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 150K msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Why doesn't this work?
Hello, %IF:%OFROMADDR=%OFROMNAME::(%OFROMADDR) What I need is: When I reply to a sender that doesn't have a name only an address I don't wont it to show E-mail (E-mail) wrote: just E-mail wrote: -- Best regards, Kian Andersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush with BayesIt! 0.7.4 Windows XP Service Pack 2 (5.1.2600) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Macro bug
C %TIME=mmdd\%- C E%- C %TIME=mmdd\%-E%- C _ C My output is: C 20041103\4 C 20041103\E C I think this is a bug, because both output lines should be the same. W I do not read them as the same W the %-CR means line continues .. whereas with the %-E the %- is W ignored because it isnt at the end of the line. If I use: %TIME=mmdd\E%- the result is still 20041103\4 -- Cip Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Mass mailing problem
Hi All: Is this by design? If so it is not functional for me because some intended recipients are skipped. 1. Individual contacts in the address book generally contain distinct email addresses. One or two contacts in my address book share email addresses. These are listed as separate contacts, but have the same email address. 2. Open the address book. Select an address book or highlight all contacts (it does not matter). Choose Mass mailing using template. Send the results to the outbox. 3. If there are 500 contacts in the address book with two pairs of duplicate addresses, only 498 emails will be generated. I hope I have been clear about this problem. Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 -- Maybe between the time I left Camp David and here I'll learn more. Bush, speaking to reporters after returning from Camp David. Source: Public Papers of the Presidents, Remarks on Returning From Camp David, Maryland, and an Exchange with Reporters, March 23, 2003 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re:
Hello I don't believe that The Bat supports delete from server if you use a common folder. It loses track of the account that it came from so it doesn't know which account it should delete from. If you use a folder within the account it does work. I think that you are right. Mmmh - Makes a nonsense of the Use a common Junk Folder then doesn't it . It explains why my delete from server filter is no longer working too -- regards, Graham Using The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush assisted by under Windows XP 5.1 (Build 2600, Service Pack 1) -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. -- Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.2.4: VERY Weird Behavior Duplicate Behavior, and Threading
Some of my problems might be on MailSnare's end, or might have to do with the route between here and there, considering that other users don't seem to have the number of problems that I have with both Mulberry and TB! Keith, My two IMAP servers are FastMail and MailSnare, and there's no doubt that Mailsnare is the slower of the two here using TB but that might be because its message base is bigger than FastMail's. However, I don't notice the difference between the two accessing them via Mulberry. I don't know where that leaves you though. -- Regards Clive Taylor Using TB 3.0.2.4 Rush Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Common Filter: Share with problem
Hello tbbeta, I have been trying to create a common filter for a test. When I get to the part about sharing the common filter I check the appropriate accounts and then select OK. When I send my test message, no joy. I go back to the filter and see that the check marks are gone from the Share with folders. Any confirmations. -- Best regards, Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 52 shopping days left til Xmas. Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Cosmetic Glitch: quote coloring
Hello everyone, the quote coloring (different colors for different quote levels) stumbles across spaces (which some mailers insert between Quote indicators). Please look: Quote Level 3 Quote Level 2 Quote Level 1 but... Quote Level 3 Quote Level 2 Quote Level 1 Is it worth adding a bugreport? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Deliplayer2 is playing: Spores From Space (A Microscopic Trace) by Cosmosis from the 1998 album 'Synergy' Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common Filter: Share with problem
Hello Stuart, I have been trying to create a common filter for a test. When I get to the part about sharing the common filter I check the appropriate accounts and then select OK. When I send my test message, no joy. I go back to the filter and see that the check marks are gone from the Share with folders. Any confirmations. I had never tried Common filters yet (didn't feel the need for them). I created one right now, shared with 3 of my accounts, sent a message to the 3 accounts from a fourth one and the filter worked as expected for the 3 shared accounts. Opening the S.O. shows the 3 shared accounts still ticked. So, no, I can't confirm. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Macro bug
On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, at 14:37:11 [UTC+0200] (Wednesday, November 3, 2004 13:37 my local time) Ciprian Trofin wrote: If I use: %TIME=mmdd\E%- the result is still 20041103\4 You use incorrect syntax of the macro. Use either quotes or parentheses, i.e., %TIME(mmdd)\E%- or %TIME=mmdd\E%- The syntax used in your macro suggests a kind of unknown formatting string, therefore result is unpredictable. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 with BayesIt! 0.7.4) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common Filter: Share with problem
On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, at 10:20:04 [UTC-0600] (Wednesday, November 3, 2004 17:20 my local time) Stuart Cuddy wrote: I have been trying to create a common filter for a test. When I get to the part about sharing the common filter I check the appropriate accounts and then select OK. When I send my test message, no joy. I go back to the filter and see that the check marks are gone from the Share with folders. Any confirmations. Cannot confirm. My common filters are used for colouring messages written by myself (incoming mail filters) or replies to such messages (replied message filters). They have associated with different accounts and I am able to change this association without any problem. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 with BayesIt! 0.7.4) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Common Filter: Share with problem
Hello MAU,
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 12:27:20 PM, you wrote:
M So, no, I can't confirm.
This is very odd. I have created a very simple common filter as follows.
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [46EC7DA0.01C4C1BD.434E3881.7DBE648C]
Name: Testing
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`2`0`testing\0D\0A}
SetColour -1459654258
IsActive
Ignore
endFilter
While viewing the Share with tab I check two folders to share. If I
then click back onto the filter name in the filter tree the shared
account checkmarks disappear. I then copied the filter and this is
what I get.
Could you please set up a Common filter like the one above with a
folder shared and paste it into a message so I can copy it into my
setup to see if that will work.
TIA
--
Best regards,
Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush
On Windows 98 4.10 Build #
Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: IMAP wish (0004013: Store non-IMAP specific TB! settings locally in separate file)
On Wednesday, November 03, 2004 at 6:25:47 AM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten wrote: I agree. The optimal solution is the one you describe. However, I am afraid that this might mean a reduction in current functionality of CGs and memos. If I can store colour groups locally without deleting them on emptying the cache, I'd still be crippled since I'll use it only if it can be used across different installations. There are also little logistical problems of how the association between the local index file that contains colour groups and memos. How is the linking of memos to messages maintained after a deletion and cache rebuild? Why am I going there anyway?? -- -= Allie =- . Words are not food, though sometimes we must eat them. __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 for IMAP mail IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common Filter: Share with problem
On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, at 12:51:43 [UTC-0600] (Wednesday, November 3, 2004 19:51 my local time) Stuart Cuddy wrote: Could you please set up a Common filter like the one above with a folder shared and paste it into a message so I can copy it into my setup to see if that will work. If you copy and paste common filter then associations with accounts are lost. I don't know this is a bug or feature. However, these associations (if set) will remain in my TB!. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 with BayesIt! 0.7.4) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: [the_bat] Re: 3.0.2.4: VERY Weird Behavior Duplicate Behavior, and Threading
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 10:49:47 AM, (Internet Time - @742) you wrote: Hello Clive, CT Keith, My two IMAP servers are FastMail and MailSnare, and there's no CT doubt that Mailsnare is the slower of the two here using TB but that CT might be because its message base is bigger than FastMail's. CT However, I don't notice the difference between the two accessing them CT via Mulberry. I don't know where that leaves you though. Clive, I too use Fastmail as my IMAP account. I have very few problems with the account and I am trying to learn as much as I can about the IMAP protocol. I too do not have many messages on the Fastmail account, roughly 1200 messages, and have only been using it for a few weeks. But as I said, I am trying to learn from you, Keith, Martin, Alley and all the rest that are posting information on the use of IMAP. Thanks... -- Best regards, Michael mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! Version 3.0.2.4 Rush On Windows XP SP2 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common Filter: Share with problem
Hello Stuart, A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on: 03 November 2004 at 20:54:35 GMT +0100 SC Could you please set up a Common filter like the one above with a SC folder shared and paste it into a message so I can copy it into my SC setup to see if that will work. I already have a filter to colour mail from me as it arrives on this list. As an experiment I copied and pasted it as a common filter shared between two accounts and it works fine. It's pasted as is below. TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [92711BA0.01C4C1D6.1C09A9E2.6ADD1B6C] Name: From\20me. Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SetColour -1597849128 IsContinue IsActive Ignore endFilter -- Best regards,Tony. _ The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush 03/11/2004 at 20:15 UTC 2ØØ4 - AWB Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Why doesn't this work?
Kian Andersen [KA], wrote: KA %IF:%OFROMADDR=%OFROMNAME::(%OFROMADDR) KA What I need is: KA When I reply to a sender that doesn't have a name only an address KA I don't wont it to show KA E-mail (E-mail) wrote: KA just KA E-mail wrote: Wrong list? Should ask on TBUDL... This is what I use: ,- | %IF:'%CAPITALFIRST(%OFROMFNAME)'=='%CAPITALFIRST(%OFROMLNAME)':%- | '%CAPITALFIRST(%OFROMFNAME)':%- | '%CAPITALFIRST(%OFROMFNAME) %CAPITALFIRST(%OFROMLNAME)'%- | [%QINCLUDE='_Initials'], wrote: `- You may wish to change this but it gives you something to work with... probably something like: ,- | %IF:'%OFROMNAME'=='%OFROMADDR':%- | '%OFROMADDR':%- | '%OFROMFNAME %OFROMLNAME (%OFROMADDR)'%- | wrote: `- -- .\\artin | ICQ 15893823 Would you like me to give you a formula for success? It's quite simple really. Double your rate of failure. THOMAS J WATSON ___ IMAP Client: The Bat! Version 3.0.2.4 Rush | Horde IMP WebMail IMAPS Server: Dovecot | OS: Windows XP Professional (Service Pack 2) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Common Filter: Share with problem
Hello Zygmunt, Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 2:09:34 PM, you wrote: Could you please set up a Common filter like the one above with a folder shared and paste it into a message so I can copy it into my setup to see if that will work. ZW If you copy and paste common filter then associations with accounts are ZW lost. I don't know this is a bug or feature. However, these associations (if ZW set) will remain in my TB!. Are you saying that the accounts that are marked to share with are lost when copying and pasting? -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush On Windows 98 4.10 Build # Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Common Filter: Share with problem
Hello Tony, Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 2:17:40 PM, you wrote: TB I already have a filter to colour mail from me as it arrives on this list. TB As an experiment I copied and pasted it as a common filter shared between TB two accounts and it works fine. It's pasted as is below. TB TB! Message Filter TB beginFilter TB UID: [92711BA0.01C4C1D6.1C09A9E2.6ADD1B6C] TB Name: From\20me. TB Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TB SetColour -1597849128 TB IsContinue TB IsActive TB Ignore TB endFilter Did you have any share with accounts selected when you copied this. It appears to have lost them when you pasted this if there were. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush On Windows 98 4.10 Build # Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common Filter: Share with problem
Hello Stuart, A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on: 03 November 2004 at 21:35:20 GMT +0100 SC Did you have any share with accounts selected when you copied this. SC It appears to have lost them when you pasted this if there were. Yes, I did, it's shared between two accounts. I'll CP it again but I can see now it's exactly the same. TB! Message Filter beginFilter UID: [92711BA0.01C4C1D6.1C09A9E2.6ADD1B6C] Name: From\20me. Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SetColour -1597849128 IsContinue IsActive Ignore endFilter -- Best regards,Tony. _ The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush 03/11/2004 at 20:43 UTC 2ØØ4 - AWB Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common Filter: Share with problem
Hello Stuart, A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on: 03 November 2004 at 21:34:53 GMT +0100 SC Are you saying that the accounts that are marked to share with are SC lost when copying and pasting? I think it beginning to look that way. I tried it twice and I don't see any shared account details. -- Best regards,Tony. _ The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush 03/11/2004 at 20:47 UTC 2ØØ4 - AWB Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
HTML Editor - adding pictures with dd
Hello, when I add pictures to the HTML Edit via drag drop, png pictures are added, but not send with the mail. And jpg images are only added as attechment. Is this behaviour intended? -- With best regards Lars Sölter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bat! Version 3.0.2.4 Rush Windows 2000 / Service Pack 4 (Build 2195) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Imagequality
Hello, the scaling quality The Bat! uses here when resizing images (attachment or integrated into HTML mails) is quite bad. Is there way to enhance this? The background to this question is: Fax messages are routed through a fax server and send as email attechments to the clients. The email client in use at the moment, is The Bat!. What is needed, to handle a lager amount of mails with attached fax images, would be a better scaling quality, and the possibility to set the default type of scaling (scale to window width, scale to window high, no scaling, ...). And option to rotate an attched image would be coolt, but not so important. -- With best regards Lars Sölter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bat! Version 3.0.2.4 Rush Windows 2000 / Service Pack 4 (Build 2195) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Imagequality
Lars Sölter [LS], wrote: LS the scaling quality The Bat! uses here when resizing images LS (attachment or integrated into HTML mails) is quite bad. Is there LS way to enhance this? You could use the Windows Fax and Picture Viewer (or another 3rd party product) with TB! Just select Use external viewer to display images in Options-Preferences-General -- .\\artin | ICQ 15893823 Whoever sets the agenda controls the outcome of the debate. NOAM CHOMSKY ___ IMAP Client: The Bat! Version 3.0.2.4 Rush | Horde IMP WebMail IMAPS Server: Dovecot | OS: Windows XP Professional (Service Pack 2) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Imagequality
You could use the Windows Fax and Picture Viewer (or another 3rd party product) with TB! Just select Use external viewer to display images in Options-Preferences-General As I said, there are many faxes to handle. It is important, to do this with as less clicks as possible. The option to use an external view is the way it is handled at the moment. But I'm getting only complains about this. The best solution would be, if the images would be displayed inline within the text part of the email. But having a state of the art preview option inside the attachment tabs of The Bat! would be fine too. An other way to go, would be using Outlook as email client. But I really don't like this idea. -- With best regards Lars Sölter The Bat! Version 3.0.2.4 Rush Windows 2000 / Service Pack 4 (Build 2195) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Common Filter: Share with problem
Hello Tony, Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 2:48:18 PM, you wrote: TB A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on: TB 03 November 2004 at 21:34:53 GMT +0100 SC Are you saying that the accounts that are marked to share with are SC lost when copying and pasting? TB I think it beginning to look that way. I tried it twice and I don't see any TB shared account details. I now have downgraded to 3.01.33 and it is working as it should. It is odd though that it became corrupt on my machine only. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 On Windows 98 4.10 Build # Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common Filter: Share with problem
On Wednesday, 03 November 2004 at 23:03 (UK time), Stuart Cuddy said: I now have downgraded to 3.01.33 and it is working as it should. It is odd though that it became corrupt on my machine only. Stuart, I am also seeing this problem (on 2 Win98 PCs) and posted about this several days ago although there was little feedback on the problem. I have logged this on the Bt as bug #0003983. Sadly, no-one else, even 9Val, can confirm that this bug exists so we may have to put up with it for a while. I see you are also a Win98 user so perhaps that is the problem although I don't see why it should be. I have tested creating new filters, deleting the .SRB file and doing everything I can possibly think of but as far as I am concerned I have no common filters on either of my Win98 PCs with a 3.0.2.x build. Like you, if I go back to 3.0.1.33 then my common filters work again one I have selected the various account check boxes on the 'Shared With..' tab. Perhaps you could add a comment in the BT for me? Thanks. -- Paul White Using The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush (Home Edition) on Windows 98 (4.10.1998) Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.2.4: VERY Weird Behavior Duplicate Behavior, and Threading
Clive Taylor wrote: Keith, My two IMAP servers are FastMail and MailSnare, and there's no doubt that Mailsnare is the slower of the two here using TB but that might be because its message base is bigger than FastMail's. However, I don't notice the difference between the two accessing them via Mulberry. I don't know where that leaves you though. My MailSnare account expires in about three weeks, and I am probably going to switch to Fastmail, Runbox, or Fusemail, in the hope that performance will improve. Unfortunately, I don't know of any good way to test these alternatives with the volume of mail that I have on the MailSnare server. I haven't decided how I'm going to move my mail once I do switch, either. I'm concerned about running into bandwidth problems, at least with Fastmail. -- Keith Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.3 Invalid Pointer when sending mail
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:44:40 -0400, Tim Casten wrote: I also have gotten the invalid pointer operation error a few times in 3.0.2.4. Usually it happens when I am clicking into another folder, not sending mail. But on one occasion, TB sent a message twice, and this might have been accompanied by an invalid pointer operation error (offhand, I don't recall). Has anyone posted this bug to BT? -- Avi Yashar Windows XP Pro and The Bat! Pro 3.0.2.4 Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: A Question About IMAP Use
Do you copy your messages to local folders? If so, how? I don't copy them all - after all, it's one of the advantages of IMAP that you can access all your mail all the time. MailSnare (which I use for list traffic) doesn't have the facility for backing up your mail from the server but OTOH FastMail, that I use for my main mail and where I have a 2Gb allowance, allows you to zip your messages and download them to to your local machine on a folder by folder basis. It works well for me and I usually do this each month. -- Regards Clive Taylor Using TB 3.0.2.4 Rush Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 3.0.2.4: VERY Weird Behavior Duplicate Behavior, and Threading
I'm concerned about running into bandwidth problems, at least with Fastmail. You shouldn't be. A full account with FastMail gives you 600Mb of storage while an enhanced a/c gives 2Gb. If space is an issue why not use a Gmail a/c (1Gb storage) and forward old mail there? I can give you an invite if you, and anyone else, wants one, (I have four left to give away). First come, first served! PM to my address. -- Regards Clive Taylor Using TB 3.0.2.4 Rush Current beta is 3.0.2.4 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
