Returning to non encrypted state.
Hello, I was just wondering if any one had tried to return to a non-encrypted state after they had used the ver. 3.0.2.10 in the encrypted mode? I was going to use the regular Tools backup. Then reinstall TheBat! Will I be able to use the backup since it will be in the encrypted state? Just curious as I'm about to move to a new machine and want to make sure I have all my options. -- Thanks, Dean 3.0.2.10 Windows 2000 5 2195 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Returning to non encrypted state.
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, at 03:19:26 [UTC-0600] (Wednesday, January 5, 2005 10:19 my local time) Dean wrote: I was going to use the regular Tools backup. Then reinstall TheBat! Will I be able to use the backup since it will be in the encrypted state? The backup copy is not encrypted until you use backup with password option. Even then you may restore all data working either in encrypted or unencrypted mode of The Bat!, because encrypted message base does not depend on encrypted backup copy. I tried this successfully several times in 3.02.10. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v3.0.2.6 on Windows 95 4.0 Build b) Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Hello Thomas Fernandez everyone else, on 05-Jan-2005 at 02:23 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote: However, I need the account level filters only to makr the messages with something so I know which account they were first sent to, before being moved to the folders that they share, so I know which account to reply from. I chose to try colour groups. Wouldn't it be possible to pick the original TO information in a %IF clause and automagically determine the correct account to use for the reply? Something like... %IF(%OTOADDR=[EMAIL PROTECTED],%ACCOUNT=germany,%ACCOUNT=intl)%- ...in your reply template? Just an idea. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using TB! v3.0.2.10 Home on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 Cease to inquire what the future has in store, and take as a gift whatever the day brings forth. -- Horace Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Change password with On The Fly Encryption
Hello hggdh, A reminder of what hggdh on TBBETA typed on: 04 January 2005 at 23:08:53 GMT +0100 h If I am correct, then what you propose could not work. Your not correct as I've just done the very thing I suggested and had no trouble at all. I transferred my OTFE installation from WinXP to my Linux box after first creating a backup. When I first ran it it asked if I wanted OTFE and I said no. So I converted an OTFE install into a non OTFE install restoring from a backup created with the OTFE install... If you follow. My suggestion will work as it worked perfectly for me. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 05/01/2005 at 10:33 UTC 2004 - AWB The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under the influence of Wine and SuSE 9.2 Registered Linux user #316959 PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=7037908 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Returning to non encrypted state.
Hello Dean, A reminder of what Dean on TBBETA typed on: 05 January 2005 at 09:36:51 GMT +0100 D I was just wondering if any one had tried to return to a D non-encrypted state after they had used the ver. 3.0.2.10 in the D encrypted mode? I have, see my previous posts. -- Best regards,Tony. _ Message composed on 05/01/2005 at 10:37 UTC 2004 - AWB The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under the influence of Wine and SuSE 9.2 Registered Linux user #316959 PGP Key http://www.theboomclan.com/pgp.txt http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=7037908 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 02:23, Thomas Fernandez wrote: BA Yes, I can confirm this behavior, but can't say whether this is a BA bug or wanted. But I think this is wanted, because if a filter BA matches a message, filtering stops (if not [X] Continue processing BA with other filters is set). I just tested it and it works as you described on my home computer. However, this is not what I want. When the first common filter catches, I don't want the other 100 or so common filters tested. simply because it takes minutes and on occasion, makes TB choke on it (tried it). Create a parent filter matching all messages and make your common filters subfilters of this catch-all-filter. Make sure Continue processing with other filters is ticked for the parent filter. When a filter matches, TB! should stop processing filters within the same sub filter group but continue through other filters below the parent filter. I have not tested this with common filters, but it works with account level filters and it seems to be exactly what you want. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.asc Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Returning to non encrypted state.
Hi Tony, Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 4:37:50 AM, you wrote: TB I have, see my previous posts. Thanks guys, evidently one of my servers must have gone down with all the snow that's falling around us. I received double the normal amount of email and the entire thread where your message was located came in this am (my time;) Pretty much answered everything I wanted to ever know;) Timing is everything. -- Cheers, Dean 3.0.2.10 Windows 2000 5 0 2195 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[3]: Problem starting The Bat!
Hello James, Tuesday, January 4, 2005, 11:00:53 PM, you wrote: AdG Well, judging from screenshot1, this SPX thingy may have something AdG to do with it. JO As a side topic... I may be mistaken, but given the icon and where JO this 'splash' is placed I believe the SPX program is what he used to JO make the screen captures. Yes, it is a new screen capture program I am trying. The graphic was not in the original. I have no idea how it new to add it to the email, but it didn't do it on the second graphic. As for the Beta I am using, it is the last beta listed on the beta page, but I will see if I can track down 3.0.2.10. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.2.8 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source)
Hello, i released a bugfixed version of the Bayes Filter Plugin to kill some strange bugs of v2.0.0. I hope you will enjoy it. - Added: edit button for the regular expression filter - Added: loading of included regular expression filter lists (see B_INCLUDE_LIST feature) - Improved: usage of new boost library (v1.31 to v1.32) - Improved: usage of new PCRE library (v4.5 to v5.0) - Improved: speed of the regular expression filter - Bugfix: exception in RegExpFilter::ScoreMail function if the received mail has no body - Bugfix: exception in TBPtest::TBP_GetSpamScore function if the received mail has no body - Bugfix: DNS-Blacklist filter was not working - Bugfix: memory leak within the regular expression filter - Bugfix: many exceptions in different functions if you use more than one mailaccount Your can download the setup file from my homepage or you can use the update function of the plugin. Happy new year! -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Achim Winkler (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.lkcc.org/achim) Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source)
Hello Achim i released a bugfixed version of the Bayes Filter Plugin to kill some strange bugs of v2.0.0. I hope you will enjoy it. Mmmh - couple of points a) The version number still reads 2.0.0? b) the macro to give the version name still doesn't work .. I'm sure I've just installed it though. -- regards, Graham Using The Bat! 3.0.2.10 assisted by under Windows XP 5.1 (Build 2600, Service Pack 1) -- Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. -- Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source)
Hello Graham, FG a) The version number still reads 2.0.0? On mine, the version number is 2.0.1 after automatuc update (The Bat! must be closed) -- Regards, Francismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Marcus Ohlström wrote: MO Create a parent filter matching all messages and make your common MO filters subfilters of this catch-all-filter. Make sure Continue MO processing with other filters is ticked for the parent filter. Nice idea. If only common sub-filters worked: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021 -- George Using The Bat! 3.0.2.8 on Windows XP Pro, Service Pack 2. Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source)
2005-01-05|16:45 you wrote: a) The version number still reads 2.0.0? Not confirmed. b) the macro to give the version name still doesn't work Not confirmed - see footer. -- GH/P/SS d- s:+ a38 C++ L+ W+++ N++ K- w O-- M-- PS--- PE+ Y+ PGP++ t--- 5-- X R- b++ DI- D-- G e+++ h r+++ z+++ The Bat! Polish Support http://thebat.pl The Bat! 3.0.2.10, W systemie Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Dodatek Service Pack 2 np.: Miles Davis, Hand Jive, album Nefertiti Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.1 Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.1 Nie-mieci: 272261 mieci: 9088 Wykryto nie-mieci: 210684 (99.99%) Wykryto mieci: 5576 (95.98%) Bdnie rozpoznane nie-mieci: 224 Bdnie rozpoznane mieci: 21 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Problem starting The Bat!
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:08:21 -0600, Stuart Cuddy wrote: As for the Beta I am using, it is the last beta listed on the beta page, but I will see if I can track down 3.0.2.10. Take a look at: http://thebat.orgavision.de/download.html Arjan -- [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Hello Alexander, On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:57 +0100 GMT (05/01/2005, 17:01 +0700 GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK Wouldn't it be possible to pick the original TO information in a %IF ASK clause and automagically determine the correct account to use for the ASK reply? No, because the address into which the email arrives is often one of many TO addresses, or in the CC, or even only BCC. ASK Just an idea. Thanks for your idea, though. -- Cheers, Thomas. The next time you feel like complaining, remember: Your garbage disposal probably eats better than thirty percent of the people in this world. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Hello Marcus, On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:49:30 +0100 GMT (05/01/2005, 17:49 +0700 GMT), Marcus Ohlström wrote: MO Create a parent filter matching all messages and make your common MO filters subfilters of this catch-all-filter. Make sure Continue MO processing with other filters is ticked for the parent filter. I don't understand your idea. What would the parent filter filter on? If you mean that I should filter on the on the Recipient address, this won't work, as the account addresses are often not mentioned, for example when only BBC'ed. -- Cheers, Thomas. A bycicle can't stand on its own, because it's two-tired. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Hello list, On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:23:11 +0700 GMT (05/01/2005, 08:23 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF I need to be able to reply from the account that the mail was TF originally sent to, though. Maybe I am think along the wrong track. TF Does anybody have an idea how I could do what I want? I think this would work: If the account-level filters were processed before the common filters, what I need to do could be accomplished. Would anybody else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish list as an option? Another idea is an optional setting in the common filters continue processing with account filters, so that only those, and not the other common filters, are processed when a match is found. Any seconders? -- Cheers, Thomas. Drugs may lead to nowhere, but at least it's the scenic route. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Hæ! Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 18:03, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Another idea is an optional setting in the common filters continue processing with account filters, so that only those, and not the other common filters, are processed when a match is found. Any seconders? Me!!! -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/ | The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Professional K9 v1.28 | Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195) Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source)
Hello Achim, Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 3:38:38 PM, you wrote: Hello, i released a bugfixed version of the Bayes Filter Plugin to kill some strange bugs of v2.0.0. I hope you will enjoy it. Your can download the setup file from my homepage or you can use the update function of the plugin. I dunno if you noticed but I cannot seem to get the macros to work :( Sean -- ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: tcobone Vodafone +353879120530 Im listening to Jive Bunny The Mastermixers - Party Mix U Sure Do. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re[2]: Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source)
Hello Sean, Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 9:45:08 PM, you wrote: Hello Achim, Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 3:38:38 PM, you wrote: Hello, i released a bugfixed version of the Bayes Filter Plugin to kill some strange bugs of v2.0.0. I hope you will enjoy it. Your can download the setup file from my homepage or you can use the update function of the plugin. I dunno if you noticed but I cannot seem to get the macros to work :( Sean Fixed my problem :) Sean -- ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: tcobone Vodafone +353879120530 :irl-flag: HamMails: 7123 SpamMails: 251 detected Ham: 6564 (99.42%) detected Spam: 187 (55.61%) FALSE Ham detected: 83 FALSE Spam detected: 38 HamMails: 7123 SpamMails: 251 detected Ham: 6564 (99.42%) detected Spam: 187 (55.61%) FALSE Ham detected: 83 FALSE Spam detected: 38 HamMails: 7125 SpamMails: 251 detected Ham: 6566 (99.42%) detected Spam: 187 (55.61%) FALSE Ham detected: 83 FALSE Spam detected: 38 HamMails: 7125 SpamMails: 251 detected Ham: 6566 (99.42%) detected Spam: 187 (55.61%) FALSE Ham detected: 83 FALSE Spam detected: 38 Im listening to Jive Bunny The Mastermixers - Party Mix Stop. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source)
Hello Sean! On Wednesday, January 5, 2005 at 10:45:08 PM you wrote: I dunno if you noticed but I cannot seem to get the macros to work :( Do you mean the Update program? I couldn't make it work correctly at first - until I remembered to shut down TB before using it. Since it exchanges files used by TB it cannot work while TB runs ... -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request Sooner or later the graveyards are full of everybody. (Terry Pratchett) Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Hello Thomas, I think this would work: If the account-level filters were processed before the common filters, what I need to do could be accomplished. Would anybody else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish list as an option? No, please. The problem is that Common filters are still buggy. Otherwise you could easily do what you wish. Another idea is an optional setting in the common filters continue processing with account filters, so that only those, and not the other common filters, are processed when a match is found. Any seconders? Again no, please. As soon as the bug(s) described in: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021 you would not need this new setting you are suggesting. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.2.6 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF If the account-level filters were processed before the common TF filters, what I need to do could be accomplished. Would anybody TF else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish list as an TF option? It's already there: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3494 -- George Using The Bat! 3.0.2.8 on Windows XP Pro, Service Pack 2. Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Hello George, On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:47:45 -0800 GMT (06/01/2005, 06:47 +0700 GMT), George Mitchell wrote: TF If the account-level filters were processed before the common TF filters, what I need to do could be accomplished. Would anybody TF else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish list as an TF option? GM It's already there: GM https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3494 Thanks. I added another bugnote. Very disturbing is that it hasn't even been assigned yet. :-( -- Cheers, Thomas. I don't have a drinking problem. I drink, I get drunk, I fall down, No problem. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Hello MAU, On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:11:10 +0100 GMT (06/01/2005, 06:11 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: I think this would work: If the account-level filters were processed before the common filters, what I need to do could be accomplished. Would anybody else find this useful, and should I put it in the wish list as an option? M No, please. The problem is that Common filters are still buggy. Otherwise M you could easily do what you wish. How can I do what I want to do with subfilters in common filters? Please describe. Keep in mind that once the message has been moved to the appropriate country folder by the common folder, there is no indication any more which account it arrived in. Well, in many cases at least, in other cases there is the address in the TO field, but not always so that's not reliable. Another idea is an optional setting in the common filters continue processing with account filters, so that only those, and not the other common filters, are processed when a match is found. Any seconders? M Again no, please. As soon as the bug(s) described in: M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021 This describes that subfilters in common filters should work. I don't think this is related to my problem. -- Cheers, Thomas. Isch des it herrlich, wie frisch d' Luft huet morge isch? - Ha, ko Wunder, si isch jo d' ganz Nacht dusse gsi. Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.10 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Common vs account filters
Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:11:10 +0100 GMT (06/01/2005, 06:11 +0700 TF GMT), MAU wrote: M No, please. The problem is that Common filters are still buggy. M Otherwise you could easily do what you wish. TF How can I do what I want to do with subfilters in common filters? TF Please describe. Marcus Ohlström described the technique pretty clearly in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. As I understand the problem, you have a lot of complicated common filters. Since the common filters are evaluated before account filters, you have to specify continue processing other filters for each common filter in order to get to the account filters. So, every message gets evaluated by every common filter, and this overwhelms TB!. Correct? If so, you could prevent this by having a single common filter with the special matching condition Any message. It would have continue processing other filters checked. All of your current existing common filters would become sub-filters of this one, and each sub-filter would have continue processing other filters unchecked. By definition each incoming message would match the common filter, so TB! would begin evaluating the sub-filters. This would continue until one was matched. At this point evaluation of all remaining sub-filters would abort, and since the parent filter allowed subsequent filters, the account filters would be evaluated. If only common sub-filters worked. M Again no, please. As soon as the bug(s) described in: M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021 TF This describes that subfilters in common filters should work. I don't TF think this is related to my problem. This is a bug I think Ritlabs really needs to fix. Filtering is a pretty key feature, and a part of it simply doesn't work. It's not like this is an elusive bug. -- George Using The Bat! 3.0.2.8 on Windows XP Pro, Service Pack 2. Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
