Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
Hello TheBat Beta List Members!!! Someday, and that was in morning, Thomas wrote something like this: Which plugins are you speaking about? Could you please name them, i.e. give the list? Thereareintotal58pluginsi am aware of: http://www.thebatworld.de/modules/download/index.php?op=viewlinkcid= To this 58 plugins you can add: - JavaScript Macros 0.4 beta 19 - add JavaScript support in templates (example below - attachment list), customizable menu like in screenshot ... - PL-Wtyczka 0.2.2.2 - RSS2POP3.pkierski 0.17 - eXtended Macros Player (eXMP) 0.0.3.67 - NameRus ver 0.4 - MyGate - BlackWhiteList Plugin 1.3 Attachments: ~~~A~~~ tbJSM.png Attachments: a) tbJSM.png Attachments: [1] tbJSM.png -- Thanks and best regards, Sebastian Murawskiattachment: tbJSM.png Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
Hello Thomas, Monday, October 8, 2007, 5:53:38 AM, you wrote: It's not only a question of costs. The problem is that Ritlabs is limiting his own program. Reducing TheBat! usable only with comercial plugins. Till know the best plugins come from private developers. I can't undertsand this step at all. I agree completely. This subject was also discussed at TB Dev and I suggested a model like XP driver signature to be followed. IE the user should be given a choice to accept or discard an unsigned plug-in. There, Maxim wrote ,- [ ] | During the whole history of The Bat! development there is almost no problems | with antivirus and macros plugins. The most problematic are anti-spam plugins. | They are the most frequent source of access violation and other exceptions, | mostly at startup and mail check, and the users are claiming that this is the | problem of The Bat! For the technical support, it is hard to figure out whether | the user has a plugin. Implementing digital signatures for anti-spam plugins will | make obsolete old plugins which are the source of access voiolations and endless loops. `- While I understand Ritlabs concerns I completely disagree with the enforcement of the above rule. GIVE USERS A CHOICE! -- George M. Menegakis Using The Bat v3.99.24 on Windows XP Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Access Denied at www.ritlabs.com
Neither the request lost password form, nor the register form work. http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?forgot_password=yes http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?register=yes (tried with Firefox and IE) I have been trying to log into my acocunt without success and the tried creating a new one with similar non success. regards Christian -- System Infos: TB! v3.99.24 OS Windows Vista Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
I agree completely. This subject was also discussed at TB Dev and I suggested a model like XP driver signature to be followed. IE the user should be given a choice to accept or discard an unsigned plug-in. That would be acceptable. I am not going to upgrade to a version that does not allow me to use my plugins... First The Bat! does not allow you to see HTML messages, now this... -- Peter Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Access Denied at www.ritlabs.com
Hello Info, Monday, October 08, 2007, 13:19:25, you wrote: Neither the request lost password form, nor the register form work. http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?forgot_password=yes http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/index.php?register=yes (tried with Firefox and IE) I have been trying to log into my acocunt without success and the tried creating a new one with similar non success. Could you please make us more details to make us able to reproduce the problem that you are speaking about? -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
Hello all, Monday, October 8, 2007, Peter Hofman wrote: That would be acceptable. I am not going to upgrade to a version that does not allow me to use my plugins... First The Bat! does not allow you to see HTML messages, now this... what problem with HTML messages do You have? I did not fouond any message from You in TBBETA about this. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.99.24 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 2.6.1.5 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 1 GB RAM Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: Access Denied at www.ritlabs.com
Not much I can say... both pages don´t even load. When clicking on the link the same page just reloads with no new content. regards Christian -- System Infos: TB! v3.99.24 OS Windows Vista Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
what problem with HTML messages do You have? I did not fouond any message from You in TBBETA about this. Marek, I should have been more specific, I realise that now... It's the not displaying pictures thing. Secondly I should not even have brought it up, it has nothing to do with the signing of plugins. -- Best regards, Peter Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
Hello George, on Monday, 8. October 2007, at 12:11:35 [GMT +0200] you wrote regarding TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins: I agree completely. This subject was also discussed at TB Dev and I suggested a model like XP driver signature to be followed. IE the user should be given a choice to accept or discard an unsigned plug-in. That's a very good idea. While I understand Ritlabs concerns I completely disagree with the enforcement of the above rule. GIVE USERS A CHOICE! I hope we can convince Ritlabs to do your suggest model. Best way and the well developed plugins don't produce AV's. More, Ritlabs should develope the API so that more kind of plugins and possibilities are given. GIVE USERS A CHOICE! -- Ciao Thomas Using: TheBat! 3.99.24 System: Windows XP Build 2600 Service Pack 2 PGP:Key-ID: 0x70D9F03B Visit: TheBat! World on http://www.thebatworld.de Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
Hello Peter, on Monday, 8. October 2007, at 12:22:46 [GMT +0200] you wrote regarding TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins: I agree completely. This subject was also discussed at TB Dev and I suggested a model like XP driver signature to be followed. IE the user should be given a choice to accept or discard an unsigned plug-in. Good suggestion, i agree. I also won't upgrade if i can not use my beloved and for me essential plugins. -- Ciao Thomas Using: TheBat! 3.99.24 System: Windows XP Build 2600 Service Pack 2 PGP:Key-ID: 0x70D9F03B Visit: TheBat! World on http://www.thebatworld.de Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
Hello Sebastian, on Monday, 8. October 2007, at 10:57:18 [GMT +0200] you wrote regarding TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins: Thereareintotal58pluginsi am aware of: http://www.thebatworld.de/modules/download/index.php?op=viewlinkcid= To this 58 plugins you can add: - JavaScript Macros 0.4 beta 19 - add JavaScript support in templates (example below - attachment list), customizable menu like in Can you please give a link? Seams interesting, is it digital signed? LOL -- Ciao Thomas Using: TheBat! 3.99.24 System: Windows XP Build 2600 Service Pack 2 PGP:Key-ID: 0x70D9F03B Visit: TheBat! World on http://www.thebatworld.de Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
First message sent to thebat.net
Hello All, First sent message to my new account at tnebat.net -- Best regards, Roger :flag-southafrica: The Bat! v3.99.24 with AntiSpamSniper 2.6.1.2, on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
Hello TheBat Beta List Members!!! Someday, and that was in afternoon, Thomas wrote something like this: Thereareintotal58 plugins i am aware of: http://www.thebatworld.de/modules/download/index.php?op=viewlinkcid= To this 58 plugins you can add: - JavaScript Macros 0.4 beta 19 - add JavaScript support in templates (example below - attachment list), customizable menu like in Can you please give a link? Seams interesting, is it digital signed? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on TBDEV -- Thanks and best regards, Sebastian Murawski Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Enable POP access
Hello Maxim, Sunday, October 7, 2007, 6:46:51 PM, you wrote: ?Hello Tbbeta, ? Unfrotunately, until we resolve this issue, you will have to login once via the web interface to www.thebat.net to enable POP access. ? Once you login and agree to the terms, you will see this screen http://www.google.com/mail/help/images/screenshots/enable_pop/pop.gif under Forwarding and POP task. I hope that this screen is quite self-explaining. I cannot access the page www.thebat.net :( -- Best regards, drifthatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Translator of Chinese The Bat! Using The Bat! v3.99.24 with AntispamSniper v2.5.0.2 MyMacros 1.11a on Windows 2000 Advanced Server Advanced Server (v5.0.2195, Service Pack 4) Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: First message sent to thebat.net
Hello All, Monday, October 8, 2007, 4:23:56 PM, among other things, I wrote: RP Hello All, RP First sent message to my new account at tnebat.net Oops!..Sorry folks, a slight hiccup. -- Best regards, Roger :flag-southafrica: The Bat! v3.99.24 with AntiSpamSniper 2.6.1.2, on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: thebat.net
Hello Cees, On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:31:44 +0200 GMT (08/10/2007, 02:31 +0700 GMT), Cees wrote: C !7-10-2007, 21:28:10: FETCH - Server reports error. The response C is: -ERR [SYS/PERM] Your account is not enabled for POP C access. Please visit your Gmail settings page and enable your account for POP access. C this is what I get when trying to collect mail. C Sending email looks to be working fine. Check out MID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Cheers, Thomas. The tides are a fight between the Earth and moon. All water tends towards the moon, because there is no water in the moon, and nature abhors a vacuum. I forget where the sun joins in this fight. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: First message sent to thebat.net
Hello Roger, Monday, October 8, 2007, 9:23:56 PM, you wrote: Hello All, First sent message to my new account at tnebat.net Did you receive it? Are you receiving this message? -- Best regards, Thomasmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TheBat! 4.x and digital signed plugins
Hello Peter, I'm breaking the thread, as this is a new issue. On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:48:17 +0200 (CEST) GMT (08/10/2007, 17:48 +0700 GMT), Peter Hofman wrote: what problem with HTML messages do You have? I did not fouond any message from You in TBBETA about this. PH Marek, PH I should have been more specific, I realise that now... It's the not PH displaying pictures thing. I'm annoyed by this, too. PH Secondly I should not even have brought it up, Good that you did. PH it has nothing to do with the signing of plugins. True. -- Cheers, Thomas. The difference between a king and a president is that a king is the son of his father but a president is not. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Maxim, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:35:13 +0300 GMT (08/10/2007, 10:35 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check MM this out and let us know the results? I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the messages I sent to TBBETA. I have received my TBBETA messages on my GMX and MyRealbox accounts, though. Is thebat.net blocking itself? -- Cheers, Thomas. SYMPTOM: Floor moving. FAULT: You are being carried out. ACTION: Find out if you are being taken to another bar. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Thomas, A reminder of what Thomas Fernandez typed on: Monday, October 08, 2007 at 22:37:57 GMT +0700 TF I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my TF thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the TF messages I sent to TBBETA. TF I have received my TBBETA messages on my G I believe this is something that Google mail does for some reason. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.99.24 On Windows XP 5.1 Build #2600 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hi Thomas, I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the messages I sent to TBBETA. Is thebat.net blocking itself? That's the way GMail works. You cannot send emails to yourself. I'm not sure why. -- All the best, Peter Gannushkin http://sonicbeet.com/ http://downtownmusic.net/ Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Peter, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:50:15 -0400 GMT (08/10/2007, 22:50 +0700 GMT), Peter Gannushkin wrote: Is thebat.net blocking itself? PG That's the way GMail works. You cannot send emails to yourself. I'm PG not sure why. Then why did Ritlabs choose Gmail? I was planning to use that address for my five TB! mailing lists. Looks like the attempt is futile. -- Cheers, Thomas. You know that little indestructible black box that is used on planes; why can't they make the whole plane out of the same substance ? http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Maxim, Monday, October 8, 2007, 6:35:13 AM, you wrote (possibly edited): We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check this out and let us know the results? I confirm that there are no problems receving and sending messages from/to thebat.net. -- Best regards, Costas Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hi Thomas, on Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:00:02 +0700GMT (08.10.2007, 18:00 +0200GMT here), you wrote: TF On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:50:15 -0400 GMT (08/10/2007, 22:50 +0700 GMT), TF Peter Gannushkin wrote: Is thebat.net blocking itself? PG That's the way GMail works. You cannot send emails to yourself. I'm PG not sure why. TF Then why did Ritlabs choose Gmail? I was planning to use that address TF for my five TB! mailing lists. Looks like the attempt is futile. You can work around it by filtering your sent mail to the list folder. You won't know however, if or when your message made it to the list. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.99.24 :beta: on WinXP, SP2, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net
Hi Peter, Monday, October 8, 2007, 9:50:15 AM, you wrote: Hi Thomas, I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the messages I sent to TBBETA. Is thebat.net blocking itself? That's the way GMail works. You cannot send emails to yourself. I'm not sure why. I have had the same experience with Google. Not a complaint, just an observation (I was a very early gmail adopter). -- Take Care, Bob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 3.99.24 (beta) on Windows XP 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Peter, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:43:43 +0200 GMT (08/10/2007, 23:43 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: TF Then why did Ritlabs choose Gmail? I was planning to use that address TF for my five TB! mailing lists. Looks like the attempt is futile. You can work around it by filtering your sent mail to the list folder. You won't know however, if or when your message made it to the list. I'm not interested in work-arounds. I think I'll stick with GMX. -- Cheers, Thomas. 10 Anzeichen, woran Sie bemerken, dass Ihre Lebensmittel nicht mehr geniessbar sind: 7. Der Schnittlauch auf dem Butterbrot blueht. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Enable POP access
Hello drifthat, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:38:23 +0800 GMT (08/10/2007, 21:38 +0700 GMT), drifthat wrote: d I cannot access the page www.thebat.net :( Opens fine over here. -- Cheers, Thomas. Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Thomas, Monday, October 08, 2007, 19:00:02, you wrote: Then why did Ritlabs choose Gmail? I was planning to use that address for my five TB! mailing lists. Looks like the attempt is futile. Ritlabs is currently the best among mail providers: it offers good anti-spam, and encrypted SMTP connection to the server. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Thomas, On Monday, October 8, 2007 Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hello Maxim, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:35:13 +0300 GMT (08/10/2007, 10:35 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check MM this out and let us know the results? I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the messages I sent to TBBETA. I have received my TBBETA messages on my GMX and MyRealbox accounts, though. Is thebat.net blocking itself? You can work it around. Just prefix your username with recent: For example for account named [EMAIL PROTECTED] you'd use username recent:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Read more on this in gmail's help, since it has some further issues. I agree that Gmail is currently the best, I've been using three google-based accounts for some time, and have no problems with them. -- Krzysztof Trybowski Gadu-Gadu: 1458144 --- Skype: trybowski AQQ: 141062 --- ICQ: 4350719 --- gpg key-id: 0xC937B0F2 Using The Bat! 3.99.24 [reg] under Windows XP 5.1 build 2600. Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Maxim, on Monday, 8. October 2007, at 05:35:38 [GMT +0200] you wrote regarding SPF for thebat.net: We have adjusted the SPF for thebat.net, could you please check this out and let us know the results? no problems sending and receiving. -- Ciao Thomas Using: TheBat! 3.99.24 System: Windows XP Build 2600 Service Pack 2 PGP:Key-ID: 0x70D9F03B Visit: TheBat! World on http://www.thebatworld.de Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Maxim, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:24:18 +0300 GMT (09/10/2007, 01:24 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: Then why did Ritlabs choose Gmail? I was planning to use that address for my five TB! mailing lists. Looks like the attempt is futile. Ritlabs is currently the best among mail providers: it offers good anti-spam, and encrypted SMTP connection to the server. So does GMX... -- Cheers, Thomas. Der Neue Grosse Shell Atlas Erster Autoatlas mit Verfahrgarantie. * http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Krzysztof, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 22:41:24 +0200 GMT (09/10/2007, 03:41 +0700 GMT), Krzysztof Trybowski wrote: I don't seem to receive my own message sent from thebat.net at my thebat.net address. This is true for both PMs to myself as well as the messages I sent to TBBETA. I have received my TBBETA messages on my GMX and MyRealbox accounts, though. Is thebat.net blocking itself? You can work it around. Just prefix your username with recent: For example for account named [EMAIL PROTECTED] you'd use username recent:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where do I set this? In the From account? Read more on this in gmail's help, since it has some further issues. There are more issues? I don't think I *need* gmail then. I agree that Gmail is currently the best, I've been using three google-based accounts for some time, and have no problems with them. Well, I'm not sure why you call a provider with these issues the best. -- Cheers, Thomas. I intend to live forever - so far, so good. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: SPF for thebat.net
10/8/2007 10:05 PM Hi Maxim, On 10/8/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM Ritlabs is currently the best among mail providers: it offers MM good anti-spam, and encrypted SMTP connection to the server. It also has gmail quirks. Is the message base on their servers encrypted? Are the calendar and addresses/contacts encrypted? If so, to what depth? Encrypted transmission is worthless if the rest of it isn't encrypted, preferably at 256 bit. Google regularly experiences various types of vulnerabilities. As they grow and integrate more stuff their security is sure to weaken. Besides, like Microsoft they are a big target which makes it a lot more fun for the black hats. -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: SPF for thebat.net
Hello Peter, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:43:43 +0200 GMT (08/10/2007, 23:43 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: PM You can work around it by filtering your sent mail to the list PM folder. You won't know however, if or when your message made it to PM the list. IF (big if) I were to use a workaround by way of TB!-Filters, I would now have to create Outging filters copying the conditions and actions of the Incoming filters. This is only because Rtilabs chose Gmail. Maybe, in order to make using thebat.net easier for their customers, they could now consider this wish: One kind of filters https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3319 -- Cheers, Thomas. Things You Would Never Know Without the Movies: Any lock can be picked by a credit card or a paper clip in seconds, unless it's the door to a burning building with a child trapped inside. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.99.3 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
