Re[2]: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : RO Hallo Carsten, RO On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:51:28 +0200GMT (6-6-2008, 10:51 +0200, where I RO live), you wrote: CGS In a business environment it is crucial that people who are in CGS TO: stay in TO: and those in CC: stay in CC:, because that's a CGS huge difference! CGS Can this be fixed? Or is there a way to get around this bug CGS using templates? RO Use a quick template (or a default reply template) with something like Isn't that a work around? RO In order to do this real fancy, you should use some regexp to RO exclude the old sender in case he put his address in the old CC: RO header, but that's something you should manage yourself. RO To be honest, I like TB's current behaviour in this. It really doesn't do much sense, IMHO. I agree with Carsten it make all the difference (IMHO, not only in Business environments) who you send the message to and who you give notice of that. And when replying, is of good sense (at least) to keep it the same way. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias I'm here because I'm not all there. Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)
am Samstag, 7. Juni 2008 um 10:03 schrieb Goncalo Farias: CGS In a business environment it is crucial that people who are in CGS TO: stay in TO: and those in CC: stay in CC:, because that's a CGS huge difference! CGS Can this be fixed? Or is there a way to get around this bug CGS using templates? RO To be honest, I like TB's current behaviour in this. It really doesn't do much sense, IMHO. I would support to make the Base Behaviour konfigurable, if it get enough support from people who find ich important too. Do the RFCs say anything relevant to this? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.24.17 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: New QTs as Common QTs still dont work
Hello all, Saturday, June 7, 2008, Jens Franik wrote: Guten Tag The Bat! Beta, new created QTs under Common QTs still dont work at all. Also they show not up in the select Dialog. (Nobody hears at me?) Confirmations? yes, confirmed, Stef knows about it -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 4.0.24.17 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 2.8.1.1 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
New QTs as Common QTs still dont work
Guten Tag The Bat! Beta, new created QTs under Common QTs still dont work at all. Also they show not up in the select Dialog. (Nobody hears at me?) Confirmations? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.24.17 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)
Hallo Goncalo, On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 09:03:22 +0100GMT (7-6-2008, 10:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: CGS Can this be fixed? Or is there a way to get around this bug CGS using templates? RO Use a quick template (or a default reply template) with something like GF Isn't that a work around? Yes that's a work around. And unless I'm very much mistaken that was Carsten's second question. He asked for a fix or a way around it with templates, I gave him the latter. -- Groetjes, Roelof Move away from the tagline. You have ten seconds to comply. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.0.24.17 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 3 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgpl47YL6CVhs.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)
Hallo Goncalo, On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 09:03:22 +0100GMT (7-6-2008, 10:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO To be honest, I like TB's current behaviour in this. GF It really doesn't do much sense, IMHO. I agree with Carsten it make GF all the difference (IMHO, not only in Business environments) who you GF send the message to and who you give notice of that. Well, that's something I agree with. It's important to whom you address a message and to whom you give notice. GF And when replying, is of good sense (at least) to keep it the same GF way. And I disagree with that. When you send a message to me and some other people and I reply to that message then I reply to you, not to the other primary recipients of the original message. When I want to notify the other recipients of the original message then a CC will do just fine. -- Groetjes, Roelof I have seen the future and it is now the past. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.0.24.17 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 3 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgpAfu8ybTO8L.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)
On Saturday, June 7, 2008, 4:10:57 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: Well, that's something I agree with. It's important to whom you address a message and to whom you give notice. I'd think in the adult world what would be important would be that all the right people got the mail. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.0.24.17 on Windows Vista version 6,0 () Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Reply to All (TO and CC fields)
Hello Dwight, Sunday, June 8, 2008, 10:26:01 AM, you wrote: DC On Saturday, June 7, 2008, 4:10:57 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: Well, that's something I agree with. It's important to whom you address a message and to whom you give notice. DC I'd think in the adult world what would be important would be that all DC the right people got the mail. In the business world, if a mail is addressed to several people, who will be the one who answers? If the sender puts several addresses in the same company / department into the TO field, my experience shows that everybody thinks one of the others will reply and therefore nobody will. There are reasons to have multiple recipients in the TO field, for example when you send party invitations to a small group of friends. Whether replies should go to all or only to the host, is another discussion. In any case, whoever replies to a message with multiple TO recipients, will reply to the person who sent the message, not to the others being copied in. Hence, I agree wth Roelof. -- Cheers, Thomas. Die Sztahlfabriken von Birmingham verbrauchen so viel Stahl, das aller Stahl, welcher fabricirt wird, dazu nicht ausreichen wuerde. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.24.11 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.24.17 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
