Re: IMAP

2009-05-31 Thread Gleason Pace

Dwight,

 On Saturday, May 30, 2009, 7:39:05 AM, Gleason Pace wrote:

 But I maintain that The Bat Imap is much much better than it was just a few
 years  ago.   All that remains of the old quirkiness for me is the
 occasional Ctrl-c to refresh folder contents.

 While  I  agree that it is better than it once was, I certainly would 
 not  classify its major failings as 'quirkiness.' The biggest problem 
 remains message counts. In Vista, the only way to get a current count 
 is  to exit and restart. I find myself doing that often. I'm not sure 
 whether  it  is  TBs  fault  that  the  server  sometimes  closes the 
 connection  and  I  have  to  exit and restart to reconnect, but that 
 happens  on  xp often. I don't trust TB! to create new folders, but I 
 haven't tried it lately. When we start working on IMAP, I'll get some 
 accounts  I can safely experiment on but I screwed up my real account 
 often enough that way in the past I won't risk it there.

And it seems we both use Fastmail, and I have had no problem creating
new  folders.  It is true that TB's folder counts aren't accurate, and
TB doesn't report new mail well, but I never need to restart it.  I
never loose my FM connection unless DSL or FM itself is down.  I have
found  that seeming poor Imap reliability  in all email clients has a lot
to do with connection configuration.  This works for me in TB:
both in and out are set to use Secure To Dedicated Port, 465 for in
and 993 for out.

As  for  folder  counts,  I can get good counts with other clients but
they  are  lacking  some  other things that TB does.  There is no such
thing as a client that does everything well.  I have decided to use
Fastcheck to tell me when new mail arrives
http://www.fastcheck.org/
regardless  of  what  client  I  am  using.  That way, that particular
feature  can be disregarded in favor of other more important ones when
deciding on an email client.

 While TB! continues to suit me better than other apps, partly at least
 out  of habit, if I ever found an app which really handled IMAP well, 
 I'd be gone.

There are others that do a better job.  Thunderbird and Becky.  But
they lack other things, like html handling in replies that are more
important for me.

 If  we don't test IMAP, then I might as well just be gone. POP has no 
 attraction to me, and I can't imagine that it is going to do anything 
 in  the long run but lose out to IMAP. The more people use their mail 
 on  more  than  one  machine, the more they are going to need IMAP or 
 webmail, or something besides POP.

Don't think so.  People mostly use POP because that is what most ISP's
provide.  That isn't likely to change.


-- 
 Gleason


Using The Bat 4.1.14.2 (RC2) on Windows XP
5.1 Build 2600



 Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


In defense of Ritlabs and TB!

2009-05-31 Thread Steve Harris
I have been reading with interest all of your comments on TB! and I
feel that I have to add my thoughts.

TB! is, for me, the best e-mail client available. I've been using it
for so long I've nearly forgotten how long (at least 9 years and still
counting) I personally don't use IMAP - I have 5 e-mail accounts - all
POP's and I am very happy with this setup. I use a couple of machines
with TB! to check my e-mail and on the one that is my second machine I
simply select for TB! to leave messages on the server until my main
machine receives them and then deletes the message from the server.
This arrangement serves me very very well. (I use a Nokia mobile with a
good e-mail client called Profimail which checks all 5 POP accounts and
also leaves messages on the server unless I choose to delete them)

The interface is great for me (it's the only client that works the way
I want to work) It is also the only decent one where you can have
individual accounts in the folder tree that behave independently of
each other and contains it's own trash and junk mail folder etc etc
Customisable interface, spam filter addin, etc etc... I personally only
write e-mails in plain text using the MicroED editor and this editor is
clean and simple (if a little quirky at times) I also think the
template system is excellent and very versatile using them in
conjunction with macros etc for different replies ... customisable
audio alerts with time schedule and very powerful sorting office
filters... being able to backup all accounts, messages and settings
into one password protected file is something that many e-mail programs
and particularly Outlook users can only dream about. There's a lot more
I've probably forgotten but you get the picture.

I wish the guys at Ritlabs well and hope that they have thick skins for
all the highly charged messages that have been sent over the last few
days.

TB! isn't perfect - but then what software is?

Steve Harris




 Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: In defense of Ritlabs and TB!

2009-05-31 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi,


SH I personally don't use IMAP - I have 5 e-mail accounts - all POP's
SH and I am very happy with this setup.

Nobody is debating that for a POP3-user the bugs currently existing in 
TheBat may be minor. For a IMAP-user they are not.


-- 
MfG,
 Altomailto:a...@treadstone79.de
 
 The Bat! 4.1.11
Windows XP 5.1
build 2600 Service Pack 2


pgpIMwb01hhLe.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Sending E-Mail failed if Name includes Comma

2009-05-31 Thread Jens Franik
Hello The Bat! Beta Tester,

Never seen that, replying to an eMail with Header

From: Ge123er, Ro123 ge12...@123.net
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)

I have in the To: Line got the Receipient

Ge123er, Ro123 ge12...@123.net

And this sending fails because of the Comma in the Name.
I think it has nuked the   but why, i never seen that!

---
Nachricht bearbeiten - Ge123er, Ro123 ge12...@123.net
---
Nachricht wurde nicht versandt. Server Antwort - bad address syntax:
Ge123er
---
OK   
---


-- 
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.1.14.2 (RC2) + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.6 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 
1.1.91.0
Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM - Debian Lenny + Windows XP 
@VirtualBox 2.2.2 non-OSE
8 POP3 Accounts - 1 IMAP - 120 Folders



 Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Sending E-Mail failed if Name includes Comma

2009-05-31 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Sunday, May 31, 2009, Jens Franik wrote:

 Never seen that, replying to an eMail with Header

 From: Ge123er, Ro123 ge12...@123.net
 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)

 I have in the To: Line got the Receipient

 Ge123er, Ro123 ge12...@123.net

yes, I saw this already and sometimes it happens to me, I have reported
this 4 years ago, but nobody confirmed it. please add note to report
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5050

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.1.14.2 (RC2)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.0.6
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




 Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: In defense of Ritlabs and TB!

2009-05-31 Thread Marcus Jaeger
G'Day,


SH I personally don't use IMAP - I have 5 e-mail accounts - all POP's
SH and I am very happy with this setup.

 Nobody is debating that for a POP3-user the bugs currently existing in 
 TheBat may be minor. For a IMAP-user they are not.

I  agree with the last comment. In general TB is much better than any other
Email  client I have used over the last 20 years and there where some other
good  once  I  loved using. I choose TB cause it was the only Email client
that  was  able  to handle my work Emails which were around and close to a
Million  Emails  in 12 years and I had to keep them all. Also the security
point  was  one as I needed to have a Email client that works well with PGP
at the time directly, not via copy and paste through the clip board etc.
TB  delivers  all  this  perfectly  for  me  and  still  does for POP 3. But
privately  and  for other reasons I prefer IMAP over anything else and here
TB has not really kept its promise as not much has happened.

I would still hope they would look at IMAP again.. The hope dies last...


---
Marcus
Using The Bat 4.1.14.2 (RC2) on Windows XP
5.1 Build 2600




 Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Sending E-Mail failed if Name includes Comma

2009-05-31 Thread Jens Franik

Sonntag, 31. Mai 2009 at 22:54, Marek Mikus wrote:

 Never seen that, replying to an eMail with Header

 From: Ge123er, Ro123 ge12...@123.net
 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)

 I have in the To: Line got the Receipient

 Ge123er, Ro123 ge12...@123.net

 yes, I saw this already and sometimes it happens to me, I have reported
 this 4 years ago, but nobody confirmed it. please add note to report
 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5050

Done, it is an urgly Quotation Problem, but i rised up now, because
formerly i got Double Quotated Names, and now i get no Quotation Marks
at all...

-- 
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg
The Bat! 4.1.14.2 (RC2) + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.6 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 
1.1.91.0
Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM - Debian Lenny + Windows XP 
@VirtualBox 2.2.2 non-OSE
8 POP3 Accounts - 1 IMAP - 120 Folders





 Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


TBBeta Mission Statement

2009-05-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings Beta Listers,

This is your monthly message from the moderation team to remind you
of the primary purpose of this discussion list.

To review the list rules, follow the link at the end of this message.

Before  posting a question to the list, please check The Bat! User's
FAQ  at:  http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html  and  the list
archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/tbb...@thebat.dutaint.com. To
join the list, send a message to
mailto:tbbeta-j...@thebat.dutaint.com


TBBETA Mission statement

The  TBBETA  list  has been set up for the purpose of discussing The
Bat!  officially released Beta test versions and related issues. For
general  topics  of  a  more  simple  nature  regarding full release
versions, refer to TBUDL. For more complex topics refer to TBTECH.

An  'officially  released'  beta  version  is  one  which  has  been
announced  *by  RITlabs*  on the TBBETA list, usually with a list of
changes.

Simply  send  messages  to  tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com to send it to
the whole list.

See  the  notes  at the end of this message for details about how to
manage your list membership or to leave the list.


It  would probably be a good idea for you to set up a folder to keep
TBBETA  messages  in.  If you do this, the next most useful thing to
have  in  place  is an automatic filter to move mail from your inbox
into your TBBETA folder.

Set up a filter for incoming mail which looks for:

Header Field [Reply-To] Contains [tbb...@thebat]


The Roguemoticon Project


It's  nice to see your contact's face in the header ... and for them
to  see  yours. That's what roguemoticons are all about. If you wish
to add yourself, then you'll need to visit this site
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat

What  this  place  will  do  for  you  is  to allow you to create an
account,  add  your  image  and  then  let  you download a .ZIP file
containing  all  the  files  you'll  need to be able so see people's
faces  without  having  to  send  or  receive any real images in any
messages.

To trigger the roguemoticon display in the message header for anyone
reading  your  message  using  TB,  you have the choice of using the
X-Rogue: header or a signature trigger.

  How to use a signature trigger
The  image  is  triggered  by  a 'Handle' you've defined in your
account,  and  when  that  Handle  appears  in a message it gets
replaced on the client side by the corresponding image. A handle
could  look  like anything you want it to look like pretty much.
For example:
:Marck_Pearlstone:
Just add this text to your standard message signature block.

  How to create the X-Rogue: header
You can do that with this macro:
%SetHeader('X-Rogue',':your_handle:')%-  in  your  templates for
this and other tb-lists.
However, the macro alone won't do the trick.
TB'll  say: 'Hey, that's not any RFC822 header I know about', so
you'll have to define it as such:
Options  ..  Preferences .. Messages .. Message headers .. 'Add'

Now you'll get a pop-up to define the header

  Display as: X-Rogue (or whatever, it isn't very important)
  RFC header: X-Rogue
  Uncheck: 'This field is an address list' (because it isn't)
  Check: 'Allow this field to be edited in the message editor'
  Uncheck:  'Display  this  field  in the scrollable part of the
  header pane'

Now you're done and every TB-user can see your lovable face when
they've installed the roguemoticons.

For you to see peoples faces:

  To get this going, you should be running TB! v2.12 or later. Fetch
  the following file:
  http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/smileys/rogues.zip

  Unzip it to the 'Images' directory that's in your TB! installation
  directory: C:\Program Files\The Bat!\Images
  You  should  now  have a directory called 'rogues' containing many
  images  as well as the file 'rogues.msl' in your Images directory.
  Go into the preferences, and bring up the View/Editor options. Now
  hit  Shift-CTRL-Alt-T  while  TB!  is in focus. This will re-fetch
  TB!'s smiley set from disk and load the new images.


TBOT - The Bat off topic discussion list

One of our members has created a list for those occasional off topic
discussions  of public interest. Please feel free to join this list,
where many of our readership currently participate.

Addresses:
Post