Re: 9.4.2.12
Hello Stuart, On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, at 01:57:24 [GMT -0400] (which was 07:57 where I live) Stuart wrote: SP>>> Generated TLS errors, could not receive mail, see logs: > > 8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake >>8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 6A72CB, algorithm: RSA (512 >>bits), issued from 8/3/2021 5:34:18 AM to 7/29/2041 5:34:18 AM, for 1 >>host(s): mx.spamdropper.com. >>8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - Owner: mx.spamdropper.com. >>8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - Issuer: mx.spamdropper.com. > !8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - TLS handshake failure. Invalid server > certificate. The certificate or one of the certificates in the > certificate chain does not have a valid signature.. The certificate > or certificate chain is based on an untrusted root. Interferences with a Spamfilter plugin, Spamfilter proxy or security/antivirus solution. -- Regards Gwen Using The Bat! Version 9.4.3.1 (32-bit) on Windows 10.0 (Build 19043 ) pgpkD12x3DTt2.pgp Description: PGP signature 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 9.4.2.12
On Thursday, August 5, 2021, 07:57:24, Stuart Pye via TBBETA wrote: >>8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 6A72CB, algorithm: RSA (512 >>bits), issued from 8/3/2021 5:34:18 AM to 7/29/2041 5:34:18 AM, for 1 >>host(s): mx.spamdropper.com. > I've always run Microsoft TLS crypto on TB, no issues. > My mail server now uses Lets Encrypt for SSL certs for the various domain > mail it handles. > TB connection logging showed that the LE cert changed at a certain time, from > a cert good for > six months, or 90 days, I forget which, to a cert good for 20 years. When > that happened, TB stopped TLS-ing > with the M'soft default. Switching to TB option, all is good now. > Just thought the developers might want to know this Lets Encrypt behavior in > regards to TB. The line I quoted above, and the fact that the certificate says it's valid for 20 years means that something's intercepting your connection, and The Bat was right to refuse to connect (512-bit RSA hasn't been secure in the last 15 years, and Let's Encrypt always issues certificates valid for 90 days). You should verify what's happening (I'm guessing some anti-spam program). -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< https://eternallybored.org/ > Never buy a car that has a wick. -- Ford Pinto Rule TheBat! Version 9.4.2.12 (64-bit), Windows 10.0.19043 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 9.4.2.12
Hello Stefan, Monday, August 2, 2021, 5:02:26 AM, you wrote: > https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x64-full.7z SP>> Generated TLS errors, could not receive mail, see logs: 8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake >8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 6A72CB, algorithm: RSA (512 >bits), issued from 8/3/2021 5:34:18 AM to 7/29/2041 5:34:18 AM, for 1 host(s): >mx.spamdropper.com. >8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - Owner: mx.spamdropper.com. >8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - Issuer: mx.spamdropper.com. !8/5/2021, 01:39:25: FETCH - TLS handshake failure. Invalid server certificate. The certificate or one of the certificates in the certificate chain does not have a valid signature.. The certificate or certificate chain is based on an untrusted root. SP>> Changed TLS settings under Otions to TB, rather than Microsoft CryptoAPI default: Mail service returned. (Bluemail on my Android phone, never stopped working.) I've always run Microsoft TLS crypto on TB, no issues. My mail server now uses Lets Encrypt for SSL certs for the various domain mail it handles. TB connection logging showed that the LE cert changed at a certain time, from a cert good for six months, or 90 days, I forget which, to a cert good for 20 years. When that happened, TB stopped TLS-ing with the M'soft default. Switching to TB option, all is good now. Just thought the developers might want to know this Lets Encrypt behavior in regards to TB. U now. Hopefully forever. -- Best regards, Stuart Pye 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 9.4.2.12
Hello Stefan, > Version 9.4.2.12 is available > > https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x64.7z Up & running. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial (Madrid) - Spain) Using The Bat! Version 9.4.2.12 (64-bit) on Windows 10.0 19043 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 9.4.2.12
Hello Stefan, STvT> Version 9.4.2.12 is available STvT> https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x64.7z U -- Best regards, Richardmailto:the...@newmangroup.com -- Using The Bat! v9.4.2.12 on Windows v10 19043 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 9.4.2.12 - "redo" functionality in message editor
Hello Stefan, Monday, August 2, 2021, 11:02:26 AM, you wrote: > https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x64.7z U - thank you! My issue "HTML editor - selecting text with Ctrl+Shift+Arrow makes multi-word jumps" seems solved now - or at least I cannot reproduce it anymore. One thing that I noticed a while ago and I'm not sure whether it's known already: "redo" doesn't seem to work as I expect it to :) When I undo a change and then try to "redo" it, TheBat! seems to kill even more text. It seems to me like it's not reverting the contents to a previous buffer, instead it seems to be repeating some edit commands, but on the text altered by Undo (and possibly different commands too) and thus producing totally new (and undesired) results. Is this known, reported, already in a roadmap? Thank you, best regards -- Cheers Viktor Kabelac mailto:kabe...@rar.cz TheBat! 9.4.2.12 Pro (x64, no OTFE) on Windows 10.0 x64 19042 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 9.4.2.12
Hello Stefan, U Monday, August 2, 2021, 5:02:26 AM, you wrote: > https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x64.7z -- Best regards, Curt Akin 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 9.4.2.12
Monday, August 2, 2021 Thanks for your email. I've put my answers below. Monday, August 2, 2021, 5:02:26 AM, you wrote: > https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x64-full.7z Up and running. Thank you. Jerry -- Ethan J. Mings The Desk Consulting Group Inc. 1-200 North Service Road W. - Suite 311 | Oakville, Ontario, Canada. L6M 2Y1 Phone 905-825-9938 or 1-877-763-7776 | e-mail je...@thedeskdatacentre.com 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
9.4.2.12
Dear All, Version 9.4.2.12 is available https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x32-full.7z https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x64-full.7z https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x32.7z https://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb9.4.2.12-x64.7z Here is a short list of changes: [+] Add the "Authorization code" input for OAUTH login using system web browser [-] Username + password input form must not appear for accounts with OAUTH authentication -- Best regards, Stefan Tanurkov CEO @ Ritlabs S.R.L. 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
