Re: Fitler scheme: should this work?

2004-09-05 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello M,
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 6:21:13 PM, you wrote:

MicCullen G'day tbbeta,

MicCullen As I never use IMAP or Bayes filters, I want to
MicCullen mark posts regarding them
MicCullen read. (Well, posts with those subjects in the subject line.)

MicCullen The Filter structure - in Common filters - is:

MicCullen Incoming messages
MicCullenOther
MicCullen  The Bat
MicCullen  Mark read - Bayes, IMAP, etc
MicCullen  TBBETA - Juice
MicCullen  TBUDL - Juice
MicCullen  TBBETA
MicCullen  TBUDL

MicCullen Problem is, I can't get it to mark the messages read.

MicCullen I've got Subject=IMAP (did have OR bayes,
MicCullen but I took it out to simplify.)
MicCullen Mark the message as read
MicCullen Continue processing

I notice you have checked the continue processing with other filters.
Is it possible that it is working and then gets altered again by the
follow-up filters.

-- 
Best regards,
 Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Using The Bat! v3.0.0 
 On Windows 98 4.10 Build #



 Current beta is 3.00.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/


Re: Fitler scheme: should this work?

2004-09-05 Thread M i c C u l l e n
On Monday, September 6, 2004 @ 7:40:40 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote:

[snips]

MicCullen The Filter structure - in Common filters - is:

MicCullen Incoming messages
MicCullenOther
MicCullen  The Bat
MicCullen  Mark read - Bayes, IMAP, etc
MicCullen  TBBETA - Juice
MicCullen  TBUDL - Juice
MicCullen  TBBETA
MicCullen  TBUDL

MicCullen Problem is, I can't get it to mark the messages read.

MicCullen I've got Subject=IMAP (did have OR bayes,
MicCullen but I took it out to simplify.)
MicCullen Mark the message as read
MicCullen Continue processing

Stuart I notice you have checked the continue processing with other filters.
Stuart Is it possible that it is working and then gets altered again by the
Stuart follow-up filters.

Sorry - should have said that I'd tried it both ways.

I also tried closing and re-opening the program, as that worked a treat on
another filter that I'd been working on for 10 minutes, trying different
configs - then I reset it to the way I wrote it, closed, opened, worked fine.
Annoying.

General question: If I want the filter to mark the message read, then pass it
on to the rest of the filters, should I have continue processing with other
filters checked? I'd have thought so.

-- 

cheers, Mic (reply address works)
You may be disappointed if you fail, but you are doomed if you don't try.
Beverly Sills




 Current beta is 3.00.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/