Wrong html display
Hi, the display of my HTML newsletters has become wrong now. An example This newsletter is also online viewable, here is the link: http://news.douglas.de/public/read_message.jsp?tsp=1229596972266sig=LLIOIGAEAIAIGBALmid=900269316custid=9250uid=9044614426 And this is, how it is desplayed in TB: http://www.gunivortus.net/clipboard01.jpg http://www.gunivortus.net/clipboard02.jpg http://www.gunivortus.net/clipboard03.jpg -- Regards, Gunivortus Using The Bat Vs. 4.1.1.7 RC1 (BETA) under 6, 6001 Current beta is 4.1.1.8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wrong html display
am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008 um 13:48 schrieb Gunivortus Goos: the display of my HTML newsletters has become wrong now. An example This has been one of my customers :-) I have a lot of such HTML Mails, but if you compare the sitation now and the previous, it is clear that in the past only some HTML Mails where readable, where as i would say now: Most of the Mails are readable, only a few problems with - font sizes - not loading images du to CSS styles - Small Lines, Fat Blocks hanging around, but do not disturb Over all i would thank the RITLABS Guys for their good work, i did sent them a selection of 36 Mails of me, which all have more or less Problems to 100% display. I am sure, this will be fixed soon. You can Help, if you export your Mail to UNIX Mailbox Format and give it to Maxim or Stefan (best to place it on a Webserver and send a link to it). -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.1.8 RC1 (BETA) AntiSpamSniper 3.1.0.3 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 4.1.1.8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wrong html display
Hello Jens, On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:39:31 +0100 GMT (18/12/2008, 21:39 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: JF I have a lot of such HTML Mails, but if you compare the sitation now and JF the previous, it is clear that in the past only some HTML Mails where JF readable, where as i would say now: Most of the Mails are readable, only JF a few problems with JF - font sizes JF - not loading images du to CSS styles JF - Small Lines, Fat Blocks hanging around, but do not disturb JF Over all i would thank the RITLABS Guys for their good work, You cannot convince a new user to accept that most of the HTML mails are rendered correctly. Never mind the technical problems, users just expect that *all* of their newsletters are shown correctly, as this is what they get from competing products. Ritlabs cannot survive with only us enthusiasts - they need new buyers all the time, in order to pay their rent. -- Cheers, Thomas. Subway: We Are Not Public Transportation, Dammit http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.28.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.1.1.8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wrong html display
am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008 um 16:10 schrieb Thomas Fernandez: You cannot convince a new user to accept that most of the HTML mails are rendered correctly. I can, because i know, the HTML Interface is pretty new. Never mind the technical problems, users just expect that *all* of their newsletters are shown correctly, as this is what they get from competing products. The equal discussion is already been declared a dead horse, because the benefits of the Bat are not to display HTML, this is new and has to be developed. Regardless of if i would have made it in another way, i have the knowledge and overview to declare, that RITLABS did their best, they could, as far as i see. Ritlabs cannot survive with only us enthusiasts - they need new buyers all the time, in order to pay their rent. Hm, i am afraid, but normally i can not explain, how the have survived over the last Years without an Upgrade fees for registration for a technically very imposant E-Mail Client. Maybe they dont want to code for the public people, or maybe they dont see what is important and what not? This is all not in my accountableness... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.1.8 RC1 (BETA) AntiSpamSniper 3.1.0.3 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current beta is 4.1.1.8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Wrong html display
Hello Jens, On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:16:32 +0100 GMT (19/12/2008, 06:16 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: You cannot convince a new user to accept that most of the HTML mails are rendered correctly. JF I can, because i know, the HTML Interface is pretty new. HTML mail has been around for many many years. Until about 10 years ago, I was also against it, but that is like being against bad weather. It happens, and users find that several email clients render their HTML newsletters correctly but TB! doesn't. And it's not new to TB! anyway, Ritlabs has been working on HTML rendering for many years. Never mind the technical problems, users just expect that *all* of their newsletters are shown correctly, as this is what they get from competing products. JF The equal discussion is already been declared a dead horse, because the JF benefits of the Bat are not to display HTML, this is new and has to be JF developed. OK, let's skip the general discussion and concentrate on developing the HTML rendering engine to a perfect module within TB!. It doesn't help to say it doesn't work correctly, but never mind. You have to keep the competition in mind, and even if TB! has more functions and features than other clients, people want to read the newsletters they have subcribed to on purpose. One of my staff uses TB! and Outlook in parallel - there are many things (for example HTML) that Outlook simply does better and he doesn't want to miss it. JF Regardless of if i would have made it in another way, i have the JF knowledge and overview to declare, that RITLABS did their best, they JF could, as far as i see. True, but then again, no sales argument. Ritlabs cannot survive with only us enthusiasts - they need new buyers all the time, in order to pay their rent. JF Hm, i am afraid, but normally i can not explain, how the have survived JF over the last Years without an Upgrade fees for registration for a JF technically very imposant E-Mail Client. True again, I don't know that either. And they won't tell us. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. 9. It is far more impressive when others discover your good qualities without your help. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.28.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.1.1.8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
