Scheduler and delayed Sending

2010-02-09 Thread Ethan J Mings


  February 9, 2010

  There appears to be some relationship between the scheduler
  component and delayed sending problem.

  I just cleaned out a lot of very old scheduled and sent notes in the
  scheduler.  Now the program runs much quicker.

  Just waiting to see the delay mailing test will work.

  Any chance of getting this feature fixed given it should be working
  in the release copy and it is not.

  Jerry

-- 
Ethan J Mings
Oakville, Ontario Canada
qualityoff...@consultant.com



 Current beta is 4.2.33.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Delayed Sending Questionable

2010-02-08 Thread Ethan J Mings


  February 8, 2010

  A group of e-mail scheduled at various times this morning did not go
  out at all.

  Some red faces here in the office.

  This is the first time I've run into this problem.

  Any one else?

  Running Beta 4.2.33.7 on Windows 7, 32 Bit.

  Jerry

-- 
Ethan J Mings
Oakville, Ontario Canada
qualityoff...@consultant.com



 Current beta is 4.2.33.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Delayed Sending Questionable

2010-02-08 Thread Rick


   February 8, 2010

   A group of e-mail scheduled at various times this morning did not go
   out at all.

   Some red faces here in the office.

   This is the first time I've run into this problem.

   Any one else?

It been flakey for a long time.  It will stop for no reason although I am 
suspecting that part of the problem has to do with the scheduler getting full 
with upcoming and past items. Cleaning out the past items won't restart it 
though. I have asked the person assigned to this if I am on the right track and 
if there is a way (registry entry etc) to get it going again. No answer.

Here is my bug tracker entry. 
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7732



-- 
Rick
Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can 
imagine. - Sir Arthur Eddington

v4.2.33.7 Beta on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.33.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Delayed Sending Questionable

2010-02-08 Thread Kertész Vilmos
   A  group of e-mail scheduled at various times this morning did not
   go out at all. Some red faces here in the office.

Solution/to learn: dont use beta version for important things.



 Current beta is 4.2.33.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-16 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Rick« · 2009-06-15 · 19:18 h (CET)]

Moin, Rick!

[Trouble with delayed sending]

 I am getting so frustrated with this. In some beta releases it has
 worked perfectly, and the next release of an EXE will totally break
 it (form me at least) and I have no idea of why.

Tonight I did a test:

- Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
- Delay time:plus 1 hour

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
   message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

Cheers!
VA

- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.6 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3.

»The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This
has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a
bad move.«

Douglas Adams ('52 - '01), »The Restaurant at the End of the Universe«



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:

 - Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
 - Delay time:plus 1 hour

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

I have set +5min and message was sent correctly

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.2.6
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.0.6
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:

 - Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
 - Delay time:plus 1 hour

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

check Scheduller if there is a task for send that message and what are its
properties.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.2.6
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.0.6
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Strange quoting (Wa: Re: delayed sending)

2009-06-16 Thread Arjan de Groot
On dinsdag 16 juni 2009, 11:41:31 PM Marek Mikus wrote,

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

 I have set +5min and message was sent correctly

Strange. Volker put = in his message, but your quote made = of
it, while my quote made it =. Shouldn't that have been = and
= respectively?

Arjan
-- 
[Delaying this message untill 01:00]



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-16 Thread Rick
 Hello all,
 Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:

 - Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
 - Delay time:plus 1 hour

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

 check Scheduller if there is a task for send that message and what are its
 properties.

I have a similar one that was supposed to go out 3 hours ago. What would you 
like to know about it?
PROPERTIES/ GENERAL Has Start: Tuesday June 4:33:51 PM
Duration 1 Seconds Priority= Normal, enabled is checked
Notify about up to 1 missed events on startup 
Execute actions for missed event is checked

The delayed sending is completely broken for me


-- 
Rick
Never deprive someone of hope; it might be all they have. - H. Jackson Brown Jr.

v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-15 Thread Rick
 I am having trouble with delayed sending too; it has apparently
 stopped working in the last couple of builds. However 3 out of 5
 scheduled went out a half hour late yesterday, the other 2 having to be sent 
 manually. Go figure.

 I set batches of 5 emails to go out tomorrow at 9 am and 2 pm respectively.

 Anyone else having trouble?

It seems Dwight and I are having trouble with delayed sending and are having 
more trouble getting anyone to help test the feature or even verify if there IS 
a problem. 

I can really use this feature but currently it is sending 2 out of 5 scheduled 
emails only. If I UNPARK the other 3 (which were not parked as such) then send 
 receive mail they will go, and that will happen irregardless of the 
scheduled time. (If the unparking is done [say] an hour before the scheduled 
time it will over ride the schedule and send the emails with the next send  
receive mail)

Confirmations anyone

-- 
Rick
A great many people think they are thinking when they are really rearranging 
their prejudices. - William James

v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-15 Thread mse
Hello Rick,

 I am having trouble with delayed sending too; it has apparently
 stopped working in the last couple of builds. However 3 out of 5
 scheduled went out a half hour late yesterday, the other 2 having to be sent 
 manually. Go figure.

 I set batches of 5 emails to go out tomorrow at 9 am and 2 pm respectively.

 Anyone else having trouble?

I set up three batches each containing ten mails:

1)
The first batch was created 17:45 to 17:47 and set to be sent at 
18:30. They were sent at 18:30, the creation time says 18:30.

2)
The second batch was created 17:51 to 17:52 and set to be sent 15 
minutes later (profile +15). They were sent at 18:06 to 18:07, the 
creation time says 18:06 to 18:07.

3)
The third batch was created 17:55 to 17:57 and set to be sent on June, 
15th 2009 at 18:20. They were sent at this date at 18:20, the creation 
time says 18:20.

(All creation times are the times as displayed in recipients inbox)
Every message was sent no one was lost.
I didn't experience any parking/unparking issues.

-- 
Best regards,
mse

Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 3







 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-15 Thread Rick
 Hello Rick,

 I am having trouble with delayed sending too; it has apparently
 stopped working in the last couple of builds. However 3 out of 5
 scheduled went out a half hour late yesterday, the other 2 having to be sent 
 manually. Go figure.

 I set batches of 5 emails to go out tomorrow at 9 am and 2 pm respectively.

 Anyone else having trouble?

 I set up three batches each containing ten mails:

 1)
 The first batch was created 17:45 to 17:47 and set to be sent at 
 18:30. They were sent at 18:30, the creation time says 18:30.

 2)
 The second batch was created 17:51 to 17:52 and set to be sent 15 
 minutes later (profile +15). They were sent at 18:06 to 18:07, the 
 creation time says 18:06 to 18:07.

 3)
 The third batch was created 17:55 to 17:57 and set to be sent on June,
 15th 2009 at 18:20. They were sent at this date at 18:20, the creation
 time says 18:20.

 (All creation times are the times as displayed in recipients inbox)
 Every message was sent no one was lost.
 I didn't experience any parking/unparking issues.

I am getting so frustrated with this. In some beta releases it has worked 
perfectly, and the next release of an EXE will totally break it (form me at 
least) and I have no idea of why.

Other's are getting flaky behavior too so in needs to be looked into, yet it 
seems to be working flawlessly for you.:)

-- 
Rick
A great many people think they are thinking when they are really rearranging 
their prejudices. - William James

v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-15 Thread Rick
 Every message was sent no one was lost.
I had 5 messages timed to go out at 2 pm. 2 went out at 2:11. The other 3 are 
still in the outbox. 

Anyone have any ideas? There is a user on TBUDL with another same problem of 
setting a message to go out at a future time and in doesn't go.

What might have an impact on the scheduler? I use antispamsniper. Has that ever 
had a documented effect on OUTGOING mail?

Help!
-- 
Rick
The art of being wise is knowing what to overlook. - William James

v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-15 Thread mse
Hello Rick,

 Every message was sent no one was lost.

 What might have an impact on the scheduler? I use antispamsniper.
 Has that ever had a documented effect on OUTGOING mail?

I use Antispamsniper v3.2.0.6 and I didn't experience any problems so
far. Did you or the other user close the program between creating the
mails and sending them? Has the computer been in standby or in
hibernation mode and has been restarted before the mails ought to be
sent? Has Windows been restarted? Has the screen saver been activated?

I have no idea how any of these actions might influence delayed
sending; during my experiment described earlier I had no program
close, screen saver, standby, hibernation or OS restarts. In fact,
program and computer weren't used at all.

-- 
Best regards,
mse

Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 3






 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-15 Thread Rick
 Hello Rick,

 Every message was sent no one was lost.

 What might have an impact on the scheduler? I use antispamsniper.
 Has that ever had a documented effect on OUTGOING mail?

 I use Antispamsniper v3.2.0.6 and I didn't experience any problems so
 far. Did you or the other user close the program between creating the
 mails and sending them? Has the computer been in standby or in
 hibernation mode and has been restarted before the mails ought to be
 sent? Has Windows been restarted? Has the screen saver been activated?

 I have no idea how any of these actions might influence delayed
 sending; during my experiment described earlier I had no program
 close, screen saver, standby, hibernation or OS restarts. In fact,
 program and computer weren't used at all.

A lot of the 9 AM batches will be with the program minimized and the screen 
saver active - yet during the betas when it worked flawlessly, that was never a 
problem. 

Today for the 2 pm batch, I was sitting right here busy on the computer with 
the bat up. As I said 2 went and 3 did not.

All I have to do to send the other 3 is highlight them and CONTROLALTJ 
which is unpark.This seems to clear the delay status (although NOT the icon) as 
they will go out with the next mail. I think this is significant in 
troubleshooting the problem.
Is it time for Maxim to get involved with this? :)

-- 
Rick
Necrophiliacs need love too!

v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-15 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Monday, June 15, 2009, 2:39:50 PM, mse wrote:

 Did you or the other user close the program between creating the
 mails and sending them? 

I  know  that  I have to close the program often, because that is the 
only  to  get  counts updated, new mail colleccted, and messages which 
have been read elsewhere to be recognized as read so scrolling through 
unread  messages  doesn't  stop at all those as well. So I can pretty 
much guarantee that I have closed and opened TB! during the time that 
messages have been waiting to be sent, but that shouldn't interfere if 
it worked right. 

-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
  http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.6 on Windows Vista version 6,0 ()



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-15 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Monday, June 15, 2009, 2:39:50 PM, mse wrote:

 Did you or the other user close the program between creating the
 mails and sending them? Has the computer been in standby or in
 hibernation mode and has been restarted before the mails ought to be
 sent? Has Windows been restarted? Has the screen saver been activated?


I just created two messages, set one for tomorrow with custom and one 
for  8  tomorrow.  Before  any  restarting,  standby,  screensaver or 
anything  had a chance to operate, sending queued messages dispatched 
them both.

-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
  http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.6 on Windows Vista version 6,0 ()



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Delayed Sending not working in 4.2.4

2009-06-13 Thread Rick
I am having trouble with delayed sending; it has apparently stopped working in 
the last couple of builds. 

I set batches of 5 emails to go out tomorrow at 9 am and 2 pm respectively.

They won't go unless I UNPARK them, then they will go immediately irregardless 
of the delay time.

Anyone else having trouble?
-- 
Rick
Rogues are preferable to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest. - 
Alexandre Dumas

v4.2.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3




 Current beta is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


delayed sending

2009-06-11 Thread Dwight Corrin
First  of  all,  my  sent  mail is wierd, because it always shows the 
received time an hour later than the created date, including when it's 
not during daylight savings time.

Yesterday  at 9:14 am, I sent myself a message, to be dispatched at 8 
am tomorrow (today). The message was sent today, at 9:04 am. 

It  appears  in  my  sent  mail,  under yesterday's date, having been 
created at 9:14 and received at 10:14. 

It  seems like it should appear as having been sent today at 9:04 am. 
It also seems like it should have been sent at 8 instead of 9. 

There  is  a second message, which was composed at the same time, and 
set  to  be  sent in 24 hours, by the custom setting. This message is 
still  sitting  in  the  outbox,  (it  is  currently  about  11:35 am 
Thursday).

-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com 
photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
  http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.1.1 on Windows Vista version 6,0 ()



 Current beta is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-11 Thread Rick
 First  of  all,  my  sent  mail is wierd, because it always shows the 
 received time an hour later than the created date, including when it's
 not during daylight savings time.

 Yesterday  at 9:14 am, I sent myself a message, to be dispatched at 8 
 am tomorrow (today). The message was sent today, at 9:04 am. 

 It  appears  in  my  sent  mail,  under yesterday's date, having been 
 created at 9:14 and received at 10:14. 

 It  seems like it should appear as having been sent today at 9:04 am. 
 It also seems like it should have been sent at 8 instead of 9. 

 There  is  a second message, which was composed at the same time, and 
 set  to  be  sent in 24 hours, by the custom setting. This message is 
 still  sitting  in  the  outbox,  (it  is  currently  about  11:35 am 
 Thursday).


I am having trouble with delayed sending too; it has apparently stopped working 
in the last couple of builds. However 3 out of 5 scheduled went out a half hour 
late yesterday, the other 2 having to be sent manually. Go figure.

I set batches of 5 emails to go out tomorrow at 9 am and 2 pm respectively.

Anyone else having trouble?
-- 
Rick
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss 
people. - Eleanor Roosevelt

v4.2.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-11 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Thursday, June 11, 2009, 11:34:47 AM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
 
 There  is  a second message, which was composed at the same time, and 
 set  to  be  sent in 24 hours, by the custom setting. This message is 
 still  sitting  in  the  outbox,  (it  is  currently  about  11:35 am 
 Thursday).
 
it went out at 11:56 am. 

I  should  add  that  the  problem  with  the mails being prematurely 
dispatched with the send queued messages did not occur.  
 
  
-- 
 Dwight A. Corrin 
 316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax 
 dcorrin at fastmail.fm 
 photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com 
 photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com 
   http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 
 Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.4 on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 1)



 Current beta is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Delayed sending totally broken in this release

2009-05-26 Thread Martin Schoch
Hi Rick

On Monday, May 25, 2009 11:39:58 PM you wrote:

 Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in this 
 release? (4.1.14.1)

Can't confirm. I'll send this message with 15min delay.

-- 
Best regards,
   Martin
   dagob...@yahoo.com

TheBat! 4.1.14.1 (RC1) Pro (no OTFE) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2


 Current beta is 4.1.14.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Delayed sending totally broken in this release

2009-05-26 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Monday, May 25, 2009, 4:39:58 PM, Rick wrote:

 Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in
 this release? (4.1.14.1)

Seems like a fair statement to me.  See 1514908674.20090521173...@fastmail.fm


-- 
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385  phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com
photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com
  http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882
Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.1.14.1 (RC1) on Windows Vista version 6,0 ()



 Current beta is 4.1.14.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Delayed sending totally broken in this release

2009-05-26 Thread Rick
 Hi Rick

 On Monday, May 25, 2009 11:39:58 PM you wrote:

 Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in this 
 release? (4.1.14.1)

 Can't confirm. I'll send this message with 15min delay.

I sent one with a 15 minute delay yesterday and it didn't go out on time

I set 5 to go out at 8 AM yesterday morning and none went out

THIS morning the 15 minute delay went out along with 2 of the 8 AM that should 
have gone out yesterday morning (they went out at 7:42 AM)

Something is broken.
-- 
Rick
Coffee is Love

v4.1.14.1 (RC1) on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.1.14.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Delayed sending totally broken in this release

2009-05-26 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Rick,

Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 5:03:41 PM, among other things, you wrote:

R Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in this 
release? (4.1.14.1)
Cannot confirm, a delayed message sent to myself went out as programmed.

-- 
Best regards,
  
 Roger 

:flag-SouthAfrica:

The   Bat!  v4.1.14.1 (RC1)  POP3with  
AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.6,
on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 3



 Current beta is 4.1.14.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Delayed sending totally broken in this release

2009-05-25 Thread Rick
Has anyone else noticed that delayed sending seems totally broken in this 
release? (4.1.14.1)

-- 
Rick
Love is the delightful interval between meeting a beautiful girl and 
discovering that she looks like a haddock. - John Barrymore

v4.1.14.1 (RC1) on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3




 Current beta is 4.1.14.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [The Bat! 4.0.28.3] Delayed sending of e-mails

2008-08-31 Thread Albrecht Backhaus
Volker Ahrendt schrieb:
 Moin, folks!
 
 I do not know exactly, when this occured the first time, but today I
 noticed, that sending an e-mail takes some seconds (15-20s) before the
 transfer actually starts. Normally the transfer used to start
 immediately. See the log:
 
  snip
 
  27.08.2008, 15:42:10: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
  27.08.2008, 15:42:11: SEND  - connected to SMTP server
  27.08.2008, 15:42:26: SEND  - authenticating (plain)...
  27.08.2008, 15:42:26: SEND  - sending message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  27.08.2008, 15:42:26: SEND  - message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent (698 bytes)
  27.08.2008, 15:42:26: SEND  - connection finished - 1 message(s) sent
 
  /snip
 
 Btw: It does not matter, if one uses a regular (Port 25) or secure
 connection (Port 465). And I yes, I tested this with different
 e-mail providers.
 

Hello,

I had exactly this problem (30sec delay)- caused by a missing parameter 
at xinetd/inetd configuration on the mail server.
This occures due to the mail server (in my case qmail) doing a dns 
request which is finally timed out after 30 secs. I added the -Rt0 
parameter to the smtp settings in inetd configuration and everything was 
immediately fine.

-- 
Regards, Albrecht



 Current beta is 4.0.32.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


[The Bat! 4.0.28.3] Delayed sending of e-mails

2008-08-27 Thread Volker Ahrendt
Moin, folks!

I do not know exactly, when this occured the first time, but today I
noticed, that sending an e-mail takes some seconds (15-20s) before the
transfer actually starts. Normally the transfer used to start
immediately. See the log:

 snip

 27.08.2008, 15:42:10: SEND  - sending mail message(s) - 1 message(s) in queue
 27.08.2008, 15:42:11: SEND  - connected to SMTP server
 27.08.2008, 15:42:26: SEND  - authenticating (plain)...
 27.08.2008, 15:42:26: SEND  - sending message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 27.08.2008, 15:42:26: SEND  - message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent (698 bytes)
 27.08.2008, 15:42:26: SEND  - connection finished - 1 message(s) sent

 /snip

Btw: It does not matter, if one uses a regular (Port 25) or secure
connection (Port 465). And I yes, I tested this with different
e-mail providers.

Any confirmations or hints?

Thanks and cheers!
VA

- --
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
QA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 4.0.28.3 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3.

»Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on
no account be allowed to do the job.«

Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001), »The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy«



 Current beta is 4.0.28.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: OT: Delayed sending idea

2001-05-14 Thread Silviu Cojocaru

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Monday, May 14, 2001, 7:09:52 PM, David Elliott wrote:

 Why don't they replace the OS whilst they are at it ? vbg


Hahaha, good call !! I too think they should :) :P

- --
  PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=send_PGP_key

  If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
   ...Oh wait, he already does.
 __
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjsAEdwACgkQlEKaOc9A4D13EwCcDgnjany+POK0/pofu0pw1wou
UboAmgKiWpJRDX6ICrx0AZ36u2EGbNrT
=a+kT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org