Re: The Bat program will not close.
Hello Ken, On Thursday, March 21, 2002 at 02:14, Roelof Otten wrote you: RO Hello Ken, RO On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:20:46 -0800GMT (21-3-02, 1:20 +0100GMT, where I RO live), you wrote: KM OK, that's starting to sound better to me, now what do I do about it? KM I know when I tried to import the Outlook address book things didn't KM go very good. RO Try to import from Outlook without the birthdays. Exactly, here is an extract from the message mentioned: ,- [ msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] | We found the answer -- I thought I would post it here just to | have it on the record! | | When my coworker imported Outlook's AB, he matched the birthdate | field. However, during the import, if Outlook's birthdate field | was empty, the import converted it to a string of zero's, which | is not a valid date string. Deleting all the address book entries | and re-importing (without the birthdate field) fixed the problem. `- -- Regards, Alain [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bat! 1.60 RC/2 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help on %IF
I have a scripting question. I will admit that I am not very
familiar with Perl and its look-alikes, so I may be missing something fundamental.
I have this template for REPLIES. I want to create a different
salutation based on the presence or non-presence of a dash ('-')
in the originator's name.
No matter what I do, the %IF always fails. Note that in the
following I added some debug lines
%SETPATTREGEXP='-'
-- echo the header information
-- %OFromFName
-- %OFromLName
-- pattern match
%REGEXPBLINDMATCH='%OFromLName'
-- Did the match work?
-- %SUBPATT='0'
-- Yes it did
%IF:%SUBPATT='0'='-':Dear %OFromLName:Hello %OFromFName
At this point, the false branch is always used, whether or not there
was a dash in the last name or not.
What am I missing?
Ed
Current Ver: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help on %IF
Hello Krall, On Friday, March 22, 2002 at 3:35:51 PM you wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): KEP No matter what I do, the %IF always fails. Note that in the KEP following I added some debug lines [...] KEP %IF:%SUBPATT='0'='-':Dear %OFromLName:Hello %OFromFName KEP At this point, the false branch is always used, whether or not there KEP was a dash in the last name or not. KEP What am I missing? you can't encase the '%SUBPATT' into another macro without taking '%SETPATTREGEXP' and '%REGEXPBLINDMATCH' into the same level. What you do is (shortened macro names!): |- %SET |- %MATCH |- %IF |- %SUB '%SUB' has to be on same level as '%SET' and '%MATCH'. So your solution might be: %IF:%SETPATTREGEXP='-'%REGEXPBLINDMATCH='%OFromLName'%SUBPATT='0'='-':Dear %OFromLName:Hello %OFromFName HTH Pit -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.60 RC/2 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2) ODAAT, we do what I can't. Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Eudora Import
Hi Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of my sent items have imported with HTML tags in the body of the document. TB! doesn't render the e-mail as html, so it shows the tags. I don't use HTML for e-mail. Everything that I sent was in plain text, so I don't know why TB! decided to add the tags. You might check in the archives. A couple of years ago, I move to TB from Eudora. I had the same problem. As I recall, I posted about this and several people knew what was going on...but I never found a way to fix it. -- Best regards, Kitty ^,,^mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Humility is a virtue; timidity is a disease. Jim Rohn Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: The Bat program will not close.
Hello Alain, YOU DID IT!!! Yes I'm yelling. After two weeks of frustration you gave me the magic answer. I had gone in and reentered all my addresses and I still had the problem. After I got your email I went in and checked each address very carefully. Sure enough one address had a problem. I reentered that address and the problem is gone. Thank you very much, I think I'll by The Bat now. KennyB www.runnerduck.com Friday, March 22, 2002, 5:47:22 AM, you wrote: AdG Hello Ken, AdG On Thursday, March 21, 2002 at 02:14, Roelof Otten wrote you: RO Hello Ken, RO On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:20:46 -0800GMT (21-3-02, 1:20 +0100GMT, where I RO live), you wrote: KM OK, that's starting to sound better to me, now what do I do about it? KM I know when I tried to import the Outlook address book things didn't KM go very good. RO Try to import from Outlook without the birthdays. AdG Exactly, here is an extract from the message mentioned: AdG ,- [ msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] AdG | We found the answer -- I thought I would post it here just to AdG | have it on the record! AdG | AdG | When my coworker imported Outlook's AB, he matched the birthdate AdG | field. However, during the import, if Outlook's birthdate field AdG | was empty, the import converted it to a string of zero's, which AdG | is not a valid date string. Deleting all the address book entries AdG | and re-importing (without the birthdate field) fixed the problem. AdG `- -- Best regards, Kenmailto:Ken[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New 1.60 version ! :-)
Hi , The Bat! 1.60 is released and available on the site : http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html -- Regards, Eric mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
gvantass, Registration is as long as the 1.xx versions. So, yes, your registration will remain valid. Charles Collinson Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
It was foretold that on 22-3-2002 @ 20:38:19 GMT+ (which was 21:38 where I live) Charles Collinson wrote and spread these wise comments on New 1.60 version ! :-): CC Registration is as long as the 1.xx versions. So, yes, your registration will CC remain valid. Do you have to register again manually or does it pick up the registration automatically? I guess the first option, because it didn't work with me. Also, TB! gave an error message because after installing there are two inboxes: the previous and a new one called inbox - known. That seems to cause a conflict. -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Thought for the day : It's not the pace of life that concerns us, it's the sudden stop at the end. -- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem Filtering for non-English characters
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:35:53 +0100GMT (which was 21.03.02, 08:35 +0100GMT where I live), Jernej Simoni wrote this about Problem Filtering for non-English characters: JS I don't really understand from your text, how you see - as ^c or as JS 'e (your text shows ^c here, see attached image). The correct is ^c... Hi Jernej, I do. Here the c (what was it? carbonated? ;-) ) appears as an e with an accent grave... -- Cheers Peter Winamp currently playing: Kent - Verkligen 08 - Halka jernej.PNG Description: PNG image
RE: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Oh, good! Thank you for the clarification! Much obliged! = Original Message From Charles Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] = gvantass, Registration is as long as the 1.xx versions. So, yes, your registration will remain valid. Charles Collinson Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Does this mean that my recently-purchased registration key will or will NOT work for this new version? = Original Message From Eric Malausséna [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Hi , The Bat! 1.60 is released and available on the site : http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html -- Regards, Eric mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
I also have the new inbox although it is empty. I had a lockup and don't know if it was connected to the installation of the new version. I shut down and it appears to be okay now (with the new inbox). My previous registration number is in the new version. This is out of beta status, is that correct? Elaine (who doesn't have the wits to be a beta tester) Hello Luc On Friday, March 22, 2002, you wrote CC Registration is as long as the 1.xx versions. So, yes, your registration will CC remain valid. Do you have to register again manually or does it pick up the registration automatically? I guess the first option, because it didn't work with me. Also, TB! gave an error message because after installing there are two inboxes: the previous and a new one called inbox - known. That seems to cause a conflict. Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Friday, March 22, 2002, 7:51:49 PM, you wrote: EM Hi , EM The Bat! 1.60 is released and available on the site : EM http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html Do I have the first bug or is this a feature? I launch The Bat from a shortcut on the quicklaunch bar in XP Pro (using 'classic' layout), with The Bat set to run maximised. When I do this with 1.6 the whole task bar disappears, leaving a gap at the bottom of the screen, and I get some really wierd screen corruption when alt-tabbing between apps. When launched from a shortcut elsewhere, it seems to be ok. John Rainer Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Hi John On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:56:59 +GMT (which was 22/03/2002, 21:56 +0100GMT for me), you wrote: JR Do I have the first bug or is this a feature? I launch The Bat from a JR shortcut on the quicklaunch bar in XP Pro (using 'classic' layout), JR with The Bat set to run maximised. When I do this with 1.6 the whole JR task bar disappears, leaving a gap at the bottom of the screen, and I JR get some really wierd screen corruption when alt-tabbing between apps. JR When launched from a shortcut elsewhere, it seems to be ok. It's a small bug (I have the same problem...) workaround: set your shortcut to 'normal window' and everything works fine... -- Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen Roel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zum antworten bitte Lederhosen entfernen * Speelplein Aboe http://www.aboe.zzn.com * Cannot open file C: ews Mail\batmail\cookies.txt Using The Bat! 1.54 RC/1 on Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 2 with an Amd Athlon XP 1800+ @ 640 MB 100Gb Hd (40 in Raid-0) Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Luc, Not sure, as I was using a beta version previous to this install. Sounds like they might want to re-visit the install routine. The betas were just exe file replacements. I'll await those more knowledgeable about The Bat to respond. It might be worth deleting your old EXE file just before install - wild guess here for sure :) Charles Collinson Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[3]: New 1.60 version ! :-)
On Friday, March 22, 2002, 22:15, you wrote: Is The Bat written in Delphi? We have a program at work that is, and it also has some strange behaviour when run via the quicklaunch bar in NT4. Yes, Delphi 6. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/pgp.txt Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Hello ETM, Friday, March 22, 2002, 9:57:25 PM, you wrote to TBUDL: E I also have the new inbox although it is empty. Bat 1.6 comes with a new filter calles known. If you activate this filter, it filters mail from senders that you have in your addressbook into your Inbox - known. You can select whick addressbooks or gorups you want this to be active for. -- Best regards, Ottar Grimstad, Norway mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.online.no/~ottgrims Using The Bat! 1.60 RC/2 on Windows 98 version 4,10 Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
It was foretold that on 22-3-2002 @ 21:00:00 GMT+ (which was 22:00 where I live) Charles Collinson wrote and spread these wise comments on New 1.60 version ! :-): snipped a bit CC It might be worth deleting your old EXE file just before install - CC wild guess here for sure :) According to Ritlab, it's supposed to be installed over the old version, which i did (after copying the TB! folder ofcourse ;-)) -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Thought for the day : I'm on a new tranquilizer diet. I haven't lost an ounce, but I don't care. -- Bob Phillips. -- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Friday, March 22, 2002, 9:00:41 PM, you wrote: R Hi John R On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:56:59 +GMT R(which was 22/03/2002, 21:56 +0100GMT for me), R you wrote: JR Do I have the first bug or is this a feature? I launch The Bat from a JR shortcut on the quicklaunch bar in XP Pro (using 'classic' layout), JR with The Bat set to run maximised. When I do this with 1.6 the whole JR task bar disappears, leaving a gap at the bottom of the screen, and I JR get some really wierd screen corruption when alt-tabbing between apps. JR When launched from a shortcut elsewhere, it seems to be ok. R It's a small bug (I have the same problem...) R workaround: set your shortcut to 'normal window' and everything works R fine... Hi Roel, After doing that, it still runs maximised but with no missing task bar. Is The Bat written in Delphi? We have a program at work that is, and it also has some strange behaviour when run via the quicklaunch bar in NT4. John Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Hello Luc, Friday, March 22, 2002, 9:47:24 PM, you wrote to TBUDL: L Do you have to register again manually or does it pick up the L registration automatically? It picks up all of your settings - including registration information. Worked flawlessly for me. -- Best regards, Ottar Grimstad, Norway mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.online.no/~ottgrims Using The Bat! 1.60 on Windows 98 version 4,10 Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Hello gvantass, 22. marec 2002, 21:28:57, you wrote: Does this mean that my recently-purchased registration key will or will NOT work for this new version? Why shouldn't it? Mine works, and it's almost a year since I purchased it. -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 [The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 98 4.10.. A ] Traffic congestion increases in proportion to the length of time the street is supervised by a traffic control officer. -- The Bumper To Bumper Theorem Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem Filtering for non-English characters
Hello Peter, 22. marec 2002, 21:47:29, you wrote: PM I do. Here the c (what was it? carbonated? ;-) ) appears as an e with an PM accent grave... Well, that's wrong display. It should appear as in body (Simon^ci^c, flip the ^'s). -- Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 [The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 98 4.10.. A ] An executive will always return to work from lunch early if no one takes him. -- Kelly's Law Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
It was foretold that on 22-3-2002 @ 22:34:38 GMT+0100 (which was 22:34 where I live) Ottar Grimstad wrote and spread these wise comments on New 1.60 version ! :-): Ottar It picks up all of your settings - including registration information. Ottar Worked flawlessly for me. I had to add it manually again, but now it's okay :-) -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Thought for the day : Always try to drive so that your license will expire before you do. -- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Hello Charles! On Friday, March 22, 2002 at 10:00:00 PM you wrote: Not sure, as I was using a beta version previous to this install. Sounds like they might want to re-visit the install routine. The betas were just exe file replacements. I'll await those more knowledgeable about The Bat to respond. It might be worth deleting your old EXE file just before install - wild guess here for sure :) Have you at least tried to run the installer over the existing installation? I did - as I wanted to have all possible changes (incl. the Readme) - a full install with the official release. And as always I didn't have to re-register. Everything was detected automatically. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.60 RC/2 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Spend some time alone. Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: New 1.60 version ! :-)
Saturday, March 23, 2002, 5:57:25 AM, ETM wrote: E This is out of beta status, is that correct? E Elaine (who doesn't have the wits to be a beta tester) From the standpoint of 'you're not going to have any show-stopping problems with your basic mail functions', I think it's out of beta, and has been for some time. But since it's a 'silent' release for the time being, I would suspect there might be a 'bis' version later to fix niggling little things that are bugs to some, yet are unnoticed by others. Yuki Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New 1.60 version: bug?
Hi list, after installing TB! 1.60 over my previous (1.53d) when i receive mail and click on the appropriate folder i get the following error: a new component named mNewQT_QT_DEFB12FF already exists. When i click OK, i can open the folder without problems. This occurs with some folders, but not with all of them. Is this a bug, has anyone else this problem...? -- Best regards, Luc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Thought for the day : How far would Moses have gone if he had taken a poll in Egypt? - Harry Truman. -- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
Hello Luc, On Friday, March 22 2002 at 03:59 PM PDT, you wrote: This occurs with some folders, but not with all of them. Is this a bug, has anyone else this problem...? This sounds more like a QT duplication error on your part than anything else. Do you have a Quick Template in use named mNewQT_QT_DEFB12FF? -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 16:30:08 GMT-0800 (which was 1:30 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on New 1.60 version: bug?: Nick This sounds more like a QT duplication error on your part than anything Nick else. Do you have a Quick Template in use named mNewQT_QT_DEFB12FF? That was my first thought also, looking at the QT error, but i don't have a QT named that way. -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Thought for the day : The best computer is a man, and it's the only one that can be mass-produced by unskilled labour. --Wernher Von Braun. -- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
Hello Luc, On Friday, March 22 2002 at 04:42 PM PDT, you wrote: That was my first thought also, looking at the QT error, but i don't have a QT named that way. No, but it may be filed that way for some reason. Try doing a search for it and see what you come up with. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 16:48:19 GMT-0800 (which was 1:48 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on New 1.60 version: bug?: NA No, but it may be filed that way for some reason. Try doing a search for NA it and see what you come up with. Nothing: did a search and came up with only the messages wherein the text comes up. Could this by some strange effect has to do with the fact that i have a backup of TB! in another folder and directory (made it before i installed the 1.60) ? -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Thought for the day : You don't learn anything the second time you're kicked by a mule. -- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whats going on with
Hello All, Does anyone know what is going on with ritlabs? No one seems to be responding to emails and I can't get anyone by phone. It seems that they may have moved locations. I ordered a new password about a week ago but have not heard anything back from them. It would not be that big a deal but I have 10 days left of the trial version then I am dead in the water. Are they still in business? -- Best regards, Phillip mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Whats going on with
Very much so. They are very active in the beta forum. Try contacting Stefan Tanurkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RIT Research Labs) Friday, March 22, 2002, 8:29:43 PM, you wrote: PF Hello All, PF Does anyone know what is going on with ritlabs? No one seems to be PF responding to emails and I can't get anyone by phone. It seems that PF they may have moved locations. PF I ordered a new password about a week ago but have not heard anything PF back from them. It would not be that big a deal but I have 10 days PF left of the trial version then I am dead in the water. PF Are they still in business? -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60 RC/2 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
v1.6 won't load on pc
Hello TBUDL, I tried running the new version of the Bat v1.60, but the program fails to load. Specifically, I see the splash screen, but then nothing. My hardware is a dual processor AMD 2.0 Ghz. I have tried dual booting from Win 2000 to Win XP Pro, but the problem persists. I was wondering if anyone else has seen this issue. -- Best regards, Terry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: v1.6 won't load on pc
Hi Terry On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 20:28:18 -0600GMT (which was 23/03/2002, 3:28 +0100GMT for me), you wrote: TM AMD 2.0 Ghz Now that doesn't exist yet :-) you mean two 2000+ processors (which run at 1.66MHz)? -- Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen Roel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zum antworten bitte Lederhosen entfernen * Speelplein Aboe http://www.aboe.zzn.com * Reality is a crutch for people who can't handle buttons Using The Bat! 1.54 RC/1 on Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 2 with an Amd Athlon XP 1700+ @ 640 MB 100Gb Hd (40 in Raid-0) Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
Hello Luc, On Friday, March 22 2002 at 05:26 PM PDT, you wrote: Nothing: did a search and came up with only the messages wherein the text comes up. Could this by some strange effect has to do with the fact that i have a backup of TB! in another folder and directory (made it before i installed the 1.60) ? I never used QT's but it sure sounds as if you have a Folder or Account Level Template that is somehow calling for a QT... if that is the correct vernacular... to be employed, but it has already been deployed. Does that make any sense? Look at all your QT's as I'm sure that is where the answer lies. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 19:34:14 GMT-0800 (which was 4:34 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on New 1.60 version: bug?: NA I never used QT's but it sure sounds as if you have a Folder or Account NA Level Template that is somehow calling for a QT... if that is the correct NA vernacular... to be employed, but it has already been deployed. Does that NA make any sense? Look at all your QT's as I'm sure that is where the answer NA lies. Well, i haven't detected anything strange with them, and why would they be acting this way after having them for a long time now without any problems? It seems that it's random generated, is i sometimes don't have the problem, sometimes in a few folders, sometimes in only one,... -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Thought for the day : Sorrow looks back, worry looks around, faith looks up. -- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
I can honestly say that I installed this version earlier today, have worked with it all day, and while I am looking at different menu placement, it has worked (after the initial lockup) without one moment's problem. In that time I have probably downloaded about 1,000 emails. Now, on to play some with the new inbox-known filter. In the meantime, all my filters and folders and some newly created sub-folders are functioning perfectly. Elaine Hello Yuki On Friday, March 22, 2002, you wrote From the standpoint of 'you're not going to have any show-stopping problems with your basic mail functions', I think it's out of beta, and has been for some time. But since it's a 'silent' release for the time being, I would suspect there might be a 'bis' version later to fix niggling little things that are bugs to some, yet are unnoticed by others. Yuki Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
Hello Luc, On Friday, March 22 2002 at 07:46 PM PDT, you wrote: Well, i haven't detected anything strange with them, and why would they be acting this way after having them for a long time now without any problems? I thought you mentioned that you had two copies of TB installed, but after re-reading your message I see I misread where you said you had only a backup of TB on your HDD. Sorry Luc... if your error doesn't exist within your existing QT's I don't know what to suggest. I'm sure someone in the know will come up with the answer before long. -- Nick Andriash Courtenay, B.C. Canada Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Friday, March 22, 2002 at 20:51:49 GMT +0100 (which was 1:51 PM where I live), thus spake Eric Malausséna on the subject of New 1.60 version ! :-): EM Hi , EM The Bat! 1.60 is released and available on the site : EM http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html Looks good! Now, can someone please tell me what the menu navigator is good for? Alternatively, where can I go to find out more about the new features in 1.60? Very nice, though! - -- Best regards, Geordonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your fortune: Life isn't about finding yourself. Life is about creating yourself. (George Bernard Shaw) Sh d d P -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQEVAwUBPJwE9t77fDX88Gt5AQHpXAgAgbsnwTZjfjcKmnfE6kNqnmHKswAzroPa JfQVwm1fAdrzT5Zy146dlxxk/D5J+n631CItW5ShDi8RbK8hCzSyx0Pa2VDgRoGv rF1szK9vmBNtKu1ZEcyfjFxSGPQ7+wB8+yyKfqZLZW/YBwi14DNnoLESW6infmkP 2dbCC/C9kj/myq43lB92ndIz3B39PNVuvJQbTz32sZ93KsZXRZskx1FG8PXmh0yv H/zs3Cf5AZL6r6sltI/wbOiPMFwcHz9LWgR0ryR5LtIA6Wu3CVbi84TKGY0h+cpx UQ/ufsmZlAbUqlp2T8C/eNY/pEIrjDJEE0P6uO6tudtQgzuDQStciQ== =WKQO -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 20:21:55 GMT-0800 (which was 5:21 where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on New 1.60 version: bug?: NA Sorry Luc... if your error doesn't exist within your existing QT's I don't NA know what to suggest. I'm sure someone in the know will come up with the NA answer before long. Actually, Nick, you did help me out: it was my QT's but it was a strange thing: i had the precisely the same QT's and in the previous version (obviously). One of them had the same handle and never caused any problems, except in this version. I only found it out when clicking on the QT edit button and then close it: it then produced the error message. So, you did help me out Nick !!! Tnx a lot -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 -- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version ! :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @ 22:30:40 -0600 [ Fri, 22 Mar 2002], Geordon Vantassle [GV] contributed this to our collective wisdom: ... GV Looks good! Now, can someone please tell me what the menu GV navigator is good for? Alternatively, where can I go to find out GV more about the new features in 1.60? Now that you've installed, take a look at the readme.txt file in the installation directory. - -- Allie C Martin -- List Moderator PGPKey - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [MUA: TB! v1.60 (*) OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600] ¯¯ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAjycB+UACgkQV8nrYCsHF+JhDgCg6Wz2Dkys9cFyF/Vq4KUmTr6Q LPEAn1lZqkwfnPmTgfVmfr0/O79F4/FB =0UHB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 05:47:51 +0100, Luc [L] wrote these comments: ... L Actually, Nick, you did help me out: it was my QT's but it was a L strange thing: i had the precisely the same QT's and in the previous L version (obviously). One of them had the same handle and never caused L any problems, except in this version. Hmmm. Since using TB!, I've never gotten away with giving two QT's the same handle. TB! would always give an error and refuse to save the QT. The same goes for address book entries with the same handle name. It's very strange that you got away with this before. shrug - -- Allie C Martin -- List Moderator PGPKey - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [MUA: TB! v1.60 (*) OS: Windows XP 5.1.2600] ¯¯ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAjycDUYACgkQV8nrYCsHF+IoZwCgz/AsDZPcPHqjMwJ+VdtApRi7 /S4AoPdBuWwvnmH8KPgcHwkNYy7NmpJo =i9em -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Res change in 1.60
All: When I change from 1024x768 to 800x600, and then back again, TB comes up with a truncated folder pane, only 600 pixels tall. Not a show stopper for sure, but this probably should not happen when TB is not even open during the transitions. I did open it once in 800x600, and that's what apparently causes the problem when I later change back. But I closed it completely before actually resetting the resolution, and I would expect it to open correctly in the new resolution, rather than remembering its size (and only a part of its size at that) in the old resolution. With some of the betas, simply minimizing to the tray and restoring would fix this. However with 1.60 that doesn't work, and I have to do a partial minimize and then maximize to get the display right. -- Best, Yuki ^_^ Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 1.60 version: bug?
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 00:06:13 GMT-0500 (which was 6:06 where I live) Allie C Martin wrote and spread these wise comments on New 1.60 version: bug?: ACM Hmmm. Since using TB!, I've never gotten away with giving two QT's the ACM same handle. TB! would always give an error and refuse to save the QT. ACM The same goes for address book entries with the same handle name. It's ACM very strange that you got away with this before. My thoughts exactly. Given no error before has resulted in having the same handles in the first place :( -- Best regards, Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Life is a sexually transmitted disease. -- Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.60 new features
Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 I've just upraded and noticed that the Help doesn't describe two of the new features; features that I would like to turn off, but am unsure whether I can or should. 1. At the right of the titlebar, to the left of the minimise button, is a new button that launches the menu navigator. Although a menu navigator is probably a good idea, I keep clicking this button when I mean to minimise TB! Can I relocate the menu navigator button or at least remove it from the title bar? 2. I've suddenly grown a new inbox called Inbox - Known. Can I safely delete this inbox? In addition, whenever I now click the Send button, TB! asks for confirmation that I really want to send the message. Is there a way to bypass the confirmation so that TB sends the message as soon as you click the Send button? TIA, -- Geoff Lane Cornwall, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] All I did was press this button and !£$!(()%^£%!£... Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1.60 new features
On Saturday, March 23, 2002, 8:05:38 AM, you wrote: GL 2. I've suddenly grown a new inbox called Inbox - Known. Can I GL safely delete this inbox? You can. I did at first when using the Beta, but then investigating further found it quite useful. If you use the known filter any mail from people in your address book goes straight into the known folder, anything else to the standard inbox. -- Best regards, Adam Using The Bat! v1.60 Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.53d FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
