Re: HTML
Hello Jonathan, On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:45:43 -0500 GMT (18/08/02, 06:45 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: I haven't gone nto IMAP yet, but I did think we were talking about POP. The reason is that on a dial-up account, IMAP (if I understand it correctly) might require more online time. JA It'd only require more online time if you wanted to redownload every message JA each time, however if you required just reading of some messages, then in JA general no... the one limitation with IMAP is that you have to be connected to JA read your mail, which is where I guess your comment about online time comes JA from. Yes. Let's say I tunr on my computer in the morning, there are 100 messages in this account. It appears faster to download the mails, read them offline and reply (if appropriate), and then reconnect to send and receive again. IMAP would require me to stay online to read all these messages. JA If the email is split into two parts, one of type text/plain and one of type JA text/html, then you'd be able to split it, but if it is formatted as only JA text/html, then that'd be all you can download. While there is no conversation involved (as requested by Peter in his original query), this sounds like a nice thing at least for the multipart/alternative messages. :-) However, unless you can set this behaviour to automatic, it wouldn't save you much online time, would it? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Blamestorming: Sitting around in a group discussing why a deadline was missed or a project failed, and who was responsible. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Customizable From field
Hello Ivan, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 03:02:11 UT GMT (18/08/02, 10:02 +0700 GMT), Ivan Vecanski wrote: IV When composing an email it seems that only the addresses of existing IV accounts appear in the History drop down box for the From and Reply-To IV fields. It won't remember other addresses I enter. So my question is: IV Is there a way to force The Bat to 'remember' the addresses in the From IV and Reply-To drop down history boxes in the Edit Mail Message screen. The From field behaves differently from the recipient fields, I have just found out. It looks like there is no history which the drop-down list can get the past addresses from, so the only way would be to store these by yourself (in a txt file or smartbat) and then cp (unless you want to type them out every time). Another work-around (but not so good IMHO) would be to create dummy accounts for each possible From address. The best idea I can come up with is to hand in a suggestion to make the From field behave like any other header address field. -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re:moving TB (files)
Hi, To those subscribers that offer assistance about my file moving problem earlier, please accept my sincere thanks. I will get it fixed on Monday (I hope) -- Best regards, Tonymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bright,Victoria, Australia Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Importing LDAP address book
We have our corporate address book for bat that included one for LDAP searches etc. Can anyone tell me how to import that? I have tried copying the file into my folder but it is still not listed in my address books and I can not search LDAP. -- Alaeddin Muntasser Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
HTML messages
Hello all, Can TB write HTML messages? Is there a way to add a plug in or something like that? I could not find any information about it in the help files. -- Alaeddin Muntasser Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Encrypting received mails ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Probably a crazy question, and it may be more a PGP question than a TB! one, but why can't I encrypt a mail that I have received? In other words, if someone sends me a plain text email and I want to keep the contents private, why will it not let me encrypt it to my own key? I realise that I could just copy and paste it and then encrypt it, but I am curious to understand why it can't be done. Many thanks. - -- Carren PGP public key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP_Key_Body=Please%20send%20key -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32) - GPGshell v2.30 Comment: As long as one keeps searching the answers come Comment: ... but sometimes they are a long time coming! :-) iEYEARECAAYFAj1fZhoACgkQyogQhPvf03NHSACeMpQnyY4KvgbSJA8V9TFp9697 0pUAnjx72fIYfhvECV6qBqwQ+Xh4eXXD =2SGL -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: HTML messages
Hi Alaeddin, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:15:42 +0400, you wrote: Can TB write HTML messages? Is there a way to add a plug in or something like that? I could not find any information about it in the help files. No, TB cannot write HTML messages... at least not yet. There have been mentions (much to some peoples disgust) or including an HTML feature in version 2 of TB. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
RE: HTML messages
Hello Jonathan, (much to some peoples disgust) or including an HTML feature in Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity. Alaeddin Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: HTML messages
Sh'mae Alaeddin, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, at 11:32:02 [GMT +0400] (08:32 where I live) you wrote: AM Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity. Its seen as a security issue - an HTML rendered would need to be tightly written to avoid being as full of security holes as OE, for example. A [ Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. - Rich Cook ] -- [18 August 2002, 10:55] [ [new-wales] project : www.new-wales.net ] [ Adam Rykala : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ Public key : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] All my emails are scanned with AntiVir's Antivirus Mail Gateway for Linux. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Encrypting received mails ... ?
Hello Carren! On Sunday, August 18, 2002 at 11:17:53 AM you wrote: Probably a crazy question, and it may be more a PGP question than a TB! one, but why can't I encrypt a mail that I have received? I am not 100% sure, but it could be a TB! question: TB! doesn't allow to change incoming mail, therefore PGP cannot encrypt and then re-write it into the message base. Apart from copy/paste with a text editor you can forward the message to yourself and then encrypt it. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.61 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C Die Trunkenheit vermehrt schön zwei schöne Dinge - Mut und Liebe. (Jean Paul) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
RE: HTML messages
Its seen as a security issue - an HTML rendered would need to be tightly written to avoid being as full of security holes as OE, for example. this makes sense.. the company I work for is paranoid about security and TB is the corporate standard for this reason I guess. Alaeddin Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Encrypting received mails ... ?
Hello Carren, Sunday, August 18, 2002, 12:17:53 PM, you wrote: CS why can't I encrypt a mail that I have received? If I am not mistaken, TB just does not allow you to edit received messages. At least that was my experience. So, from my viewpoint, the solution would be to save the message in a text file, and encrypt it there. Perhaps someone will come up with a better idea. -- Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -=Robert Beata Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=- ~ PGP public key: 0x633F6D07 (link 1 - embedded, link 2 - attached) Fingerprint: 1A1C 29F1 2A0C 4C4E 0BDA C8EE 5A1D 9F03 633F 6D07 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP%20KeyBody=Please%20send%20key mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=GPG%20KeyBody=Please%20send%20key ~ Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Encrypting received mails ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, CS why can't I encrypt a mail that I have received? If I am not mistaken, TB just does not allow you to edit received messages. At least that was my experience. So, from my viewpoint, the solution would be to save the message in a text file, and encrypt it there. Perhaps someone will come up with a better idea. I put my message base on a PGP Disk. No problems so far. Bis demnaechst. Alex - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Bat! 1.61 (Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600) Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark, professionals built the Titanic ... (unknown) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBPV9lNR/yzcsqRzGeEQKDsQCfQOqBja4kVQU8nh/WsOJhHakTzg4An16j zLOOmF+b+lTN0uTIGBugEdvu =TpOm -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Encrypting received mails ... ?
Hi Carren, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 21:17:53 +1200, you wrote: Probably a crazy question, and it may be more a PGP question than a TB! one, but why can't I encrypt a mail that I have received? The only way I know of is to select the message, then go to Tools - Export - .msg file, then open it up, select the block of text you want to encript (don't get the headers, otherwise this probably won't work), copy, and then in PGPTray, encrypt the clipboard, select your key, then paste the text back over the top of the message body. Once you have done this, delete the original from your message base, and re-import the file you just updated (I forgot to remind you to save it first). Now providing you have left a new line after the end of the headers, the text should be encrypted, and you should (in theory) be able to go into the PGP options, and decode it (I think Special - OpenPGP Decrypt or something like that). I've not tested this, it is a theory, you could give it a shot on a dummy message if you wanted to see if it'd work. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: HTML messages
Hi Adam, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 10:56:13 +0100, you wrote: AM Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity. Its seen as a security issue - an HTML rendered would need to be tightly written to avoid being as full of security holes as OE, for example. I wouldn't just say security bugs, but more along the lines of wasted bandwidth. I've followed a full HTML thread before, and it got to the size of nearly 800kb... the plain text version was a mear 50kb... quite a nasty size difference for not using any formating of any sorts. But as somebody has already suggested, take a peek back through the archives. I don't want to be somebody that starts this one off again, although I probably did with the comment to start with (my bad). -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: HTML messages
Hello Alaeddin, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 11:32:02 +0400 GMT (18/08/02, 14:32 +0700 GMT), Alaeddin Muntasser wrote: (much to some peoples disgust) or including an HTML feature in AM Why is this bad for some people? Just out of curiosity. It is not bad for some people, it is bad for all people. ;-) HTML blows up the size of the mail by a significant factor, even if you don't use colours and different sized fonts. Almost all emails that I receive in HTML by OE/OL users or AOL users have no such enhancement. If I strip the HTML part and view the message in TB's Rich Text Viewer, I get exactly the same result. Why have 70% of the size been wasted? With millions of people sending email every day, a factor 2 or 3 or so is significant to bandwidth on a global level. If you live in a country that hasn't the widest international links, you'll understand. Furthermore, I do not like to receive emails in green size 28 fonts on pink background. I see no enhancement in that and hence no advantage of HTML emails as opposed to plaintext emails. Pictures I can attach alsoo to plaintext mails, I don;t need HTML for that. Last not least, HTML is the Hyper-Text Markup Language, invented in Geneva for hyperlinking seperate text parts in a document, or even different documents. for the non-scientific user, Help files are often HTML documents, and websites surely are; the latter are transmitted to your computer using the Hyper-Text Transfer Protocol (http). Hence the name of that protocol. Email does not use the hypertext transfer protocol, it uses email-related protocols. HTML has in fact nothing to do with email. Why try to squeeze it in there? -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Hans Krankl (Oesterreichischer Nationaltrainer): Wir muessen gewinnen, alles andere ist primaer. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Encrypting received mails ... ?
Hi Carren, on Sun, 18 Aug 2002 21:17:53 +1200GMT (18.08.02, 11:17 +0200GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : CS Probably a crazy question, and it may be more a PGP question than a TB! CS one, but why can't I encrypt a mail that I have received? You can move the message to an outbox. There you can open and edit it. -- Cheers Peter PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Winamp currently playing: - silence - Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Turning Off Msg List Status Pop-up
Hi Thomas, on Sun, 18 Aug 2002 04:23:37 +0700GMT (17.08.02, 23:23 +0200GMT here), you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : TF I get the tool tips also (Win98). Select a couple of messages and hold TF the mouse over it. Won't work if you select only one message. No way here... But I really don't miss it. :o) -- Cheers Peter PGP-Key: http://www.meynsweb.com/public-key.txt Winamp currently playing: - silence - Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions
Hello alain You wrote On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, at 23:15:04 [GMT +0200] (07:15:04 Tuesday, 13 August 2002 where I live):- Secondly, are there any plans to implement Cloudmark's SpamNet ? I can't quite understand why you guys are paranoid about spam. Looks like I will soon get a mention in the Guinness Book of Records - world's longest penis. And all gained from spam! Only cost me a fortune, of course. -- Regards, John Phillips Sydney, Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTML mail spam not welcome. Using Bat! 1.62/Beta1 7BE05C47 - Being used by Windows 98 4.10 Build ASony Vaio Notebook PCG-505TS Pentium 300 64meg ram @*@ --- The offspring of a tribble and Ross Perot. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Encrypting received mails ... ?
Hi Jonathan, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 05:13:46 -0500 GMT (Aug 18, 15:58 my local time), you [JA] wrote: Probably a crazy question, and it may be more a PGP question than a TB! one, but why can't I encrypt a mail that I have received? JA The only way I know of is to select the message, then go to Tools JA - Export - .msg file, then ... snip Or as an unorthodox approach, you can copy/move the message(s) to Outbox and encrypt them there and, of course, park them as well :) -- Cheers,Sudip Pokhrel Sudip Kathmandu-NP. PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 http://pgpkeys.mit.edu TB! v1.61 -- XP Pro 5.1 | P4-1.6GHz 256MB _.. Viewer discretion may be advised, but it's never really expected Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Encrypting received mails ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Carren, @18-Aug-2002, 21:17 +1200 (10:17 UK time) Carren Stuart [CS] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: CS Probably a crazy question, and it may be more a PGP question than CS a TB! one, but why can't I encrypt a mail that I have received? I can. But then, I'm using SecureBat! ;-). That's the way all mail is stored. Without the iKey and the PIN code, nobody can read my mail. CS In other words, if someone sends me a plain text email and I want CS to keep the contents private, why will it not let me encrypt it to CS my own key? I realise that I could just copy and paste it and then CS encrypt it, but I am curious to understand why it can't be done. You can redirect the mail to yourself and encrypt it on the way then delete the original... - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 6.5.8ckt build 09 beta 3 iQA+AwUBPV+JLjnkJKuSnc2gEQLoTwCYl8HVwEc+EXUbJBTWdZKKfa5joQCeI8X9 y8zmaFKnqJC1OM8AN/s2TQc= =LBbv -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
POP b4 send
Hi, Bat's expert maybe this should considered as OT but I don't know whether there is any trick in Bat that could get the job done :) I owned a pop3 email A/c (softhome.net) but it required me to pop the a/c first b4 I could send out any email I find it quite annoying can I make any changes in the Bat to bypass it or any 3rd party software or plug-in to do the same job?? TIA Best regards, Jason Primary e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Secondary e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPKey Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: anti-spam suggestions
Hello John, On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 11:03:24 +1000 GMT (17/08/02, 08:03 +0700 GMT), John Phillips wrote: JP And all gained from spam! Only cost me a fortune, of course. Since you know about the price, I see you read your spam attentively. That a boy! -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. From page 468 of Using Turbo C++ by Herbert Schildt: REMEMBER: The private parts of an object are accessible only by functions that are members of that object. (Well, there goes free love...) Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: POP b4 send
Hallo Jason, On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 21:13:31 +0800GMT (18-8-02, 15:13 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: J but it required me to pop the a/c first b4 I could send out any email Account-Properties-Transport-SMTP:Authentication-Check 'Use POP before SMTP' That ought to take care of it. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: non-moving / folder-specific rule?
Hello Jan, First of all I admit that my reply is not on time, but I guess there's worse :) Saturday, August 17, 2002, 3:36:15 PM, you wrote: jr The moving issue is no problem as long as you jr leave the source move folder the same. [snipped out stuff] jr Then those msgs left over could be subjected to jr a move action based on age, i.e. if it stays in jr the Inbox or $KNOWN$ folder for 1 day move to jr Trash or wherever. What you describe is an interesting solution and thanks for giving the idea. However, this was just experimentation and not something that *had* to be done. I'll maybe try it, I'll maybe not. I don't know yet... :) Thanks for the reply. See you around ;) Best regards, Alexandros Cicovic Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
KOI-8 to Windows1251 conversion.
Dear tbudl, Is there any way to convert part of text from KOI-8 to Windows1251? I want to insert some text (header) from HTML file using RegEx into a message. I can do it. But encoding is wrong. What can I do? -- Best regards, Sergey Uvarov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TheBat version :1.62/Beta1, Running at NT 5.0, Build 2195 Service Pack 2. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Regex help-hilfe-ajuto needed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, at 18:25:20 -0700 Januk wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
JA On Saturday, August 17, 2002 at 21:35 GMT +0200, a stampede was
JA started when Mandara hollered:
Well, that's something... ;-)
JA I know this should really go on TBTECH, but I suppose one or two of
JA these every couple of years on TBUDL isn't so bad.
.
Januk, thanks a lot for the all useful things you wrote. I'll proceed
with it on tbtech, as you and Luc suggested.
Mandara
- --
(__) If you need this key:
('') mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x257DFF36
\/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE9X7lsvgcu6yV9/zYRAhHEAJ9HcfE2Coe2iv9+Rc7zw4K1eB7ObACgt9qM
/GFqvgoH+cnSuEHxVaVXrbA=
=P1cy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Encrypting received mails ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, at 21:17:53 +1200 Carren wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
CS Probably a crazy question, and it may be more a PGP question than a
CS TB! one, but why can't I encrypt a mail that I have received?
CS In other words, if someone sends me a plain text email and I want to
CS keep the contents private, why will it not let me encrypt it to my own
CS key? I realise that I could just copy and paste it and then encrypt
CS it, but I am curious to understand why it can't be done.
In addition to what Marck already said, you can use ScramDisk and make
your encrypted file where you can put your Bat folder with
confidential mail. Even more, this file will appear as an added
separate partition/drive and will be invisible until you decrypt it.
Also you can put all your mail folders in a such encrypted
file/partition.
Any time you restart/turn-off machine this encrypted file/partition
disappears until next decryption.
Mandara
- --
(__) If you need this key:
('') mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x257DFF36
\/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE9X7flvgcu6yV9/zYRAlKOAJ0bfmrSGoR6aOn3fTb5Kt2ia8P1IACgga0R
4WoDED7qlcVWa9AgxjPSgAo=
=ZdV9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: HTML messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, at 11:15:42 +0400 Alaeddin wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
AM Can TB write HTML messages?
Officially, no. Unofficially, yes. But this is work of devil.
;-) Nobody loves HTML mail, and if such love exists that's a lost love.
Anyway, you can make your HTML, add all loads of pictures and so (pics
must be in the same folder with html), and when you finish it, open a
new message in TB and add this HTML as attachment together with all
pictures. That's it.
I discovered it once I had to send a very complicated formatted
text as an uncompressed html attachment (to a person who knew nothing
about WinZip and similar tools).
Mandara
- --
(__) If you need this key:
('') mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x257DFF36
\/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE9X8Sxvgcu6yV9/zYRAvbfAJ924Lyif0ogM8EwbcYfYByh8n2NhACgtzB5
28dsJTZyV3fU1dHs2DLrFSQ=
=e2Ns
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Encrypting received mails ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, at 13:19:19 +0200 Peter wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PM You can move the message to an outbox. There you can open and edit it.
But if original headers are needed, they will be lost.
In this case, only solution is with editing message by
exporting-editing-importing. But this way message is still changed.
I think the best way is to put such (intacta) message in a folder in
an encrypted file/drive.
Mandara
- --
(__) If you need this key:
('') mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x257DFF36
\/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE9X7uZvgcu6yV9/zYRAk5NAJ9kxMY1ViPYxubJAOKyO7fks3Cj8ACfdHEo
Fk7PqnVWUOqWYlCGt1VQlDQ=
=cGkn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
deleting mail on the server by regex
Hello, I'd like to delete all mail containing attachments on the server (= no download at all) *unless* the mail contains a specific string in the subject line. (e.g. file_from_xyz) This is because I receive a lot of mails containing quite large virus files lately... I'm trying to achieve this with regex and The Bat! 1.61 searching for files containing multipart in the header whithout file_from_xyz in the subject line. Marck Pearlstone suggested this: multipart.*\nSubject:[ \S]*(?!file_from_xyz) Can't get it to work so far, didn't find anything in the FAQ... Anyone any ideas? Marek Moehling Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
RegEx question
Dear tbudl, I want to extract one HTML string naving particular color. How can i do this? Problem is, that this RegEx stops on *last* /P sequence, not on first. And this RegEx gives all text within first 80 and last /P. ,- [ ] | %SETPATTREGEXP='(80)(.*s?)(/P)'%REGEXPBLINDMATCH='%COMMENT'%SUBPATT='2' `- But I need text *between* 80 and first /P after 80! -- Best regards, Sergey Uvarov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TheBat version :1.62/Beta1, Running at NT 5.0, Build 2195 Service Pack 2. Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: RegEx question
Hello Sergey, On Sunday, August 18, 2002 at 8:11:30 PM you [SU] wrote (at least in part): SU ,- [ ] SU | %SETPATTREGEXP='(80)(.*s?)(/P)'%REGEXPBLINDMATCH='%COMMENT'%SUBPATT='2' SU `- I don't know what 's' in this string should match: (.*s?) ... make is (.*?) and it should do it's job. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) CanaDOS: Yer sure, eh? (B)eauty! (N)o way! (T)ake off! Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
