Re[2]: Common folders
Hello Paul, On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, at 19:46:34 [GMT +0100] (which was 19:46 in my TimeZone) you wrote: PR Allie Martin wrote: Yes, you can filter messages to common folders PR Thanks again. I meant filter messages within common folders. and you can create read and replied message filters for common folders. PR Yes, I've taken the plunge and created one to experiment with. I PR can't presently see a use to which I might put it, though :-) I use common folders to filter stuff like virus infected mails, spam etc from multiple accounts into the single folder. -- Best regards, Michael http://www.thompsonmike.co.uk/ PGP KeyID := 0x402A090F I'm out of bed and dressed. What more do you want? Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Common folders
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Hi Michael, Monday, August 18, 2003, 7:23:27 AM, you wrote: PR Yes, I've taken the plunge and created one to experiment with. I PR can't presently see a use to which I might put it, though :-) In XP the common folders are visible to all users whereas only the accounts specific to that user are visible. ie my son can see his account and the common folders, whereas I can see my account and the common folders. -- From, Kat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Common folders
Kat Armstrong wrote: In XP the common folders are visible to all users whereas only the accounts specific to that user are visible. Interesting. TVM. Is this the case with other OS too? It's lamentable that basic but important information like this is not in the help file. -- Paul Richardson Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Common folders
Hello Kat, On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, at 09:14:21 [GMT +0100] (which was 09:14 in my TimeZone) you wrote: KA Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 KA Hi Michael, KA Monday, August 18, 2003, 7:23:27 AM, you wrote: PR Yes, I've taken the plunge and created one to experiment with. I PR can't presently see a use to which I might put it, though :-) KA In XP the common folders are visible to all users whereas only the KA accounts specific to that user are visible. ie my son can see his KA account and the common folders, whereas I can see my account and the KA common folders. Umm, never thought of that. Could be a bonus for me, to see what other users are getting for spam, and viruses. But since I am the only one to use the computer.But the theories are there.. -- Best regards, Michael http://www.thompsonmike.co.uk/ PGP KeyID := 0x402A090F Top Fifty Least-Known Facts About Saddam Hussein-- Top scientists have finally unlocked technological secrets of 8-track tapes and Pez dispensers, but have yet to procure free HBO. Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Common folders
Hello Paul, On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, at 09:21:51 [GMT +0100] (which was 09:21 in my TimeZone) you wrote: PR Kat Armstrong wrote: In XP the common folders are visible to all users whereas only the accounts specific to that user are visible. PR Interesting. TVM. PR Is this the case with other OS too? PR It's lamentable that basic but important information like this is not PR in the help file. Agreed, but with the help of people like Allie and Thomas we can work out the Bat Beast! -- Best regards, Michael http://www.thompsonmike.co.uk/ PGP KeyID := 0x402A090F Bother, said Pooh as the brakes went out! Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Old Question
Firstly, I recall this was probably the first question I posted to this list right back when I first installed TB but since then I have both forgotten the answer and deleted the reply that indicated what I needed to do to correct it, but I am now experiencing the same problem with another machine (Windows XP), so apologies all round for repeating myself. When clicking on a mailto link on a website the message Could not perform this operation because the default mail client is not properly installed is displayed, followed by 48 web browser windows opening that all say they cannot display the page. TB is the default mail client and is associated with all mail type files (mailto: .msg; .eml; .VCF) and one of the accounts is set to be the defaul for mailto URLs. What do I need to do here? Many thanks Steve Mulhall CMC Partnership (UK) Ltd The Bat version 1.62r Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old Question
Hallo Steve, On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:06:25 +0100GMT (18-8-03, 12:06 +0200, where I live), you wrote: SM When clicking on a mailto link on a website the message Could not SM perform this operation because the default mail client is not SM properly installed Close TB Start OE and configure it as your default mail client Close OE Start TB and let it configure itself as the default mail client -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old Question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Steve, @18-Aug-2003, 11:06 Steve Mulhall [SM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to The: SM ... the default mail client is not properly installed ... SM What do I need to do here? Exit TB. Open the control panel Internet Properties. Go to the Programs tab. Select anything other than TB as the default. Click Apply. Select TB as the default. Click Apply. Reload TB. All will now work correctly. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.0 Beta/2 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 (C) 1997-1999 Network Associates, Inc. and its affiliated companies. iQA/AwUBP0C5yznkJKuSnc2gEQL0sQCgw0oxlVxntmsPNWuzykYiKGcOqaIAoIGr XiT4gJ3P2uw+t8I50t8x72Ls =sekq -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old Question
On Monday, August 18, 2003, 6:06 AM, you wrote: SM When clicking on a mailto link on a website the message Could not SM perform this operation because the default mail client is not properly SM installed is displayed, followed by 48 web browser windows opening SM that all say they cannot display the page. TB is the default mail SM client and is associated with all mail type files (mailto: .msg; .eml; SM .VCF) and one of the accounts is set to be the defaul for mailto URLs. SM What do I need to do here? I changed to using the option, Use Specific E-mail client and in the field put: G:\The Bat!\thebat.exe mailto:%t?subject=%sbody=%m SM SM Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: SM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Addressbook question
On Tuesday, August 12, 2003 at 14:46 (which was Tuesday, August 12, 2003 at 20:46 where I am) Steve M. Sawczyn [SMS] wrote: SMS I tried entering the addresses seperated by commas, but that SMS didn't seem to work. You can put them on separate lines. Then on the last tab you can select to have TB automatically add all but the first address to the BCC field whenever you e-mail this person. -- Greetings, Maurice Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically
Hello List, I created a filter that moves all email comming from @peoplecall.com, to a internal mail folder and create a new entry in addresbook for all the addresses in kludges. The problem is that many entries are duplicated, for example: Johnn Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED] JOHNN DOE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Doe, J.[EMAIL PROTECTED] .. etc. There is some sort of way for *not* create the entry if the email address is already created? Thanks a lot in advance. Herme Garcia Peoplecall.com -- Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP Running on 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Common folders
Monday, August 18, 2003, Paul Richardson wrote: Is this the case with other OS too? Common folders is a function of TB, not the OS, so I'd be surprised if it wasn't. -- Urban Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Multiple Addresbook entries when added automatically
Hallo Herme, On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 17:31:25 +0200GMT (18-8-03, 17:31 +0200, where I live), you wrote: HG There is some sort of way for *not* create the entry if the email HG address is already created? Yep, on the 'Advanced' tab of your filter. Scroll down till you find: 'Address(es) must not be listed in the Address Book' You can check this and use some options... -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Can TB! create a verbose log file?
Hello: Is there a way to have TB! log *everything* that is transmitted to and from a POP3 server? I am having a problem with some messages mysteriously disappearing and I have traced the problem to TB! showing some strange behaviour when the POP3 session is interrupted for some reason. I would like to see the exact POP3 commands and responses and the message numbers and UIDLs that are being handled so that I can check if the problem is in fact TB!, my POP3 Server or whatever. TIA! -dZ. -- Powered by The Bat! v1.62r Hindered by MS Windows 2000 build 5.0.2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
OT: password recovery software
A long time ago, someone on this list recommended a password recovery program, a free download. I had it installed on my old laptop found it great, but can't remember what it was called, the old laptop has now gone the way of the dinosaurs, thanks to a fall followed by a flood. Can anyone remind me please? TIA -- Deborah Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: password recovery software
On Monday, August 18, 2003, 8:58 PM, you wrote: DW A long time ago, someone on this list recommended a password recovery DW program, a free download. I had it installed on my old laptop found it DW great, but can't remember what it was called, the old laptop has now DW gone the way of the dinosaurs, thanks to a fall followed by a flood. Can DW anyone remind me please? Revelation? -- Paul Using The Bat! v2.0 Beta/2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Can TB! create a verbose log file?
Hello DZ-Jay, On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:59:01 -0400 GMT (19/08/2003, 07:59 +0700 GMT), DZ-Jay wrote: Is there a way to have TB! log *everything* that is transmitted to and from a POP3 server? Unfortunately not. I use a third-party tool called Etheral to monitor that traffic: www.ethereal.com -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Bureaucrats do not change the course of the ship of state. They merely adjust the compass. Message reply created with The Bat! 2.0 Beta/2 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: OT: password recovery software
On Monday, August 18, 2003, 9:25:57 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: PC Revelation? That's the one! :-) - thanks! -- Deborah Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
message 100 stalls
Hello Bats!, In a previous post I told of having to reformat my hard drive and upon reinstallation of The Bat! I noticed a problem with the log files on each account. Thanks to the many knowledgeable people on this list, that problem was nicely resolved. Now I am faced with another problem probably related to the reformat/reinstallation. I've noticed that whenever the server is holding *more* than 100 messages, The Bat! will fetch up to message 100 where it then stalls. The message center says it is deleting message 100. Finally after many seconds of apparent inactivity, the message center closes, fetching no more messages. From the Web I can go to the server and will find that all messages are still there. Any subsequent fetch the message center will say I still have the original number of messages and proceed to fetch them all over again. And once again, it will stall at message 100 never deleting any of the messages from the server. If I go on the Web to the server and delete enough messages to get the count below 100, The Bat! then does the fetch with no stalling and deletes the messages from the server as it is supposed to. Anyone care to hazard a guess as to what the problem might be? -- Best regards, Jack LaRosa mail to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alabama, USA Message created 9:35:48 PM (GMT-6) on Monday, August 18, 2003 = Using The Bat! ver. 1.61 (reg) under Windows 98 ver.4.10 build Service Pack A = Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old Question
Exit TB. Open the control panel Internet Properties. Go to the Programs tab. Select anything other than TB as the default. Click Apply. Select TB as the default. Click Apply. Reload TB. All will now work correctly. Thanks, this helped me too! Not the most obvious fix, but a simple one. One thing I noticed: The mail composition window never assumes focus when triggered from a mailto: link. Is this by design? -- zParticle Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
