Re: Help with filters please

2005-02-24 Thread Cory
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:13:17 +, Marck D Pearlstone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 log-fw  Sender  Yes
 alert   Subject Yes
 [scan|attack] dropped   TextYes

On v2.12.00 this did the trick:

log-fw  Sender  Yes
alert   Subject Yes
[attack dropped]|scan dropped]|[sppf dropped]   TextYes

Apparently, using the | in between []'s isn't working - on v2.12.00.
I'd say I had used this in my tests before, but alas... thanks again,
Marck.


-- 
Happy flappin'!
 Corne' (aka Cory, The Batdmin)


Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Everybody,

  Just found this piece of info at the TB forum at the ritlabs site

=
Topic title:
NEW: TBClamWin - AV Plugin for ClamWin

Message author: Marco Pontello
Message date: 02/24/2005 02:56:11
Message text:

I have coded this little plugin for The Bat!, to experiment with the
Plug-In API. It allow the use of (a previously installed) ClamWin as a
scanning engine for every saved or opened file attachment. ClamWin is
a Win32 version/port of the open source - GPL licensed - ClamAV antivirus.   

Here's the page with some info:
http://mark0.net/plugins-tb-tbclamwin-e.html

I developed  tested it with a trial version of The Bat!. Thanks to
anyone that will double check if it works correctly with some other versions. 
=

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Wizard's Guild Parking Only:Violators will be Toad.

The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpWxgSKePRqB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Again, why only TB built-in filters are enough to fight all sorts of SPAM

2005-02-24 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

   ***^\ ._)~~
 ~( __ _o   Was another beautiful day, Tue, 22 Feb 2005,
   @  @  at 06:16:14 +0500, when Richard H. Stoddard wrote:

MM Okay then, less problems to solve. Tell me, do you have some
MM friends, or business partners who do not address you properly,
MM namely not using your full name (or a screen/nick name defined by
MM yourself) in TO (or CC) field, but using only the address of yours?

 I assume I'm like most folks: I have my friends and others in my
 address book and flagged so they go to the known folder; I have
 white-listed mailing lists like TBUDL; but I do receive mail that is not
 spam from others who are not in my book but whom I know or were
 referred to me by friends. My friends use all sorts of nicknames for
 me, including only the address; I can try to train them, but
 will have to deal with the third on a case-by-case basis.

Pardon my pause, Richard, I had to interrupt for a...moment.

OK, actually you would have to train a bit your friends then, and to
tell them (if they already do not do so) to use only (nick)names you use
in your FROM and REPLY-TO fields.

When they are giving your address to third parties, they would have,
of course, to use those very same forms.

Then you simply put all those forms of addressing on a white list too,
and that's it. Nothing which is not addressed this way can pass in.

This part, with friends, is, potentially, 'hardest' one, although it is
not very hard. My experiences are that my friends/correspondents pretty
easily accept and understand why I do so, and often they themselves
start to practise similar method. Some of them initially mumble but they
shortly after accept it too. You, therefore, have to train them, your
friends, and they will train all others. (-: So, there is no need for
dealing with the third on a case-by-case basis.

So you actually have 2 groups here: messages addressed to you personally
and those coming to/from various lists, addressed to these lists.

If you receive some newsletters then you add them too.

~~~
It's only important that no message arrives *only* to your plain
address (since this is form which spammers use; and sometimes adding a
'random' faked nick name, or name).
~~~

This way you practically can filter everything using just Selective
Download filters.

There is no 'fear' of losing some 'important' mail this way, since if
someone wants to contact you, for enough serious reasons, s/he will
definitely take care about way s/he is addressing you.

Even if something like that happens, and some letter is deleted due to
lack of the proper addressing, you may see info of that message in LOG
(Ctrl+Shift+A) and to inform the sender how to resend the message.

If I wasn't clear enough, ask me. (-:

- --
Mica
PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast
:banana:
[Earth LOG: 176 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium
with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux, and with Bochs 2.1.1
with a small DLX Linux; and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector
via Wine...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQFCHf3J9q62QPd3XuIRAmJnAJ9YuTorKIIVFUnUNh8/o8c1X9JOIACdEld+
xnIuIGf4jx2lmpK8YI4KBSk=
=slgG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB voyager : mobile solution...

2005-02-24 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

   ***^\ ._)~~
 ~( __ _o   Was another beautiful day, Tue, 22 Feb 2005,
   @  @  at 18:58:37 +1300, when Allister Jenks wrote:

 Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 1:48:05 AM, Mica wrote:

 That's why God (or at least the fellows at Apple) invented the iPod.
 :-)

MM What's that, actually?

 Essentially, a hard-disk based portable audio player.  It's something of
 a phenomenon lately...

 http://www.apple.com/ipod/

Thanks, Jenks, I'll fling my eye to ponder the thing.

- --
Mica
PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast
:flagmica:
[Earth LOG: 176 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium
with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux, and with Bochs 2.1.1
with a small DLX Linux; and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector
via Wine...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQFCHf4s9q62QPd3XuIRAheoAJsGZX4RgIzK9eSc7ejpFC7u8PNf1QCcDSZ3
cusVPfYrR2zq9/3oApLGK9E=
=BqS8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread B R i a N S

On Date : Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:22:01 +0100
Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this lines:

Roelof Hallo Everybody,

Roelof   Just found this piece of info at the TB forum at the ritlabs site

Roelof 
=
Roelof Topic title:
Roelof NEW: TBClamWin - AV Plugin for ClamWin

Roelof Message author: Marco Pontello
Roelof Message date: 02/24/2005 02:56:11
Roelof Message text:

Roelof I have coded this little plugin for The Bat!, to experiment with the
Roelof Plug-In API. It allow the use of (a previously installed) ClamWin as a
Roelof scanning engine for every saved or opened file attachment. ClamWin is
Roelof a Win32 version/port of the open source - GPL
Roelof licensed - ClamAV antivirus.   

Roelof Here's the page with some info:
Roelof http://mark0.net/plugins-tb-tbclamwin-e.html

Roelof I developed  tested it with a trial version of The Bat!. Thanks to
Roelof anyone that will double check if it works correctly with some other 
versions.
Roelof 
=

:o At last!!! i've been waiting a long time for it!!

ClamAV is a very good antivirus solution.  

--
Saludos,
B R i a N S (Cienfuegos, Cuba)

Using The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 
Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 4 2.4ghz with 256MB.

Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they
have to say something.-- Plato (429-347 BC)
   




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread David Calvarese
B R i a N S wrote:
 :o At last!!! i've been waiting a long time for it!!
 
 ClamAV is a very good antivirus solution.
 
 

Better than Avast?

-- 
Dave Calvarese
PGP Key Available at http://home.comcast.net/~dhcalva/DavidCalvarese-dh.asc


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello B R i a N S  everyone else,

on 24-Feb-2005 at 19:01 you (B R i a N S) wrote:

 ClamAV is a very good antivirus solution.

God exists. Proof or faith?

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

All you need in life is ignorance and confidence, and then success is
sure. -- Mark Twain



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello Alexander,

on Thursday, 24. February 2005, at 19:06:29 [GMT +0100] you wrote
regarding new AV plug-in for TB:

 ClamAV is a very good antivirus solution.

 God exists. Proof or faith?

It is very good, databases are actual, but has no background scanner and
can't clean files or messages. It is special designed for Mail
server.

-- 
Ciao

Thomas

Using:  TheBat! 3.0.2.10
System: Windows XP Build 2600 Service Pack 2
PGP:Key-ID: 0x70D9F03B
Visit:  TheBat! World on http://www.thebatworld.de





pgp2D70tMsjWP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread B R i a N S

On Date : Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:11:07 -0500
David Calvarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this lines:

David B R i a N S wrote:
 :o At last!!! i've been waiting a long time for it!!
 
 ClamAV is a very good antivirus solution.

David Better than Avast?

Well, here is a list of antivirus solutions responding to the new
MyDoom version released on 16.02.2005 Guess who's on the top. ;)
It was the only one that could detect/remove MyDoom on 16.02.2005.

ClamAV 16.02.2005 23:02 :: Worm.Mydoom.M-2
Sophos 17.02.2005 00:02 :: W32/MyDoom-O
TrendMicro 17.02.2005 01:11 :: WORM_MYDOOM.M
F-Prot 17.02.2005 01:48 :: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
McAfee 17.02.2005 01:53 :: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eTrust-Iris 17.02.2005 02:35 :: Win32/Mydoom.AU!Worm
Symantec 17.02.2005 03:30 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eTrust-Vet 17.02.2005 06:35 :: Win32.Mydoom.AU!ZIP
Antivir 17.02.2005 07:11 :: Worm/MyDoom.BB
DrWeb 17.02.2005 08:10 :: Win32.HLLW.MyBot
BitDefender 17.02.2005 08:54 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Panda 17.02.2005 08:54 :: W32/Mydoom.AO.worm
Norman 17.02.2005 09:25 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AVG 17.02.2005 11:10 :: I-Worm/Mydoom.AP

--
Saludos,
B R i a N S (Cienfuegos, Cuba)

Using The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 
Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 4 2.4ghz with 256MB.

If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish
thing.-- Anatole France [Jacques Anatole Thibault] (1844-1924)
   




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread David Calvarese
B R i a N S wrote:
 On Date : Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:11:07 -0500
 David Calvarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this lines:
 
 David B R i a N S wrote:
 :o At last!!! i've been waiting a long time for it!!
 
 ClamAV is a very good antivirus solution.
 
 David Better than Avast?
 
 Well, here is a list of antivirus solutions responding to the new
 MyDoom version released on 16.02.2005 Guess who's on the top. ;)
 It was the only one that could detect/remove MyDoom on 16.02.2005.
 
 ClamAV 16.02.2005 23:02 :: Worm.Mydoom.M-2
 Sophos 17.02.2005 00:02 :: W32/MyDoom-O
 TrendMicro 17.02.2005 01:11 :: WORM_MYDOOM.M
 F-Prot 17.02.2005 01:48 :: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 McAfee 17.02.2005 01:53 :: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 eTrust-Iris 17.02.2005 02:35 :: Win32/Mydoom.AU!Worm
 Symantec 17.02.2005 03:30 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 eTrust-Vet 17.02.2005 06:35 :: Win32.Mydoom.AU!ZIP
 Antivir 17.02.2005 07:11 :: Worm/MyDoom.BB
 DrWeb 17.02.2005 08:10 :: Win32.HLLW.MyBot
 BitDefender 17.02.2005 08:54 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Panda 17.02.2005 08:54 :: W32/Mydoom.AO.worm
 Norman 17.02.2005 09:25 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AVG 17.02.2005 11:10 :: I-Worm/Mydoom.AP

I find it a little odd that Eset/NOD32 isn't on that list.  They're
usually pretty fast.  Where did you find that info anyway?  I'm curious.


-- 
Dave Calvarese
PGP Key Available at http://home.comcast.net/~dhcalva/DavidCalvarese-dh.asc


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: message with no Date in its rfc-822 headers: TB! says created 30 December 1899, 00:00:00 () or same time as received?

2005-02-24 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Wednesday 23 February 2005 at 7:07:18 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:


 Confirmed with the latest aplha. It would be nice to a consistent
 behaviour of course, but messages must have a Date: header according
 to RFC2822, so I can imagine that something like this is overlooked...

Reported at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4281

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi,
The original quoted text below was written on 24/02/2005 20:17 my local 
time;

ClamAV 16.02.2005 23:02 :: Worm.Mydoom.M-2
Sophos 17.02.2005 00:02 :: W32/MyDoom-O
TrendMicro 17.02.2005 01:11 :: WORM_MYDOOM.M
F-Prot 17.02.2005 01:48 :: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
McAfee 17.02.2005 01:53 :: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eTrust-Iris 17.02.2005 02:35 :: Win32/Mydoom.AU!Worm
Symantec 17.02.2005 03:30 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eTrust-Vet 17.02.2005 06:35 :: Win32.Mydoom.AU!ZIP
Antivir 17.02.2005 07:11 :: Worm/MyDoom.BB
DrWeb 17.02.2005 08:10 :: Win32.HLLW.MyBot
BitDefender 17.02.2005 08:54 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Panda 17.02.2005 08:54 :: W32/Mydoom.AO.worm
Norman 17.02.2005 09:25 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AVG 17.02.2005 11:10 :: I-Worm/Mydoom.AP
I find it a little odd that Eset/NOD32 isn't on that list.  They're
usually pretty fast.
And Kaspersky!
--
Chris

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread B R i a N S

On Date : Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:17:09 -0500
David Calvarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this lines:

David I find it a little odd that Eset/NOD32 isn't on that list.  They're
David usually pretty fast.  Where did you find that info anyway?  I'm curious.

http://www.hispasec.com/unaaldia/2308/

I hope you know spanish ;)

--
Cheers,
B R i a N S (Cienfuegos, Cuba)

Using The Bat! 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 
Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 4 2.4ghz with 256MB.

I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work.-- Thomas
Edison (1847-1931)
   




Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: new AV plug-in for TB)

2005-02-24 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo David,

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:17:09 -0500GMT (24-2-2005, 21:17 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

DC B R i a N S wrote:
 On Date : Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:11:07 -0500
 David Calvarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this lines:

moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out David.

  '

Please trim replies to context. A sure fire indicator that
insufficient trimming has been done is that the original signature and
list footer remain in the quoted text.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.
/moderator

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

WinErr: 010 Reserved for future mistakes by our developers

The Bat! 3.0.2.10
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpVJ1ztnZTcY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: new AV plug-in for TB)

2005-02-24 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo B,

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:01:09 -0500GMT (24-2-2005, 22:01 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

BRI David Calvarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this lines:

David B R i a N S wrote:

moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out B.

  '

Please trim replies to context. A sure fire indicator that
insufficient trimming has been done is that the original signature and
list footer remain in the quoted text.

To find out why these MOD messages are posted to the list instead of
private mail, please read the welcome message you received when you
subscribed.

Thank you.
/moderator

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Wizard's Guild Parking Only:Violators will be Toad.

The Bat! 3.0.2.10
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN



pgpj6O1wLf6UV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: new AV plug-in for TB

2005-02-24 Thread Cory
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:01:09 -0500, B R i a N S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Well, here is a list of antivirus solutions responding to the new
MyDoom version released on 16.02.2005 Guess who's on the top. ;)
It was the only one that could detect/remove MyDoom on 16.02.2005.

I'd say it's quite likely this MyDoom variety could have been detected
by scanners using heuristic methods with an earlier release date.
Not based on facts, just my feeling and experience over time with this
type of protection.

-- 
Happy flappin'!
 Corne' (aka Cory, The Batdmin)


Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


need NOD32 plug-in source

2005-02-24 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Battyfolk,

Would someone be so kind as to direct me to the current NOD32 plug-in?

Thanks.

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB!3.0.1.33, , Windows 2000, Service Pack 4
ICQ 41116329








Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: need NOD32 plug-in source

2005-02-24 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Friday, February 25, 2005, Jan Rifkinson wrote:

 Would someone be so kind as to direct me to the current NOD32 plug-in?

this is the last version developed by Ritlabs and working with 3.x
version:

http://www.thebat.cz/stazeni/beta/nod32.rar (50kB)

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 3.0.2.10
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM, ADSL line

 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Again, why only TB built-in filters are enough to fight all sorts of SPAM

2005-02-24 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Mica,

Thursday, February 24, 2005, 9:16:11 PM, you wrote:

MM OK, actually you would have to train a bit your friends then, and to
MM tell them (if they already do not do so) to use only (nick)names you use
MM in your FROM and REPLY-TO fields.

For some reason I was assuming it would be more complicated than it
turned out to be. I guess that's because I usually read e-mail in the
morning while drinking my first cups of coffee.

It'll take my friends and others awhile to get used to using a particular 
address
form, but I'll give it a try.

MM This way you practically can filter everything using just Selective
MM Download filters.

In the beginning, I'll just filter those that don't pass to a junk
folder I can check periodically. Some of my friends are slow learners.
:-)

-- 
Thanks, Rick



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: message with no Date in its rfc-822 headers: TB! says created 30 December 1899, 00:00:00 () or same time as received?

2005-02-24 Thread Chris

MFPA @ 2005-Feb-24 3:37:15 PM
message with no Date in its rfc-822 headers: TB! says created 30 December 
1899, 00:00:00  () or same time as received? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Confirmed with the latest aplha. It would be nice to a consistent
 behaviour of course, but messages must have a Date: header
 according to RFC2822, so I can imagine that something like this is
 overlooked...

 Reported at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4281

Although I agree that The Bat! should be able to handle malformed Date
headers (to a point), shouldn't this issue also be reported to the
mail server manager or generating e-mail client?

-- 
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Accessing a POP3 mailbox.

Should vegetarians eat animal crackers?


pgpbh5O4U8GQY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Help with filters please

2005-02-24 Thread Chris

Cory @ 2005-Feb-24 4:27:14 AM
Help with filters please mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 [attack dropped]|scan dropped]|[sppf dropped]   TextYes

This probably isn't the problem, but you're missing a '[' before scan.

-- 
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Accessing a POP3 mailbox.

I'd love to go out with you, but I have to stay home and see if I
snore.


pgpI9kNcsFuFD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: need NOD32 plug-in source

2005-02-24 Thread capocasa
X-Rogue,:PACO: Hello all,
 Friday, February 25, 2005, Jan Rifkinson wrote:

 Would someone be so kind as to direct me to the current NOD32 plug-in?

 this is the last version developed by Ritlabs and working with 3.x
 version:

 http://www.thebat.cz/stazeni/beta/nod32.rar (50kB)

Would someone please explain what this Nod32 plugin is? I've been
using Nod32 for over two years with excellent results, and the Bat!
for longer than that, but I never run across a Nod32 plugin. Have I
been sleeping?

Paco




-- 

Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2 on a Pentium II with 255MB. :PACO: 



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html