Re: The Bat slowing down.

2005-10-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo K,

On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 22:25:38 -0500GMT (3-10-2005, 5:25 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

KS I was an old user of The Bat!. I recommend it to my friends who use MS 
Windows.
KS A friend of mine has windows XP, Mobile Pentium 4 , 2,2Ghz , 512MB RAM
KS 40GB HDD has around 1.5 Gb of mails (approx. 50k messages) in around 4 
accounts.
KS But his The Bat! 2.00.6 si very slow to start and stop. He is getting tired
KS with his delay and is planning to shift to another email client which can 
gracefully
KS handle that load. Can we suggest a few tricks to make the bat! handle that 
load
KS easily?

He could see how important it is for him to keep all of the mail he's
storing.
He could use archive folders without purge and compress settings for
older mail.
He should see whether there are a lot of messages in his inboxes that
he could store elsewhere too. Large high traffic folders tend to slow
TB (and most other mail clients too).
I don't know whether he does purge and compress on a regular base, if
he doesn't then he should do so more often. If he has purge and
compress all folders on exit, then he could disable that (provided he
has the self discipline to do it regularly manually)

He could upgrade to 2.12, that runs on the same license as 2.06 and
can still be downloaded from the Ritlabs site. I'm not sure what that
does to the speed, but there would be more people here being familiar
with what can and cannot be done with his version.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

I'm never difficult...Impossible maybe, difficult, never.

The Bat! 3.61.09 Echo (Beta)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM


pgpUenmmuzUNw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: The Bat slowing down.

2005-10-03 Thread Timo Boettcher
Hi,


* K. Shantanu  [EMAIL PROTECTED], Monday, October 3, 2005, 5:25:38 AM:

 Hi,
 I was an old user of The Bat!. I recommend it to my friends who use MS 
 Windows.
 A friend of mine has windows XP, Mobile Pentium 4 , 2,2Ghz , 512MB RAM
 40GB HDD has around 1.5 Gb of mails (approx. 50k messages) in around 4 
 accounts.
 But his The Bat! 2.00.6 si very slow to start and stop. He is getting tired
 with his delay and is planning to shift to another email client which can 
 gracefully
 handle that load. Can we suggest a few tricks to make the bat! handle that 
 load
 easily?
 Thanks in advance.
 Shantanu

I have made the experience (with 2.12 and about half a million mails in one
account, about 2GB together) that no single folder should contain more
than +-3 mails. Any more than that, and TB slows down
dramatically.



 Timo



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat slowing down.

2005-10-03 Thread Curtis
On 10/3/2005 at 5:51:14 AM [GMT -0500], Timo Boettcher wrote:

 I have made the experience (with 2.12 and about half a million mails
 in one account, about 2GB together) that no single folder should
 contain more than +-3 mails. Any more than that, and TB slows down
 dramatically.

May be true. What aggravates matters further is the failure to compress
folders such as the Inbox and Outbox.

-- 
  -= Curtis =-
The Bat!™ v3.61.09 Echo (Beta) / http://specs.aimlink.name
PGPKey: http://rsakey.aimlink.name
...WORK: Something to do between breaks.

pgpjDPsp1In9S.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: The Bat slowing down.

2005-10-03 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello K. Shantanu   everyone else,

on 03-Okt-2005 at 05:25 you (K. Shantanu ) wrote:

 A friend of mine has windows XP, Mobile Pentium 4 , 2,2Ghz , 512MB RAM
 40GB HDD has around 1.5 Gb of mails (approx. 50k messages) in around 4
 accounts. But his The Bat! 2.00.6 si very slow to start and stop. He is
 getting tired with his delay and is planning to shift to another email
 client which can gracefully handle that load. Can we suggest a few tricks
 to make the bat! handle that load easily?

The most obvious thing to start with would be a folder maintenance. It
should be run regularly (menu Folder, item Maintenance Center).

TB is storing messages in a database. When you delete or move messages,
this database will get an increasing number of holes. Folder maintenance
can compress the database, thus close the holes, and make the files
smaller.


-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat slowing down.

2005-10-03 Thread Scott Frederick
Hello K.,

Sunday, October 2, 2005, 8:25:38 PM, you wrote:

KS I was an old user of The Bat!. I recommend it to my friends who
KS use MS Windows. A friend of mine has windows XP, Mobile Pentium 4
KS , 2,2Ghz , 512MB RAM 40GB HDD has around 1.5 Gb of mails (approx.
KS 50k messages) in around 4 accounts. But his The Bat! 2.00.6 si
KS very slow to start and stop. He is getting tired with his delay
KS and is planning to shift to another email client which can
KS gracefully handle that load. Can we suggest a few tricks to make
KS the bat! handle that load easily?

My Bat! is very fast. My setup is comparable to your friend's. Specs
below (1.7Ghz 768MB).

I keep my mail database on it's own partition (4GB - 1.5GB free), and
purge and compress on exit. Almost all my mail is filtered into
folders on download.

As others have suggested I would start with a folder maintenance.

-- 
Best regards,
 Scottmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! 2.12.00 under Windows XP Professional/5.1 build 2600
Service Pack 2 (0 days 3:0:22) on Uno AMD Athlon MP
pgp key: http://sfrederick.com/keys/



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


junk mail filter -- need some advice

2005-10-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Battyfolk,

For a long time now I have been getting a piece of spam that I can't
filter out  it's really getting on my nerves.

Message is entirely HTML w attachment
There is no text
spam comes in the form of a gif (name changes as well)
All headers seem random

X-Spam: [F=0.5893273767; heur=0.727(2800); stat=0.349;

I've looked thru current crop of filters and can't seem to put
anything together that works for this piece of trash.

I was thinking of something along the lines of:

any message
with no text
and attachment
w from not in my address book
move to junk file
and mark read

Anyone got an idea to throw my way?

Thanks,

-- 
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB!3.61.09 Echo (Beta), BayesIt! 0.8.1, Windows 2000, Service Pack 4
ICQ 41116329






Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Howto: set Reading Confirmation in template?

2005-10-03 Thread Tom Plunket
Cory wrote:

 Am I overlooking something? Can't find a way to do so for a per-folder
 template, no switch nor macro...

You mean, beyond what the right-click/Properties gives you in tabs?


-tom!

-- 



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Rogues Updates

2005-10-03 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Wednesday 17 August 2005 at 5:36:53 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:


 I download the R.M. archive about once a month and don't care for the rest
 of the updates. What we need are incremental updates! :-)

How about a Rogues Server so that TB! could ask to connect to the
server if an unknown handle was encountered?

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

I think not, said Descartes, and promptly disappeared

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: junk mail filter -- need some advice

2005-10-03 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Jan Rifkinson  everyone else,

on 03-Okt-2005 at 20:07 you (Jan Rifkinson) wrote:

 Anyone got an idea to throw my way?

This may not be what you wanted to hear, but... try K9 instead of the
BayesIt plugin.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

Be careful of reading health books, you might die of a misprint. --
Mark Twain



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Rogues Updates

2005-10-03 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello MFPA  everyone else,

on 03-Okt-2005 at 22:25 you (MFPA) wrote:

 I download the R.M. archive about once a month and don't care for the
 rest of the updates. What we need are incremental updates! :-)

 How about a Rogues Server so that TB! could ask to connect to the server
 if an unknown handle was encountered?

IIRC an early implementation worked like that. But it wasn't conform with
TB's no contact to the outside world (other than for mail sending and
retrieval) policy, and thus was, being regarded as a potential security
and/or privacy issue, removed.

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

Look not mournfully into the past. It comes not back again. Wisely
improve the present. It is thine. Go forth and meet the shadowy
future, without fear, and with a manly heart. (Henry Wadsworth
Longfellow)



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Rogues Updates

2005-10-03 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Alexander,

Monday, October 3, 2005, 2:33:20 PM, you wrote:
 IIRC an early implementation worked like that. But it wasn't conform
 with TB's no contact to the outside world (other than for mail
 sending and retrieval) policy, and thus was, being regarded as a
 potential security and/or privacy issue, removed.

Yep, you remember correctly. 9val and I worked out a system to do it
and it worked quite well. However, it was turned off in TB after
people stated they didn't like the possibility of nefarious uses by
the bad guys.

The webserver implementation is still up at:

http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/getrogue.php?id=:leif:

Just replace :leif: with the handle you're looking for.

It works for both roguemoticons and smileys.

However, it doesn't do you much good since the functionality was
turned off in TB. Maybe one day we can convince 9val to turn it on as
optional.


-- 
  TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
 __       Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site:  http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons  Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org

Siskel and Ebert gave this tagline two thumbs up.




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Checking a URL in a composed m,essage

2005-10-03 Thread MFPA

Hi

On Saturday 17 September 2005 at 10:57:44 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:

 Hello John Phillips  everyone else,

 on 17-Sep-2005 at 23:26 you (John Phillips) wrote:

 When I post a URL whilst composing a message, I often want to check same to
 make sure I have not made a mistake;  however this does not seem possible in
 the Edit Mail Message screen.

 Thats working fine over here. I'm using MicroEd.


Here, example.com is not clickable unless I put the www. in
front.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPA

You're only young once; you can be immature forever

Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Checking a URL in a composed m,essage

2005-10-03 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello MFPA  everyone else,

on 03-Okt-2005 at 23:33 you (MFPA) wrote:

 When I post a URL whilst composing a message, I often want to check
 same to make sure I have not made a mistake; however this does not seem
 possible in the Edit Mail Message screen.

 Thats working fine over here. I'm using MicroEd.

 Here, example.com is not clickable unless I put the www. in front.

OK, it requires the www part. It would be a little too much to ask TB to
interpret anything in the format of word-dot-word into an URL, would it?

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)

It does not matter if you fall down, as long as you pick something up
from the floor when you get up.



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Checking a URL in a composed m,essage

2005-10-03 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Alexander,

Monday, October 3, 2005, 3:48:29 PM, you wrote:
 Here, example.com is not clickable unless I put the www. in front.

 OK, it requires the www part. It would be a little too much to ask
 TB to interpret anything in the format of word-dot-word into an URL,
 would it?

No doubt... Can you imagine what atrocities would happen if I was
posting VB or C# code and TB hyperlinked word.word?

i.e.

btn1.Text = Click Me;
btn1.Location = new Point( 25, 15 );


-- 
  TBUDL/BETA/DEV/TECH Lists Moderator / PGP 0x6C0AB16B
 __       Geocaching:http://gps.PCWize.com
(  )  ( ___)(_  _)( ___)  TBUDP Wiki Site:  http://www.PCWize.com/thebat/tbudp
 )(__  )__)  _)(_  )__)   Roguemoticons  Smileys:http://PCWize.com/thebat
()()()(__)PHP Tutorials and snippets:http://www.DevTek.org

As I said before, I never repeat myself.




Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html