What was that 'close all folders' shortcut?
Recently someone pointed out that a shortcut existed to close all folers in the folder tree, and also opened all folders. I can't find it and can't remember it. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.71.03 with POPFile 0.22.4 on Windows XP 5.1 tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: What was that 'close all folders' shortcut?
Hello Marten, On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:46:32 +GMT Marten Gallagher wrote: MG Recently someone pointed out that a shortcut existed to close all folers in MG the folder tree, and also opened all folders. Ctrl + * (on the numeric keypad) -- Regards, Feli The Bat! 3.72.04 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 BayesIt! 0.8.4 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: What was that 'close all folders' shortcut?
shortcut to close all folders Ctrl + * (on the numeric keypad) Thanks - acutally CTRL + 8 does it for me as well as * on num pad. -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.71.03 with POPFile 0.22.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Copying addressbook from non-OTFE to OTFE
Hello Alexander, On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:38:37 +0100 GMT (21/03/2006, 23:38 +0700 GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: How do I go about? The AB in Voyager is empty, so an overwrite would be OK. ASK Backup Restore only the AB. This worked. Thanks a lot. -- Cheers, Thomas. Cadix liegt auf einer Insel, und vermittels einer Brucke hangt das feste Land mit dem Meere zusammen. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.71.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Copying addressbook from non-OTFE to OTFE
Hello vitalie, On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:14:25 +0200 GMT (22/03/2006, 00:14 +0700 GMT), vitalie vrabie wrote: I also have a second AB, and when I create this in Voyager, it asks where to import from - but allows only EBD files. vv THAT is not an import per se; it's rather a prompt to point the vv location of the addrbook file to be used or created. Hm. I used the Import function in the AB window, and it worked this way for importing the default addressbook. What do you mean by the location of the addressbook to be used? The problem has been solved by backing up and restoring the second AB, but I didn't need to do that for the default AB. I sense at least some inconsistency here. -- Cheers, Thomas. The real question for 1988 is whether we're going to go forward to tomorrow or past to the--to the back! --V.P. Dan Quayle. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.71.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro
Hello Marten, Sorry for my late reply. type something in the body and complete the subject and body from it. I use that a lot. Hmmm that sounds possible - not perfect bit possible - so the next question is how to do that? I guess the macro called by the eom handle sets the subject - can I type a line in the body and then that line gets pulled out and put in the subject by the macro? I don't think you can transfer a line from the body to the subject, at least I don't know how to do it. However, I found out something that may be of help. If you assign a keyboard shortcut to a QT, the QT will be executed if you key the shortcut while the cursor is in the subject line. That is, you could type the subject and then hit the shortcut. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.72.04 (Beta) Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
MicroEd vs Plain text
Hi all, Someone suggested that I use MicroEd as my mail editor rather than the Plain text (Windows) editor that I use currently. My main objection to this is that it only appears to use fixed-width fonts which I don't want to get used to unless I have to. So here's the question, what are the benefits of MicroEd as compared with the Plain text editor? -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 3.72.04 (Beta) on Windows XP Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Ignoring URL's whilst Spellchecking
Hi all, The plot thickens further... When running a spell check whilst using the Plain text (windows) editor in a message with at least two items which the Spell-checker will highlight use the Ignore all button on the Spell-checker. This closes the Spell-checker. However if you do exactly the same thing on MicroEd Ignore All seems to ignore all instances of that spelling mistake. There are a number of inconsistencies that I'm coming across, the only thing is, I'm not sure which is right! -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 3.72.04 (Beta) on Windows XP Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd vs Plain text
Hello Paul Meathrel everyone else, on 22-Mrz-2006 at 19:02 you (Paul Meathrel) wrote: So here's the question, what are the benefits of MicroEd as compared with the Plain text editor? For me its the (auto)formatting options and the hard wrapping at the column I specify. WinEd just wraps on-screen, but not in the actually sent message. Your original message is just one single very long line which appears as three lines in my preview window - I find that rather hard to read. I only have auto-wrap enabled and use ALT+L on the quotes and my own text to format it nicely. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) I have yet to see any problem, however complicated, which, when looked at in the right way, did not become still more complicated. -- Poul Anderson Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd vs Plain text
A Bat-fellow, Paul Meathrel, wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wednesday, 22nd March 2006 at 18:02:30 (GMT), which was 19:02 in Bratislava -- So here's the question, what are the benefits of MicroEd as compared with the Plain text editor? In one word, wysiwyg. Using MicroEd, you're guaranteed that what you see on your screen as you type your message, will be delivered looking exactly the same to all recipients of your message, irrespectively of what software they use for reading their email. This is a dream come true that can never come true in web design, for example. No matter if you adhere to all standards or not, not everyone will see your webpage in exactly the way you want them to see it. In contrast, when composing a message in The Bat's MicroEd editor, you can be sure it will be displayed for all of your recipients in exactly the same way you're composing it. -- Yours, Alex. of Slovakia www.avenarius.sk [flying with The Bat! 3.65.01 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 amd athlon 2400 mhz 704 mb ram] Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro
MAU @ 3/22/2006 10:05:15 AM Content dependent on subject contents through macro mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't think you can transfer a line from the body to the subject, at least I don't know how to do it. Look at the %CLIPBOARD macro. You have to manually copy the line (I think), but then you can do all sorts of cool stuff with that line. -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me. Using The Bat! v3.71.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. Today's Oxymoron: Software documentation pgpaZyehWrGsf.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd vs Plain text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 22 Mar 2006, @ @ at 18:02:30 +, when Paul Meathrel wrote: Someone suggested that I use MicroEd as my mail editor rather than the Plain text (Windows) editor that I use currently. My main objection to this is that it only appears to use fixed-width fonts which I don't want to get used to unless I have to. So here's the question, what are the benefits of MicroEd as compared with the Plain text editor? It has much more options for text formatting. The best way to become familiar with the differences is to use them both for a while. I was using Windows' one for a minute or two. It's not that I was lazy or shallow, but because options I had to learn about. It's like a kid toy with acceleration and breaks. No anything else. - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 567 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector Linuxes via Wine... ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From|Reply To field(s). ~~~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEVAwUBRCGgjLSpHvHEUtv8AQNIrAf/ZVbQ2hHOhH+NBOOOHnQJteWQ1M+WoCoG Ep27Lh/wHyCfzKvPEOBim6vmcvxFY+SCfQ6tJ1supu+xMmZmaIKQVDmk2dbKgD6g kck/sYJ/DK9mpWbDghnm7JwPWOJbHqrKw07FTaIyYvD7JQaAYDsvNBSYoVMwR7Cb NfcSp597DvEW0hls5A8m9+eYAZ0SiekXxs2QXSqGIPzIStoRc5ddv/hq/u8acEsc /sXGjk5ee0bJZ9i5/8HWYHrMzqpPMSv44YnAIqxVV+5GxB8/a/Ts4igfuk5K/EEE AjjLvGU5mMIfgmacbcV2zj/DoNhe1EibP5P1b49TUFCerEs0F1u46g== =KFKB -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro
Hello Chris, I don't think you can transfer a line from the body to the subject, at least I don't know how to do it. Look at the %CLIPBOARD macro. You have to manually copy the line (I think), but then you can do all sorts of cool stuff with that line. I'm aware about %CLIPBOARD macro, but I think that is not what Marten is looking for. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.72.04 (Beta) Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd vs Plain text
[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 3/22/2006 1:00:40 PM MicroEd vs Plain text mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] In one word, wysiwyg. Using MicroEd, you're guaranteed that what you see on your screen as you type your message, will be delivered looking exactly the same to all recipients of your message, irrespectively of what software they use for reading their email. Which can be a double edged sword. With a hard-wrapped message, if I don't have the resolution to display a full line, I have to scroll left-to-right. With a flowed message, it will wrap to my window size. However, when I have too much resolution, it will still wrap to the window size, make the message hard to read. It would be nice if the display algorithm wrapped to the window size or the user's specified number of columns, whichever is smaller. This is a dream come true that can never come true in web design, for example. No matter if you adhere to all standards or not, not everyone will see your webpage in exactly the way you want them to see it. Again, a double-edged sword. There have been many times I have used Opera's display override function. Personally, I don't like reading yellow text on a white background... :-) I'll summarize my diatribe about the web: it's not a print media, so fixed positioning doesn't make any sense. Stuff flows. Deal with it! Don't design you pages like brochures (because they're not). -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me. Using The Bat! v3.71.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. In a Nonsmoking Area: If we see smoking we will assume you are on fire and take appropriate action. pgpqthWHMPvdW.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Content dependent on subject contents through macro
Look at the %CLIPBOARD macro. You have to manually copy the line (I think), but then you can do all sorts of cool stuff with that line. I'm aware about %CLIPBOARD macro, but I think that is not what Marten is looking for. Hmmm... possibility but not precisely what I was hoping might be possible What I wanted was: IF a certain string of characters [ - eom] exists in the hand-written subject THEN complete the body with %thistext% -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using The Bat! 3.71.03 with POPFile 0.22.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd vs Plain text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 22 Mar 2006, @ @ at 20:00:40 +0100, when [EMAIL PROTECTED] explained advantages of TB's wsygfdjjkfd MicroEd(itor): This is a dream come true that can never come true in web design, for example. No matter if you adhere to all standards or not, not everyone will see your webpage in exactly the way you want them to see it. It's possible if is used pre/preformatted text with avoidance of glam(e)orousness. Simple, elegant shapes/colors/elements do not leave much room for different interpretations.[1] Fixed width tables (with no visible borders) filled by a text of strictly defined fonts (by the type and size) would give same results. And so on, there are various tricks. As for the Windows' editor in TB, yes, it's just a joke. A delusional son of a someone's night mare offering a mule design for a daily productivity. [1] It's like if you would interpret very expert content using ordinary colloquial words. It's quite possible and quite efficient. The rendering web machines, coming from different technologies, are like people coming from various cultures: they will communicate successfully only what they have in common. This what is common is then a standard, for a such communication. - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 567 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector Linuxes via Wine... ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From|Reply To field(s). ~~~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEVAwUBRCGxrrSpHvHEUtv8AQPE1Af+I+zZB7wYVY0p5Vfm7dOUQ2zPlHa6S/3n hOBXZiCNEaHxeFdGsgeMUY81YUQOX4mVwIL2KhQ/uzOth7U54LMx211atvVsSjfJ fKnMrQyhw04f95FVyNLIer7qqNerbiO66a9lKatIV8aeFVJytrjOWEz72Ty/5c/h dvUJNXrtSZZwYKoc+Nk6SSLzdr/AbXDl/j9tAJtcHGqT5ClYjki9A8+Lw20K6cCu tDwgVe8LKtSBpFS3ocEGNUaEhCYQRnzN+xO0nIT6sRU/cmb+7mCA9otBUwWVZhZc jzXVCdUqoohwDGKgHH9EQ8mpaRLj9ZPqiv4B1Gv7POSqr9ADjI7+wA== =TX0w -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Copying addressbook from non-OTFE to OTFE
hi, Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:49:21 PM, you wrote: I'll buy me another one and try to install Voyager. But I'll have to take the time to read how to install it (can I copy all the settings of my regular version?) and think about a strategy for using it. depends on the type of the account. no problems at all with IMAP and keep messages on server for N days for POP3, where N is no less than the period of your backups. simple filecopying is sufficient for the backup/restoral, but you'll have to activate it again if restored to a filesystem with a different ID. BTW: Does it still write to the registry? If I use the stick on someone else's PC, will it leave any traces there (temp files -registry)? registry - non-harmful things like window positions. temp files - yes, if content is passed to external apps. and we can't predict anything further, as it's not only app-dependant, but environment-dependant too (like filesystem activity monitoring and content-intercepting tools). -- regards, vitaliemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: MicroEd vs Plain text
hi, Wednesday, March 22, 2006, 9:00:40 PM, you wrote: when composing a message in The Bat's MicroEd editor, you can be sure it will be displayed for all of your recipients in exactly the same way you're composing it. ...with the condition that they'll view with a fixed-width font and their viewer will scroll (and not autowrap) lines that don't fit its viewarea's width. :) -- regards, vitaliemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd vs Plain text
Hi Alexander, Wednesday, March 22, 2006, 6:53:06 PM, you wrote: For me its the (auto)formatting options and the hard wrapping at the column I specify. WinEd just wraps on-screen, but not in the actually sent message. Your original message is just one single very long line which appears as three lines in my preview window - I find that rather hard to read. OK, does this suit you better. I've temporarily switched to MicroEd to see how things go for a few days. I've no doubt that you'll notice if I switch back. How does it look at your end now I've switched? I only have auto-wrap enabled and use ALT+L on the quotes and my own text to format it nicely. As far as the Help file goes, it seems to indicate that ALT-L means Align the block on left end. When I try it on your text and on mine it doesn't appear to do anything, what exactly does it do? -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 3.72.04 (Beta) on Windows XP Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: MicroEd vs Plain text
Hello Paul, Wednesday, March 22, 2006, 3:17:31 PM, you wrote: PM As far as the Help file goes, it seems to indicate that ALT-L means PM Align the block on left end. When I try it on your text and on mine PM it doesn't appear to do anything, what exactly does it do? Try typing a Paragraph with two lines in it, sort of like this one will be. Then place your cursor in the middle of the first line and type some more info, as if you had forgotten some words. You will notice that your formatting is all messed up, assuming you do not have auto-formatting turned on. Now with the cursor still in the paragraph somewhere hit ALT+L and voila, formatting should be fixed. ALT+J should then Justify it if you so wish. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.72.02 (Beta) on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd vs Plain text
Hello Paul Meathrel everyone else, on 22-Mrz-2006 at 22:17 you (Paul Meathrel) wrote: Your original message is just one single very long line which appears as three lines in my preview window - I find that rather hard to read. OK, does this suit you better. I've temporarily switched to MicroEd to see how things go for a few days. I've no doubt that you'll notice if I switch back. How does it look at your end now I've switched? Much better - the text is nicely wrapped now. I only have auto-wrap enabled and use ALT+L on the quotes and my own text to format it nicely. As far as the Help file goes, it seems to indicate that ALT-L means Align the block on left end. When I try it on your text and on mine it doesn't appear to do anything, what exactly does it do? It only does something if the text is out of bounds for the wrap limit you specific in the editor preferences. If there's nothing to re-align, it indeed doesn't do anything. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) A man's only as old as the woman he feels. -- Groucho Marx Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd vs Plain text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 22 Mar 2006, @ @ at 13:20:10 -0600, when Chris wrote: Personally, I don't like reading yellow text on a white background... :-) Sometimes reading even blackest text on a whitest background makes same effect. (-: - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 567 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector Linuxes via Wine... ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From|Reply To field(s). ~~~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEVAwUBRCG1grSpHvHEUtv8AQNsEwgAjXOquey8oYdcvWJFq/MDsBOK6nRYpuA9 G9SDqTgpeT89Wv8jzm0owrDzklzrTkVNjKA3WGq3kXnUMUxu8GfkFVaveDEH2pGc Cyvxm2jwyrCxOdbIRsRIC6pMPjxPsjrSVz2OYTeYKhMl11InYn0OvOn79wsuzAwq i/IFiugMem0Gl5Bigx1Du77GLV1Syzqea/Gohi1wky5XezlczaMQzRn3Nze6ulfs z5pP5u/WaVL78OA+3/f207QTC48pO/jrbgM+n3PYrryOPBoRZyWOBEn/yjOAc9tM SVFTIb3+lErAIzH7z2UOBC21aC4nqrnAONCj9UJ/h9soX5tnNk7PsQ== =hCff -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 at 19:23:57 +, Marten wrote:
What I wanted was:
IF
a certain string of characters [ - eom] exists in the hand-written subject
THEN
complete the body with
%thistext%
You could set up your message template in this way. Create a template for
your new messages call NewMessageTemplate. Then set up the new template for the
account to be
%_Match=%SetPattRegexp=- eom%RegexpMatch=%Subject%-
%If:%_Match:thistext:%QInclude('NewMessageTemplate')%-
You will get thistext if the subject includes - eom, otherwise you will
get the contents of NewMessageTemplate.
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Popfile v0.22.3
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Content dependent on subject contents through macro
That should have read
You could set up your message template in this way. Create a QUICK template
for
your new messages call NewMessageTemplate. Then set up the new template for
the
account to be
%_Match=%SetPattRegexp=- eom%RegexpMatch=%Subject%-
%If:%_Match:thistext:%QInclude('NewMessageTemplate')%-
You will get thistext if the subject includes - eom, otherwise you will
get the contents of NewMessageTemplate.
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Popfile v0.22.3
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: MicroEd vs Plain text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 22 Mar 2006, @ @ at 21:17:31 +, when Paul Meathrel wrote: OK, does this suit you better. I've temporarily switched to MicroEd to see how things go for a few days. I've no doubt that you'll notice if I switch back. How does it look at your end now I've switched? Beautiful. A holiday for eyes. I only have auto-wrap enabled and use ALT+L on the quotes and my own text to format it nicely. As far as the Help file goes, it seems to indicate that ALT-L means Align the block on left end. When I try it on your text and on mine it doesn't appear to do anything, what exactly does it do? Try firstly Alt+R, or Alt+J, or Alt+C, and then Alt+L. - -- Mica PGP keys nestled at: http://blueness.port5.com/pgpkeys/ [Earth LOG: 568 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OSs: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium Windows XP(ee) Micro Lite Professional 1.6, and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector Linuxes via Wine... ~~~ For personal mail please use my address as it is *exactly* given in my From|Reply To field(s). ~~~ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEVAwUBRCHg07SpHvHEUtv8AQMJdAf8CkJt4JK9g5jDcP45Nd2u4gpft94VW8PK Gtk261EpehSvlZr+KPR8HH+HsVzljtzJ2+Brab95QYaTfMyz+cjxpvFe2tZZdK8f 1b+DoGdYPffmxmA4iQHKN+8NCqi7mk7fdZ7o8bh4JzfnCyVm1g1haSWxOwycbuHH ZLElVZ4Adt+bkRL5BQtKe7cOk8GEuR9P2++DPNU3QWd4kLaAk63SjmXQyN+e4+Ro MKSF2uX0/7sDyIbnaeRkAdL194vY2qnmjvoqVuDnAVQA7Py94OpKtJHc+b7FdgBj T5c4M7EjOAMaEatIL/X1HJF6CNkm/rt8G/qKinNw+DJbRn9P0RRY3g== =u4HX -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Content dependent on subject contents through macro
That should have read
You could set up your message template in this way. Create a QUICK
template for
your new messages call NewMessageTemplate. Then set up the new template
for the
account to be
%_Match=%SetPattRegexp=- eom%RegexpMatch=%Subject%-
%If:%_Match:thistext:%QInclude('NewMessageTemplate')%-
You will get thistext if the subject includes - eom, otherwise you will
get the contents of NewMessageTemplate.
OK - I'll give that a go tomorrow - Hypnos is calling now...
Thanks for your trouble and for going to the trouble of correcting it - I
really appreciate it.
Will let you know the result.
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web Design
www.annerykiln.co.uk
Using The Bat! 3.71.03
with POPFile 0.22.4
on Windows XP 5.1
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
