Re[2]: Smartspace
On Tuesday, June 24, 2008, 9:05:45 PM, Hendrik Oesterlin wrote: > "Günter Minnerup" wrote on 15/06/2008 at 11:41:08 +1100 > subject "Smartspace" : Tried everything but no go. I am positive that the feature is broken in this version of TB! >>> It has to be turned on in OPTIONS / PREFERENCES / MESSAGES then >>> checking "go to the next unread message when using smartspace etc. >> I did. Both options are checked. Still no go. Everything else working >> fine, including the keyboard :-) > You are using the 4.0.24 "final" beta. ;-) > I do not have enough time to revert to this version 4.0.24 to try it > out, but you my consider to try one of the newer versions. 4.0.24.23 > seems to be quite usable. I'm using the latest publicly available (i'm not part of the beta testing). Can't find any later one on the Ritlabs website. -- Regards, Günter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! Version 4.0.24 Windows Vista Version 6 Build 6000 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply/macro/filter issue
Hello Tom, Thursday, June 26, 2008, 3:22:54 AM, you wrote: T> Sorry, you are right, my quoting these addresses was incorrect. The address T> appears as follows: T> _Paul XYZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T> Paul-XYZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T> I think there was a third version but I cannot find it quickly. The T> email address is the same but the way it is being presented prior to T> the is different (probably due to the way it is being set up in T> Paul's email program and this seems to cause my little issue here. T> Hope this makes it clearer Unless I'm missing something, which is quite frequently the case, it looks like you're trying to prevent your replies from including the dashes or underscores in the reply salutation. If I've guessed correctly, it looks like this is a job for a properly constructed RegExp which would automagically trim those characters from your reply salutation. Unfortunately, I have absolutely no knowledge on how to construct/use RegExps but there are others on this amazing list who do. The only reason I can think of for why someone would include odd characters in their name is that they might be trying to track the origins of subsequent spam. Hope I haven't clouded the issue any further. -- Best regards, Jackmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Now running TB! v3.99.3 from Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 - Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Copying to new machine w/Vista
Hello Jack, On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:54:57 -0500 GMT (25/06/2008, 22:54 +0700 GMT), Jack S. LaRosa wrote: TF>> 1.) Make a full backup of TB! using the internal backup function. TF>> Click all options under Tools / Backup. JSL> - snip - JSL> Many thanks Thomas. Your suggestion seemed *slightly* easier (simpler JSL> to my addled brain) compared to Roelof's so I tried it your way. JSL> Everything seemed to work ok except apparently the backup doesn't JSL> copy the address books. Strange. Hm. Let me check on the new computer tomorrow. FWIW, I don't use an addressbook in the office, just the address history. If the history doesn't show the desired address, the seaerch function is so fast that I don't even bother to keep an addressbook updated. I keep message "forever" in the office. At home, I do have an addressbook. I don't kow why, maybe because it's a nice toy. JSL> I had to go back into the old machine to find and copy them JSL> separately. I then transferred them to the new machine without JSL> any problems. My wife is not as picky about how TB! operates as JSL> am I so she isn't bothered by stuff that would annoy the hell JSL> out of me. I may take Roelof's suggestion to upgrade to v4 on JSL> her machine however. JSL> In retrospect, Dan's suggestion might have worked better had I looked JSL> at it closer. In any case, she's up and running and that's all she JSL> cares about. Right, all seems well now. JSL> I did find a problem(?) with transferring K9 over to her machine. JSL> Everything transferred ok including a separate copy of K9's large JSL> storage of emails but I never could get K9 to recognize that those JSL> emails were there. It just means that she'll have to re-educate K9 JSL> all over again but since neither of us has been receiving spam to the JSL> degree we were when I installed K9, it shouldn't be a problem. I have no idea about that. At home, I use GMX with a free server-side spam filter, and in the (new) office, I don't receive spams yet. JSL> So, alls well that ends well. Thanks to all that helped in this JSL> endeavor. You are welcome. -- Cheers, Thomas. When it rains, why don't sheep shrink? http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.24.23 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply/macro/filter issue
Hallo Tom, On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:33:25 +1000GMT (26-6-2008, 3:33 +0200, where I live), you wrote: T> However each time I receive a new email from the _paul or paul-xyz T> addresses, they also end in my address book as new addresses In that case just stop adding all addresses to your address book. Or change your filter that adds those addresses so that it checks whether the address exists in your AB before adding it. -- Groetjes, Roelof Be nice to your kids. They'll choose your nursing home. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.0.24.23 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 3 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgpriyxLCCOEo.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Reply/macro/filter issue
Thursday, June 26, 2008, 2:58:14 PM, you wrote: > Hello Tom, > Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:03:25 AM, you wrote: >> So, I either need to amend the salutation manually or go into the >> addressbook to remove the duplicate entry for Paul (it's duplicate as >> the email address is always the same, just the way it appears changes >> with the various prefixes). > How can the following three email addresses be called same: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To me they look like three distinct email addresses. Sorry, you are right, my quoting these addresses was incorrect. The address appears as follows: _Paul XYZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul-XYZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think there was a third version but I cannot find it quickly. The email address is the same but the way it is being presented prior to the is different (probably due to the way it is being set up in Paul's email program and this seems to cause my little issue here. Hope this makes it clearer -- Tom using TheBat! 3.99.29 on XP Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
